10 research outputs found
Aberrant Lymphatic Endothelial Progenitors in Lymphatic Malformation Development
Lymphatic malformations (LMs) are vascular anomalies thought to arise from dysregulated lymphangiogenesis. These lesions impose a significant burden of disease on affected individuals. LM pathobiology is poorly understood, hindering the development of effective treatments. In the present studies, immunostaining of LM tissues revealed that endothelial cells lining aberrant lymphatic vessels and cells in the surrounding stroma expressed the stem cell marker, CD133, and the lymphatic endothelial protein, podoplanin. Isolated patient-derived CD133+ LM cells expressed stem cell genes (NANOG, Oct4), circulating endothelial cell precursor proteins (CD90, CD146, c-Kit, VEGFR-2), and lymphatic endothelial proteins (podoplanin, VEGFR-3). Consistent with a progenitor cell identity, CD133+ LM cells were multipotent and could be differentiated into fat, bone, smooth muscle, and lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro. CD133+ cells were compared to CD133− cells isolated from LM fluids. CD133− LM cells had lower expression of stem cell genes, but expressed circulating endothelial precursor proteins and high levels of lymphatic endothelial proteins, VE-cadherin, CD31, podoplanin, VEGFR-3 and Prox1. CD133− LM cells were not multipotent, consistent with a differentiated lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype. In a mouse xenograft model, CD133+ LM cells differentiated into lymphatic endothelial cells that formed irregularly dilated lymphatic channels, phenocopying human LMs. In vivo, CD133+ LM cells acquired expression of differentiated lymphatic endothelial cell proteins, podoplanin, LYVE1, Prox1, and VEGFR-3, comparable to expression found in LM patient tissues. Taken together, these data identify a novel LM progenitor cell population that differentiates to form the abnormal lymphatic structures characteristic of these lesions, recapitulating the human LM phenotype. This LM progenitor cell population may contribute to the clinically refractory behavior of LMs
Recommended from our members
Aberrant Lymphatic Endothelial Progenitors in Lymphatic Malformation Development
Lymphatic malformations (LMs) are vascular anomalies thought to arise from dysregulated lymphangiogenesis. These lesions impose a significant burden of disease on affected individuals. LM pathobiology is poorly understood, hindering the development of effective treatments. In the present studies, immunostaining of LM tissues revealed that endothelial cells lining aberrant lymphatic vessels and cells in the surrounding stroma expressed the stem cell marker, CD133, and the lymphatic endothelial protein, podoplanin. Isolated patient-derived CD133+ LM cells expressed stem cell genes (NANOG, Oct4), circulating endothelial cell precursor proteins (CD90, CD146, c-Kit, VEGFR-2), and lymphatic endothelial proteins (podoplanin, VEGFR-3). Consistent with a progenitor cell identity, CD133+ LM cells were multipotent and could be differentiated into fat, bone, smooth muscle, and lymphatic endothelial cells in vitro. CD133+ cells were compared to CD133− cells isolated from LM fluids. CD133− LM cells had lower expression of stem cell genes, but expressed circulating endothelial precursor proteins and high levels of lymphatic endothelial proteins, VE-cadherin, CD31, podoplanin, VEGFR-3 and Prox1. CD133− LM cells were not multipotent, consistent with a differentiated lymphatic endothelial cell phenotype. In a mouse xenograft model, CD133+ LM cells differentiated into lymphatic endothelial cells that formed irregularly dilated lymphatic channels, phenocopying human LMs. In vivo, CD133+ LM cells acquired expression of differentiated lymphatic endothelial cell proteins, podoplanin, LYVE1, Prox1, and VEGFR-3, comparable to expression found in LM patient tissues. Taken together, these data identify a novel LM progenitor cell population that differentiates to form the abnormal lymphatic structures characteristic of these lesions, recapitulating the human LM phenotype. This LM progenitor cell population may contribute to the clinically refractory behavior of LMs.</p
Interpretation of Basic Clinical Images: How Are Surgical Residents Performing Compared to Other Trainees?
Endothelial precursor and lymphatic endothelial protein expression in isolated CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> LM cells.
<p>FACS of patient-matched CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> LM cells isolated from microcystic mesenteric (Micro Mes) LM, microcystic subcutaneous (Micro SC) LM and general lymphatic anomaly (GLA) specimens. (A) Endothelial precursor markers, CD34, CD90, CD146 and VEGFR-2. (B) Lymphatic endothelial cell markers, podoplanin and VEGFR-3. Blue line represents antibody data, and red line IgG control.</p
Retinoid Signaling in Progenitors Controls Specification and Regeneration of the Urothelium
The urothelium is a multilayered epithelium that serves as a barrier between the urinary tract and blood, preventing the exchange of water and toxic substances. It consists of superficial cells specialized for synthesis and transport of uroplakins that assemble into a tough apical plaque, one or more layers of intermediate cells, and keratin 5-expressing basal cells (K5-BCs), which are considered to be progenitors in the urothelium and other specialized epithelia. Fate mapping, however, reveals that intermediate cells rather than K5-BCs are progenitors in the adult regenerating urothelium, that P cells, a transient population, are progenitors in the embryo, and that retinoids are critical in P cells and intermediate cells, respectively, for their specification during development and regeneration. These observations have important implications for tissue engineering and repair and, ultimately, may lead to treatments that prevent loss of the urothelial barrier, a major cause of voiding dysfunction and bladder pain syndrome
Identification of CD133<sup>+</sup> cells in LMs of different subtypes and anatomical locations.
<p>(A) LYVE1 and podoplanin staining of cervicofacial mixed LM tissue and patient-matched uninvolved tissue. White arrowheads mark normal lymphatics. (B) Podoplanin and CD133 staining of neonatal foreskin (postnatal day 1), uninvolved tissue, mixed cervicofacial (Mixed CF) LM tissues (2x), and Gorham’s dermal tissue. White arrowheads mark CD133<sup>+</sup>/podoplanin<sup>+</sup> lymphatic endothelium. Red arrowheads mark CD133<sup>low</sup>/podoplanin<sup>+</sup> lymphatic endothelium. Yellow arrowheads mark CD133<sup>+</sup>/podoplanin<sup>+</sup> stromal cells. Blue asterisks mark blood vessels with autofluorescing red blood cells. Scale bars: 50μm. lymphatic channel (lc)</p
Patient-matched LMPC and LMEC implants expressed the lymphatic proteins, LYVE1 and VEGFR-3.
<p>CD133+ LMPCs and CD133- LMECs isolated from a microcystic subcutaneous LM were suspended in Matrigel and implanted in immunocompromised mice. Staining of implants was compared to microcystic subcutaneous LM patient tissue (Micro LM tissue). (A) Podoplanin and LYVE1 and (B) podoplanin and VEGFR-3 staining. Scale bars: 50μm.</p
Expression of markers for mature lymphatic endothelial cells in isolated CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> LM cells.
<p>(A) Podoplanin, VE-cadherin, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, Prox1, and LYVE1 qRT-PCR of RNA isolated from CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> cells from LMs of different subtypes and anatomical locations and GLA compared to control HdLECs. Data normalized to β-actin qRT-PCR and represented as mean ± s.e.m. (B) CD31 and VE-cadherin FACS of patient-matched CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> LM cells isolated from microcystic mesenteric (Micro Mes) LM, microcystic subcutaneous (Micro SC) LM and general lymphatic anomaly (GLA) specimens. Thick gray line represents antibody data, and black line IgG control. (C) VE-cadherin/CD31 and (D) podoplanin/LYVE1 staining of patient-matched CD133<sup>+</sup> and CD133<sup>−</sup> LM cells isolated from microcystic mesenteric (Micro Mes) LM, microcystic subcutaneous (Micro SC) LM, and GLA compared to control HdLEC. Scale bars: 50μm.</p
Retinoid Signaling in Progenitors Controls Specification and Regeneration of the Urothelium
Fatores determinantes na variação dos preços dos produtos contratados por pregão eletrônico
A pesquisa buscou avaliar quais os fatores determinantes na variação dos preços dos produtos comprados através de pregão eletrônico. Para atingir os objetivos, testou-se a relação da variação dos preços com as variáveis: número de fornecedores, especificidade dos ativos, frequência das transações, quantidade, oportunismo dos agentes, tempo de existência e faturamento da empresa ganhadora e número de lances da disputa. Foram realizadas correlação de Pearson e regressão linear múltipla, com o intuito de explorar as relações entre as variáveis e construir um modelo para medir a variação dos preços. As variáveis número de fornecedores, especificidade dos ativos, quantidade e frequência das transações apresentaram um poder de explicação conjunta de 67,4% das variações dos preços. Assim, os órgãos públicos devem desenvolver ações que busquem maximizar o efeito destas variáveis com o objetivo de reduzir os preços pagos