8 research outputs found

    Evaluating the functional results and complications of autograft vs allograft use for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a systematic review

    Get PDF
    The aim of our review is to identify the reconstruction technique that has a superior functional outcome and decreased number of complications for the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). We have divided our review into 2 sections. Our primary question evaluates the functional results and complications of autografts compared to allografts for ACL reconstruction. Our subsidiary question evaluates the functional results and complications of bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autografts compared to hamstring tendon autografts. We conducted a systematic review (SR) based on high quality evidence provided by Cochrane, PubMed and National Health Service evidence searches for papers comparing different ACL reconstruction techniques. Results from 2 primary studies, 1 SR and 1 meta-analysis showed no significant statistical difference when comparing clinical outcomes such as pain, range of motion, laxity, International Knee Documentation Committee score, single assessment numerical evaluation score, Tegner activity score and patient reported satisfaction with regards to autografts vs allografts. Allografts had worse outcomes for postoperative tibial tunnelling and graft failure. Results of 3 SRs showed statistically significant differences in incidence of anterior knee pain, kneeling pain and knee stability, which were all found to be greater amongst those who had received a BPTB autograft. Knee extension was significantly reduced in patients with BPTB grafts when compared to patients with Hamstring tendon autografts. However, with regards to return to prior levels of activity, there was no statistically significant difference between those that received BPTB autografts and those that received Hamstring tendon autografts. Autograft reconstruction of the ACL was shown to provide better postoperative outcomes when compared to allograft reconstruction, although the difference was not statistically significant. When researching different autograft options BPTB autografts were associated with greater pain but also greater stability of the knee joint postoperatively when compared to hamstring tendon autografts

    The impact of immediate breast reconstruction on the time to delivery of adjuvant therapy: the iBRA-2 study

    Get PDF
    Background: Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) is routinely offered to improve quality-of-life for women requiring mastectomy, but there are concerns that more complex surgery may delay adjuvant oncological treatments and compromise long-term outcomes. High-quality evidence is lacking. The iBRA-2 study aimed to investigate the impact of IBR on time to adjuvant therapy. Methods: Consecutive women undergoing mastectomy ± IBR for breast cancer July–December, 2016 were included. Patient demographics, operative, oncological and complication data were collected. Time from last definitive cancer surgery to first adjuvant treatment for patients undergoing mastectomy ± IBR were compared and risk factors associated with delays explored. Results: A total of 2540 patients were recruited from 76 centres; 1008 (39.7%) underwent IBR (implant-only [n = 675, 26.6%]; pedicled flaps [n = 105,4.1%] and free-flaps [n = 228, 8.9%]). Complications requiring re-admission or re-operation were significantly more common in patients undergoing IBR than those receiving mastectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was required by 1235 (48.6%) patients. No clinically significant differences were seen in time to adjuvant therapy between patient groups but major complications irrespective of surgery received were significantly associated with treatment delays. Conclusions: IBR does not result in clinically significant delays to adjuvant therapy, but post-operative complications are associated with treatment delays. Strategies to minimise complications, including careful patient selection, are required to improve outcomes for patients

    Does 'Prison Napalm' work? Measuring the cooling temperature of sugar solution burns in a porcine model

    No full text
    Non-accidental scalds sustained with sugar solution are potentially devastating and often associated with assaults within prisons where they are commonly known as 'Napalm' attacks. However, little is known about the mechanism behind such injuries. Proposed explanations have included a higher initial temperature, increased viscosity compared to water and lower emissivity, although these have yet to be demonstrated in any experimental model. We therefore set out to measure the post-exposure cooling temperature of the dermis after exposure to different concentrations of boiled sugar solution in a dead porcine model. Dead pork belly tissue was pre-heated to human body temperature (36.3-38.4 °C). Five solutions with different concentrations of sugar (0, 250, 500, 1000 and 2000 g/L) were heated to boiling point using standard commercially available kettles and then poured directly onto the tissue. Intradermal temperatures of the dermis were measured at one-minute intervals for a duration of 10 min. At one-minute after exposure, average intradermal porcine temperatures were 46.7 °C, 47.9 °C, 48.9 °C, 50.8 °C and 51.7 °C respectively for increasing concentrations of sugar solution. The rate of cooling was similar in all solutions with an average loss of 1.5 °C per minute. Using a generalised mixed model accounting for concentration and time period, it was identified that increasing sugar concentration resulted in statistically higher temperatures of burn (p = 0.006). Our report finds that higher concentrations of boiled sugar solution caused a higher initial temperature of burn but did not influence cooling rates. This suggests that 'Prison Napalm' attacks will indeed cause more severe burns than those utilising plain water, but not for all the widely believed reasons. We therefore recommend that access to kettles in prison cells should be limited, but where such access is deemed a right, consideration should be given to temperature restricted devices, as is the case in other countries
    corecore