Orthogonality and Boolean Algebras for Deduction Modulo

Originating from automated theorem proving, deduction modulo removes computational arguments from proofs by interleaving rewriting with the deduction process. From a proof-theoretic point of view, deduction modulo defines a generic notion of cut that applies to any first-order theory presented as a rewrite system. In such a setting, one can prove cut-elimination theorems that apply to many theories, provided they verify some generic criterion. Pre-Heyting algebras are a generalization of Heyting algebras which are used by Dowek to provide a semantic intuitionistic criterion called superconsistency for generic cut-elimination. This paper uses pre-Boolean algebras (generalizing Boolean algebras) and biorthogonality to prove a generic cut-elimination theorem for the classical sequent calculus modulo. It gives this way a novel application of reducibility candidates techniques, avoiding the use of proof-terms and simplifying the arguments

Three Dimensional Proofnets for Classical Logic

Classical logic and more precisely classical sequent calculi are currently the subject of several studies that aim at providing them with an algorithmic meaning. They are however ruled by an annoying syntactic bureaucracy which is a cause of pathologic non-confluence. An interesting patch consists in representing proofs using proofnets. This leads (at least in the propositional case) to cut-elimination procedures that remain confluent and strongly normalising without using any restricting reduction strategy. In this paper we describe a presentation of sequents in a two-dimensional space as well as a presentation of proofnets and sequent calculus derivations in a three-dimensional space. These renderings admit interesting geometrical properties: sequent occurrences appear as parallel segments in the case of three-dimensional sequent calculus derivations and the De Morgan duality is expressed by the fact that negation stands for a ninety degree rotation in the case of two-dimensional sequents and three-dimensional proofnets

Strong Normalization in two Pure Pattern Type Systems

International audiencePure Pattern Type Systems (P 2 T S ) combine in a unified setting the frameworks and capabilities of rewriting and λ-calculus. Their type systems, adapted from Barendregt's λ-cube, are especially interesting from a logical point of view. Strong normalization, an essential property for logical soundness, had only been conjectured so far: in this paper, we give a positive answer for the simply-typed system and the dependently-typed system. The proof is based on a translation of terms and types from P 2 T S into the λ-calculus. First, we deal with untyped terms, ensuring that reductions are faithfully mimicked in the λ-calculus. For this, we rely on an original encoding of the pattern matching capability of P 2 T S into the System Fω. Then we show how to translate types: the expressive power of System Fω is needed in order to fully reproduce the original typing judgments of P 2 T S . We prove that the encoding is correct with respect to reductions and typing, and we conclude with the strong normalization of simply-typed P 2 T S terms. The strong normalization with dependent types is in turn obtained by an intermediate translation into simply-typed terms

Principles of Superdeduction

International audienceIn predicate logic, the proof that a theorem P holds in a theory Th is typically conducted in natural deduction or in the sequent calculus using all the information contained in the theory in a uniform way. Introduced ten years ago, Deduction modulo allows us to make use of the computational part of the theory Th for true computations modulo which deductions are performed. Focussing on the sequent calculus, this paper presents and studies the dual concept where the theory is used to enrich the deduction system with new deduction rules in a systematic, correct and complete way. We call such a new deduction system "superdeduction''. We introduce a proof-term language and a cut-elimination procedure both based on Christian Urban's work on classical sequent calculus. Strong normalisation is proven under appropriate and natural hypothesis, therefore ensuring the consistency of the embedded theory and of the deduction system. The proofs obtained in such a new system are much closer to the human intuition and practice. We consequently show how superdeduction along with deduction modulo can be used to ground the formal foundations of new extendible proof assistants. We finally present lemuridae, our current implementation of superdeduction modulo

University Community Concerts New Artist Series 1980-81; Reel 2

Sonata for Flute and Continuo in G Major (Bach, C. P. E.); Trio for Violin, Cello, and Fortepiano in D Minor, Hob. XV 23 (Haydn, Joseph); Sonata for Violin and Fortepiano in D Major, D. 384, Op. posth. 137, No. 1 (Schubert, Franz); Trio for Flute, Cello, and Fortepiano in G Major, Hob. XV 15 (Haydn, Joseph). Instrumentation: flute; piano; violin; cell

Distributive rewriting calculus

International audienceThe rewriting calculus has been introduced as a general formalism that uniformly integrates rewriting and lambda-calculus. In this calculus all the basic ingredients of rewriting such as rewrite rules, rule applications and results are first-class objects. The rewriting calculus has been originally designed and used for expressing the semantics of rule based as well as object oriented paradigms. We have previously shown that convergent term rewriting systems and classic strategies can be encoded naturally in the calculus. In this paper, we go a step further and we propose an extended version of the calculus that allows one to encode unrestricted term rewriting systems. This version of the calculus features a new evaluation rule describing the behavior of the result structures and a call-by-value evaluation strategy. We prove the confluence of the obtained calculus and the correctness and completeness of the proposed encoding