Utilidad de un protocolo estandarizado anatomopatológico en la evaluación de los márgenes de resección tras duodenopancreatectomía cefálica. Implicaciones pronósticas y evaluación de factores de riesgo en cáncer de páncreas

Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Medicina, Departamento de Cirugía. Fecha de lectura: 11-11-2016Esta tesis tiene embargado el acceso al texto completo hasta el 11-05-201

On Data Dissemination for Large-Scale Complex Critical Infrastructures

Middleware plays a key role for the achievement of the mission of future largescalecomplexcriticalinfrastructures, envisioned as federations of several heterogeneous systems over Internet. However, available approaches for datadissemination result still inadequate, since they are unable to scale and to jointly assure given QoS properties. In addition, the best-effort delivery strategy of Internet and the occurrence of node failures further exacerbate the correct and timely delivery of data, if the middleware is not equipped with means for tolerating such failures. This paper presents a peer-to-peer approach for resilient and scalable datadissemination over large-scalecomplexcriticalinfrastructures. The approach is based on the adoption of epidemic dissemination algorithms between peer groups, combined with the semi-active replication of group leaders to tolerate failures and assure the resilient delivery of data, despite the increasing scale and heterogeneity of the federated system. The effectiveness of the approach is shown by means of extensive simulation experiments, based on Stochastic Activity Networks

An Effective Approach for Injecting Faults in Wireless Sensor Networks Operating Systems

This paper presents an effective approach for injecting faults/errors in WSN nodes operating systems. The approach is based on the injection of faults at the assembly level. Results show that depending on the concurrency model and on the memory management, the operating systems react to injected errors differently, indicating that fault containment strategies and hang-checking assertions should be implemented to avoid spreading and activations of errors

Fracture of Ceramic Bearing Surfaces following Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic Review

Ceramic bearing surfaces are increasingly used for total hip replacement, notwithstanding that concern is still related to ceramic brittleness and its possible mechanical failure. The aim of this systematic review is to answer three questions: (1) Are there risk factors for ceramic component fracture following total hip replacement? (2) Is it possible to perform an early diagnosis of ceramic component failure before catastrophic fracture occurs? (3) Is it possible to draw guidelines for revision surgery after ceramic components failure? A PubMed and Google Scholar search was performed and reference citations from publications identified in the literature search were reviewed. The use of 28\u2009mm short-neck femoral head carries an increased risk of fracture. Acetabular component malposition might increase the risk of ceramic liner fractures. Synovial fluid microanalysis and CT scan are promising in early diagnosis of ceramic head and liner failure. Early revision is suggested in case of component failure; no consensus exists about the better coupling for revision surgery. Ceramic brittleness remains a major concern. Due to the increased number of ceramic on ceramic implants, more revision surgeries and reports on ceramic components failure are expected in the future. An algorithm of diagnosis and treatment for ceramic hip failure is proposed

Evolving Trends in the Management of Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Waves: The ACIE Appy II Study

Background In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak. Methods From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study. Results A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM. Conclusion Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide

Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy versus appendectomy or antibiotics in the modern approach to uncomplicated acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopic therapy; Appendicitis; AppendectomyTerapia endoscópica; Apendicitis; ApendicectomíaTeràpia endoscòpica; Apendicitis; ApendicectomiaIntroduction Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy has been proposed as an alternative strategy for treating appendicitis, but debate exists on its role compared with conventional treatment. Methods This systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE. The last search was in April of 2023. The risk ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for dichotomous variables, and the mean difference with a 95% confidence interval for continuous variables. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool (randomized controlled trials) and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Intervention tool (non-randomized controlled trials). Results Six studies met the eligibility criteria. Four studies compared endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (n = 236 patients) and appendectomy (n = 339) and found no differences in technical success during index admission (risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval [0.92,1.02]). Appendectomy showed superior outcomes for recurrence at 1-year follow-up (risk ratio 11.28, 95% confidence interval [2.61,48.73]). Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy required shorter procedural time (mean difference –14.38, 95% confidence interval [–20.17, –8.59]) and length of hospital stay (mean difference –1.19, 95% confidence interval [–2.37, –0.01]), with lower post-intervention abdominal pain (risk ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [0.14,0.32]). Two studies compared endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (n = 269) and antibiotic treatment (n = 280). Technical success during admission (risk ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [0.91,1.35]) and appendicitis recurrence (risk ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [0.08,14.87]) did not differ, but endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy decreased the length of hospitalization (mean difference –1.91, 95% confidence interval [–3.18, –0.64]). Conclusion This meta-analysis did not identify significant differences between endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy and appendectomy or antibiotics regarding technical success during index admission and treatment efficacy at 1-year follow-up. However, a high risk of imprecision limits these results. The advantages of endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy in terms of reduced procedural times and shorter lengths of stay must be balanced against the increased risk of having an appendicitis recurrence at one year

Seroma in lipoabdominoplasty and abdominoplasty: ultrasonographic comparative study

BACKGROUND: Seroma is one of the most common complications in abdominoplasty. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rate of seroma formation in patients who underwent either abdominoplasty and lipoabdominoplasty. METHODS: The sample consisted of 41 female patients, who were divided into three groups and underwent one of the following procedures: group A (n=21), abdominoplasty and group B (n=20), lipoabdominoplasty. In order to investigate seroma formation, abdominal ultrasound was performed in 5 regions of the abdominal wall [epigastrium (EPI), umbilical (UMB), hypogastrium (HYPO), right iliac fossa (RIF) and left iliac fossa (LIF)], at two postoperative periods: (P1), between postoperative days 11 and 14, and (P2), between postoperative days 18 and 21. RESULTS: The rate of seroma formation at both P1 and P2 was significantly higher in group A than in group B. It was observed that, in group A at P1, the regions RIF and LIF developed larger fluid collections. In group B, there were significantly larger fluid collections in the HYPO region at P1, and in the UMB and HYPO regions at P2. CONCLUSION: Lipoabdominoplasty is effective technique for the prevention of seroma compared with abdominoplasty.INTRODUÇÃO: O seroma é uma das complicações mais frequentes nas abdominoplastias. OBJETIVO: Comparar a incidência de seroma em pacientes submetidos à abdominoplastia convencional e à lipoabdominoplastia. MÉTODO: Foram estudadas 41 pacientes, divididas em dois grupos: Grupo A (21 pacientes submetidas à abdominoplastia convencional e Grupo B (20 pacientes submetidas à lipoabdominoplastia). Para a investigação da formação de seroma foi realizado ultrassonografia de cinco regiões da parede abdominal (epigástrio (EPI), umbilical (UMB), hipogástrio (HIPO), fossa ilíaca direita (FID) e fossa ilíaca esquerda (FIE)) em dois momentos: entre o 11º e o 14º dia de pós-operatório (DPO) (P1) e entre o 18º e 21º DPO (P2). RESULTADOS: A incidência de seroma tanto em P1 quanto em P2 foi significativamente maior no grupo A que no grupo B. Observou-se que no grupo A, no P1, as regiões FID e FIE apresentaram maior incidência de coleções fluidas. No grupo B, houve uma maior incidência de coleções fluidas na região HIPO em P1 e nas regiões UMB e HIPO em P2. CONCLUSÃO: Houve menor incidência de seroma nos pacientes submetidos à lipoabdominoplastia em relação à abdominoplastia convencional nos momentos estudados.SBCPUNIFESP-EPMUNIFESP-EPM Setor de Deformidades da Parede Abdominal da Disciplina de Cirurgia PlásticaUniversidade de Santo AmaroUNIFESP-EPM Departamento de CirurgiaUNIFESP-EPM Programa Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia PlásticaUNIFESP, EPM, Setor de Deformidades da Parede Abdominal da Disciplina de Cirurgia PlásticaUNIFESP, EPM Depto. de CirurgiaUNIFESP, EPM Programa Pós-Graduação em Cirurgia PlásticaSciEL

Evolving Trends in the Management of Acute Appendicitis During COVID-19 Waves: The ACIE Appy II Study

Apendicitis aguda; Gestió; Onada de COVID-19Apendicitis aguda; Gestión; Ola de COVID-19Acute appendicitis; management; COVID-19 wavesBackground In 2020, ACIE Appy study showed that COVID-19 pandemic heavily affected the management of patients with acute appendicitis (AA) worldwide, with an increased rate of non-operative management (NOM) strategies and a trend toward open surgery due to concern of virus transmission by laparoscopy and controversial recommendations on this issue. The aim of this study was to survey again the same group of surgeons to assess if any difference in management attitudes of AA had occurred in the later stages of the outbreak. Methods From August 15 to September 30, 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to all 709 participants of the ACIE Appy study. The questionnaire included questions on personal protective equipment (PPE), local policies and screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection, NOM, surgical approach and disease presentations in 2021. The results were compared with the results from the previous study. Results A total of 476 answers were collected (response rate 67.1%). Screening policies were significatively improved with most patients screened regardless of symptoms (89.5% vs. 37.4%) with PCR and antigenic test as the preferred test (74.1% vs. 26.3%). More patients tested positive before surgery and commercial systems were the preferred ones to filter smoke plumes during laparoscopy. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was the first option in the treatment of AA, with a declined use of NOM. Conclusion Management of AA has improved in the last waves of pandemic. Increased evidence regarding SARS-COV-2 infection along with a timely healthcare systems response has been translated into tailored attitudes and a better care for patients with AA worldwide.Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors did not receive any funding for the present study