Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences

The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) deposited in collections should be accepted for publication by scientific journals and allowed by the Code has already been discussed in Zootaxa (Dubois & Nemésio 2007; Donegan 2008, 2009; Nemésio 2009a–b; Dubois 2009; Gentile & Snell 2009; Minelli 2009; Cianferoni & Bartolozzi 2016; Amorim et al. 2016). This question was again raised in a letter supported by 35 signatories published in the journal Nature (Pape et al. 2016) on 15 September 2016. On 25 September 2016, the following rebuttal (strictly limited to 300 words as per the editorial rules of Nature) was submitted to Nature, which on 18 October 2016 refused to publish it. As we think this problem is a very important one for zoological taxonomy, this text is published here exactly as submitted to Nature, followed by the list of the 493 taxonomists and collection-based researchers who signed it in the short time span from 20 September to 6 October 2016

Sociolinguistique du contact

Objet de recherche récent dans le domaine de la linguistique, la sociolinguistique des langues en contact constitue désormais un champ multidisciplinaire à part entière, ouvert aux aspects sociaux, psychologiques et linguistiques des situations de contact. Trois courants majeurs ont émergé : un courant à dominante structurale / générativiste à ambition universaliste ; un courant à dominante interactionnelle ; enfin, un courant à dominante sociopolitique. Toute tentative s’est jusque-là montrée vaine pour œuvrer à un consensus – ne serait-ce que terminologique – ou a fortiori pour aboutir à une théorie unifiée. C’est pourquoi il nous a semblé que le moment venait d’offrir à un public francophone un état de l’art dans un domaine des sciences du langage qui connaît un foisonnement de travaux, dont certains, jugés majeurs, sont dispersés dans l’espace et dans le temps. Cet ouvrage, qui se présente sous la forme d’un dictionnaire composé de quinze entrées, offre une synthèse inédite de ces travaux. Grâce à un examen approfondi de ces thématiques articulées en un tout cohérent, il constitue un puissant analyseur des mutations sociétales mondiales, celles-ci étant en rapport direct avec les pratiques sociolangagières

Doppler e marcadores séricos maternos na predição de complicações da gestação Doppler and maternal serum screening in the prediction of pregnancy complications

OBJETIVO: Comparar a eficácia do Doppler das artérias uterinas e de marcadores séricos maternos na predição de complicações da gestação. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Trata-se de um estudo prospectivo com 49 primigestas, incluídas no estudo na 18ª semana, sendo coletada a amostra sanguínea para a realização das dosagens séricas, realizadas pelo método de quimioluminescência (alfa-fetoproteína, gonadotrofina coriônica humana e óxido nítrico) e radioimunoensaio (peptídio atrial natriurético). O Doppler das artérias uterinas foi realizado entre 24-26 semanas, determinando a presença ou ausência de incisura na onda de velocidade de fluxo. Na análise estatística utilizou-se o teste de Mann-Whitney, para amostras não-paramétricas, e o teste exato de Fisher, para parâmetros qualitativos. RESULTADOS: Os valores de sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo e valor preditivo negativo foram, respectivamente, de 8,3%, 97,0%, 50,0% e 74,4% para a alfa-fetoproteína; 8,3%, 87,9%, 20,0% e 72,5% para a gonadotrofina coriônica humana; 16,7%, 97,0%, 33,3% e 76,2% para o peptídio atrial natriurético; e 16,7%, 93,9%, 50,0% e 75,6% para o óxido nítrico. A sensibilidade do Doppler foi de 75,0%, especificidade de 63,6%, valor preditivo positivo de 57,1% e valor preditivo negativo de 87,5%. CONCLUSÃO: O Doppler das artérias uterinas é melhor preditor de complicações da gestação quando comparado a alguns marcadores séricos em populações de baixo risco.<br>OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of uterine artery Doppler and maternal serum screening in the prediction of pregnancy complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective study with 49 primigravidae at their 18th gestational week, when a blood sample was collected for serum dosage by chemiluminescence (alpha-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin and nitric oxide) and radioimmunoassay (atrial natriuretic peptide). Uterine artery Doppler was performed between the 24th and 26th gestational weeks, for determining the presence or absence of notch in the flow velocity waveform. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test was utilized for statistical analysis, and the Fisher exact test for analysis of qualitative parameters. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were, respectively, 8.3%, 97.0%, 50.0% and 74.4% for alpha-fetoprotein; 8.3%, 87.9%, 20.0% and 72.5% for human chorionic gonadotropin; 16.7%, 97.0%, 33.3% and 76.2% for atrial natriuretic peptide; and 16.7%, 93.9%, 50.0% and 75.6% for nitric oxide. The uterine artery Doppler sensitivity was 75.0%, specificity 63.6%, positive predictive value 57.1%, and negative predictive value 87.5%. CONCLUSION: Uterine artery Doppler is an effective method for prediction of pregnancy complications as compared with maternal serum screening in low risk populations