Rates of carbonate cementation associated with sulphate reduction in DSDP/ODP sediments: implications for the formation of concretions

DSDP/ODP porewater profiles in organic carbon-bearing (<5% org. C) sediments commonly show decreases in Ca2+ concentrations and increases in alkalinity over depths where sulphate is being removed by microbial reduction. These Ca2+ depletion profiles represent the combined effect of diffusion, advection and reaction (addition by ion exchange and removal by precipitation mainly as CaCO3 and/or dolomite). A diagenetic model has been used to estimate the rate constant (k) for Ca2+ removal by precipitation during sulphate depletion over depths of 15-150 m, assuming first order kinetics. The rate constants for Ca2+ removal range from 10(-14) to 10(-11) s(-1) in 19 DSDP/ODP sediments, which span a range of bottom water temperatures (0-10 degreesC), lithologies (calcareous to clastic) and sedimentation rates (0.001-0.4 cm year(-1)). Values of k correlate with sedimentation rate (omega) such that log k=1.16 log omega-10.3, indicating that faster rates of Ca2+ removal occur at higher sedimentation rates where there are also higher degrees of saturation with respect to CaCO3 and dolomite. Depth-integrated masses of Ca2+ removed (<100 mumol cm(-2)) during sulphate depletion over these depth ranges are equivalent to a dispersed phase of approximately 1.5 wt.% CaCO3 or 3 wt.% dolomite in a compacted sediment. The complete occlusion of sediment porosity observed in concretions with isotopic signatures suggesting carbonate sourced from sulphate reduction therefore requires more time (a depositional hiatus), more rapid sulphate reduction (possibly by anaerobic methane oxidation) and/or the continued transport of isotopically light carbonate to the concretion site after sulphate reduction has ceased

Seasonal variability of water mass distribution in the southeastern Beaufort Sea determined by total alkalinity and delta O-18

ISI Document Delivery No.: 903QF Times Cited: 10 Cited Reference Count: 120 Cited References: AAGAARD K, 1981, DEEP-SEA RES, V28, P529, DOI 10.1016/0198-0149(81)90115-1 Alkire MB, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JC003446 ANDERSON LG, 1990, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V95, P1703, DOI 10.1029/JC095iC02p01703 Anderson LG, 2001, POLAR RES, V20, P225, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2001.tb00060.x Anderson LG, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V109, DOI [10.1029/2003JC002120, 10.1029/2003JC001773] [Anonymous], 2008, CLIM CHANG 2007 SYNT Arrigo KR, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2003GL018978 Arrigo KR, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL035028 Barber DG, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JC002027 Bates NR, 2009, BIOGEOSCIENCES, V6, P2433 Bauch D, 2005, GLOBAL PLANET CHANGE, V48, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2004.12.011 Benner R, 2004, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V31, DOI 10.1029/2003GL019251 Bidleman TF, 2007, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V41, P2688, DOI 10.1021/es062375b BYRNE RH, 1987, ANAL CHEM, V59, P1479, DOI 10.1021/ac00137a025 Cai WJ, 2010, SCIENCE, V329, P556, DOI 10.1126/science.1189338 CARMACK EC, 1989, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V94, P18043, DOI 10.1029/JC094iC12p18043 Carmack EC, 2004, MAR ECOL PROG SER, V277, P37, DOI 10.3354/meps277037 Carmack EC, 2002, ARCTIC, V55, P29 CLAYTON TD, 1993, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V40, P2115, DOI 10.1016/0967-0637(93)90048-8 Cooper LW, 1997, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V102, P12563, DOI 10.1029/97JC00015 Cooper LW, 2008, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V35, DOI 10.1029/2008GL035007 Cooper LW, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V110, DOI 10.1029/2005JG000031 Delille B, 2007, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V52, P1367, DOI 10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1367 Dickson A. G., 1994, ORNLCDIAC74 DEP EN DICKSON AG, 1990, J CHEM THERMODYN, V22, P113, DOI 10.1016/0021-9614(90)90074-Z DICKSON AG, 1987, DEEP-SEA RES, V34, P1733, DOI 10.1016/0198-0149(87)90021-5 Eicken H, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2000JC000583 Ekwurzel B, 2001, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V106, P9075, DOI 10.1029/1999JC000024 Else BGT, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2010JC006760 EPSTEIN S, 1953, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V4, P213, DOI 10.1016/0016-7037(53)90051-9 Fransson A, 2009, CONT SHELF RES, V29, P1317, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2009.03.008 Gibson JAE, 1999, MAR CHEM, V66, P187, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00040-7 Grasshoff K., 1983, METHODS SEAWATER ANA Gratton Y., 2006, 2006 GEN M CAN ARCT Guay CK, 1997, DEEP-SEA RES PT II, V44, P1543, DOI 10.1016/S0967-0645(97)00066-0 Guay CKH, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JC005099 Guo LD, 2007, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V34, DOI 10.1029/2007GL030689 Howell SEL, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL037681 Jeansson E, 2008, PROG OCEANOGR, V78, P12, DOI 10.1016/j.pocean.2007.08.031 JOHNSON KM, 1993, MAR CHEM, V44, P167, DOI 10.1016/0304-4203(93)90201-X JONES EP, 1981, J GEOPHYS RES-OC ATM, V86, P1041, DOI 10.1029/JC086iC11p11041 JONES EP, 1986, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V91, P759, DOI 10.1029/JC091iC09p10759 Jones EP, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2001JC001141 Jones EP, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JC004124 Jones EP, 1998, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V25, P765, DOI 10.1029/98GL00464 Karcher MJ, 2002, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V107, DOI 10.1029/2000JC000530 Karstensen J., 2005, Journal of Geophsical Research-Part C-Oceans, V110, DOI 10.1029/2004JC002510 Karstensen J., 2006, OMP OPTIMUM MULTIPAR Keeling RF, 2008, ATMOSPHERIC CO2 RECO KROUSE HR, 1971, CAN J EARTH SCI, V8, P1107 Leffanue H, 2004, J MARINE SYST, V48, P3, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.07.004 LEHMANN M, 1991, J GLACIOL, V37, P23 Lewis E., 1998, ORNLCDIAC105 US DEP Macdonald R. W., 2006, HDB ENV CHEM, P91 Macdonald RW, 2002, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V49, P1769, DOI 10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00097-3 Macdonald RW, 1999, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V26, P2223, DOI 10.1029/1999GL900508 MACDONALD RW, 1995, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V100, P895, DOI 10.1029/94JC02700 MACDONALD RW, 1989, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V94, P18057, DOI 10.1029/JC094iC12p18057 Macdonald RW, 1999, MAR CHEM, V65, P3, DOI 10.1016/S0304-4203(99)00007-9 MACDONALD RW, 1987, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V92, P2939, DOI 10.1029/JC092iC03p02939 MACKAS DL, 1987, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V92, P2907, DOI 10.1029/JC092iC03p02907 Mathis JT, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003899 McGuire AD, 2009, ECOL MONOGR, V79, P523, DOI 10.1890/08-2025.1 McLaughlin FA, 2004, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V51, P107, DOI 10.1016/j.dsr.2003.09.010 McLaughlin FA, 1996, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V101, P1183, DOI 10.1029/95JC02634 MEHRBACH C, 1973, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V18, P897 MELLING H, 1993, CONT SHELF RES, V13, P1123, DOI 10.1016/0278-4343(93)90045-Y MELLING H, 1995, CONT SHELF RES, V15, P89, DOI 10.1016/0278-4343(94)P1814-R Miller LA, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2009JC006058 MILLERO FJ, 1993, MAR CHEM, V44, P143, DOI 10.1016/0304-4203(93)90199-X Millot R, 2003, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V67, P1305, DOI 10.1016/S0016-7037(02)01207-3 Mucci A, 2010, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V115, DOI 10.1029/2009JC005330 Mundy CJ, 2009, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V36, DOI 10.1029/2009GL038837 Newton R, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JC004111 Nilsen F, 2008, CONT SHELF RES, V28, P1838, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2008.04.015 Nomura D, 2006, TELLUS B, V58, P418, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2006.00204.x OSTLUND HG, 1984, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V89, P6373, DOI 10.1029/JC089iC04p06373 Overpeck J., 2005, EOS, V86, P312, DOI DOI 10.1029/2005EO340001 Overpeck JT, 2005, EOS, V86, P309, DOI [10.1029/2005EO340001, DOI 10.1029/2005E0340001, DOI 10.1029/2005EO340001] Papadimitriou S, 2004, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V68, P1749, DOI 10.1016/j.gca.2003.07.004 Pickart RS, 2004, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V109, DOI 10.1029/2003JC001912 Pickart RS, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JC005009 Pipko II, 2002, PROG OCEANOGR, V55, P77, DOI 10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00071-X Retamal L, 2008, POLAR BIOL, V31, P363, DOI 10.1007/s00300-007-0365-0 ROBERTBALDO GL, 1985, ANAL CHEM, V57, P2564, DOI 10.1021/ac00290a030 Rudels B, 1996, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V101, P8807, DOI 10.1029/96JC00143 Rudels B, 2004, POLAR RES, V23, P181, DOI 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2004.tb00007.x Rysgaard S, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003572 Schlitzer R., 2009, OCEAN DATA VIEW Schlosser P, 2002, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V29, DOI 10.1029/2001GL013135 Semiletov IP, 2007, J MARINE SYST, V66, P204, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2006.05.012 Serreze MC, 2006, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V111, DOI 10.1029/2005JC003424 Serreze MC, 2007, SCIENCE, V315, P1533, DOI 10.1126/science.1139426 Shadwick E. H., 2009, BIOGEOSCI DISCUSS, V6, P971, DOI [10.5194/bgd-6-971-2009, DOI 10.5194/BGD-6-971-2009] Shadwick EH, 2011, LIMNOL OCEANOGR, V56, P303, DOI 10.4319/lo.2011.56.1.0303 Shadwick EH, 2011, CONT SHELF RES, V31, P806, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2011.01.014 Shaw WJ, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JC004991 Shcherbina AY, 2003, SCIENCE, V302, P1952, DOI 10.1126/science.1088692 Sherr BF, 2003, DEEP-SEA RES PT I, V50, P529, DOI 10.1016/S0967-0637(03)00030-X Shimada K, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2005GL025624 Skogseth R, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JC004452 Spall MA, 2008, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V38, P1644, DOI 10.1175/2007JPO3829.1 Stroeve JC, 2005, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V32, DOI 10.1029/2004GL021810 Symon C., 2005, ARCTIC CLIMATE IMPAC Taylor JR, 2003, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V108, DOI 10.1029/2002JC001635 Telang S. A., 1991, BIOGEOCHEMISTRY MAJO, P75 Thomas H, 2011, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V116, DOI 10.1029/2011JC007120 Timmermans ML, 2008, J PHYS OCEANOGR, V38, P133, DOI 10.1175/2007JPO3782.1 TOMCZAK M, 1989, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V94, P16141, DOI 10.1029/JC094iC11p16141 Tremblay JE, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2007JC004547 Vallieres C, 2008, J MARINE SYST, V74, P756, DOI 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2007.12.002 White D, 2007, J GEOPHYS RES-BIOGEO, V112, DOI 10.1029/2006JG000353 Williams WJ, 2006, CONT SHELF RES, V26, P2352, DOI 10.1016/j.csr.2006.06.012 Williams WJ, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003591 Williams WJ, 2008, J MAR RES, V66, P645 Woodgate RA, 2006, GEOPHYS RES LETT, V33, DOI 10.1029/2006GL026931 Yamamoto-Kawai M, 2008, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V113, DOI 10.1029/2006JC003858 Yamamoto-Kawai M, 2009, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V114, DOI 10.1029/2008JC005000 Yamamoto-Kawai M, 2005, J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANS, V110, DOI 10.1029/2004JC002793 Yi Y, 2010, J HYDROL, V383, P223, DOI 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.12.038 Lansard, Bruno Mucci, Alfonso Miller, Lisa A. Macdonald, Robie W. Gratton, Yves Macdonald, Robie/A-7896-2012 Macdonald, Robie/0000-0002-1141-8520 CCGS Amundsen; CASES (Canadian Arctic Shelf Exchange Study) NSERC network (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada); Canadian Fund for Innovation; Canadian Coast Guard; Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada; NSERC Discovery We thank the officers and crew of the CCGS Amundsen for their support and dedication to the CASES expedition. We are indebted to Constance Guignard, Nes Sutherland, Pascale Collin, Simon Belanger, Jens Ehn, Mike Arychuk and Owen Owens for their care and perseverance in collecting and analyzing the TA, TIC and pH samples at sea. Thanks must go to the CTD data acquisition group for these basic but critical measurements and the calibration of the various probes. Most of the plots and maps in this study were created with the ODV Software [Schlitzer, 2009]. We also thank A. Proshutinsky and two anonymous reviewers who provided constructive comments that helped to improve our manuscript. This study was funded through the CASES (Canadian Arctic Shelf Exchange Study) NSERC network (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) and a Canadian Fund for Innovation grant to support the upgrade and operation of the CCGS Amundsen. Additional financial contributions were provided by the Canadian Coast Guard, the Strategic Science Fund of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and NSERC Discovery grants to A. Mucci and Y. Gratton. 10 AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION WASHINGTON J GEOPHYS RES-OCEANSWe examined the seasonal variability of water mass distributions in the southeastern Beaufort Sea from data collected between September 2003 and August 2004. Salinity, total alkalinity (TA) and isotopic composition (delta O-18) of seawater were used together as tracers of freshwater input, i.e., meteoric water and sea ice meltwater. We used an optimum multiparameter analysis to identify the different water masses, including the Mackenzie River, sea ice melt (SIM), winter polar mixed layer (PML), upper halocline water (UHW) with core salinity of 33.1 psu (Pacific origin) and Atlantic Water. Computed values of CO2 fugacity in seawater (fCO(2)-sw) show that the surface mixed layer (SML) remains mostly undersaturated (328 +/- 55 mu atm, n = 552) with respect to the average atmospheric CO2 concentration (380 +/- 5 mu atm) over the study period. The influence of the Mackenzie River (fCO(2-SW) > 500 mu atm) was relatively small in the southeastern Beaufort Sea, and significant fractions were only observed on the inner Mackenzie Shelf. The contribution of sea ice melt (fCO(2-SW) 600 mu atm) was usually located between 120 and 180 m depth, but could contribute to the SML during wind-driven upwelling events, in summer and autumn, and during brine-driven eddies, in winter

Metabolomic Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: Prediction, Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis, and Recurrence

Metabolite profiling is being increasing employed in the study of prostate cancer as a means of identifying predictive, diagnostic, and prognostic biomarkers. This review provides a summary and critique of the current literature. Thirty-three human case-control studies of prostate cancer exploring disease prediction, diagnosis, progression, or treatment response were identified. All but one demonstrated the ability of metabolite profiling to distinguish cancer from benign, tumor aggressiveness, cases who recurred, and those who responded well to therapy. In the subset of studies where biomarker discriminatory ability was quantified, high AUCs were reported that would potentially outperform the current gold standards in diagnosis, prognosis, and disease recurrence, including PSA testing. There were substantial similarities between the metabolites and the associated pathways reported as significant by independent studies, and important roles for abnormal cell growth, intensive cell proliferation, and dysregulation of lipid metabolism were highlighted. The weight of the evidence therefore suggests metabolic alterations specific to prostate carcinogenesis and progression that may represent potential metabolic biomarkers. However, replication and validation of the most promising biomarkers is currently lacking and a number of outstanding methodologic issues remain to be addressed to maximize the utility of metabolomics in the study of prostate cancer.National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant P01 CA055075)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA133891)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA141298)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant CA136578)National Institutes of Health (U.S.) (Grant UM1 CA167552

prebiotics offered to broiler chicken exert positive effect on meat quality traits irrespective of delivery route

Elimination of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry production has encouraged intensive search for relevant alternatives. Prebiotics are proposed as efficient replacements to stimulate colonization/expansion of beneficial microflora in chickens. The aim of this study was to deepen the knowledge on the effect of prebiotic administration on slaughter performance and meat quality traits of broiler chickens by evaluating different routes of their delivery (in ovo vs. in-water vs. in ovo + in-water). At d 12 of incubation, 1,500 eggs (Ross 308) containing viable embryos were randomly allotted into 4 groups and injected in ovo with 0.2 mL solution containing: 3.5 mg/embryo BI (Bi²tos, trans-galactooligosaccharides); 0.88 mg/embryo DN (DiNovo, extract of Laminaria spp.); 1.9 mg/embryo RFO (raffinose family oligosaccharides) and 0.2 mL physiological saline (C). All prebiotics increased final BW compared to C group (P < 0.01), irrespective of delivery route. The prebiotics injected in ovo (T1) or in ovo combined with in-water supplementation (T2) increased carcass weight as compared with in-water group (T3), while T3 had the lowest carcass yield compared to the other groups. All prebiotics increased breast muscle weight and yield (P < 0.01), as well as fiber diameter (P < 0.05). Ultimate meat pH was lower (P < 0.01) in T3 than in T2 group. Meat from chickens treated with prebiotics showed a lower redness index, while lightness and yellowness were not affected by the treatments. Saturated fatty acid (SFA), polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) and n-3 fatty acids contents were higher (P < 0.01), and monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) level was lower (P < 0.01) in prebiotic groups compared with C group. Nutritional indexes (n-6/n-3, PUFA/SFA ratio and thrombogenic index) displayed favorable human health-promoting values in the meat of chickens which were treated with prebiotics, irrespective of delivery route. Muscle cholesterol content was not affected by prebiotics. In conclusion, this study has shown that prebiotics can exert positive effects on growth of broiler chickens, carcass and meat quality traits, irrespective of delivery route

NEW SECONDARY METABOLITES IN THE AMPHINOMID FIREWORM HERMODICE CARUNCULATA

Eight betaine-derived novel compounds were found in extracts of the Mediterranean stinging fireworm Hermodice carunculata. The identification of their structures relies on 1D and 2D NMR (Fig. 1-3) and HPLC-ESI/HRMS spectra. Two types of terminal ammonium portions A and B and a series of different alkyl chains were identified (Fig. 4a,b). Their matching provides the structures of uncharacterized secondary metabolites, named carunculines, and their related isomers. These molecules differ from already known trimethylammonium inflammatory compounds (i.e. complanines) isolated from another amphinomid species, for the structures of the terminal ammonium groups (Fig. 4c) [1]. Carunculine anatomical distribution within H. carunculata was assessed by screening through HPLC-ESI/HRMS (Fig. 5, Table 1): their occurrence was revealed in all the body parts analyzed, both involved in predator-prey interactions [2], and mainly in the digestive apparatus. The results achieved reveal an array of different novel compounds from a chemically unknown species, improving knowledge on Marine Animal Products with chemical and biological potential for bioprospection [3]. Overall, these data reinforce the necessity of studying poorly-investigated taxa to expand knowledge on animal venom biology, their mechanisms of action and exploitation as promising source of drug molecule

effect of in ovo administration of different synbiotics on carcass and meat quality traits in broiler chickens

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to examine the effect of in ovo synbiotic administration on slaughter performance and meat quality traits of broiler chickens. On day 12 of incubation, 5,850 eggs (Cobb 500 FF) were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups and automatically injected in ovo with physiological saline (control, C) and 2 different synbiotic formulations (SYN1: Lactobacillus salivarius + galactooligosaccharides; SYN2: Lactobacillus plantarum + raffinose family oligosaccharides). After hatching, 240 males were randomly chosen (80 chicks per group) and split into 8 replicate pens (10 birds per pen). At 42 d of age, 15 birds per treatment were weighed and slaughtered. In ovo synbiotic administration had a low effect on investigated traits, but depends on the kind of synbiotic administered. Both synbiotic formulations did not affect final BW, weight, and yield of carcass and pectoral muscle (PM); likewise, physicochemical properties (pH, color, water holding capacity), intramuscular collagen properties, and cholesterol content of PM were not affected by treatment. Synbiotic administration reduced (P = 0.061) the lipid content compared with C group, markedly (

Molecular characterization of human gastric mucosa by HR-MAS Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

The present study was aimed at identifying themolecular profile characteristic of the healthy humangastric mucosa.Ex vivo HR-MAS magnetic resonance spectroscopy performed at 9.4 Tesla (400.13 MHz for 1H) on gastric specimens collected during endoscopy, permits the identification of more than forty species giving a detailed picture of the biochemical pattern of the gastric tissues. These preliminary data will be used for a comparison with gastric preneoplastic and neoplastic situations. Moreover, the full knowledge of the biochemical pattern of the healthy gastrictissues is the necessary presupposition for the application of magnetic resonance spectroscopy directly in vivo

Urban noise and psychological distress: A systematic review

Chronic exposure to urban noise is harmful for auditory perception, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal and nervous systems, while also causing psychological annoyance. Around 25% of the EU population experience a deterioration in the quality of life due to annoyance and about 5&ndash;15% suffer from sleep disorders, with many disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) lost annually. This systematic review highlights the main sources of urban noise, the relevant principal clinical disorders and the most effected countries. This review included articles published on the major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus), using a combination of some keywords. The online search yielded 265 references; after selection, the authors have analyzed 54 articles (5 reviews and 49 original articles). From the analysis, among the sources of exposure, we found the majority of items dealing with airports and wind turbines, followed by roads and trains; the main disorders that were investigated in different populations dealt with annoyance and sleep disorders, sometimes associated with cardiovascular symptoms. Regarding countries, studies were published from all over the world with a slight prevalence from Western Europe. Considering these fundamental health consequences, research needs to be extended in such a way as to include new sources of noise and new technologies, to ensure a health promotion system and to reduce the risk of residents being exposed

Allergic anaphylactic risk in farming activities: A systematic review

Allergic disorders in the agriculture sector are very common among farm workers, causing many injuries and occupational diseases every year. Agricultural employees are exposed to multiple conditions and various allergenic substances, which could be related to onset of anaphylactic reactions. This systematic review highlights the main clinical manifestation, the allergens that are mostly involved and the main activities that are usually involved. This research includes articles published on the major databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus), using a combination of keywords. The online search yielded 489 references; after selection, by the authors, 36 articles (nine reviews and 27 original articles) were analyzed. From this analysis, the main clinical problems that were diagnosed in this category were respiratory (ranging from rhinitis to asthma) and dermatological (eczema, dermatitis, hives) in nature, with a wide symptomatology (from a simple local reaction to anaphylaxis). The main activities associated with these allergic conditions are harvesting or cultivation of fruit and cereals, beekeepers and people working in greenhouses. Finally, in addition to the allergens already known, new ones have emerged, including triticale, wine, spider and biological dust. For these reasons, in the agricultural sector, research needs to be amplified, considering new sectors, new technologies and new products, and ensuring a system of prevention to reduce this risk.peer-reviewe