24 research outputs found

    Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers

    Get PDF
    Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years1,2. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period3. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe4, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants

    Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers

    Get PDF
    Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants.Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society. This project has received funding by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements no. 803147-RESOLUTION (to S.T.), no. 771234-PALEoRIDER (to W.H.), no. 864358 (to K.M.), no. 724703 and no. 101019659 (to K.H.). K.H. is also supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG FOR 2237). E.A. has received funding from the Van de Kamp fonds. PACEA co-authors of this research benefited from the scientific framework of the University of Bordeaux’s IdEx Investments for the Future programme/GPR Human Past. A.G.-O. is supported by a Ramón y Cajal fellowship (RYC-2017-22558). L. Sineo, M.L. and D.C. have received funding from the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) PRIN 2017 grants 20177PJ9XF and 20174BTC4R_002. H. Rougier received support from the College of Social and Behavioral Sciences of CSUN and the CSUN Competition for RSCA Awards. C.L.S. and T. Saupe received support from the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund (project no. 2014-2020.4.01.16-0030) and C.L.S. received support from the Estonian Research Council grant PUT (PRG243). S. Shnaider received support from the Russian Science Foundation (no. 19-78-10053).Peer reviewe

    Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers

    Get PDF
    : Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years1,2. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period3. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe4, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants

    Palaeogenomics of Upper Palaeolithic to Neolithic European hunter-gatherers

    Get PDF
    Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).Modern humans have populated Europe for more than 45,000 years1,2. Our knowledge of the genetic relatedness and structure of ancient hunter-gatherers is however limited, owing to the scarceness and poor molecular preservation of human remains from that period3. Here we analyse 356 ancient hunter-gatherer genomes, including new genomic data for 116 individuals from 14 countries in western and central Eurasia, spanning between 35,000 and 5,000 years ago. We identify a genetic ancestry profile in individuals associated with Upper Palaeolithic Gravettian assemblages from western Europe that is distinct from contemporaneous groups related to this archaeological culture in central and southern Europe4, but resembles that of preceding individuals associated with the Aurignacian culture. This ancestry profile survived during the Last Glacial Maximum (25,000 to 19,000 years ago) in human populations from southwestern Europe associated with the Solutrean culture, and with the following Magdalenian culture that re-expanded northeastward after the Last Glacial Maximum. Conversely, we reveal a genetic turnover in southern Europe suggesting a local replacement of human groups around the time of the Last Glacial Maximum, accompanied by a north-to-south dispersal of populations associated with the Epigravettian culture. From at least 14,000 years ago, an ancestry related to this culture spread from the south across the rest of Europe, largely replacing the Magdalenian-associated gene pool. After a period of limited admixture that spanned the beginning of the Mesolithic, we find genetic interactions between western and eastern European hunter-gatherers, who were also characterized by marked differences in phenotypically relevant variants.Peer reviewe

    Star‐Shaped Ruthenium Complexes as Prototypes of Molecular Gears

    No full text
    International audienceThe design and synthesis of two families of molecular gears prototypes is reported, with the aim of assembling them into trains of gears on surface and ultimately achieving controlled intermolecular gearing motion. These piano-stool ruthenium complexes incorporate a hydrotris(indazolyl)borate moiety as tripodal rotation axle and a pentaarylcyclopentadienyl ligand as star-shaped cogwheel, equipped with five teeth ranging from pseudo 1-dimensional aryl groups to large planar 2-dimensional paddles. A divergent synthetic approach was followed, starting from a penta(p-bromophenyl)cyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) complex as key precursor or from its iodinated counterpart, first obtained by copper-catalyzed aromatic Br/I exchange. Subsequent five-fold cross-coupling reactions with various partners allowed high structural diversity to be reached, yielding molecular gears prototypes displaying aryl-, carbazole-, BODIPY-and porphyrin-derived teeth of increasing size and length

    Nouvelles données paléontologiques de la grotte de La Marche (PléistocÚne supérieur, Lussac-les-Chùteaux, Vienne)

    No full text
    International audienceLa grotte de La Marche dĂ©couverte en 1937 par L. PĂ©ricard a fait l’objet de plusieurs campagnes de fouilles, initiĂ©es d’abord par L. PĂ©ricard lui-mĂȘme, associĂ© Ă  S. Lwoff vers la fin des annĂ©es 1930, et conduites ensuite par L. Pradel dans les annĂ©es 1960 et J. Airvaux entre 1988 et 1993. L’unique niveau du MagdalĂ©nien moyen (datĂ© radiomĂ©triquement 14280 ± 160 ans B.P.) a livrĂ© un ensemble exceptionnel de plaquettes gravĂ©es Ă  reprĂ©sentation humaine et Ă  figuration animaliĂšre, mais aussi un assemblage diversifiĂ© de vertĂ©brĂ©s comprenant des dents humaines. Notre Ă©tude a Ă©tĂ© menĂ©e sur les rĂ©sidus de tamis de 400 kg de matĂ©riel inĂ©dit issu des campagnes de fouilles et conservĂ© au musĂ©e Sainte-Croix de Poitiers, qui ont Ă©tĂ© triĂ©s et identifiĂ©s au sein de l’iPHEP. Les donnĂ©es obtenues sont concordantes avec la liste faunique Ă©tablie par Pradel en 1960 et Airvaux et al. en 1999, mais permettent de mettre en Ă©vidence Ă  partir de restes dentaires l’occurrence de nouveaux taxons de mammifĂšres tels que les carnivores Panthera,Felis et Crocuta, les genres Sus et Castor et Ă©galement des Phocidae identifiĂ©s par deux dents jugales. Outre cette faune, nous avons identifiĂ© quelques plaques de carapace de chĂ©loniens dulçaquicoles (Emys), associĂ©es Ă  des restes d’élĂ©ments mobiliers (tels que des perles de parure, des silex, des boules d’ocre et du charbon) et de matĂ©riel humain comprenant quelques dents dĂ©finitives et dĂ©ciduales, des phalanges, un fragment fĂ©moral et un fragment de maxillaire

    GnpIS-Asso : A Generic Database for Managing and Exploiting Plant Genetic Association Studies Results Using High Throughput Genotyping and Phenotyping Data

    No full text
    We will present a new functionality developed in GnpIS information system to manage association studies data (GWAS). A query form is available on http://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/gnpis portal and directly at this URL https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/association/association/viewer.do#form. The tool allows plant scientists or breeders to get associations values between traits and markers obtained in several association studies. Several filters are available to refine the query, such as the species, trait (s), or marker (s) or panel of germplasms. The tool gives also the possibility in a second round of analysis, to add a new set of filters, i) on statistical values, or ii) on treatment done in the study, or iii) on the location and iv) year of the phenotyping trial or according to the v) statistical model chosen to do the analysis. It allows to view graphically the results with dedicated plots (QQPlot, Manhattan Plot), generated dynamically and to extract data in files to continue the analysis with external tools. After selecting the best markersassociated to trait of interest, the tool allows also to automatically jump on the genome to find where this marker is located on chromosomes and to identify in a very simpler way which genes or other markers or features of interest are near it. This tool is already now used for dealing GWAS studies (association, genotyping and phenotyping data) for 2 species: tomato and maize, data that are already referenced in two 2 publications and will also manage wheat data in 2015

    Association of ventilator type with hospital mortality in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV2 infection:a prospective study

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between ventilator type and hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 infection), a single-center prospective observational study in France. RESULTS: We prospectively included consecutive adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital for ARDS related to proven COVID-19, between March 2020 and July 2021. All patients were intubated. We compared two patient groups defined by whether an ICU ventilator or a less sophisticated ventilator such as a sophisticated turbine-based transport ventilator was used. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted. Cox multivariate regression was performed to identify associations between patient characteristics and hospital mortality. We included 189 patients (140 [74.1%] men) with a median age of 65 years [IQR, 55–73], of whom 61 (32.3%) died before hospital discharge. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were age ≄ 70 years (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.24–3.59; P = 0.006), immunodeficiency (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16–5.09; P = 0.02) and serum creatinine ≄ 100 ”mol/L (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.77–5.10; P < 0.001) but not ventilator type. As compared to conventional ICU (equipped with ICU and anesthesiology ventilators), management in transient ICU (equipped with non-ICU turbine-based ventilators) was associated neither with a longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (18 [IQR, 11–32] vs. 21 [13–37] days, respectively; P = 0.39) nor with a longer ICU stay (24 [IQR, 14–40] vs. 27 [15–44] days, respectively; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In ventilated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, management in transient ICU equipped with non-ICU sophisticated turbine-based ventilators was not associated with worse outcomes compared to standard ICU, equipped with ICU ventilators. Although our study design is not powered to demonstrate any difference in outcome, our results after adjustment do not suggest any signal of harm when using these transport type ventilators as an alternative to ICU ventilators during COVID-19 surge. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13613-022-00981-2
    corecore