Measurement of brain atrophy in subcortical vascular disease: A comparison of different approaches and the impact of ischaemic lesions

Measurement of brain atrophy has been proposed as a surrogate marker in MS and degenerative dementias. Although cerebral small vessel disease predominantly affects white and subcortical grey matter, recent data suggest that whole brain atrophy is also a good indicator of clinical and cognitive status in this disease. Automated methods to measure atrophy are available that are accurate and reproducible in disease-free brains. However, optimal methods in small vessel disease have not been established and the impact of ischaemic lesions on different techniques has not been explored systematically. In this study, three contrasting techniques -- Statistical Parametric Mapping 5 (SPM5), SIENAX and BrainVisa -- were applied to measure cross-sectional atrophy (brain parenchymal fraction or BPF) in a large (n=143) two-centre cohort of patients with CADASIL, a genetic model of small vessel disease. All three techniques showed similar sensitivity to trends in BPF associated with age and lesion load. No single technique was particularly vulnerable to error as a result of lesions. Provided major errors in registration were excluded by visual inspection, manual correction of segmentations had a negligible impact with mean errors of 0.41% for SIENAX and 0.46% for BrainVisa. BPF correlated strongly with global cognitive function and physical disability, independent of the technique used. Correlation coefficients with the Minimental State Examination score were: BrainVisa 0.58, SIENAX 0.58, SPM5 0.60 (for all, p<0.001). These results suggest that all three methods can be applied reliably in patients with ischaemic lesions. Choice of analysis approach for this kind of clinical question will be determined by factors other than their robustness and precision, such as a desire to explore subtle localised changes using extensions of these processing tools

Hippocampal volume is an independent predictor of cognitive performance in CADASIL

Recent evidence suggests that hippocampal changes are present in vascular cognitive impairment but their importance and relationship with ischaemic mechanisms remain controversial. To investigate these issues we performed MRI and cognitive assessment in a large cohort (n = 144) of patients with CADASIL, a hereditary small vessel disease and model of pure vascular cognitive impairment. Dementia status was ascribed according to DSM-IV and global cognitive function assessed with the Minimental State Examination (MMSE) and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Hippocampalvolume (HV) correlated with age (r = −0.33, p < 0.001), brain volume (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) and lacunar lesion volume (r = −0.23, p = 0.008), but not white matter lesions or microhaemorrhages. HV was reduced in dementia (2272 ± 333 mm3 versus 2642 ± 349 mm3, p < 0.001) in the whole cohort and the subgroup progressing to dementia before age 60. HV correlated with MMSE (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), MDRS (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and in a multivariate model predicted cognition independent of typical vascular lesions and whole brain atrophy. These findings strengthen the view that hippocampal atrophy is an important pathway of cognitive impairment in vascular as well as degenerative disease

Hippocampal volume is an independent predictor of cognitive performance in CADASIL

Recent evidence suggests that hippocampal changes are present in vascular cognitive impairment but their importance and relationship with ischaemic mechanisms remain controversial. To investigate these issues we performed MRI and cognitive assessment in a large cohort (n = 144) of patients with CADASIL, a hereditary small vessel disease and model of pure vascular cognitive impairment. Dementia status was ascribed according to DSM-IV and global cognitive function assessed with the Minimental State Examination (MMSE) and Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (MDRS). Hippocampalvolume (HV) correlated with age (r = −0.33, p < 0.001), brain volume (r = 0.39, p < 0.001) and lacunar lesion volume (r = −0.23, p = 0.008), but not white matter lesions or microhaemorrhages. HV was reduced in dementia (2272 ± 333 mm3 versus 2642 ± 349 mm3, p < 0.001) in the whole cohort and the subgroup progressing to dementia before age 60. HV correlated with MMSE (r = 0.30, p < 0.001), MDRS (r = 0.40, p < 0.001) and in a multivariate model predicted cognition independent of typical vascular lesions and whole brain atrophy. These findings strengthen the view that hippocampal atrophy is an important pathway of cognitive impairment in vascular as well as degenerative disease

Impact of MRI markers in subcortical vascular dementia:a multi-modal analysis in CADASIL

CADASIL is an arteriopathy caused by mutations of the Notch3 gene. White matter hyperintensities (WMH), lacunar lesions (LL), cerebral microhemorrhages (CM), brain atrophy and tissue microstructural changes are detected on MRI. Using an integrated multi-modal approach, we examined the relative impact of lesion burden and location of these MRImarkers on cognitive impairment and disability. Multi-modal imaging was performed on 147 patients from a two-center cohort study. Volume of LL, WMH and number of CM was determined. Whole brain mean apparent diffusion coefficient (mean-ADC) and brain parenchymal fraction (BPF) were measured. In multivariate models accounting for lesion burden and location, volume of LL, mean-ADC, and BPF each had an independent influence on global cognitive function and disability. BPF explained the largest portion of the variation in cognitive and disability scores (35–38%). Brain atrophy has the strongest independent influence on clinical impairment in CADASIL when all MRImarkers in the disease are considered together. The results suggest that the clinical impact of cerebral tissue loss plays a principal role in this genetic model of subcortical ischemic vascular dementia

Concordance rate differences of 3 noninvasive imaging techniques to measure carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice: results of the CARMEDAS multicenter study.

International audienceBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To replace digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in carotid stenosis evaluation, noninvasive imaging techniques have to reach a high concordance rate. Our purpose is to compare the concordance rates of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) and CT angiography (CTA) with Doppler ultrasound (DUS) in clinical routine practice. METHODS: We evaluated prospectively with DUS, CEMRA, and CTA 150 patients suspected of carotid stenosis. The overall concordance rates of the 3 techniques were calculated for symptomatic stenosis > or =50% and > or =70%, for asymptomatic stenosis > or =60%, and for occlusion. For the carotid arteries treated by surgery (n=97), the results of each method and combined techniques were recorded, and misclassification rates were evaluated from surgical reports. RESULTS: The overall concordance rates of DUS-CEMRA, DUS-CTA, and CEMRA-CTA were not statistically different. However, the concordance rate of DUS-CEMRA (92.53%) was significantly higher than that for DUS-CTA (79.10%) in the surgical asymptomatic stenosis group (P=0.0258). CTA considered alone would misclassify the stenosis in a significant number of cases (11 of 64) in the surgical asymptomatic group compared with CEMRA (3 of 67) and DUS (1 of 66) (P=0.0186 versus MRA, P=0.0020 versus DUS). CONCLUSIONS: With the techniques as utilized in our study, the overall concordance rates of combined noninvasive methods are similar for measuring carotid stenosis in clinical routine practice, but in asymptomatic carotid stenosis, the decision making for surgery is significantly altered if DUS and CTA are considered in place of DUS and CEMRA

Targeting Prodromal Alzheimer Disease With Avagacestat: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ImportanceEarly identification of Alzheimer disease (AD) is important for clinical management and affords the opportunity to assess potential disease-modifying agents in clinical trials. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a randomized trial to prospectively enrich a study population with prodromal AD (PDAD) defined by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker criteria and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) symptoms.ObjectivesTo assess the safety of the γ-secretase inhibitor avagacestat in PDAD and to determine whether CSF biomarkers can identify this patient population prior to clinical diagnosis of dementia.Design, setting, and participantsA randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial with a parallel, untreated, nonrandomized observational cohort of CSF biomarker-negative participants was conducted May 26, 2009, to July 9, 2013, in a multicenter global population. Of 1358 outpatients screened, 263 met MCI and CSF biomarker criteria for randomization into the treatment phase. One hundred two observational cohort participants who met MCI criteria but were CSF biomarker-negative were observed during the same study period to evaluate biomarker assay sensitivity.InterventionsOral avagacestat or placebo daily.Main outcomes and measureSafety and tolerability of avagacestat.ResultsOf the 263 participants in the treatment phase, 132 were randomized to avagacestat and 131 to placebo; an additional 102 participants were observed in an untreated observational cohort. Avagacestat was relatively well tolerated with low discontinuation rates (19.6%) at a dose of 50 mg/d, whereas the dose of 125 mg/d had higher discontinuation rates (43%), primarily attributable to gastrointestinal tract adverse events. Increases in nonmelanoma skin cancer and nonprogressive, reversible renal tubule effects were observed with avagacestat. Serious adverse event rates were higher with avagacestat (49 participants [37.1%]) vs placebo (31 [23.7%]), attributable to the higher incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. At 2 years, progression to dementia was more frequent in the PDAD cohort (30.7%) vs the observational cohort (6.5%). Brain atrophy rate in PDAD participants was approximately double that of the observational cohort. Concordance between abnormal amyloid burden on positron emission tomography and pathologic CSF was approximately 87% (κ = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87). No significant treatment differences were observed in the avagacestat vs placebo arm in key clinical outcome measures.Conclusions and relevanceAvagacestat did not demonstrate efficacy and was associated with adverse dose-limiting effects. This PDAD population receiving avagacestat or placebo had higher rates of clinical progression to dementia and greater brain atrophy compared with CSF biomarker-negative participants. The CSF biomarkers and amyloid positron emission tomography imaging were correlated, suggesting that either modality could be used to confirm the presence of cerebral amyloidopathy and identify PDAD.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00890890