Intravenous Versus Oral Iron for the Treatment of Anemia in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Anemia is the most prevalent extraintestinal complication of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and harm of intravenous (IV) versus oral iron supplementation for correcting anemia in adult IBD patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to integrate evidence from randomized controlled trials having enrolled adults with IBD, and comparing IV versus oral iron (head-to-head) for correcting iron-deficiency anemia. Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Web of Science database were searched through July 2015. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the ClinicalTrials.gov, and international conference proceedings were also investigated. Two reviewers independently abstracted study data and outcomes, and rated each trial's risk-of-bias. Pooled odds ratio (OR) estimates with their 95% CIs were calculated using fixed- and random-effects models. Five eligible studies, including 694 IBD patients, were identified. In meta-analysis, IV iron demonstrated a higher efficacy in achieving a hemoglobin rise of ≥2.0 g/dL as compared to oral iron (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.18). Treatment discontinuation rates, due to adverse events or intolerance, were lower in the IV iron groups (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.59). Similarly, the occurrence of gastrointestinal adverse events was consistently lower in the IV iron groups. On the contrary, serious adverse events (SAEs) were more frequently reported among patients receiving IV iron preparations (OR: 4.57, 95% CI: 1.11, 18.8); however, the majority of the reported SAEs were judged as unrelated or unlikely to be related to the study medication. We found no evidence of publication bias, or between-study heterogeneity, across all analyses. Risk of bias was high across primary studies, because patients and personnel were not blinded to the intervention. IV iron appears to be more effective and better tolerated than oral iron for the treatment of IBD-associated anemia

Carcinomas in inflammatory bowel disease: a narrative review on diagnostic imaging techniques

We aimed, therefore, to review the current evidence on imaging modalities and carcinomas overlapping IBD.Patients affected by inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are at increased risk for developing both gastrointestinal and extra-intestinal cancers. The subtype of IBD, namely Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis, the location, the activity, the extent, and the duration of the disease determine this risk. Standardized surveillance programs based on imaging techniques exist only for colorectal cancer, where colonoscopy is the milestone of early detection. Clarification is needed on whether different imaging modalities might be adopted in the algorithms for screening and diagnosis of cancers in IBD patients.PubMed was searched up to July 2021 to identify relevant studies investigating the accuracy of imaging techniques in identifying carcinomas in IBD patients. The following text words and corresponding Medical Subject Heading/Entree terms were used: "imaging", "computed tomography", "magnetic resonance imaging", "inflammatory bowel disease", "adenocarcinoma" and "cancer".Currently dye-chromoendoscopy (DCE) is established as the gold standard diagnostic modality for the detection of dysplasia in IBD, with a demonstrated superiority compared to white-light endoscopy. Two main radiological patterns have been described at cross-sectional imaging for both colorectal cancer and small bowel adenocarcinoma. The first subtype is characterized by a tissue mass, while the second subtype recognizes a circumferential thickening with or without the stricturing of the lumen. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of cross-sectional imaging techniques for the detection of carcinomas in the context of IBD are largely unknown and scarcely investigated. The definition of surveillance programs based on different imaging methods is warranted

Defining Transabdominal Intestinal Ultrasound Treatment Response and Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Expert Consensus Statement

Background and Aims No consensus exists on defining intestinal ultrasound response, transmural healing, or transmural remission in inflammatory bowel disease, nor clear guidance for optimal timing of assessment during treatment. This systematic review and expert consensus study aimed to define such recommendations, along with key parameters included in response reporting. Methods Electronic databases were searched from inception to July 26, 2021, using pre-defined terms. Studies were eligible if at least two intestinal ultrasound [IUS] assessments at different time points during treatment were reported, along with an appropriate reference standard. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to examine study-level risk of bias. An international panel of experts [n = 18] rated an initial 196 statements [RAND/UCLA process, scale 1–9]. Two videoconferences were conducted, resulting in additional ratings of 149 and 13 statements, respectively. Results Out of 5826 records, 31 full-text articles, 16 abstracts, and one research letter were included; 83% [40/48] of included studies showed a low concern of applicability, and 96% [46/48] had a high risk of bias. A consensus was reached on 41 statements, with clear definitions of IUS treatment response, transmural healing, transmural remission, timing of assessment, and general considerations when using intestinal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease. Conclusions Response criteria and time points of response assessment varied between studies, complicating direct comparison of parameter changes and their relation to treatment outcomes. To ensure a unified approach in routine care and clinical trials, we provide recommendations and definitions for key parameters for intestinal ultrasound response, to incorporate into future prospective studies.publishedVersio

Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease Are Not at Increased Risk of COVID-19: A Large Multinational Cohort Study

The impact of COVID-19 on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients under pharmacological immunosuppression is still not clearly understood. We investigated the incidence of COVID-19 and the impact of immunosuppression and containment measures on the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a large IBD cohort, from a multicenter cohort from 21st of February to 30th of June, 2020. Ninety-seven patients with IBD (43 UC, 53 CD, one unclassified IBD) and concomitant COVID-19 over a total of 23,879 patients with IBD were enrolled in the study. The cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with IBD vs. the general population was 0.406% and 0.402% cases, respectively. Twenty-three patients (24%) were hospitalized, 21 (22%) had pneumonia, four (4%) were admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, and one patient died. Lethality in our cohort was 1% compared to 9% in the general population. At multivariable analysis, age > 65 years was associated with increased risk of pneumonia and hospitalization (OR 11.6, 95% CI 2.18-62.60; OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.10-23.86, respectively), treatment with corticosteroids increased the risk of hospitalization (OR 7.6, 95% CI 1.48-40.05), whereas monoclonal antibodies were associated with reduced risk of pneumonia and hospitalization (OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.04-0.52; OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.10-0.90, respectively). The risk of COVID-19 in patients with IBD is similar to the general population. National lockdown was effective in preventing infection in our cohort. Advanced age and treatment with corticosteroids impacted negatively on the outcome of COVID-19, whereas monoclonal antibodies did not seem to have a detrimental effect

Psychological Challenges for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is known to be associated with psychological burden: stigmatization due to the condition, high levels of anxiety and depression, and quality of life. impairments. The COVID-19 pandemic is an additional psychological stressor; thus, IBD patients may face psychological challenges

Ultrasound Elastography in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review of Accuracy Compared with Histopathological Assessment

Abstract Background and Aims Ultrasound elastography [USE] is an innovative, non-invasive, promptly available, ancillary technique that has been proposed in the evaluation of intestinal fibrosis as a monitorable biomarker, in terms of stiffness. The non-invasive estimate of fibrosis by USE appears appealing for dedicated physicians, in order to optimise the treatments for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients [surgical vs non-surgical]. We aimed to systematically review literature evidence on ultrasound elastography in IBD patients. Methods For this qualitative systematic review, we searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus to identify all studies, published until October 2021, investigating the application of USE in IBD patients compared with histopathological assessment. Results Overall, 12 papers published between 2011 and 2019 were included. A total of 275 IBD patients were included: 272 Crohn’s disease [CD] [98.9%] and three ulcerative colitis [UC] [1.1%]. Seven [58.3%] and four [41.6%] studies investigated strain elastography [SE] and shear wave elastography [SWE], respectively; in one study [0.1%] both techniques were addressed. The histological evaluation was largely conducted on surgical specimens and in two studies endoscopic biopsies were also included. The histological assessment was semi-quantitative in all the included studies, except for two where the fibrosis was evaluated only qualitatively. In 10/12 publications USE could accurately distinguish inflammation from fibrosis in the examined bowel tracts. Conclusions From the preliminary available data, an overall moderate-to-good accuracy of USE in detecting histological fibrosis [10/12 studies] was found. Point-shear wave elastography has been shown to perform superiorly. Further studies are needed to confirm these evidences