9 research outputs found
Semblanza del Grupo Comunicación y Salud
Para aproximarse a la realidad del Grupo Comunicación y Salud y entender a que se debe su heterogeneidad, la diversidad de temas que aborda, los centenares de horas docentes que ofrece a los Médicos de Familia y la presencia de sus miembros en las Plataformas más activas que rondan la Atención Primaria en España, es interesante acercarse a cómo empezó el grupo y a quiénes fueron los pioneros de las diferentes actividades y metodologías que utiliza el grupo. Dar a conocer su origen como grupo de pretensión docente, su enriquecimiento con aportaciones del exterior y su voluntad de vanguardia en temas de comunicación con los pacientes es el interés de este artículo
Effectiveness of a Structured Group Intervention Based on Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients with Fibromyalgia in Primary Care: a Multicentre Randomized Open-Label Controlled Trial
Background There has been increased interest in pain neuroscience education (PNE) as a therapeutic approach for the management of fibromyalgia (FM).
Methods A multicentre randomized, open-label, controlled trial was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a structured group intervention based on PNE in patients with FM. A total of 139 patients were included in the study and randomized to the intervention group (7 group sessions of education in neurobiology of pain) or to the control group (treatment as usual only). The primary outcome was the improvement of functional status and pain measured with the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), and secondary outcomes were the reduction in the impact of pain and other symptoms (catastrophizing, anxiety and depression) and number of patients reaching no worse than moderate functional impairment (FIQ score <39). Differences between groups were calculated by linear mixed-effects (intention-to-treat approach) and mediational models through path analyses.
Results At 1 year, improvements in FIQ scores were higher in the intervention group with moderate or high effect size, and decreases of >= 20% in 69.1% of patients (20.9% in the control group) and of >= 50% in 39.7% (4.5% in the control group). Also, 52.9% of patients had a FIQ <39 points (13.4% in the control group).
Conclusions In this sample of patients with FM, the improvement in quality of life and control of symptoms obtained by adding a PNE intervention showed promising results, equalling or surpassing previously reported outcomes.
Significance A structured group intervention based on pain neuroscience education for 1 year in patients with fibromyalgia was associated with significant amelioration of the impact of the disease on scores of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, the Health Assessment Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale as compared with only treatment as usual. These findings are clinically relevant considering the challenges posed by fibromyalgia to clinicians and patients alike.Partial reduction of routine work tasks of the principal investigator, MJ Barrenengoa-Cuadra, was supported by a grant from OSI Bilbao Basurto Osakidetza, Basque country, Spain (the grant was paid to the Health Service to substitute MJ Barrenengoa-Cuadra while research work)
Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy:Study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)
This study was funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias ISCIII (Grant Numbers PI15/00276, PI15/00572, PI15/00996), REDISSEC (Project Numbers RD12/0001/0012, RD16/0001/0005), and the European Regional Development Fund ("A way to build Europe").Background: Multimorbidity is associated with negative effects both on people's health and on healthcare systems. A key problem linked to multimorbidity is polypharmacy, which in turn is associated with increased risk of partly preventable adverse effects, including mortality. The Ariadne principles describe a model of care based on a thorough assessment of diseases, treatments (and potential interactions), clinical status, context and preferences of patients with multimorbidity, with the aim of prioritizing and sharing realistic treatment goals that guide an individualized management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that implements the Ariadne principles in a population of young-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The intervention seeks to improve the appropriateness of prescribing in primary care (PC), as measured by the medication appropriateness index (MAI) score at 6 and 12months, as compared with usual care. Methods/Design: Design:pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. Unit of randomization: family physician (FP). Unit of analysis: patient. Scope: PC health centres in three autonomous communities: Aragon, Madrid, and Andalusia (Spain). Population: patients aged 65-74years with multimorbidity (≥3 chronic diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs prescribed in ≥3months). Sample size: n=400 (200 per study arm). Intervention: complex intervention based on the implementation of the Ariadne principles with two components: (1) FP training and (2) FP-patient interview. Outcomes: MAI score, health services use, quality of life (Euroqol 5D-5L), pharmacotherapy and adherence to treatment (Morisky-Green, Haynes-Sackett), and clinical and socio-demographic variables. Statistical analysis: primary outcome is the difference in MAI score between T0 and T1 and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Adjustment for confounding factors will be performed by multilevel analysis. All analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: It is essential to provide evidence concerning interventions on PC patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, conducted in the context of routine clinical practice, and involving young-old patients with significant potential for preventing negative health outcomes. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02866799Publisher PDFPeer reviewe
Semblanza del Grupo Comunicación y Salud
Para aproximarse a la realidad del Grupo Comunicación y Salud y entender a que se debe su heterogeneidad, la diversidad de temas que aborda, los centenares de horas docentes que ofrece a los Médicos de Familia y la presencia de sus miembros en las Plataformas más activas que rondan la Atención Primaria en España, es interesante acercarse a cómo empezó el grupo y a quiénes fueron los pioneros de las diferentes actividades y metodologías que utiliza el grupo. Dar a conocer su origen como grupo de pretensión docente, su enriquecimiento con aportaciones del exterior y su voluntad de vanguardia en temas de comunicación con los pacientes es el interés de este artículo
Posicionamientos de sociedades científicas y revisiones de grupos de trabajo: declaración sobre conflictos de intereses y necesidad de transparencia
Conflictos de intereses y necesidad de transparencia: a propósito del consenso sobre prescripción de los nuevos anticoagulantes orales
Posicionamientos de sociedades científicas y revisiones de grupos de trabajo: declaración sobre conflictos de intereses y necesidad de transparencia
Effectiveness of pain neuroscience education in patients with fibromyalgia: Structured group intervention in Primary Care
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a group intervention in Primary Care in patients with fibromyalgia (FM) based on pain neuroscience education (PNE). Design: Pre-post study.Location: Urban Primary Health Centre in Bilbao. Participants: Patients with FM (2010 American College of Rheumatology Diagnostic Criteria for fibromyalgia), ≥ 18 years. Intervention: 5 weekly sessions (2 hours each), and a reminder session one month later. Main measurements: Compliance with FM criteria, assessed using the WPI (Widespread Pain Index, number of pain areas) and the SS (severity of symptoms) questionnaires. An assessment was also made on the impact of FM on functional capacity (FIQ: ≥ 20% and ≥ 50% reduction in the FIQ total score from baseline to after treatment, and proportion of patients with FIQ< 39 at the end of the study). Assessments were made at baseline, one month following the 5th session, and during the 6- and 12-month follow-up. Results: All the study evaluations were completed by 85/98 patients. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the 3 studied categories (WPI, SS, and FIQ) since the first visit, and was maintained until the final visit (12 months later). A total of 45 patients (53%, 95% CI: 42%-63%), more than those at baseline, scored FIQ< 39 (no worse than mild functional impairment). One month following the 5th session there were 44 patients (52%, 95% CI: 41%-62%) that no longer met FM criteria and, at the end of follow-up, there were 56 patients (66%, 95% CI:55%-75%). Conclusions: An intervention based on PNE has shown to be feasible in Primary Care, with results in the upper range of those published with other treatments for FM.La presente investigación recibió una beca de la Convocatoria de Ayudas a la Investigación de la OSI Bilbao Basurto de Osakidetza durante los años 2015 y 2016. Asimismo, recibió una ayuda de la Comisión de Investigación del Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo de Osakidetza en la 2.a Convocatoria de Financiación de Actividades de Investigación de 2019.YesObjetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de una intervención grupal en atención primaria en pacientes con fibromialgia (FM), basada en la educación en neurociencia del dolor (Pain Neuroscience Education, PNE). Diseno: ˜ Estudio de intervención antes-después.Emplazamiento: Centro de Salud urbano de Bilbao. Participantes: Pacientes con FM (criterios diagnósticos 2010 del American College of Rheuma tology), ≥ 18 años. Intervención: Cinco sesiones semanales (2 h cada una), y una sesión de recuerdo un mes después.Mediciones principales: Cumplimiento de criterios de FM, mediante los cuestionarios WPI (número de áreas de dolor) y SS (gravedad de los síntomas), e impacto de la FM sobre la capacidad funcional (FIQ: reducción ≥ 20% y ≥ 50% sobre la puntuación basal, y proporción de pacientes con FIQ< 39 al final del estudio). Se hicieron evaluaciones al inicio, al mes de la 5.a sesión, 6 y 12 meses después. Resultados: Completaron todas las evaluaciones del estudio 85/98 pacientes. Se objetivó una mejoría estadísticamente significativa en las 3 categorías estudiadas (WPI, SS y FIQ) desde la primera visita, mantenida hasta la visita final (12 meses después). Cuarenta y cinco pacientes (53%, IC: 42-63%) más que al inicio tuvieron una puntuación en el FIQ< 39 (impacto funcional no grave). Al mes de finalizar la 5.a sesión había 44 (52%, IC: 41-62%) que ya no cumplían criterios de FM y al final del seguimiento 56 (66%, IC: 55-75%). Conclusiones: Una intervención basada en PNE ha mostrado ser factible en atención primaria, con resultados en el rango superior de los publicados con otros tratamientos para FM