6 research outputs found

    Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

    Get PDF
    This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

    Bloqueio por clipagem de gĂąnglios simpĂĄticos torĂĄcicos no tratamento da hiper-hidrose

    No full text
    FUNDAMENTOS: Bloqueio simpĂĄtico videotoracoscĂłpico no tratamento da hiper-hidrose Ă© realizado por clipagem do tronco simpĂĄtico, com possibilidade de reversĂŁo em casos de sudorese compensatĂłria intensa. OBJETIVO: Avaliar sucesso terapĂȘutico, satisfação e sudorese compensatĂłria nos pacientes submetidos a essa tĂ©cnica. MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo em que 45 pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos. Grupo I: um paciente com hiper-hidrose palmar e 20 com hiper-hidrose palmar e plantar submetidos a bloqueio de T3; Grupo II: quatro pacientes com hiper-hidrose axilar , dois com hiper-hidrose axilar e palmar, dois com hiper-hidrose axilar e plantar e 16 com hiperidrose axilar, palmar e plantar submetidos a bloqueio de T3 e T4. RESULTADOS: No grupo I 95,2% dos pacientes tinham hiper-hidrose palmar e plantar, e no grupo II 66,7% tinham hiperidrose axilar, palmar e plantar. Na regiĂŁo palmar, resultados excelentes ou bons ocorreram em 95,3% do grupo I e em 94,4% do grupo II; na regiĂŁo plantar 40% do grupo I e 44,5% do grupo II apresentaram bons resultados; e na regiĂŁo axilar, 95,8% relataram resultados excelentes ou bons. Em seis meses, havia sudorese compensatĂłria em 76,2% do grupo I e 91,7% do grupo II, mas a sudorese compensatĂłria intensa ocorreu em apenas trĂȘs pacientes do grupo II. CONCLUSÕES: Esse tratamento foi eficiente para o tratamento da hiper-hidrose. Ao final de seis meses, todos os pacientes do grupo I e 95,9% dos pacientes do grupo II estavam satisfeitos com os resultados

    Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

    Get PDF
    Aim: This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method: This was an international cohort study of patients undergoing elective resection of colon or rectal cancer without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Centres entered data from their first recorded case of COVID-19 until 19 April 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 and a comparison with prepandemic European Society of Coloproctology cohort data. Results: From 2073 patients in 40 countries, 1.3% (27/2073) had a defunctioning stoma and 3.0% (63/2073) had an end stoma instead of an anastomosis only. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (38/2073), the incidence of postoperative SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8% (78/2073) and the anastomotic leak rate was 4.9% (86/1738). Mortality was lowest in patients without a leak or SARS-CoV-2 (14/1601, 0.9%) and highest in patients with both a leak and SARS-CoV-2 (5/13, 38.5%). Mortality was independently associated with anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 6.01, 95% confidence interval 2.58–14.06), postoperative SARS-CoV-2 (16.90, 7.86–36.38), male sex (2.46, 1.01–5.93), age >70 years (2.87, 1.32–6.20) and advanced cancer stage (3.43, 1.16–10.21). Compared with prepandemic data, there were fewer anastomotic leaks (4.9% versus 7.7%) and an overall shorter length of stay (6 versus 7 days) but higher mortality (1.7% versus 1.1%). Conclusion: Surgeons need to further mitigate against both SARS-CoV-2 and anastomotic leak when offering surgery during current and future COVID-19 waves based on patient, operative and organizational risks

    Outcomes from elective colorectal cancer surgery during the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic

    Get PDF
    Aim This study aimed to describe the change in surgical practice and the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on mortality after surgical resection of colorectal cancer during the initial phases of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Method This was an international cohort study of patients undergoing elective resection of colon or rectal cancer without preoperative suspicion of SARS-CoV-2. Centres entered data from their first recorded case of COVID-19 until 19 April 2020. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included anastomotic leak, postoperative SARS-CoV-2 and a comparison with prepandemic European Society of Coloproctology cohort data. Results From 2073 patients in 40 countries, 1.3% (27/2073) had a defunctioning stoma and 3.0% (63/2073) had an end stoma instead of an anastomosis only. Thirty-day mortality was 1.8% (38/2073), the incidence of postoperative SARS-CoV-2 was 3.8% (78/2073) and the anastomotic leak rate was 4.9% (86/1738). Mortality was lowest in patients without a leak or SARS-CoV-2 (14/1601, 0.9%) and highest in patients with both a leak and SARS-CoV-2 (5/13, 38.5%). Mortality was independently associated with anastomotic leak (adjusted odds ratio 6.01, 95% confidence interval 2.58–14.06), postoperative SARS-CoV-2 (16.90, 7.86–36.38), male sex (2.46, 1.01–5.93), age >70 years (2.87, 1.32–6.20) and advanced cancer stage (3.43, 1.16–10.21). Compared with prepandemic data, there were fewer anastomotic leaks (4.9% versus 7.7%) and an overall shorter length of stay (6 versus 7 days) but higher mortality (1.7% versus 1.1%). Conclusion Surgeons need to further mitigate against both SARS-CoV-2 and anastomotic leak when offering surgery during current and future COVID-19 waves based on patient, operative and organizational risks
    corecore