4 research outputs found
Framing of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) financial scandal by english and chinese newspapers published in Malaysia
The study compared how the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) financial scandal was framed in
English and Chinese online newspapers published in Malaysia. Content analysis was conducted for 200
articles for two English newspapers (The Star, 50; Malaysiakini English, 50) and two Chinese
newspapers (Sin Chew Daily, 50; Malaysiakini Chinese, 50). The four newspapers were similar in the
reliance on episodic framing and government sources of information, and the valence of the articles.
Government sources is the opinion leader in 1MDB events but space is given to the voices of the
opposition, foreign entities and the public. The English newspapers and Malaysiakini Chinese have
more articles with a positive valence (46%-56%) in favour of investigations to resolve the financial
corruption case and about 31% of the articles had a negative valence. However, Sin Chew Daily is more
critical of the investigations than the other three newspapers. There are significant differences among
the newspapers in frame dimensions of news headlines. The responsibility frame is used in close to
80% of the 1MDB articles in the Chinese newspapers but only in 40%-50% of the 1MDB articles in the
English newspapers. Instead the English newspapers highlight the economic consequences of 1MDB
and the conflict between individuals and groups, as well as contradictions between rumour and fact.
The findings suggest that framing of controversial high-profile financial corruption case may differ due
to the readership of the English and Chinese newspapers
Unravelling the Neural Basis of Spatial Delusions After Stroke
International audienc
Brainhack: Developing a culture of open, inclusive, community-driven neuroscience
Brainhack is an innovative meeting format that promotes scientific collaboration and education in an open, inclusive environment. This NeuroView describes the myriad benefits for participants and the research community and how Brainhacks complement conventional formats to augment scientific progress
36-month clinical outcomes of patients with venous thromboembolism: GARFIELD-VTE
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), encompassing both deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.Methods: GARFIELD-VTE is a prospective, non-interventional observational study of real-world treatment practices. We aimed to capture the 36-month clinical outcomes of 10,679 patients with objectively confirmed VTE enrolled between May 2014 and January 2017 from 415 sites in 28 countries.Findings: A total of 6582 (61.6 %) patients had DVT alone, 4097 (38.4 %) had PE +/- DVT. At baseline, 98.1 % of patients received anticoagulation (AC) with or without other modalities of therapy. The proportion of patients on AC therapy decreased over time: 87.6 % at 3 months, 73.0 % at 6 months, 54.2 % at 12 months and 42.0 % at 36 months. At 12-months follow-up, the incidences (95 % confidence interval [CI]) of all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE and major bleeding were 6.5 (7.0-8.1), 5.4 (4.9-5.9) and 2.7 (2.4-3.0) per 100 person-years, respectively. At 36-months, these decreased to 4.4 (4.2-4.7), 3.5 (3.2-2.7) and 1.4 (1.3-1.6) per 100 person-years, respectively. Over 36-months, the rate of all-cause mortality and major bleeds were highest in patients treated with parenteral therapy (PAR) versus oral anti-coagulants (OAC) and no OAC, and the rate of recurrent VTE was highest in patients on no OAC versus those on PAR and OAC. The most frequent cause of death after 36-month follow-up was cancer (n = 565, 48.6 %), followed by cardiac (n = 94, 8.1 %), and VTE (n = 38, 3.2 %). Most recurrent VTE events were DVT alone (n = 564, 63.3 %), with the remainder PE, (n = 236, 27.3 %), or PE in combination with DVT (n = 63, 7.3 %).Interpretation: GARFIELD-VTE provides a global perspective of anticoagulation patterns and highlights the accumulation of events within the first 12 months after diagnosis. These findings may help identify treatment gaps for subsequent interventions to improve patient outcomes in this patient population