52 research outputs found
The radial arrangement of the human chromosome 7 in the lymphocyte cell nucleus is associated with chromosomal band gene density
This is the author's accepted manuscript. The final published article is available from the link below. Copyright @ Springer-Verlag 2008.In the nuclei of human lymphocytes, chromosome territories are distributed according to the average gene density of each chromosome. However, chromosomes are very heterogeneous in size and base composition, and can contain both very gene-dense and very gene-poor regions. Thus, a precise analysis of chromosome organisation in the nuclei should consider also the distribution of DNA belonging to the chromosomal bands in each chromosome. To improve our understanding of the chromatin organisation, we localised chromosome 7 DNA regions, endowed with different gene densities, in the nuclei of human lymphocytes. Our results showed that this chromosome in cell nuclei is arranged radially with the gene-dense/GC-richest regions exposed towards the nuclear interior and the gene-poorest/GC-poorest ones located at the nuclear periphery. Moreover, we found that chromatin fibres from the 7p22.3 and the 7q22.1 bands are not confined to the territory of the bulk of this chromosome, protruding towards the inner part of the nucleus. Overall, our work demonstrates the radial arrangement of the territory of chromosome 7 in the lymphocyte nucleus and confirms that human genes occupy specific radial positions, presumably to enhance intra- and inter-chromosomal interaction among loci displaying a similar expression pattern, and/or similar replication timing
The CACTA transposon Bot1 played a major role in Brassica genome divergence and gene proliferation
We isolated and characterized a Brassica C genome-specific CACTA element, which was designated Bot1 (Brassica oleracea transposon 1). After analysing phylogenetic relationships, copy numbers and sequence similarity of Bot1 and Bot1 analogues in B. oleracea (C genome) versus Brassica rapa (A genome), we concluded that Bot1 has encountered several rounds of amplification in the oleracea genome only, and has played a major role in the recent rapa and oleracea genome divergence. We performed in silico analyses of the genomic organization and internal structure of Bot1, and established which segment of Bot1 is C-genome specific. Our work reports a fully characterized Brassica repetitive sequence that can distinguish the Brassica A and C chromosomes in the allotetraploid Brassica napus, by fluorescent in situ hybridization. We demonstrated that Bot1 carries a host S locus-associated SLL3 gene copy. We speculate that Bot1 was involved in the proliferation of SLL3 around the Brassica genome. The present study reinforces the assumption that transposons are a major driver of genome and gene evolution in higher plants
Mugsy: fast multiple alignment of closely related whole genomes
Motivation: The relative ease and low cost of current generation sequencing technologies has led to a dramatic increase in the number of sequenced genomes for species across the tree of life. This increasing volume of data requires tools that can quickly compare multiple whole-genome sequences, millions of base pairs in length, to aid in the study of populations, pan-genomes, and genome evolution
The Nobel Prize as a Reward Mechanism in the Genomics Era: Anonymous Researchers, Visible Managers and the Ethics of Excellence
The Human Genome Project (HGP) is regarded by many as one of the major scientific achievements in recent science history, a large-scale endeavour that is changing the way in which biomedical research is done and expected, moreover, to yield considerable benefit for society. Thus, since the completion of the human genome sequencing effort, a debate has emerged over the question whether this effort merits to be awarded a Nobel Prize and if so, who should be the one(s) to receive it, as (according to current procedures) no more than three individuals can be selected. In this article, the HGP is taken as a case study to consider the ethical question to what extent it is still possible, in an era of big science, of large-scale consortia and global team work, to acknowledge and reward individual contributions to important breakthroughs in biomedical fields. Is it still viable to single out individuals for their decisive contributions in order to reward them in a fair and convincing way? Whereas the concept of the Nobel prize as such seems to reflect an archetypical view of scientists as solitary researchers who, at a certain point in their careers, make their one decisive discovery, this vision has proven to be problematic from the very outset. Already during the first decade of the Nobel era, Ivan Pavlov was denied the Prize several times before finally receiving it, on the basis of the argument that he had been active as a research manager (a designer and supervisor of research projects) rather than as a researcher himself. The question then is whether, in the case of the HGP, a research effort that involved the contributions of hundreds or even thousands of researchers worldwide, it is still possible to “individualise” the Prize? The “HGP Nobel Prize problem” is regarded as an exemplary issue in current research ethics, highlighting a number of quandaries and trends involved in contemporary life science research practices more broadly
Segmental duplication as one of the driving forces underlying the diversity of the human immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene region
Segmental duplication as one of the driving forces underlying the diversity of the human immunoglobulin heavy chain variable gene region
Background: Segmental duplication and deletion were implicated for a region containing the human
immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) gene segments, 1.9III/hv3005 (possible allelic variants of IGHV3-30) and
hv3019b9 (a possible allelic variant of IGHV3-33). However, very little is known about the ranges of the duplication
and the polymorphic region. This is mainly because of the difficulty associated with distinguishing between allelic
and paralogous sequences in the IGHV region containing extensive repetitive sequences. Inability to separate the
two parental haploid genomes in the subjects is another serious barrier. To address these issues, unique DNA
sequence tags evenly distributed within and flanking the duplicated region implicated by the previous studies were
selected. The selected tags in single sperm from six unrelated healthy donors were amplified by multiplex PCR
followed by microarray detection. In this way, individual haplotypes of different parental origins in the sperm donors
could be analyzed separately and precisely. The identified polymorphic region was further analyzed at the nucleotide
sequence level using sequences from the three human genomic sequence assemblies in the database.
Results: A large polymorphic region was identified using the selected sequence tags. Four of the 12 haplotypes were
shown to contain consecutively undetectable tags spanning in a variable range. Detailed analysis of sequences from
the genomic sequence assemblies revealed two large duplicate sequence blocks of 24,696 bp and 24,387 bp,
respectively, and an incomplete copy of 961 bp in this region. It contains up to 13 IGHV gene segments depending on
haplotypes. A polymorphic region was found to be located within the duplicated blocks. The variants of this
polymorphism unusually diverged at the nucleotide sequence level and in IGHV gene segment number, composition
and organization, indicating a limited selection pressure in general. However, the divergence level within the gene
segments is significantly different from that in the intergenic regions indicating that these regions may have been
subject to different selection pressures and that the IGHV gene segments in this region are functionally important.
Conclusions: Non-reciprocal genetic rearrangements associated with large duplicate sequence blocks could
substantially contribute to the IGHV region diversity. Since the resulting polymorphisms may affect the number,
composition and organization of the gene segments in this region, it may have significant impact on the function
of the IGHV gene segment repertoire, antibody diversity, and therefore, the immune system. Because one of the
gene segments, 3-30 (1.9III), is associated with autoimmune diseases, it could be of diagnostic significance to learn
about the variants in the haplotypes by using the multiplex haplotype analysis system used in the present study
with DNA sequence tags specific for the variants of all gene segments in this regio
- …
