9 research outputs found

    High levels of immunosuppression are related to unfavourable outcomes in hospitalised patients with rheumatic diseases and COVID-19 : first results of ReumaCoV Brasil registry

    Get PDF
    Objectives To evaluate risk factors associated with unfavourable outcomes: emergency care, hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation and death in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) and COVID-19. Methods Analysis of the first 8 weeks of observational multicentre prospective cohort study (ReumaCoV Brasil register). Patients with IMRD and COVID-19 according to the Ministry of Health criteria were classified as eligible for the study. Results 334 participants were enrolled, a majority of them women, with a median age of 45 years; systemic lupus erythematosus (32.9%) was the most frequent IMRD. Emergency care was required in 160 patients, 33.0% were hospitalised, 15.0% were admitted to the ICU and 10.5% underwent mechanical ventilation; 28 patients (8.4%) died. In the multivariate adjustment model for emergency care, diabetes (prevalence ratio, PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.73; p=0.004), kidney disease (PR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77; p=0.020), oral glucocorticoids (GC) (PR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85; p50 years (PR 1.89; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.85; p=0.002), no use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (PR 2.51;95% CI 1.16 to 5.45; p=0.004) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy (PR 2.50; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.92; p<0.001); for ICU admission, oral GC (PR 2.24; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.71; p<0.001) and pulse therapy with methylprednisolone (PR 1.65; 95% CI 1.00 to 2.68; p<0.043); the two variables associated with death were pulse therapy with methylprednisolone or cyclophosphamide (PR 2.86; 95% CI 1.59 to 5.14; p<0.018). Conclusions Age >50 years and immunosuppression with GC and cyclophosphamide were associated with unfavourable outcomes of COVID-19. Treatment with TNFi may have been protective, perhaps leading to the COVID-19 inflammatory process

    Avaliação da mortalidade nos pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico em diálise regular: um estudo multicêntrico no Grande Rio

    No full text
    Introdução: A sobrevida dos pacientes com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico (LES) em diálise ainda é assunto controverso. O presente estudo controlado e prospectivo tem como objetivo estudar a sobrevida dos pacientes com LES em diálise e os fatores relacionados com a mortalidade. Métodos: Vinte centros de diálise foram visitados entre maio de 2003 e fevereiro de 2004. A atividade da doença foi avaliada através do índice SLEDAI sem os parâmetros renais (SLEDAInr). Os dados foram coletados na entrada do estudo. O grupo controle foi composto por pacientes sem LES em diálise pareados por gênero, idade, tipo de diálise, tempo de diálise e infecção pelo vírus C da hepatite (VCH). Todos os pacientes foram acompanhados prospectivamente durante 60 meses. O método de Kaplan-Meier foi usado na estimativa de sobrevida e a associação de fatores de risco com mortalidade foi testada com o modelo de proporção de risco de Cox. Resultados: Cada grupo foi composto por 57 pacientes. Na análise multivariada, apenas o SLEDAInr >8 (HR 6.368, 95%CI 1.798-22.548, P=0.004) e o índice de redução de ureia, IRU, (HR 0.953, 95%CI 0.917-0.990, P=0.014) foram fatores independentes associados com mortalidade nos pacientes com LES. A taxa de sobrevida em 5 anos do grupo controle e dos pacientes com LES e SLEDAInr ≤8 foram semelhantes (83% e 73%, respectivamente), mas significativamente superior à dos pacientes com LES e SLEDAInr >8 (17%), P 8 conferiu um risco extremamente elevado de mortalidade em cinco anos na população de pacientes com LES em diáliseBackground: Data about the survival rate of lupus patients on dialysis is controversial. The present controlled prospective study reports the survival of systemic lupus erythemathosus (SLE) patients undergoing dialysis and analyzes factors associated with mortality. Methods: Twenty dialysis centers were visited between May/2003 and February/2004. Disease activity was evaluated using the SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) without the renal related parameters (nrSLEDAI); Data collection was performed at entrance in the study. The control group consisted of hemodialysis patients without SLE matched for gender, age, dialysis modality, time on dialysis, and dialysis associated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Patients were prospectively followed for 60 months. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. Associations of risk factors with mortality were tested using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Each group was composed of 57 patients. In the multivariate analysis, only nrSLEDAI>8 (HR 6.368, 95%CI 1.798-22.548, P=0.004), and urea reduction ratio (HR 0.953, 95%CI 0.917-0.990, P=0.014) were independently associated with mortality in lupus patients. The five year survival rate of the control group and the one from SLE patients with nrSLEDAI≤8 were similar (83% and 73%, respectively) but significantly better than the one of SLE patients with nrSLEDAI>8 (17%), P<0.001. Conclusions: The IRU proved to be a protective factor against mortality. However, a high nrSLEDAI was strongly associated with five-year mortality in lupus patients on dialysis165f

    Characteristics associated with poor COVID-19 outcomes in people with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis:data from the COVID-19 PsoProtect and Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registries

    Get PDF
    Funding The study received support from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR).OBJECTIVES: To investigate factors associated with severe COVID-19 in people with psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). METHODS: Demographic data, clinical characteristics and COVID-19 outcome severity of adults with PsO, PsA and axSpA were obtained from two international physician-reported registries. A three-point ordinal COVID-19 severity scale was defined: no hospitalisation, hospitalisation (and no death) and death. ORs were estimated using multivariable ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 5045 cases, 18.3% had PsO, 45.5% PsA and 36.3% axSpA. Most (83.6%) were not hospitalised, 14.6% were hospitalised and 1.8% died. Older age was non-linearly associated with COVID-19 severity. Male sex (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.83), cardiovascular, respiratory, renal, metabolic and cancer comorbidities (ORs 1.25-2.89), moderate/high disease activity and/or glucocorticoid use (ORs 1.39-2.23, vs remission/low disease activity and no glucocorticoids) were associated with increased odds of severe COVID-19. Later pandemic time periods (ORs 0.42-0.52, vs until 15 June 2020), PsO (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.65, vs PsA) and baseline exposure to TNFi, IL17i and IL-23i/IL-12+23i (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.73; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98; respectively; vs no disease-modifying antirheumatic drug) were associated with reduced odds of severe COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Older age, male sex, comorbidity burden, higher disease activity and glucocorticoid intake were associated with more severe COVID-19. Later pandemic time periods, PsO and exposure to TNFi, IL17i and IL-23i/IL-12+23i were associated with less severe COVID-19. These findings will enable risk stratification and inform management decisions for patients with PsO, PsA and axSpA during COVID-19 waves or similar future respiratory pandemics.publishersversionepub_ahead_of_prin

    A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS)

    No full text
    Objectives Treat-to-target recommendations have identified 'remission' as a target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but recognise that there is no universally accepted definition for this. Therefore, we initiated a process to achieve consensus on potential definitions for remission in SLE. Methods An international task force of 60 specialists and patient representatives participated in preparatory exercises, a face-to-face meeting and follow-up electronic voting. The level for agreement was set at 90%. Results The task force agreed on eight key statements regarding remission in SLE and three principles to guide the further development of remission definitions: 1. Definitions of remission will be worded as follows: remission in SLE is a durable state characterised by . (reference to symptoms, signs, routine labs). 2. For defining remission, a validated index must be used, for example, clinical systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index (SLEDAI)=0, British Isles lupus assessment group (BILAG) 2004 D/E only, clinical European consensus lupus outcome measure (ECLAM)=0; with routine laboratory assessments included, and supplemented with physician's global assessment. 3. Distinction is made between remission off and on therapy: remission off therapy requires the patient to be on no other treatment for SLE than maintenance antimalarials; and remission on therapy allows patients to be on stable maintenance antimalarials, low-dose corticosteroids (prednisone ≤5 mg/day), maintenance immunosuppressives and/or maintenance biologics. The task force also agreed that the most appropriate outcomes (dependent variables) for testing the prognostic value (construct validity) of potential remission definitions are: death, damage, flares and measures of health-related quality of life. Conclusions The work of this international task force provides a framework for testing different definitions of remission against long-term outcomes

    A framework for remission in SLE: consensus findings from a large international task force on definitions of remission in SLE (DORIS)

    Get PDF
    Treat-to-target recommendations have identified 'remission' as a target in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but recognise that there is no universally accepted definition for this. Therefore, we initiated a process to achieve consensus on potential definitions for remission in SLE

    Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry

    No full text
    Objectives: To determine factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases. Methods: Physician-reported registry of adults with rheumatic disease and confirmed or presumptive COVID-19 (from 24 March to 1 July 2020). The primary outcome was COVID-19-related death. Age, sex, smoking status, comorbidities, rheumatic disease diagnosis, disease activity and medications were included as covariates in multivariable logistic regression models. Analyses were further stratified according to rheumatic disease category. Results: Of 3729 patients (mean age 57 years, 68% female), 390 (10.5%) died. Independent factors associated with COVID-19-related death were age (66-75 years: OR 3.00, 95% CI 2.13 to 4.22; >75 years: 6.18, 4.47 to 8.53; both vs ≤65 years), male sex (1.46, 1.11 to 1.91), hypertension combined with cardiovascular disease (1.89, 1.31 to 2.73), chronic lung disease (1.68, 1.26 to 2.25) and prednisolone-equivalent dosage >10 mg/day (1.69, 1.18 to 2.41; vs no glucocorticoid intake). Moderate/high disease activity (vs remission/low disease activity) was associated with higher odds of death (1.87, 1.27 to 2.77). Rituximab (4.04, 2.32 to 7.03), sulfasalazine (3.60, 1.66 to 7.78), immunosuppressants (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, ciclosporin, mycophenolate or tacrolimus: 2.22, 1.43 to 3.46) and not receiving any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) (2.11, 1.48 to 3.01) were associated with higher odds of death, compared with methotrexate monotherapy. Other synthetic/biological DMARDs were not associated with COVID-19-related death. Conclusion: Among people with rheumatic disease, COVID-19-related death was associated with known general factors (older age, male sex and specific comorbidities) and disease-specific factors (disease activity and specific medications). The association with moderate/high disease activity highlights the importance of adequate disease control with DMARDs, preferably without increasing glucocorticoid dosages. Caution may be required with rituximab, sulfasalazine and some immunosuppressants
    corecore