11 research outputs found

    CyberShake-derived ground-motion prediction models for the Los Angeles region with application to earthquake early warning

    Get PDF
    Real-time applications such as earthquake early warning (EEW) typically use empirical ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) along with event magnitude and source-to-site distances to estimate expected shaking levels. In this simplified approach, effects due to finite-fault geometry, directivity and site and basin response are often generalized, which may lead to a significant under- or overestimation of shaking from large earthquakes (M > 6.5) in some locations. For enhanced site-specific ground-motion predictions considering 3-D wave-propagation effects, we develop support vector regression (SVR) models from the SCEC CyberShake low-frequency (415 000 finite-fault rupture scenarios (6.5 ≤ M ≤ 8.5) for southern California defined in UCERF 2.0. We use CyberShake to demonstrate the application of synthetic waveform data to EEW as a ‘proof of concept’, being aware that these simulations are not yet fully validated and might not appropriately sample the range of rupture uncertainty. Our regression models predict the maximum and the temporal evolution of instrumental intensity (MMI) at 71 selected test sites using only the hypocentre, magnitude and rupture ratio, which characterizes uni- and bilateral rupture propagation. Our regression approach is completely data-driven (where here the CyberShake simulations are considered data) and does not enforce pre-defined functional forms or dependencies among input parameters. The models were established from a subset (∼20 per cent) of CyberShake simulations, but can explain MMI values of all >400 k rupture scenarios with a standard deviation of about 0.4 intensity units. We apply our models to determine threshold magnitudes (and warning times) for various active faults in southern California that earthquakes need to exceed to cause at least ‘moderate’, ‘strong’ or ‘very strong’ shaking in the Los Angeles (LA) basin. These thresholds are used to construct a simple and robust EEW algorithm: to declare a warning, the algorithm only needs to locate the earthquake and to verify that the corresponding magnitude threshold is exceeded. The models predict that a relatively moderate M6.5–7 earthquake along the Palos Verdes, Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon, Elsinore or San Jacinto faults with a rupture propagating towards LA could cause ‘very strong’ to ‘severe’ shaking in the LA basin; however, warning times for these events could exceed 30 s

    CyberShake-derived ground-motion prediction models for the Los Angeles region with application to earthquake early warning

    Get PDF
    Real-time applications such as earthquake early warning (EEW) typically use empirical ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) along with event magnitude and source-to-site distances to estimate expected shaking levels. In this simplified approach, effects due to finite-fault geometry, directivity and site and basin response are often generalized, which may lead to a significant under- or overestimation of shaking from large earthquakes (M>6.5) in some locations. For enhanced site-specific ground-motion predictions considering 3-D wave-propagation effects, we develop support vector regression (SVR) models from the SCEC CyberShake low-frequency (415000 finite-fault rupture scenarios (6.5 ≤ M ≤ 8.5) for southern California defined in UCERF 2.0. We use CyberShake to demonstrate the application of synthetic waveform data to EEW as a ‘proof of concept', being aware that these simulations are not yet fully validated and might not appropriately sample the range of rupture uncertainty. Our regression models predict the maximum and the temporal evolution of instrumental intensity (MMI) at 71 selected test sites using only the hypocentre, magnitude and rupture ratio, which characterizes uni- and bilateral rupture propagation. Our regression approach is completely data-driven (where here the CyberShake simulations are considered data) and does not enforce pre-defined functional forms or dependencies among input parameters. The models were established from a subset (∼20per cent) of CyberShake simulations, but can explain MMI values of all>400 k rupture scenarios with a standard deviation of about 0.4 intensity units. We apply our models to determine threshold magnitudes (and warning times) for various active faults in southern California that earthquakes need to exceed to cause at least ‘moderate', ‘strong' or ‘very strong' shaking in the Los Angeles (LA) basin. These thresholds are used to construct a simple and robust EEW algorithm: to declare a warning, the algorithm only needs to locate the earthquake and to verify that the corresponding magnitude threshold is exceeded. The models predict that a relatively moderate M6.5-7 earthquake along the Palos Verdes, Newport-Inglewood/Rose Canyon, Elsinore or San Jacinto faults with a rupture propagating towards LA could cause ‘very strong' to ‘severe' shaking in the LA basin; however, warning times for these events could exceed 30

    Consistency test scores for aftershock+mainshock RELM forecasts

    No full text
    Summary Files are transcribed from Zechar et al. (2013) into comma separated values (csv) files. The consistency test scores are shown in the electronic supplement table S4 and the catalog is found in Table 1 of the main text. Reference Zechar, J. D., D. Schorlemmer, M. J. Werner, M. C. Gerstenberger, D. A. Rhoades, and T. H. Jordan (2013). Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models I: First-Order Results, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 787-798.

    Mainshock+aftershock forecasts from Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models (RELM) experiment

    No full text
    Contains mainshock+aftershock forecasts produced by various members of the working group for the development of Regional Earthquake Likelihood Models. These forecasts were obtained from the Collaboratory of the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) testing center hosted by the Southern California Earthquake Center at the University of Southern California. Forecasts are described by the following publications Helmstetter et al. (2007) with aftershocksKagan et al. (2007)Shen et al. (2007)Bird & Liu (2007)Ebel et al. (2007) with aftershocks Forecasts are stored in tab separated value files with the following fields (the first row of data is shown as an example): LON_0 LON_1 LAT_0 LAT_1 DEPTH_0 DEPTH_1 MAG_0 MAG_1 RATE FLAG -125.4 -125.3 40.1 40.2 0.0 30.0 4.95 5.05 5.8499099999999998e-04 1 References Bird, P., and Z. Liu (2007). Seismic Hazard Inferred from Tectonics: California, Seismological  Research Letters 78 37-48. Ebel, J. E., D. W. Chambers, A. L. Kafka, and J. A. Baglivo (2007). Non-Poissonian Earthquake Clustering and the Hidden Markov Model as Bases for Earthquake Forecasting in California, Seismological  Research Letters 78 57-65. Helmstetter, A., Y. Y. Kagan, and D. D. Jackson (2007). High-resolution Time-independent Grid-based Forecast for M >= 5 Earthquakes in California, Seismological  Research Letters 78 78-86. Kagan, Y. Y., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Rong (2007). A Testable Five-Year Forecast of Moderate and Large Earthquakes in Southern California Based on Smoothed Seismicity, Seismological  Research Letters 78 94-98. Shen, Z.-K., D. D. Jackson, and Y. Y. Kagan (2007). Implications of Geodetic Strain Rate for Future Earthquakes, with a Five-Year Forecast of M5 Earthquakes in Southern California, Seismological  Research Letters 78 116-120

    Supporting Data for pyCSEP: A Software Toolkit for Earthquake Forecast Developers

    No full text
    Contains data needed to reproduce the figures from the publication of pyCSEP: A Software Toolkit for Earthquake Forecast Developers.     evaluation_catalog.json     evaluation_catalog_zechar2013_merge.txt     SRL_2018031_esupp_Table_S1.txt     bird_liu.neokinema-fromXML.dat     ebel.aftershock.corrected-fromXML.dat     helmstetter_et_al.hkj.aftershock-fromXML.dat     lombardi.DBM.italy.5yr.2010-01-01.dat     meletti.MPS04.italy.5yr.2010-01-01.dat     werner.HiResSmoSeis-m1.italy.5yr.2010-01-01.dat     config.json     m71_event.json     results_complete.bi
    corecore