Do gut activated immune cells mediate low bone mineral density in paediatric Crohn’s disease?

Background: There has been an increasing awareness of the negative impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) on bone metabolism and bone mineral density (BMD). A number of potential mechanisms have been suggested, including malnutrition and the use of steroids. Although it has been known for some time that the immune system can influence the cells of bone, the specific contribution of interactions between osteoblasts and T cells in the pathogenesis of IBD-associated osteoporosis in children has yet to be clearly demonstrated. This body of work consists of two parts: an in vitro study investigating the influence of T cells and their activation products on the growth and alkaline phosphatase activity of the Saos-2 osteosarcoma cell line, and an in vivo study comparing the phenotype of lymphocyte subpopulations in the gut and peripheral circulation of children with and without IBD, relating these to measures of bone metabolism and mineralisation. Methods: For the in vitro studies, Saos-2 cells were incubated with increasing numbers of resting and polyclonally activated immune cells, with and without the presence of transwell inserts. The expansion of the Saos-2 cells and their alkaline phosphatase activity were measured, and flow cytometry was used to establish the activation status of T cell subpopulations in the immune cell populations. The in vivo study recruited 30 children undergoing lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy for investigation of GI symptoms aiming to identify 15 patients newly diagnosed with Crohn’s disease and 15 healthy controls. Immune cells were isolated from blood and gut biopsy samples, and analysed by flow cytometry. Samples of serum and urine were analysed for bone turnover markers. Confirmed cases of IBD had their bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: The in vitro study found that populations of PBMCs and CD4+ lymphocytes had similar effects on the growth of Saos-2 cells, and whilst activated immune cells significantly inhibited Saos-2 cell growth it was also observed that resting immune cells increased Saos-2 cell growth. These effects were lost when immune cells were added after saos-2 had become adherent. There was a reciprocal effect of Saos-2 cells on the activation status of CD4+ lymphocytes, increasing the activation of resting cells and potentially limiting the effects of polyclonal activation. The in vivo study found that children with Crohn’s disease had significant reductions in BMD, reductions in both bone resorption and formation, lower total lymphocyte counts and increased expression of CD25. Linear regression showed a positive correlation between the numbers of circulating CD4+ lymphocytes and BMD, and a negative correlation with their expression of CD25. These correlations were not statistically significant, but the power of the study was only 20% Conclusion: The findings support the hypothesis that gut activated immune cells mediate low bone mineral density in paediatric Crohn’s disease. However, the findings also raise the possibility of osteoimmune interactions being important for the immune response and bone metabolism, in both health and disease. Therefore, further study of cellular responses in the bone are necessary to better understand the relationships between these two important systems

Randomized factorial trial of esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett’s oesophagus: the Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett’s metaplasia Trial (AspECT)

Background: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) is the sixth commonest cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is the most significant risk factor. We evaluated the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton pump inhibitor acid suppression (PPI) and aspirin in improving outcome for BO patients in the largest such randomized controlled trial. Methods: Patients with ≥1cm BO in UK and Canadian hospitals were randomized 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit in a 2X2 factorial design to high-dose (40mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20mg once-daily) PPI, alone or with aspirin (UK: 300mg/day, Canada: 325mg/day), unblinded (reporting pathologists blinded). The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, OA, or high-grade dysplasia, analysed using accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimization factors (age, BO length, intestinal metaplasia). Findings: Recruited patients (N=2557) were followed for 8·9 years (median; interquartile range 8·2–9·8), collecting 20,095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. There were 313 primary events. High-dose PPI was superior to low-dose PPI (p=0·037, N=1265 (low dose), N=1270 (high dose), time ratio (TR)=1·27, 95%CI=1·01–1·58). Aspirin was not significantly better than no aspirin (p=0·068, N=1142 (no aspirin), N = 1138 (aspirin), TR=1·24, 95%CI=0·98–1·57). If patients using NSAIDs were censored at time of first use,aspirin was significantly better than no Aspirin (p=0·043, N=2,236, TR=1·29 95%CI=1·01– 1·66). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low dose PPI without aspirin (p=0·0068, TR=1·59, 95%CI=1·14–2·23). NNT for PPI and aspirin benefit is 34 and 43, respectively. Only 1·0% (28) of participants reported study-treatment related serious adverse events. Interpretation: High-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improve outcome in BO patients

Timing of neonatal stoma closure: a survey of health professional perspectives and current practice

Optimal timing for neonatal stoma closure remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to establish current practice and illustrate multidisciplinary perspectives on timing of stoma closure using an online survey sent to all 27 UK neonatal surgical units, as part of a research programme to determine the feasibility of a clinical trial comparing ‘early’ and ‘late’ stoma closure. 166 responses from all 27 units demonstrated concordance of opinion in target time for closure (6 weeks most commonly stated across scenarios), although there was a high variability in practice. A sizeable proportion (41%) of respondents use weight, rather than time, to determine when to close a neonatal stoma. Thematic analysis of free text responses identified nine key themes influencing decision-making; most related to nutrition, growth and stoma complications. These data provide an overview of current practice that is critical to informing an acceptable trial design.<br/

Esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett's oesophagus (AspECT):a randomised factorial trial

Background: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) is the sixth commonest cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is the most significant risk factor. We evaluated the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton pump inhibitor acid suppression (PPI) and aspirin in improving outcome for BO patients in the largest such randomized controlled trial.Methods: Patients with ≥1cm BO in UK and Canadian hospitals were randomized 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit in a 2X2 factorial design to high-dose (40mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20mg once-daily) PPI, alone or with aspirin (UK: 300mg/day, Canada: 325mg/day), unblinded (reporting pathologists blinded). The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, OA, or high-grade dysplasia, analysed using accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimization factors (age, BO length, intestinal metaplasia).Findings: Recruited patients (N=2557) were followed for 8·9 years (median; interquartile range 8·2–9·8), collecting 20,095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. There were 313 primary events. High-dose PPI was superior to low-dose PPI (p=0·037, N=1265 (low dose), N=1270 (high dose), time ratio (TR)=1·27, 95%CI=1·01–1·58). Aspirin was not significantly better than no aspirin (p=0·068, N=1142 (no aspirin), N = 1138 (aspirin), TR=1·24, 95%CI=0·98–1·57). If patients using NSAIDs were censored at time of first use,aspirin was significantly better than no Aspirin (p=0·043, N=2,236, TR=1·29 95%CI=1·01– 1·66). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low dose PPI without aspirin (p=0·0068, TR=1·59, 95%CI=1·14–2·23). NNT for PPI and aspirin benefit is 34 and 43, respectively. Only 1·0% (28) of participants reported study-treatment related serious adverse events.Interpretation: High-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improve outcome in BO patients

Randomized factorial trial of esomeprazole and aspirin in Barrett’s oesophagus: the Aspirin and Esomeprazole Chemoprevention in Barrett’s metaplasia Trial (AspECT)

Background: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OA) is the sixth commonest cause of cancer death worldwide and Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) is the most significant risk factor. We evaluated the efficacy of high-dose esomeprazole proton pump inhibitor acid suppression (PPI) and aspirin in improving outcome for BO patients in the largest such randomized controlled trial. Methods: Patients with ≥1cm BO in UK and Canadian hospitals were randomized 1:1:1:1 using a computer-generated schedule held in a central trials unit in a 2X2 factorial design to high-dose (40mg twice-daily) or low-dose (20mg once-daily) PPI, alone or with aspirin (UK: 300mg/day, Canada: 325mg/day), unblinded (reporting pathologists blinded). The primary composite endpoint was time to all-cause mortality, OA, or high-grade dysplasia, analysed using accelerated failure time modelling adjusted for minimization factors (age, BO length, intestinal metaplasia). Findings: Recruited patients (N=2557) were followed for 8·9 years (median; interquartile range 8·2–9·8), collecting 20,095 follow-up years and 99·9% of planned data. There were 313 primary events. High-dose PPI was superior to low-dose PPI (p=0·037, N=1265 (low dose), N=1270 (high dose), time ratio (TR)=1·27, 95%CI=1·01–1·58). Aspirin was not significantly better than no aspirin (p=0·068, N=1142 (no aspirin), N = 1138 (aspirin), TR=1·24, 95%CI=0·98–1·57). If patients using NSAIDs were censored at time of first use,aspirin was significantly better than no Aspirin (p=0·043, N=2,236, TR=1·29 95%CI=1·01– 1·66). Combining high-dose PPI with aspirin had the strongest effect compared with low dose PPI without aspirin (p=0·0068, TR=1·59, 95%CI=1·14–2·23). NNT for PPI and aspirin benefit is 34 and 43, respectively. Only 1·0% (28) of participants reported study-treatment related serious adverse events. Interpretation: High-dose PPI and aspirin chemoprevention therapy, especially in combination, significantly and safely improve outcome in BO patients

Consensus statements for management of Barrett's Dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi Process

Background & aimsEsophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) is increasingly common among patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). We aimed to provide consensus recommendations based on the medical literature that clinicians could use to manage patients with BE and low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia (HGD), or early-stage EA.MethodsWe performed an international, multidisciplinary, systematic, evidence-based review of different management strategies for patients with BE and dysplasia or early-stage EA. We used a Delphi process to develop consensus statements. The results of literature searches were screened using a unique, interactive, Web-based data-sifting platform; we used 11,904 papers to inform the choice of statements selected. An a priori threshold of 80% agreement was used to establish consensus for each statement.ResultsEighty-one of the 91 statements achieved consensus despite generally low quality of evidence, including 8 clinical statements: (1) specimens from endoscopic resection are better than biopsies for staging lesions, (2) it is important to carefully map the size of the dysplastic areas, (3) patients that receive ablative or surgical therapy require endoscopic follow-up, (4) high-resolution endoscopy is necessary for accurate diagnosis, (5) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surveillance, (6) endoscopic therapy for HGD is preferred to surgery, (7) the combination of endoscopic resection and radiofrequency ablation is the most effective therapy, and (8) after endoscopic removal of lesions from patients with HGD, all areas of BE should be ablated.ConclusionsWe developed a data-sifting platform and used the Delphi process to create evidence-based consensus statements for the management of patients with BE and early-stage EA. This approach identified important clinical features of the diseases and areas for future studies.Cathy Bennett... Rajvinder Singh... et al

Common variants at the MHC locus and at chromosome 16q24.1 predispose to Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is an increasingly common disease that is strongly associated with reflux of stomach acid and usually a hiatus hernia, and it strongly predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a tumor with a very poor prognosis. We report the first genome-wide association study on Barrett's esophagus, comprising 1,852 UK cases and 5,172 UK controls in the discovery stage and 5,986 cases and 12,825 controls in the replication stage. Variants at two loci were associated with disease risk: chromosome 6p21, rs9257809 (P combined = 4.09 × 10-9; odds ratio (OR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.13-1.28), within the major histocompatibility complex locus, and chromosome 16q24, rs9936833 (P combined = 2.74 × 10-10; OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10-1.19), for which the closest protein-coding gene is FOXF1, which is implicated in esophageal development and structure. We found evidence that many common variants of small effect contribute to genetic susceptibility to Barrett's esophagus and that SNP alleles predisposing to obesity also increase risk for Barrett's esophagus. © 2012 Nature America, Inc. All rights reserved

Common variants at the MHC locus and at chromosome 16q24.1 predispose to Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is an increasingly common disease that is strongly associated with reflux of stomach acid and usually a hiatus hernia, and it strongly predisposes to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), a tumor with a very poor prognosis. We report the first genome-wide association study on Barrett's esophagus, comprising 1,852 UK cases and 5,172 UK controls in the discovery stage and 5,986 cases and 12,825 controls in the replication stage. Variants at two loci were associated with disease risk: chromosome 6p21, rs9257809 (Pcombined = 4.09 × 10−9; odds ratio (OR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) =1.13–1.28), within the major histocompatibility complex locus, and chromosome 16q24, rs9936833 (Pcombined = 2.74 × 10−10; OR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.10–1.19), for which the closest protein-coding gene is FOXF1, which is implicated in esophageal development and structure. We found evidence that many common variants of small effect contribute to genetic susceptibility to Barrett's esophagus and that SNP alleles predisposing to obesity also increase risk for Barrett's esophagus