69 research outputs found
Vers une meilleure représentation de la distribution et de la variabilité de l'ozone atmosphérique par l'assimilation des données satellitaires
The PREV’AIR system, an operational system for large scale air quality forecasts over Europe; applications at the local scale
International audienceNumerical simulations of pollution events with deterministic models have become easier for the last decade thanks to increasing computer skills. Hence three-dimensional chemistry-transport-runs can be performed on a single workstation for long-term simulation or real-time forecast over large scale areas. Furthermore, fast Internet download and high file storage capacity in data processing make it possible to use a wide database of meteorological parameters and pollutant concentration measurements. The PREV'AIR System rests on those technological progresses for delivering daily air qualiry forecasts in operational conditions
Respuesta del dióxido de carbono y de la calidad del aire a la reducción de emisiones fruto de las restricciones vinculadas a la COVID-19
EUNADICS-AV early warning system dedicated to supporting aviation in the case of a crisis from natural airborne hazards and radionuclide clouds
The purpose of the EUNADICS-AV (European Natural Airborne Disaster Information and Coordination System for Aviation) prototype early warning system (EWS) is to develop the combined use of harmonised data products from satellite, ground-based and in situ instruments to produce alerts of airborne hazards (volcanic, dust, smoke and radionuclide clouds), satisfying the requirement of aviation air traffic management (ATM) stakeholders (https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/723986, last access: 5 November 2021). The alert products developed by the EUNADICS-AV EWS, i.e. near-real-time (NRT) observations, email notifications and netCDF (Network Common Data Form) alert data products (called NCAP files), have shown significant interest in using selective detection of natural airborne hazards from polar-orbiting satellites. The combination of several sensors inside a single global system demonstrates the advantage of using a triggered approach to obtain selective detection from observations, which cannot initially discriminate the different aerosol types. Satellite products from hyperspectral ultraviolet–visible (UV–vis) and infrared (IR) sensors (e.g. TROPOMI – TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument – and IASI – Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer) and a broadband geostationary imager (Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager; SEVIRI) and retrievals from ground-based networks (e.g. EARLINET – European Aerosol Research Lidar Network, E-PROFILE and the regional network from volcano observatories) are combined by our system to create tailored alert products (e.g. selective ash detection, SO2 column and plume height, dust cloud, and smoke from wildfires). A total of 23 different alert products are implemented, using 1 geostationary and 13 polar-orbiting satellite platforms, 3 external existing service, and 2 EU and 2 regional ground-based networks. This allows for the identification and the tracking of extreme events. The EUNADICS-AV EWS has also shown the need to implement a future relay of radiological data (gamma dose rate and radionuclides concentrations in ground-level air) in the case of a nuclear accident. This highlights the interest of operating early warnings with the use of a homogenised dataset. For the four types of airborne hazard, the EUNADICS-AV EWS has demonstrated its capability to provide NRT alert data products to trigger data assimilation and dispersion modelling providing forecasts and inverse modelling for source term estimate. Not all of our alert data products (NCAP files) are publicly disseminated. Access to our alert products is currently restricted to key users (i.e. Volcanic Ash Advisory Centres, national meteorological services, the World Meteorological Organization, governments, volcano observatories and research collaborators), as these are considered pre-decisional products. On the other hand, thanks to the EUNADICS-AV–SACS (Support to Aviation Control Service) web interface (https://sacs.aeronomie.be, last access: 5 November 2021), the main part of the satellite observations used by the EUNADICS-AV EWS is shown in NRT, with public email notification of volcanic emission and delivery of tailored images and NCAP files. All of the ATM stakeholders (e.g. pilots, airlines and passengers) can access these alert products through this free channel.Peer ReviewedArticle escrit per 46 autors/es: Hugues Brenot Nicolas Theys Lieven Clarisse Jeroen van Gent Daniel Hurtmans Sophie Vandenbussche Nikolaos Papagiannopoulos Lucia Mona Timo Virtanen Andreas Uppstu Mikhail Sofiev Luca Bugliaro Margarita Vázquez-Navarro Pascal Hedelt Michelle Maree Parks Sara Barsotti Mauro Coltelli William Moreland Simona Scollo Giuseppe Salerno Delia Arnold-Arias Marcus Hirtl Tuomas Peltonen Juhani Lahtinen Klaus Sievers Florian Lipok Rolf Rüfenacht Alexander Haefele Maxime Hervo Saskia Wagenaar Wim Som de Cerff Jos de Laat Arnoud Apituley Piet Stammes Quentin Laffineur Andy Delcloo Robertson Lennart Carl-Herbert Rokitansky Arturo Vargas Markus Kerschbaum Christian Resch Raimund Zopp Matthieu Plu 1 Vincent-Henri Peuch Michel van Roozendael Gerhard WotawaPostprint (author's final draft
PREV'AIR : un système opérationnel de prévision et de cartographie de la qualité de l'air en France et en Europe
National audienceLe système PREV'AIR de prévision et de surveillance de la qualité de l'air en France et en Europe est mis en oeuvre à l'Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS) depuis le printemps 2003, en coopération avec l'Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (IPSL) du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Météo France et l'Agence De l'Environnement et de Maîtrise de l'Energie (ADEME). Le système a pour objectif de délivrer quotidiennement une information (sous la forme de prévisions et de cartographies) relative à la qualité de l'air en France et en Europe. Il est reconnu comme un complément du dispositif national de surveillance de la qualité de l'air assurée au niveau local par une quarantaine d'Associations Agréées de Surveillance de la Qualité de l'Air (AASQAs). Ce dispositif repose sur plus de 2000 analyseurs dédiés à la mesure d'indicateurs de pollution (SO2, O3, NO2, particules...), répartis sur plus de 700 sites fixes. Les modèles déterministes tridimensionnels de simulation de la qualité de l'air, ou modèles de Chimie-Transport (CTM), généralement couplés à un modèle météorologique, permettent désormais de répondre en grande partie aux objectifs de la prévision, grâce à leur fiabilité croissante et aux progrès réalisés dans le domaine de l'informatique scientifique. La diminution des temps de calculs, l'augmentation des capacités de stockage et le développement des technologies de l'information (accès rapide par Internet à de nombreuses bases de données) rendent désormais possible la mise en oeuvre quotidienne ("opérationnelle") de ces modèles, et la diffusion de l'information qui en découle. Le système PREV'AIR s'appuie sur un ensemble d'outils numériques (modèles et post traitement des sorties de modèles; modules d'interface pour la gestion des entrées / sorties de données). Les données numériques générées par le système (concentrations en polluants atmosphériques) sont exploitées afin de 1) réaliser des études spécifiques pour le compte du Ministère de l'Ecologie et du Développement Durable - MEDD- (bilan de qualité de l'air, analyses de tendances et prospectives); 2) fournir des prévisions de concentrations de polluants atmosphériques (ozone, dioxyde d'azote et particules) à trois jours d'échéance; 3) élaborer des "analyses" des concentrations de polluants (ozone) - c'est-à -dire des cartographies réalisées a posteriori en intégrant les résultats de modélisation et les observations disponibles. Les prévisions et les analyses sont délivrées quotidiennement via Internet sous forme de données numériques et de cartes (http://www.prevair.org). L'objet du présent article est de décrire brièvement le système PREV'AIR tel qu'il fonctionne depuis l'été 2004 ainsi que les produits de sortie délivrés par le système. Un état des performances du système sera également proposé
User requirements for monitoring the evolution of stratospheric ozone at high vertical resolution (‘Operoz’: Operational ozone observations using limb geometry)
The purpose of the Operoz study has been threefold:
(i) To establish the user requirements for an operational mission targeting ozone profiles at high vertical resolution,
(ii) To identify the observational gaps with respect to these user requirements taking into account planned operational missions and observational ground networks, and
(iii) To perform a reality check on the observational requirements based on proven concepts and present-day knowledge of potentially available measurement techniques and to identify options for a small to medium size satellite mission
Development of West-European PM2.5 and NO2 land use regression models incorporating satellite-derived and chemical transport modelling data
Satellite-derived (SAT) and chemical transport model (CTM) estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 are increasingly used in combination with Land Use Regression (LUR) models. We aimed to compare the contribution of SAT and CTM data to the performance of LUR PM2.5 and NO2 models for Europe. Four sets of models, all including local traffic and land use variables, were compared (LUR without SAT or CTM, with SAT only, with CTM only, and with both SAT and CTM). LUR models were developed using two monitoring data sets: PM2.5 and NO2 ground level measurements from the European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) and from the European AIRBASE network. LUR PM2.5 models including SAT and SAT+CTM explained ~60% of spatial variation in measured PM2.5 concentrations, substantially more than the LUR model without SAT and CTM (adjR(2): 0.33-0.38). For NO2 CTM improved prediction modestly (adjR(2): 0.58) compared to models without SAT and CTM (adjR(2): 0.47-0.51). Both monitoring networks are capable of producing models explaining the spatial variance over a large study area. SAT and CTM estimates of PM2.5 and NO2 significantly improved the performance of high spatial resolution LUR models at the European scale for use in large epidemiological studies
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission conditions
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015-2019. By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O-3 and the total gaseous oxidant (O-X = NO2 + O-3) during the pre-lockdown, partial lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63 cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015-2019 periods) were calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoples' mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change in air quality. As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015-2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals, even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary PM formation. Changes in O-3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases (as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America, respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of similar to 70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for 2020 compared to 2015-2019 (between similar to 25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to similar to 40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of similar to 60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2 + O-3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O-3 production, whereas at background sites, O-X was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O-3 concentrations. The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g., from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility. Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required.Peer reviewe
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015–2019. By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O3 and the total gaseous oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) during the pre-lockdown, partial lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63 cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015–2019 periods) were calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoples’ mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change in air quality. As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015–2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals, even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary PM formation. Changes in O3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases (as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America, respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of ~70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for 2020 compared to 2015–2019 (between ~25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to ~40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of ~60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O3 production, whereas at background sites, OX was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O3 concentrations. The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g., from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility. Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required.Peer reviewedFinal Published versio
A global observational analysis to understand changes in air quality during exceptionally low anthropogenic emission conditions
This global study, which has been coordinated by the World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric
Watch (WMO/GAW) programme, aims to understand the behaviour of key air pollutant species during the
COVID-19 pandemic period of exceptionally low emissions across the globe. We investigated the effects of the
differences in both emissions and regional and local meteorology in 2020 compared with the period 2015–2019.
By adopting a globally consistent approach, this comprehensive observational analysis focuses on changes in air
quality in and around cities across the globe for the following air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, PMC (coarse fraction of
PM), NO2, SO2, NOx, CO, O3 and the total gaseous oxidant (OX = NO2 + O3) during the pre-lockdown, partial
lockdown, full lockdown and two relaxation periods spanning from January to September 2020. The analysis is
based on in situ ground-based air quality observations at over 540 traffic, background and rural stations, from 63
cities and covering 25 countries over seven geographical regions of the world. Anomalies in the air pollutant
concentrations (increases or decreases during 2020 periods compared to equivalent 2015–2019 periods) were
calculated and the possible effects of meteorological conditions were analysed by computing anomalies from
ERA5 reanalyses and local observations for these periods. We observed a positive correlation between the reductions
in NO2 and NOx concentrations and peoples’ mobility for most cities. A correlation between PMC and
mobility changes was also seen for some Asian and South American cities. A clear signal was not observed for
other pollutants, suggesting that sources besides vehicular emissions also substantially contributed to the change
in air quality.
As a global and regional overview of the changes in ambient concentrations of key air quality species, we
observed decreases of up to about 70% in mean NO2 and between 30% and 40% in mean PM2.5 concentrations
over 2020 full lockdown compared to the same period in 2015–2019. However, PM2.5 exhibited complex signals,
even within the same region, with increases in some Spanish cities, attributed mainly to the long-range transport
of African dust and/or biomass burning (corroborated with the analysis of NO2/CO ratio). Some Chinese cities
showed similar increases in PM2.5 during the lockdown periods, but in this case, it was likely due to secondary
PM formation. Changes in O3 concentrations were highly heterogeneous, with no overall change or small increases
(as in the case of Europe), and positive anomalies of 25% and 30% in East Asia and South America,
respectively, with Colombia showing the largest positive anomaly of ~70%. The SO2 anomalies were negative for
2020 compared to 2015–2019 (between ~25 to 60%) for all regions. For CO, negative anomalies were observed for all regions with the largest decrease for South America of up to ~40%. The NO2/CO ratio indicated that
specific sites (such as those in Spanish cities) were affected by biomass burning plumes, which outweighed the
NO2 decrease due to the general reduction in mobility (ratio of ~60%). Analysis of the total oxidant (OX = NO2
+ O3) showed that primary NO2 emissions at urban locations were greater than the O3 production, whereas at
background sites, OX was mostly driven by the regional contributions rather than local NO2 and O3 concentrations.
The present study clearly highlights the importance of meteorology and episodic contributions (e.g.,
from dust, domestic, agricultural biomass burning and crop fertilizing) when analysing air quality in and around
cities even during large emissions reductions. There is still the need to better understand how the chemical
responses of secondary pollutants to emission change under complex meteorological conditions, along with
climate change and socio-economic drivers may affect future air quality. The implications for regional and global
policies are also significant, as our study clearly indicates that PM2.5 concentrations would not likely meet the
World Health Organization guidelines in many parts of the world, despite the drastic reductions in mobility.
Consequently, revisions of air quality regulation (e.g., the Gothenburg Protocol) with more ambitious targets that
are specific to the different regions of the world may well be required.World Meteorological Organization Global Atmospheric Watch
programme is gratefully acknowledged for initiating and coordinating
this study and for supporting this publication.
We acknowledge the following projects for supporting the analysis
contained in this article:
Air Pollution and Human Health for an Indian Megacity project
PROMOTE funded by UK NERC and the Indian MOES, Grant reference
number NE/P016391/1;
Regarding project funding from the European Commission, the sole
responsibility of this publication lies with the authors. The European
Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information
contained therein.
This project has received funding from the European Commission’s
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement
No 874990 (EMERGE project).
European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under the
Mobilitas Pluss programme;
Estonian Research Council (project PRG714);
Estonian Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental
Observatory (KKOBS, project 2014-2020.4.01.20-0281).
European network for observing our changing planet project (ERAPLANET,
grant agreement no. 689443) under the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, Estonian Ministry of
Sciences projects (grant nos. P180021, P180274), and the Estonian
Research Infrastructures Roadmap project Estonian Environmental Observatory
(3.2.0304.11-0395).
Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East—Climate and Atmosphere Research (EMME-CARE) project, which has received funding from the
European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
(grant agreement no. 856612) and the Government of Cyprus.
INAR acknowledges support by the Russian government (grant
number 14.W03.31.0002), the Ministry of Science and Higher Education
of the Russian Federation (agreement 14.W0331.0006), and the Russian
Ministry of Education and Science (14.W03.31.0008). We are grateful to to the following agencies for providing access to
data used in our analysis:
A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics Russian Academy of
Sciences;
Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell’Ambiente della Campania
(ARPAC);
Air Quality and Climate Change, Parks and Environment (MetroVancouver,
Government of British Columbia);
Air Quality Monitoring & Reporting, Nova Scotia Environment
(Government of Nova Scotia);
Air Quality Monitoring Network (SIMAT) and Emission Inventory,
Mexico City Environment Secretariat (SEDEMA);
Airparif (owner & provider of the Paris air pollution data);
ARPA Lazio, Italy;
ARPA Lombardia, Italy;
Association Agr´e´ee de Surveillance de la Qualit´e de l’Air en ˆIle-de-
France AIRPARIF / Atmo-France;
Bavarian Environment Agency, Germany;
Berlin Senatsverwaltung für Umwelt, Verkehr und Klimaschutz,
Germany;
California Air Resources Board;
Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India;
CETESB: Companhia Ambiental do Estado de SËœao Paulo, Brazil.
China National Environmental Monitoring Centre;
Chandigarh Pollution Control Committee (CPCC), India.
DCMR Rijnmond Environmental Service, the Netherlands.
Department of Labour Inspection, Cyprus;
Department of Natural Resources Management and Environmental
Protection of Moscow.
Environment and Climate Change Canada;
Environmental Monitoring and Science Division Alberta Environment
and Parks (Government of Alberta);
Environmental Protection Authority Victoria (Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia);
Estonian Environmental Research Centre (EERC);
Estonian University of Life Sciences, SMEAR Estonia;
European Regional Development Fund (project MOBTT42) under
the Mobilitas Pluss programme;
Finnish Meteorological Institute;
Helsinki Region Environmental Services Authority;
Haryana Pollution Control Board (HSPCB), IndiaLondon Air Quality
Network (LAQN) and the Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN)
supported by the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
UK Government;
Madrid Municipality;
Met Office Integrated Data Archive System (MIDAS);
Meteorological Service of Canada;
Minist`ere de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements
climatiques (Gouvernement du Qu´ebec);
Ministry of Environment and Energy, Greece;
Ministry of the Environment (Chile) and National Weather Service
(DMC);
Moscow State Budgetary Environmental Institution
MOSECOMONITORING.
Municipal Department of the Environment SMAC, Brazil;
Municipality of Madrid public open data service;
National institute of environmental research, Korea;
National Meteorology and Hydrology Service (SENAMHI), Peru;
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation;
NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment;
Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks,
Canada;
Public Health Service of Amsterdam (GGD), the Netherlands.
Punjab Pollution Control Board (PPCB), India.
R´eseau de surveillance de la qualit´e de l’air (RSQA) (Montr´eal);
Rosgydromet. Mosecomonitoring, Institute of Atmospheric Physics,
Russia;
Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project 20–05–00254)
SAFAR-IITM-MoES, India;
SËœao Paulo State Environmental Protection Agency, CETESB;
Secretaria de Ambiente, DMQ, Ecuador;
SecretarÃa Distrital de Ambiente, Bogot´a, Colombia.
Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente Rio de Janeiro;
Mexico City Atmospheric Monitoring System (SIMAT); Mexico City
Secretariat of Environment, SecretarÃa del Medio Ambiente (SEDEMA);
SLB-analys, Sweden;
SMEAR Estonia station and Estonian University of Life Sciences
(EULS);
SMEAR stations data and Finnish Center of Excellence;
South African Weather Service and Department of Environment,
Forestry and Fisheries through SAAQIS;
Spanish Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic
Challenge (MITECO);
University of Helsinki, Finland;
University of Tartu, Tahkuse air monitoring station;
Weather Station of the Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics and Atmospheric
Science of the University of SËœao Paulo;
West Bengal Pollution Control Board (WBPCB).http://www.elsevier.com/locate/envintam2023Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorolog
- …