222 research outputs found

    Bone Flap Management In Neurosurgery

    Get PDF
    Bone flap removal procedure is growing in frequency in neurosurgical practice. Decompressive craniotomy has gained more scientifical evidences of its therapeutical value in post-traumatic brain swelling, in cerebrovascular diseases and in brain edema non - responding to clinical treatment after elective surgeries. Bone flap destination after craniotomy has many possible fates. We present a literature review of bone flap management in neurosurgical practice: technical preservation of bone flaps (under the scalp, in the abdominal wall, frozen), when to remove the bone flap and what to do when it is dropped during the craniotomy or is infected.172133137Movassaghi, K., Ver Halen, J., Ganchi, P., Amin-Hanjani, S., Mesa, J., Yaremchuk, M.J., Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts (2006) Plast Reconstr Surg, 117 (1), pp. 202-206Hauptli, J., Segantini, P., New tissue preservation method for bone flaps following decompressive craniotomy (1980) Helv Chir Acta, 47 (1-2), pp. 121-124Tybor, K., Fortuniak, J., Komunski, P., Papiez, T., Andrzejak, S., JaskĂłlski, D., Supplementation of cranial defects by an autologous bone flap stored in the abdominal wall (2005) Neurol Neurochir Pol, 39 (3), pp. 220-224Josan, V.A., Sgouros, S., Walsh, A.R., Dover, M.S., Nishikawa, H., Hockley, A.D., Cranioplasty in children (2005) Childs Nerv Syst, 21 (3), pp. 200-204Flannery, T., McConnell, R.S., Cranioplasty: Why throw the bone flap out? (2001) Br J Neurosurg, 15 (6), pp. 518-520Krishnan, P., Bhattacharyya, A.K., Sil, K., De, R., Bone flap preservation after decompressive craniectomy - experience with 55 cases (2006) Neurol India, 54 (3), pp. 291-292Korfali, E., Aksoy, K., Preservation of craniotomy bone flaps under the scalp (1988) Surg Neurol, 30 (4), pp. 269-272Goel, A., Deogaonkar, M., Subgaleal preservation of calvarial flaps (1995) Surg Neurol, 44 (2), pp. 181-182. , Aug;, discussion 182-3Pasaoglu, A., Kurtsoy, A., Koc, R.K., Kontas, O., Akdemir, H., Ă–ktem, I.S., Cranioplasty with bone flaps preserved under the scalp (1996) Neurosurg Rev, 19 (3), pp. 153-156Iwama, T., Yamada, J., Imai, S., Shinoda, J., Funakoshi, T., Sakai, N., The use of frozen autogenous bone flaps in delayed cranioplasty revisited (2003) Neurosurgery, 52 (3), pp. 591-596Winkler, P.A., Stummer, W., Linke, R., Krishnan, K.G., Tatsch, K., The influence of cranioplasty on postural blood flow regulation, cerebrovascular reserve capacity, and cerebral glucose metabolism (2000) Neurosurg Focus, 8 (1), pp. e9Matsuno, A., Tanaka, H., Iwamuro, H., Takanashi, S., Miyawaki, S., Nakashima, M., Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty (2006) Acta Neurochir (Wien), 148 (5), pp. 535-540Yacubian-Fernandes, A., Laronga, P.R., Coelho, R.A., Ducati, L.G., Silva, M.V., Prototyping as an alternative to cranioplasty using methylmethacrylate: Technical, 62 (3 B), pp. 865-868. , note. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2004;Chiarini, L., Figurelli, S., Pollastri, G., Torcia, E., Ferrari, F., Albanese, M., Cranioplasty using acrylic material: A new technical procedure (2004) J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 32 (1), pp. 5-9Korinek, A.M., Risk factors for neurosurgical site infections after craniotomy: A prospective multicenter study of 2944 patients. The French Study Group of Neurosurgical Infections, the SEHP, and the C-CLIN Paris-Nord. Service Epidemiologie Hygiene et Prevention (1997) Neurosurgery, 41 (5), pp. 1073-1079Bruce, J.N., Bruce, S.S., Preservation of bone flaps in patients with postcraniotomy infections (2003) J Neurosurg, 98 (6), pp. 1203-1207Auguste, K.I., McDermott, M.W., Salvage of infected craniotomy bone flaps with the wash-in, wash-out indwelling antibiotic irrigation system. Technical note and case series of 12 patients (2006) J Neurosurg, 105 (4), pp. 640-644Jankowitz, B.T., Kondziolka, D.S., When the bone flap hits the floor (2006) Neurosurgery, 59 (3), pp. 585-59

    Time-integrated luminosity recorded by the BABAR detector at the PEP-II e+e- collider

    Get PDF
    This article is the Preprint version of the final published artcile which can be accessed at the link below.We describe a measurement of the time-integrated luminosity of the data collected by the BABAR experiment at the PEP-II asymmetric-energy e+e- collider at the ϒ(4S), ϒ(3S), and ϒ(2S) resonances and in a continuum region below each resonance. We measure the time-integrated luminosity by counting e+e-→e+e- and (for the ϒ(4S) only) e+e-→μ+μ- candidate events, allowing additional photons in the final state. We use data-corrected simulation to determine the cross-sections and reconstruction efficiencies for these processes, as well as the major backgrounds. Due to the large cross-sections of e+e-→e+e- and e+e-→μ+μ-, the statistical uncertainties of the measurement are substantially smaller than the systematic uncertainties. The dominant systematic uncertainties are due to observed differences between data and simulation, as well as uncertainties on the cross-sections. For data collected on the ϒ(3S) and ϒ(2S) resonances, an additional uncertainty arises due to ϒ→e+e-X background. For data collected off the ϒ resonances, we estimate an additional uncertainty due to time dependent efficiency variations, which can affect the short off-resonance runs. The relative uncertainties on the luminosities of the on-resonance (off-resonance) samples are 0.43% (0.43%) for the ϒ(4S), 0.58% (0.72%) for the ϒ(3S), and 0.68% (0.88%) for the ϒ(2S).This work is supported by the US Department of Energy and National Science Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Canada), the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique and Institut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physiquedes Particules (France), the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Germany), the Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (Italy), the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (The Netherlands), the Research Council of Norway, the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain), and the Science and Technology Facilities Council (United Kingdom). Individuals have received support from the Marie-Curie IEF program (European Union) and the A.P. Sloan Foundation (USA)
    • …
    corecore