Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Chagas Disease in the United States: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Chagas disease affects approximately 300,000 patients in the United States. We evaluated a multicenter U.S.-based network to obtain clinical characteristics and outcomes of chronic Chagas disease by disease forms. This was a U.S.-based, multicenter, population-based, retrospective cohort study. We queried TriNetX, a global research network, to identify patients with dual-positive IgG serology for Trypanosoma cruzi. We captured outcomes of interest for up to 5 years. We found 429 patients with evidence of dual-positive T. cruzi IgG out of 19,831 patients with an available test result from 31 U.S. medical centers. The positive proportion for those tested was 2.2%, up to 4.6% among Hispanics. We found a prevalence of a positive Chagas serology of 0.02% among Hispanics. Cardiomyopathy risk reached an annual rate of 1.3% during the initial 5 years of follow-up among patients with the indeterminate form. We found no new events for pulmonary embolism, sudden death, or left ventricular aneurysms at 5 years. Annual risks for arrhythmias and stroke for chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) were 1.6% and 0.8%, respectively. The yearly mortality and hospitalization rates for CCC were 2.7% and 17.1%, respectively. Only 13 patients had a documented antitrypanosomal therapy course within 6 months after diagnosis. Of those receiving treatment, 10 patients received benznidazole and three nifurtimox. Chagas disease screening in patients from endemic areas living in the United States remains crucial. Chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy carries a considerable disease burden, translating into increased morbidity and mortality and an enlarging medical health service utilization

Influence of creatine supplementation on the functional capacity of patients with heart failure

FUNDAMENTO: A Insuficiência Cardíaca (IC) é uma síndrome complexa, marcada pela intolerância ao esforço e perda da capacidade funcional. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a capacidade funcional dos pacientes com IC suplementados com creatina. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo, randomizado, duplo cego. Foram randomizados em dois grupos 33 pacientes com IC, com idade > 18 anos, sexo masculino, classes funcionais II a IV. O grupo experimental (G CRE, n = 17) foi suplementado com creatina com dose de 5 g por dia durante seis meses. E o grupo placebo (G PLA, n = 16) recebeu 5 g de maltodextrina por dia durante o mesmo período de tempo. Ambos os grupos foram submetidos a avaliação da capacidade funcional por meio da ergoespirometria e teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6) pré e pós-intervenção. O modelo estatístico Ancova e a correlação de Pearson foram utilizados na análise dos grupos e nas formas de tratamento. RESULTADOS: Das variáveis avaliadas na ergoespirometria, o volume de oxigênio pico (VO2 pico), limiar anaeróbio (LA) e o pulso de oxigênio (pulso de O2) não apresentaram diferenças significativas entre os grupos (P>0,05). No TC6 não houve diferença significativa na distância percorrida. CONCLUSÃO: A suplementação de creatina em pacientes com IC não promoveu melhora significativa na capacidade funcional.BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome characterized by intolerance to exertion and reduced functional capacity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the functional capacity of patients with HF and supplemented with creatine. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Thirty-three male patients over the age of 18 years with functional class II to IV HF were randomized into two groups as follows: the experimental group (CRE, n = 17), supplemented with 5 g/day of creatine for six months; and the placebo group (PLA, n = 16), receiving 5 g/day of maltodextrin for that same period. Both groups underwent functional capacity assessment by use of cardiopulmonary exercise test and 6-minute walk test (6MWT) before and after the intervention. The Ancova statistical model and Pearson correlation were used to assess the groups and the treatment. RESULTS: Of the variables assessed on the cardiopulmonary exercise test, peak oxygen consumption (peak VO2), anaerobic threshold (AT), and oxygen pulse (O2 pulse) showed no significant differences between the groups (P>0.05). On the 6MWT, no significant difference was observed in the covered distance. CONCLUSION: Creatine supplementation in patients with HF did not significantly improve functional capacity

Comparative study between two recombinant human NPH insulin formulations for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the effects of the neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) recombinant human insulin formulations Gansulin and Humulin N ® on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Subjects and methods: Prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel, singlecenter study of 37 individuals with T2DM treated with NPH insulin formulations. The Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons, the Wilcoxon paired comparison test and the Chi-Square test were used for the statistical analyses. The significance level was set at 5% (p < 0.05). Results: The NPH insulin formulations Humulin and Gansulin similarly reduced the HbA1c levels observed at the end of the study compared with the values obtained at the beginning of the study. In the Humulin group, the initial HbA1c value of 7.91% was reduced to 6.56% (p < 0.001), whereas in the Gansulin group, the reduction was from 8.18% to 6.65% (p < 0.001). At the end of the study, there was no significant difference between the levels of glycated hemoglobin (p = 0.2410), fasting plasma glucose (FG; p = 0.9257) and bedtime plasma glucose (BG; p = 0.3906) between the two insulin formulations. There was no nt diffe rence in the number of hypoglycemic events between the two insulin formulations, and no severe hyp episodes were recorded. Conclusion: This study demonstrated similar glycemic control by NPH insulin Gansulin compared with human insulin Humulin N ® in patients with T2DM

Impacto dos Modos de Estimulação DDD e VVIR na Capacidade Funcional e Qualidade de Vida de Pacientes Chagásicos

Introdução: A estimulação atrioventricular propicia benefícios hemodinâmicos em relação à ventricular isolada, mas essa vantagem não está completamente estabelecida em pacientes chagásicos com disfunção sistólica. Objetivo: Avaliar a influência dos modos de estimulação DDD e VVIR na capacidade funcional, qualidade de vida (QV) e alterações laboratoriais de peptídeo natriurético em pacientes chagásicos com disfunção ventricular submetidos a implante de marcapasso. Métodos: Estudaram-se prospectivamente 20 pacientes (55% do sexo masculino) com média de idade de 62,7 (± 9,9 anos) e média da fração de ejeção de 41,8% (± 2,8). Alternadamente, os pacientes receberam a estimulação nos modos DDD e VVIR por um período de três meses sob cada programação. O mínimo percentual de estimulação ventricular admitido foi de 80%. Após cada período, o paciente foi submetido ao teste de caminhada de seis minutos (TC6M), avaliação de QV pelo Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) e pelo Assesment of QUAlity of life and RELated events (AQUAREL). A avaliação laboratorial foi realizada com a dosagem da fração N-terminal do peptídeo natriurético cerebral (N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide – NT-proBNP). Resultados: A média da distância percorrida no TC6M nos modos DDD e VVIR foram respectivamente 390,60 (± 52,71) e 396,30 (± 52,71) metros (p = 0,160). Verificaram-se resultados de QV inferiores, considerando o domínio físico do MLHFQ (p = 0,03) e os domínios dispneia de esforço (p = 0,05) e arritmia (p < 0,001) do AQUAREL, com o modo VVIR. Os níveis de NT-proBNP aumentaram significativamente com a estimulação no modo VVIR (p < 0,001). Conclusão: Após três meses de estimulação com o modo VVIR, houve piora da QV dos pacientes chagásicos e aumento dos níveis de NT-proBNP (registro de ensaio clínico: ReBEc RBR-53x476)

Levosimendan in decompensated heart failure patients: efficacy in a Brazilian cohort. Results of the BELIEF study

FUNDAMENTO: A levosimendana é um novo agente inodilatador que aumenta a contratilidade cardíaca pela sensibilização ao Ca(2+) e induz vasodilatação por meio da ativação dos canais KATP/BKCa. OBJETIVO: Estudar a eficácia e segurança da levosimendana em uma coorte brasileira portadora de insuficiência cardíaca descompensada e em pacientes resistentes a agonistas b-adrenérgicos. MÉTODOS: O BELIEF (Brazilian Evaluation of Levosimendan Infusion Efficacy) foi um estudo aberto, prospectivo, multicêntrico e observacional realizado com 182 portadores de ICD de alto risco, todos tratados com levosimendana. O desfecho primário do estudo era alta hospitalar sem terapia inotrópica adicional (pacientes que responderam ao tratamento). Os desfechos secundários eram alterações nos parâmetros clínicos e hemodinâmicos e nos níveis de peptídeo natriurético cerebral (BNP). RESULTADOS: A taxa de mortalidade foi de 14,8%, e 139 dos 182 pacientes responderam ao tratamento. Entre os que não responderam, a taxa de mortalidade foi de 62,8%. A pressão arterial sistólica foi um preditor de resposta ao tratamento. No grupo resistente aos agonistas b-adrenérgicos, 55,8% responderam ao tratamento. Ao todo, 54 pacientes tiveram pelo menos um evento adverso, a maioria dos quais desapareceu espontaneamente ou após redução da dose da levosimendana. Houve uma melhora significativa na qualidade de vida entre 2 e 6 meses do acompanhamento (p < 0,0001). CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados indicam que a infusão de levosimendana é uma terapia alternativa de curto prazo para tratamento de pacientes com ICD. A gravidade da insuficiência cardíaca pode influenciar a resposta ao tratamento com levosimendana. São necessários estudos prospectivos com uma coorte brasileira que inclua também pacientes com doença de Chagas.BACKGROUND: Levosimendan is a new inodilatory agent that enhances cardiac contractility via Ca(2+) sensitization and induces vasodilation through the activation of KATP/BKCa. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of levosimendan in a decompensated heart failure (DHF) Brazilian cohort, and in b-adrenergic agonist resistant patients. METHODS: The Brazilian Evaluation of Levosimendan Infusion Efficacy (BELIEF) study was prospective, multicenter, observational and included 182 high-risk DHF patients, all of which received open-label levosimendan. Primary end point was hospital discharge without additional inotropic therapy (responder). Secondary end points were changes in hemodynamics, clinical parameters, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). RESULTS: Mortality rate was 14.8%, and 139 of 182 patients were responders. In non responders it was 62.8%. Systolic blood pressure was a predictor of response. In b-adrenergic agonist resistant group, 55.8% were responders. Overall, 54 patients experienced at least one adverse event; most of them resolved either spontaneously or after levosimendan dose reduction. A significant improvement in quality of life was verified at 2-6 months of follow-up (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest levosimendan infusion as an alternative therapy in the short term management of DHF patients. HF severity can influence the response to levosimendan treatment. Prospective studies are warranted in a Brazilian cohort including Chagas heart disease

III Diretriz Brasileira de Insuficiência Cardíaca Crônica

Universidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina Hospital das ClínicasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Hospital de Clínicas de Porto AlegreUniversidade de Pernambuco Faculdade de Ciências Médicas de PernambucoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de MedicinaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Faculdade de MedicinaFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio PretoFundação Universitária de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul Instituto de CardiologiaRede Labs D'OrUniversidade Federal FluminenseUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Faculdade de Ciencias MédicasInstituto Dante Pazzanese de CardiologiaSanta Casa de MisericórdiaUniversidade de Pernambuco Pronto Socorro Cardiológico de PernambucoHospital Pró CardíacoHospital de MessejanaPontifícia Universidade Católica do ParanáUniversidade Federal de Goiás Faculdade de MedicinaUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão PretoReal e Benemerita Sociedade de Beneficência PortuguesaFaculdade de Ciências Médicas de Minas GeraisUNIFESP, EPMSciEL

South american guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention and rehabilitation

Resumo não disponíve

Antiinflammatory Therapy with Canakinumab for Atherosclerotic Disease

Background: Experimental and clinical data suggest that reducing inflammation without affecting lipid levels may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Yet, the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis has remained unproved. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial of canakinumab, a therapeutic monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin-1β, involving 10,061 patients with previous myocardial infarction and a high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level of 2 mg or more per liter. The trial compared three doses of canakinumab (50 mg, 150 mg, and 300 mg, administered subcutaneously every 3 months) with placebo. The primary efficacy end point was nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death. RESULTS: At 48 months, the median reduction from baseline in the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level was 26 percentage points greater in the group that received the 50-mg dose of canakinumab, 37 percentage points greater in the 150-mg group, and 41 percentage points greater in the 300-mg group than in the placebo group. Canakinumab did not reduce lipid levels from baseline. At a median follow-up of 3.7 years, the incidence rate for the primary end point was 4.50 events per 100 person-years in the placebo group, 4.11 events per 100 person-years in the 50-mg group, 3.86 events per 100 person-years in the 150-mg group, and 3.90 events per 100 person-years in the 300-mg group. The hazard ratios as compared with placebo were as follows: in the 50-mg group, 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.07; P = 0.30); in the 150-mg group, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.74 to 0.98; P = 0.021); and in the 300-mg group, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.75 to 0.99; P = 0.031). The 150-mg dose, but not the other doses, met the prespecified multiplicity-adjusted threshold for statistical significance for the primary end point and the secondary end point that additionally included hospitalization for unstable angina that led to urgent revascularization (hazard ratio vs. placebo, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; P = 0.005). Canakinumab was associated with a higher incidence of fatal infection than was placebo. There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio for all canakinumab doses vs. placebo, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P = 0.31). Conclusions: Antiinflammatory therapy targeting the interleukin-1β innate immunity pathway with canakinumab at a dose of 150 mg every 3 months led to a significantly lower rate of recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo, independent of lipid-level lowering. (Funded by Novartis; CANTOS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01327846.

Omecamtiv mecarbil in chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, GALACTIC‐HF: baseline characteristics and comparison with contemporary clinical trials

Aims: The safety and efficacy of the novel selective cardiac myosin activator, omecamtiv mecarbil, in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is tested in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac outcomes Through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC‐HF) trial. Here we describe the baseline characteristics of participants in GALACTIC‐HF and how these compare with other contemporary trials. Methods and Results: Adults with established HFrEF, New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA) ≥ II, EF ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptides and either current hospitalization for HF or history of hospitalization/ emergency department visit for HF within a year were randomized to either placebo or omecamtiv mecarbil (pharmacokinetic‐guided dosing: 25, 37.5 or 50 mg bid). 8256 patients [male (79%), non‐white (22%), mean age 65 years] were enrolled with a mean EF 27%, ischemic etiology in 54%, NYHA II 53% and III/IV 47%, and median NT‐proBNP 1971 pg/mL. HF therapies at baseline were among the most effectively employed in contemporary HF trials. GALACTIC‐HF randomized patients representative of recent HF registries and trials with substantial numbers of patients also having characteristics understudied in previous trials including more from North America (n = 1386), enrolled as inpatients (n = 2084), systolic blood pressure &lt; 100 mmHg (n = 1127), estimated glomerular filtration rate &lt; 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (n = 528), and treated with sacubitril‐valsartan at baseline (n = 1594). Conclusions: GALACTIC‐HF enrolled a well‐treated, high‐risk population from both inpatient and outpatient settings, which will provide a definitive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of this novel therapy, as well as informing its potential future implementation