Connecting Land–Atmosphere Interactions to Surface Heterogeneity in CHEESEHEAD19

The Chequamegon Heterogeneous Ecosystem Energy-Balance Study Enabled by a High-Density Extensive Array of Detectors 2019 (CHEESEHEAD19) is an ongoing National Science Foundation project based on an intensive field campaign that occurred from June to October 2019. The purpose of the study is to examine how the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) responds to spatial heterogeneity in surface energy fluxes. One of the main objectives is to test whether lack of energy balance closure measured by eddy covariance (EC) towers is related to mesoscale atmospheric processes. Finally, the project evaluates data-driven methods for scaling surface energy fluxes, with the aim to improve model–data comparison and integration. To address these questions, an extensive suite of ground, tower, profiling, and airborne instrumentation was deployed over a 10 km × 10 km domain of a heterogeneous forest ecosystem in the Chequamegon–Nicolet National Forest in northern Wisconsin, United States, centered on an existing 447-m tower that anchors an AmeriFlux/NOAA supersite (US-PFa/WLEF). The project deployed one of the world’s highest-density networks of above-canopy EC measurements of surface energy fluxes. This tower EC network was coupled with spatial measurements of EC fluxes from aircraft; maps of leaf and canopy properties derived from airborne spectroscopy, ground-based measurements of plant productivity, phenology, and physiology; and atmospheric profiles of wind, water vapor, and temperature using radar, sodar, lidar, microwave radiometers, infrared interferometers, and radiosondes. These observations are being used with large-eddy simulation and scaling experiments to better understand submesoscale processes and improve formulations of subgrid-scale processes in numerical weather and climate models

Immunophenotypic Evidence for Reactive Polyclonal Marrow Plasmacytosis in Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Long-Term Lenalidomide Therapy

Abstract Introduction: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide (LEN) is considered standard of care in the US, supported by meta analysis showing that LEN maintenance is associated with significantly longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). In a previously reported study of MM patients (pts) treated with extended courses of LEN, we have described a polyclonal Ig and FLC elevation exceeding the upper limit of normal (up to 3-4 X the ULN) and associated with striking polyclonal bone marrow (BM) plasmacytosis (up to 20% of plasma cells (PCs)), occurring with a relatively high frequency (20% of pts) and associated with better outcome (Zamarin, Leukemia, 2013). Importantly, we cautioned about the risk of misinterpretation of this polyclonal Ig response and plasmacytosis. Since Immuno-histochemical staining (IHS) may often be an unreliable tool to distinguish between a reactive polyclonal plasmacytosis from monoclonal disease, especially when the percentage of PCs in the BM is relatively low (5 -15%), we aimed at confirming the polyclonal nature of this often unrecognized and paradoxical response to prolonged LEN exposure, and at validating the important role of BM assessment by flow cytometry (FACS) in this setting. Methods: Pts analyzed in this study were enrolled at MSKCC on three randomized, first line therapy, clinical trials (NCT01109004, NCT01208662, and NCT00807599). All pts were kept on LEN maintenance until POD, toxicity, or major event. BM aspirate and biopsy with IHS were performed as per standard of care. Eight-fluorochrome FACS method (minimum of 1 x 106 cells) was used for 2014 samples employing a surface marker cocktail (CD117 PC5.5, CD19 BV421, CD138 APC, CD56 PC7, CD45 APC-H7, CD38 BV510) and cytoplasmic Kappa FITC/Lambda PE staining. Ten-fluorochrome (minimum of 5 x 106 WBCs) method was used in 2015 and performed employing a surface marker cocktail (CD117 PC5.5, CD19 PC7, CD138 APC, CD56 APC-R700, CD45 APC-H7, CD81 Pacific Blue, CD38 BV510, CD27 BV605) and cytoplasmic Kappa FITC/Lambda PE staining. Results: Among 147 pts enrolled in the three trials, 55 achieved serologic CR after first line therapy. Of those, 46 had a BM biopsy with FACS analysis available. Among these 46 patients, bone marrow plasmacytosis as assessed by light microscopy of BM aspirate and biopsy ranged from 2% to 15% (32 pts had PCs ≤ 5%, 14 PCs > 5%). Among the 14 pts with > 5% PCs, 2 had PCs = 15%, 9 had PCs = 10%, and 3 between 6% and 9%. By FACS, 9 of 14 pts showed no clonal or phenotypically aberrant PCs. The percentage of aberrant PCs among all PCs in the other 5 pts remained low (≤7.3%). Among the 2 pts with PC = 15%, the percentage of aberrant PCs among all PCs was 0% and 7.3%. In pts with PC = 10%, the percentage of aberrant PCs among all PCs was 0% (6 pts), or ranged from 0.17% to 5.1% (3 pts). Figure 1 depicts representative pt cases with BM plasmacytosis estimated at 15% by light microscopy. PCs were gated based on CD38 and CD138 expression as well as forward and side scatter (not shown). Blue dots represent kappa LC expression; Red lambda LC. Proportion of aberrant PCs among total PCs in the sample is quantitated and shown using high sensitivity MRD detection with 10-color panel with 6-million event acquisitions. Panel A shows a pt with 15% PC in the BM with no residual disease confirming the polyclonal nature of the plasmacytosis. Panel B shows a pt with 15% PC exhibiting a low proportion of aberrant PCs (green) among a predominant background of normal polytypic PCs. In contrast, Panel C shows a pt with early relapsed disease with 15% PCs exhibiting a high proportion of aberrant PCs (99% of all PCs). Conclusions: These results confirm the common and striking polyclonal plasmacytosis (up to 15% PCs in this cohort) associated with prolonged LEN exposure, and the importance of FACS in the assessment of BM plasmacytosis in these MM pts. In the setting of current MM response criteria established by the IMWG and NCCN guidelines, mandating a BM plasmacytosis <5% in addition to negative serum and urine immunofixation for CR determination, as well as an increase in plasmacytosis from baseline by 25% with an absolute value ≥10% for determination of disease progression, FACS analysis with assessment of clonality and percentage of aberrant PCs among total PCs, becomes an essential tool to distinguish reactive polyclonal patterns from monoclonal disease persistence or recurrence. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Hassoun: Novartis: Consultancy; Binding Site: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding. Roshal:BD Biosciences: Consultancy. Landau:Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Korde:Medscape: Honoraria. Landgren:Merck: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Medscape Myeloma Program: Honoraria

Overall Survival with Osimertinib in Untreated, EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC

BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. A phase 3 trial compared first-line osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in patients with EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial showed longer progression-free survival with osimertinib than with the comparator EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46). Data from the final analysis of overall survival have not been reported. METHODS: In this trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R allele) in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or one of two other EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily, with patients receiving these drugs combined in a single comparator group). Overall survival was a secondary end point. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 38.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 to 41.8) in the osimertinib group and 31.8 months (95% CI, 26.6 to 36.0) in the comparator group (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95.05% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P = 0.046). At 3 years, 79 of 279 patients (28%) in the osimertinib group and 26 of 277 (9%) in the comparator group were continuing to receive a trial regimen; the median exposure was 20.7 months and 11.5 months, respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were reported in 42% of the patients in the osimertinib group and in 47% of those in the comparator group. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously untreated advanced NSCLC with an EGFR mutation, those who received osimertinib had longer overall survival than those who received a comparator EGFR-TKI. The safety profile for osimertinib was similar to that of the comparator EGFR-TKIs, despite a longer duration of exposure in the osimertinib group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125.).status: publishe

The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

© 2017 British Journal of Anaesthesia Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32–0.77); P\u3c0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88–1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62–0.92); P\u3c0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61–0.88); P\u3c0.01; I2=89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine