Applying precision methods to treatment selection for moderate/severe depression in person-centered experiential therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy

Objective: To develop two prediction algorithms recommending person-centered experiential therapy (PCET) or cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) for patients with depression: (1) a full data model using multiple trial-based and routine variables, and (2) a routine data model using only variables available in the English NHS Talking Therapies program. Method: Data was used from the PRaCTICED trial comparing PCET vs. CBT for 255 patients meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression. Separate full and routine data models were derived and the latter tested in an external data sample. Results: The full data model provided the better prediction, yielding a significant difference in outcome between patients receiving their optimal vs. non-optimal treatment at 6- (Cohen’s d =.65 [.40,.91]) and 12 months (d =.85 [.59, 1.10]) post-randomization. The routine data model performed similarly in the training and test samples with non-significant effect sizes, d =.19 [−.05,.44] and d =.21 [−.00,.43], respectively. For patients with the strongest treatment matching (d ≥ 0.3), the resulting effect size was significant, d =.38 [.11, 64]. Conclusion: A treatment selection algorithm might be used to recommend PCET or CBT. Although the overall effects were small, targeted matching yielded somewhat larger effects

Surgical treatment of recidivist lymphedema

Lymphedema is a chronic disease with a progressively ingravescent evolvement and an appearance of recurrent complications of acute lymphangitic type; in nature it is mostly erysipeloid and responsible for a further rapid increase in the volume and consistency of edema. The purpose of this work is to present our experience in the minimally invasive treatment for recurrence of lymphedema; adapting techniques performed in the past which included large fasciotomy with devastating results cosmetically; but these techniques have been proposed again by the use of endoscopic equipment borrowed from the advanced laparoscopy surgery, which allows a monoskin access of about one cm

Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 2012

La osteoporosis es una patología en constante crecimiento y que afecta a más de 200 millones de personas a nivel mundial. Las recomendaciones presentes son guías para el diagnóstico, la prevención y tratamiento pero no normas para las decisiones clínicas en pacientes individuales. El médico debe adaptarlas a situaciones y pacientes deferentes, incorporando factores personales que trascienden los límites de estas guías y hacen al saber y al arte del médico. Como todo conocimiento médico científico deben ser revisadas y actualizadas periódicamente a medida que se adquieran nuevas, mejores y más efectivas herramientas diagnósticas y terapéuticas.Osteoporosis is a constantly growing disease which affects over 200 million people worldwide. The present recommendations are guidelines for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment, but they do not constitute standards for clinical decisions in individual patients. The physician must adapt them to individual patients and special situations, incorporating personal factors that transcend the limits of these guidelines and are dependent on the knowledge and art of the physician. These guidelines should be reviewed and updated periodically as new, better and more effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools become available.Fil: Schurman, Leon. Grupo de Investigación en Osteopatías y Metabolismo Mineral; ArgentinaFil: Bagur, Alicia. Centro de Osteopatías Médicas; ArgentinaFil: Claus Hermberg, Heraldo. Hospital Alemán; ArgentinaFil: Messina, Osvaldo D.. Ministerio de Defensa. Ejercito Argentino. Hospital Militar Central Cirujano Mayor "Cosme Argerich"; ArgentinaFil: Negri, Armando L.. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaFil: Sánchez, Ariel. Centro de Endocrinología; ArgentinaFil: González, Claudio. Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas; ArgentinaFil: Diehl, María. Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Rey, Paula. Universidad del Salvador; ArgentinaFil: Gamba, Julieta. Ministerio de Defensa. Ejercito Argentino. Hospital Militar Central Cirujano Mayor "Cosme Argerich"; ArgentinaFil: Chiarpenello, Javier. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Moggia, María Susana. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Hospital de Clínicas General San Martín; ArgentinaFil: Mastaglia, Silvina Rosana. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Inmunología, Genética y Metabolismo; Argentin

PLAN DE ACCIÓN PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN DEL AGUARÁ GUAZÚ EN SANTA FE VERSIÓN 01 PERÍODO 2009 – 2014

El presente plan fue realizado usando de base los capítulos 1, 2, 3 y 4 del trabajo: Estado  de  conocimiento  y  conservación  del  aguará  guazú  (Chrysocyon  brachyurus)  en  la  provincia  de Santa Fe, Argentina. . Se tomó como base orientaciones generales de Margoluis y Salafsky (1998) y en la estructura general se siguió de modelo práctico a Jiménez Pérez (2006). Para asignar la prioridad se utilizaron las categorías desarrolladas por el Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis (Baz Hughes, et al. 2006), estas son: Esencial: una actividad específica cuyo cumplimiento es necesario para evitar una declinación de las poblaciones que pueda llevar a la extinción de la especie en la naturaleza y/o en cautiverio. Alta: una actividad específica cuyo cumplimiento es necesario para evitar una declinación poblacional de más del 20% de una población en 20 años o menos. Media: una actividad específica cuyo cumplimiento es necesario para evitar una declinación poblacional de hasta el 20% de una población en 20 años o menos. Baja: una actividad específica cuyo cumplimiento es necesario para prevenir declinaciones poblacionales  locales o que se estima que dicha acción apenas tiene un pequeño impacto sobre las poblaciones en un área grande. Se trata de una planificación para cinco años pues la experiencia indica que a Santa Fe le falta mucho  trabajo  y experiencia para  fortalecer  su  forma de  ver  y de actuar en  la  recuperación de  las especies amenazadas.  Por ejemplo muchas de  las amenazas  indirectas (generadoras de amenazas directas) que afectan a esta especie son producto de  la  falta de coordinación, compromiso, metas y objetivos comunes entre  los profesionales de  la conservación, sea sociedad civil u organismos estatales. Es así como se pretende en un corto plazo y monitoreando constantemente, las acciones y sus resultados, lograr un plan a futuro de mediano y largo plazo.Fil: Biassati, R. Secreataría de Medio Ambiente de Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Larriera, Alejandro. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente de Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Mosso, E.. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente de Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Rozztti, J.C.. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente de Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Moggia, L.. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Santa Fe; ArgentinaFil: Pautasso, A.. Museo de Cs Naturales Florentino Ameghino; ArgentinaFil: Nebozuk, M. A.. Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales Ángel Gallardo; ArgentinaFil: Walker, C.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Ramirez, C.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Mirol, P.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; ArgentinaFil: Raimondi, Vanina Belén. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales "Bernardino Rivadavia"; ArgentinaFil: Beldomenico, Pablo Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - CONICET - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades; ArgentinaFil: Eberhardt, María Ayelen Teresita. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - CONICET - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades; ArgentinaFil: Manzzoli, D.. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico - CONICET - Santa Fe. Instituto de Ciencias Veterinarias del Litoral; Argentina. Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades; ArgentinaFil: Correa, A.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Terragona, E.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Magni, C.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Alvarado, S.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; ArgentinaFil: Barengo, E.. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias; Argentin

Global overview of the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic (CHOLECOVID study)

Background: This study provides a global overview of the management of patients with acute cholecystitis during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: CHOLECOVID is an international, multicentre, observational comparative study of patients admitted to hospital with acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on management were collected for a 2-month study interval coincident with the WHO declaration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and compared with an equivalent pre-pandemic time interval. Mediation analysis examined the influence of SARS-COV-2 infection on 30-day mortality. Results: This study collected data on 9783 patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to 247 hospitals across the world. The pandemic was associated with reduced availability of surgical workforce and operating facilities globally, a significant shift to worse severity of disease, and increased use of conservative management. There was a reduction (both absolute and proportionate) in the number of patients undergoing cholecystectomy from 3095 patients (56.2 per cent) pre-pandemic to 1998 patients (46.2 per cent) during the pandemic but there was no difference in 30-day all-cause mortality after cholecystectomy comparing the pre-pandemic interval with the pandemic (13 patients (0.4 per cent) pre-pandemic to 13 patients (0.6 per cent) pandemic; P = 0.355). In mediation analysis, an admission with acute cholecystitis during the pandemic was associated with a non-significant increased risk of death (OR 1.29, 95 per cent c.i. 0.93 to 1.79, P = 0.121). Conclusion: CHOLECOVID provides a unique overview of the treatment of patients with cholecystitis across the globe during the first months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The study highlights the need for system resilience in retention of elective surgical activity. Cholecystectomy was associated with a low risk of mortality and deferral of treatment results in an increase in avoidable morbidity that represents the non-COVID cost of this pandemic

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery. METHODS: This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin. RESULTS: Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes. CONCLUSION: One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease

A922 Sequential measurement of 1 hour creatinine clearance (1-CRCL) in critically ill patients at risk of acute kidney injury (AKI)

Meeting abstrac

Implementing precision methods in personalizing psychological therapies: barriers and possible ways forward

This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordData availability: No data was used for the research described in the article.Highlights: • Personalizing psychological treatments means to customize treatment for individuals to enhance outcomes. • The application of precision methods to clinical psychology has led to data-driven psychological therapies. • Applying data-informed psychological therapies involves clinical, technical, statistical, and contextual aspects

Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis

Background Appendicitis is the most common general surgical emergency worldwide, but its diagnosis remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine whether existing risk prediction models can reliably identify patients presenting to hospital in the UK with acute right iliac fossa (RIF) pain who are at low risk of appendicitis. Methods A systematic search was completed to identify all existing appendicitis risk prediction models. Models were validated using UK data from an international prospective cohort study that captured consecutive patients aged 16–45 years presenting to hospital with acute RIF in March to June 2017. The main outcome was best achievable model specificity (proportion of patients who did not have appendicitis correctly classified as low risk) whilst maintaining a failure rate below 5 per cent (proportion of patients identified as low risk who actually had appendicitis). Results Some 5345 patients across 154 UK hospitals were identified, of which two‐thirds (3613 of 5345, 67·6 per cent) were women. Women were more than twice as likely to undergo surgery with removal of a histologically normal appendix (272 of 964, 28·2 per cent) than men (120 of 993, 12·1 per cent) (relative risk 2·33, 95 per cent c.i. 1·92 to 2·84; P < 0·001). Of 15 validated risk prediction models, the Adult Appendicitis Score performed best (cut‐off score 8 or less, specificity 63·1 per cent, failure rate 3·7 per cent). The Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score performed best for men (cut‐off score 2 or less, specificity 24·7 per cent, failure rate 2·4 per cent). Conclusion Women in the UK had a disproportionate risk of admission without surgical intervention and had high rates of normal appendicectomy. Risk prediction models to support shared decision‐making by identifying adults in the UK at low risk of appendicitis were identified