37 research outputs found

    Comparative Genomic Analysis of Human Fungal Pathogens Causing Paracoccidioidomycosis

    Get PDF
    Paracoccidioides is a fungal pathogen and the cause of paracoccidioidomycosis, a health-threatening human systemic mycosis endemic to Latin America. Infection by Paracoccidioides, a dimorphic fungus in the order Onygenales, is coupled with a thermally regulated transition from a soil-dwelling filamentous form to a yeast-like pathogenic form. To better understand the genetic basis of growth and pathogenicity in Paracoccidioides, we sequenced the genomes of two strains of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis (Pb03 and Pb18) and one strain of Paracoccidioides lutzii (Pb01). These genomes range in size from 29.1 Mb to 32.9 Mb and encode 7,610 to 8,130 genes. To enable genetic studies, we mapped 94% of the P. brasiliensis Pb18 assembly onto five chromosomes. We characterized gene family content across Onygenales and related fungi, and within Paracoccidioides we found expansions of the fungal-specific kinase family FunK1. Additionally, the Onygenales have lost many genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and fewer genes involved in protein metabolism, resulting in a higher ratio of proteases to carbohydrate active enzymes in the Onygenales than their relatives. To determine if gene content correlated with growth on different substrates, we screened the non-pathogenic onygenale Uncinocarpus reesii, which has orthologs for 91% of Paracoccidioides metabolic genes, for growth on 190 carbon sources. U. reesii showed growth on a limited range of carbohydrates, primarily basic plant sugars and cell wall components; this suggests that Onygenales, including dimorphic fungi, can degrade cellulosic plant material in the soil. In addition, U. reesii grew on gelatin and a wide range of dipeptides and amino acids, indicating a preference for proteinaceous growth substrates over carbohydrates, which may enable these fungi to also degrade animal biomass. These capabilities for degrading plant and animal substrates suggest a duality in lifestyle that could enable pathogenic species of Onygenales to transfer from soil to animal hosts.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U.S.)National Institutes of Health. Department of Health and Human Services (contract HHSN266200400001C)National Institutes of Health. Department of Health and Human Services(contract HHSN2722009000018C)Brazil. National Council for Scientific and Technological Developmen

    Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

    Get PDF
    Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

    Get PDF

    Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

    Get PDF
    Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

    Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

    Get PDF
    Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

    Dialogue on Childbirth with Family Health Teams during Prenatal Care:A Communicative Study

    No full text
    12 PáginasO diálogo entre gestantes e profissionais de saúde sobre parto pode ser uma importante ferramenta para mudanças na prática de cesáreas no Brasil. Entretanto, a priorização desse tema no pré-natal e a forma como ele é abordado estão diretamente relacionadas à sua valorização e às dificuldades de abordagem. Objetivos: analisar, junto com equipes de saúde da família, os elementos que dificultam a abordagem do parto no pré-natal. Materiais e método: pesquisa qualitativa, que utilizou a metodologia comunicativa para identificar elementos facilitadores e dificultadores para o exercício de uma prática ou benefício. Foram realizados grupos de discussão comunica-tivos com as equipes, entre 2013 e 2014. Resultados: os elementos dificultadores perpassam a formação profissional, o processo e as condições de trabalho nas unidades, que interferem nas atividades educativas, na falta de articulação entre a atenção básica e a hospi-talar, e nas próprias vivências pessoais dos profissionais com o tema, aspectos que influenciam negativamente a abordagem do parto. Conclusões: é necessário investimento na qualificação dos profissionais nas questões referentes ao parto, com espaços de diálogo que permitam explorar as possibilidades de superação das dificuldades institucionais e expressar suas próprias vivências, a fim de desfazer mitos e crenças em relação ao parto.El diálogo entre gestantes y profesionales de la salud acerca del parto puede ser una importante herramienta para cambios en la práctica de cesarianas en Brasil. Sin embargo, la priorización del tema en el prenatal y la forma como este es abordado están directamente relacionadas a su valoración y a dificultades de enfoque. Objetivos: analizar, junto con equipos de salud de la familia, los elementos que dificultan el abordaje del parto en prenatal. Materiales y método: investigación cualitativa, que utilizó la metodología comunicativa para identificar elementos facilitadores y dificultadores para el ejercicio de una práctica o beneficio. Se realizaron grupos de discusión comunicativos con los equipos, entre el 2013 y el 2014. Resultados: los elementos dificultadores permean la formación profesional, el proceso y las condiciones de trabajo en las unidades, e interfieren en las actividades educacionales, en la falta de articulación entre la atención básica y la hospitalaria, y en las propias vivencias personales de los profesionales con el tema, aspectos que influencian negativamente el abordaje del parto. Conclusiones: se necesita inversión en la capacitación de los profesionales en cuestiones referentes al tema, con espacios de diálogo que permitan explorar las posibilidades de superación de dificultades institucionales y expresar sus propias vivencias, con el fin de deshacer mitos y creencias en relación con el parto
    corecore