15 research outputs found
ΠΡΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠ° Π½Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ ΠΊΠ°Ρ Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎ ΠΌΡΠ»ΡΠΈΠΏΠ½Π° ΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠ·Π°
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is linked with a wide range of physical, psychological, and societal challenges that significantly impact the quality of life (QoL) of those affected by the disease. This comprehensive study delved into the multifaceted aspects of MS, aiming to unravel the intricate relationships between disability, self-efficacy, acceptance of illness, and various dimensions of QoL. Material and methods: The study, encompassing 778 participants from diverse backgrounds, highlighted the nuanced experiences of individuals with MS, emphasizing the importance of understanding the unique challenges faced by different age groups and disease subtypes. The findings revealed profound connections between MS-related symptoms and psychological well-being, underscoring the necessity for tailored interventions. Notably, self-efficacy and acceptance of illness emerged as pivotal factors influencing QoL, providing crucial insights for healthcare providers and policymakers.Furthermore, this study underscored the importance of a holistic approach to MS management, integrating biomedical and psychosocial perspectives. The studyβs outcomes offer valuable direction for future research endeavors, advocating for longitudinal studies to capture the dynamic nature of QoL challenges, exploring patient perspectives through qualitative methods, and investigating the impact of socioeconomic factors on QoL outcomes. Additionally, the potential of telemedicine and digital interventions in providing continuous support and evidence-based counseling for individuals with chronic conditions is highlighted. By addressing these critical areas, future research endeavors can contribute to a more compassionate and empowering framework, enhancing the lives of those affected by MS and their families.ΠΡΠ»ΡΠΈΠΏΠ½Π°ΡΠ° ΡΠΊΠ»Π΅ΡΠΎΠ·Π° (ΠΠ‘) ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠ°Π²ΡΠ²Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠ½Π° ΠΌΡΠ΅ΠΆΠ° Π½Π° ΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΊΠΈ, ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π½ΠΎ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠ· ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΠ½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠ°. ΠΠ²Π° ΡΠ΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π³ΡΠ²Π° Π²ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π°ΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΠ‘, ΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π» Π΄Π° Π³ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·ΠΎΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ°, ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ. Π‘ΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ°, ΠΊΠΎΡΠ° ΠΎΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠ° 778 ΡΡΠ΅ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΠΊΠ»ΠΎ, Π³ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠ½Π° Π½ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΊΡΡΡΠ²Π° Π½Π° Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ° ΡΠΎ ΠΠ‘, Π½Π°Π³Π»Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ° Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΎΠ΄ ΡΠ°Π·Π±ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠΎΡΡΠ²Π°Π°Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΈ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠΈΠΏΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ° Π΄Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠΎΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΈ ΡΠΎ ΠΠ‘ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡΠΊΠ°ΡΠ° Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ±Π°, Π½Π°Π³Π»Π°ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±Π°ΡΠ° Π·Π° ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ·Π°Π½ΠΎΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ ΡΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ ΠΈ Π²ΠΈΠ΄ΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΠ‘. ΠΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎ-Π΅ΡΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ° ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡΠ° ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΠ° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠ· ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ, ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠ° Π·Π° Π·Π΄ΡΠ°Π²ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠΈ.ΠΠ²Π° ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ° Π½Π°Π³Π»Π°ΡΡΠ²Π° Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ° Π½Π° Ρ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠΊΠΈΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΏ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΠΠ‘, ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ Π³ΠΈ Π±ΠΈΠΎΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π½ΡΠ΄Π°Ρ Π²ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈ Π½Π°ΡΠΎΠΊΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°ΠΏΠΎΡΠΈ, Π·Π°ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π·Π° Π»ΠΎΠ½Π³ΠΈΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°Π»Π½ΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ΄ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° Π΄Π° ΡΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΠΌΠΈΡΠ½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ΄Π° Π½Π° ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ, ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ΅ΡΡΠΏΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΡ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°ΠΆΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π½Π° Π²Π»ΠΈΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΡΠΎ Π½Π° ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠΎ-Π΅ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡΠΊΠΈΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΈ Π²ΡΠ· ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΊΠ²Π°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠΎΡ. Π‘Π΅ ΠΈΡΡΠ°ΠΊΠ½ΡΠ²Π° ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π»ΠΎΡ Π½Π° ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΡΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ³ΠΈΡΠ°Π»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΡΠ²Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° ΠΎΠ±Π΅Π·Π±Π΅Π΄ΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠΈΡΠ°Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄ΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈ ΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΠ΅ Π·Π°ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΎ Π½Π° Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·ΠΈ Π·Π° Π»ΠΈΡΠ° ΡΠΎ Ρ
ΡΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈ
Getting athletes back in the game: A comprehensive rehabilitation assessment of knee injuries
Movement is an essential characteristic that has developed over the course of human evolution. With the inclusion of various populations in sports activities, sports have become an important part of peopleβs daily lives. Knee injuries are common among athletes, with knee joint being the most vulnerable to various injuries. Knee injuries require appropriate treatment to allow the athlete to return to their sports activities. Additionally, this study aimed to increase awareness of the importance of preventing knee injuries in sports and to highlight the potential impact of such injuries on an athleteβs ability to participate in their sport. A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the functional outcomes of athletes with knee injuries. The study included 38 patients with knee injuries (ACL, meniscal injuries, collateral ligament injuries) out of which 21 were physically active athletes, 9 were not, but they were athletes who were not involved in sports at the time of the testing and 8 were recreational athletes. The majority of respondents (76%) reported that they sustained the injury during sports activities. Knee pain was reported as at least once a week by most respondents. The study highlights the importance of proper knee injury prevention measures during sports activities and the need for prompt and effective rehabilitation for those who do suffer injuries. Overall, these findings have important implications for the treatment and management of knee injuries among athletes and individuals seeking to maintain an active lifestyle
DIFFERENT SERUM BDNF LEVELS IN DEPRESSION: RESULTS FROM BDNF STUDIES IN FYR MACEDONIA AND BULGARIA
Background: A growing body of evidence shows that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) plays a role in depressive
disorder. Serum BDNF levels are lower in depressed patients and they increase after a long course of antidepressant treatment. Our
study aims to test the effect of antidepressant treatment on serum BDNF levels in patients with a depressive episode, after they have
achieved remission in two studies in Macedonia and Bulgaria.
Subjects and methods: In the Macedonian study 23 patients were included (11 female, 12 male) diagnosed with a first depressive
episode according to ICD-10, as well as 23 control subjects age- and sex-matched without a history of psychiatric disorder. In the
Bulgarian study 10 female patients with depression and 10 control subjects were included. We have applied the Hamilton Depression
Rating Scale (HDRS) to assess depression severity. Blood samples were collected before antidepressive treatment and after
remission was achieved (decrease to 7 points or less on HDRS).
Results: In the Macedonian study, mean serum BDNF level at baseline was 13.15Β±6.75 ng/ml and the mean HDRS score was
28.52Β±4.02. Untreated depressed patients showed significantly lower serum BDNF levels compared to the control group (25.95Β±9.17
ng/ml). After remission was achieved, the mean serum BDNF level was 24.73Β±11.80 ng/ml whereas the mean HDRS score was
7.04Β±3.15. After 8 weeks of treatment there was no statistically significant difference in the serum BDNF levels between the two
groups. In the Bulgarian study, baseline mean serum BDNF levels were 26.84Β±8.66 ng/ml, after 3 weeks treatment and remission
was achieved mean serum BDNF levels were 30.33Β±9.25 ng/ml and in the control group mean serum BDNF levels were 25.04Β±2.88
ng/ml. Integrated results showed baseline mean serum BDNF levels of 17.30Β±9.66 ng/ml, after achieved remission 26.43Β±11.25
ng/ml and in the control group mean serum BDNF levels of 25.68Β±7.76 ng/ml.
Conclusion: The Bulgarian results showed no statistical difference between the depressed group and controls. The Integrated
results and the Macedonian study supported previous findings of low BDNF levels in untreated depressive patients compared to
healthy controls, and that those levels increase after antidepressant treatment. These results may suggest that low serum levels of
BDNF are a state abnormality that is evident during depression and normalizes during remission