127 research outputs found
Continuity and Change in Higher Education Careers Services in England
This chapter charts key aspects of the work of Careers Services in Higher Education (HE) in England (1999-2020). It is organised into six main sections: 1. public policy and the rise of employability; 2. employability, tuition fee rises and marketisation; 3. evolution of professional identity and practice; 4. changes in student and graduate employment and work; 5. policy and practice trends (regionalisation and social mobility); and finally, 6. present and future challenges (big data and technology). Contextual issues are outlined, and Careers Service responses are explored addressing how the work of careers professionals has dramatically evolved during this period. Across the chapter, we reflect on developments in policy and context that influenced continuity and change in professional practices that lead us to the present-day and to consider key opportunities and challenges for the future
Feeling the clunk: Managing and attributing uncertainty in screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in infancy
This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordThe management of uncertainty in clinical practice has been an enduring topic of sociological scholarship. However, little of this addresses how uncertainty and non-knowledge are attributed to the self and other actors. We take the example of checking for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), part of infant screening in UK primary care, to examine the âdouble contingencyâ of attributions of uncertainty and ignorance. Our data come from interviews with parents and General Practitioners (GPs), and observations of the six-week check conducted as part of a study to develop a checklist to aid GPs' diagnostic and referral decisions. Parents' pervasive uncertainties about managing with a new-born infant place them in a trusting relation to biomedicine, in which knowledge about infant hips is delegated to the clinical team: most described themselves as not-knowing about DDH. GPs focus on the uncertainties of applying sensory and experiential knowledge of infant bodies, in a consultation with more diffuse aims than screening for DDH. A prototype checklist, developed by orthopaedic specialists, was an explicit attempt to reduce uncertainty around thresholds for referral. However, using the checklist surfaced multiple logics of uncertainty. It also surfaced attributions of uncertainty and non-knowledge to other actors: orthopaedic specialists' assumptions about GPs' uncertain technical knowledge; GPs' assumptions about orthopaedic specialists' ignorance of the primary care setting; and clinicians' assumptions about the role of parental ignorance. This âdouble contingencyâ of attributions of other actors' non-knowledge is a salient additional dimension to the uncertainty that infuses biomedical practice.Wellcome TrustNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR
Parents' expectations and experiences of the 6-week baby check: a qualitative study in primary care
This s the final published version, available from Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this recordBackground: The Newborn and Infant Physical Examination (NIPE) programme requires all babies to have a comprehensive health check at 6-8 weeks of age. These are typically completed by GPs. Although person-centred care has achieved prominence in maternity care policy in recent years, there is limited empirical evidence on what parents and/or carers expect from the check, and how far experiences meet their needs. Aim: To explore the expectations and experiences of parents attending their GP for a baby check. Design & setting: A qualitative study was undertaken in primary care in London. Method: Content analysis was undertaken of transcripts of semi-structured interviews. Interviews were conducted with a total of 16 participants (14 mothers and two fathers) who had recently attended for a 6-week check for their baby. Results: Despite the availability of plentiful sources of general advice on infants' health and development, a thorough check by a trusted GP was an important milestone for most parents. They had few specific expectations of the check in terms of what examinations were undertaken, but even experienced parents anticipated reassurance about their baby's normal development. Many also hoped for reassurance about their own parenting. Parents appreciated GPs who explained what they were doing during the examination; space to raise any concerns; and combined mother and baby checks. Referrals to secondary care were generally experienced as reassuring rather than a source of anxiety. Conclusion: The baby check meets needs beyond those of the NIPE screening programme. Protecting the time for a thorough consultation is important for parents at what can be a vulnerable time.National Institute for Health Research (NIHR
A critique of Rasch analysis using the Dyspnoeaâ12 as an illustrative example
Aim. This paper is a report of a study of the application and critique of Rasch analysis to the development of the Dyspnoeaâ12 questionnaire; an instrument that measures breathlessness severity.
Background. The development of questionnaires has traditionally involved application of classical test theory. Rasch analysis has gained international momentum as a robust application of âmodernâ psychometric testing for the development of new instruments and the refinement of existing ones.
Method. A total of 358 patients [mean age 62 (sdâ=â8); chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseâ=â123, interstitial lung diseaseâ=â129, heart failureâ=â106], responded to an initial list of 81 items (between May 2006 and February 2008). Hierarchical modelling reduced the list to 34 items. Rasch analysis was used to inform decisions about further item removal and fit to the unidimensional model. Rasch analysis included tests of item response appropriateness, item residual, differential item functioning (including gender and diagnosis) and unidimensionality.
Results. Twentyâtwo items failed to reach the requirements of the Rasch model and were removed. Reasons included high residuals and item bias associated with gender and diagnosis. The 12âitems conformed to the Rasch unidimensional parameters (number of statistically significant tâtests 6·7%; confidence interval: 4·4â9·0%).
Conclusion. We have presented the steps involved in reducing and refining a large itemâset by identifying those items which possessed the most reliable measurement properties. The Dyspnoeaâ12 is reliable and simple to use and should find utility in both practice and research settings. We recommend that nurses consider Rasch analysis in the development of healthârelated questionnaires
A Lay Health Worker Intervention to Increase Uptake and Completion of Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Assessing Fidelity of Intervention Delivery
âThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis Group in COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease on 17 Aug 2020, available online: https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2020.1797658
Working in dissonance: experiences of work instability in workers with common mental disorders
The lay health worker-patient relationship in promoting pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in COPD: What makes it work?
Lay health workers (LHWs) can improve access to services and adherence to treatment, as well as promoting
self-care and prevention. Their effect in promoting uptake and adherence in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been tested. PR is the most effective treatment for the
symptoms and disability of COPD, but this effectiveness is undermined by poor rates of completion. Trained
LHWs with COPD, who also have first-hand experience of PR, are well placed to help overcome the
documented barriers to its completion. The relationship between LHWs and patients may be one of the
keys to their effectiveness but it has been little explored. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were used with
the aim of examining the LHW-patient partnership in a feasibility study of trained PR-experienced LHWs used
to support COPD patients referred to PR. Twelve volunteers with COPD who completed LHW training
supported 66 patients referred for PR. All 12 of these LHWs gave end-of-study interviews, 21 COPD patients
supported by LHWs were also interviewed. Patients reported that the LHWs were keen to share their
experiences of PR, and that this had a positive impact. The enthusiasm of the LHWs for PR was striking.
The common bond between LHWs and patients of having COPD together with the LHWs positive, first-hand
experience of PR were dominant and recurring themes in their relationship.This article presents independent research funded by the NIHR under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme (Grant Reference Number PB-PG0214-30052). SL receives additional funding from the South African Medical Research Council. SJCT was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Bartâs Health NHS Trust
Work disability and state benefit claims in early rheumatoid arthritis: the ERAN cohort
Objective. RA is an important cause of work disability. This study aimed to identify predictive factors for work disability and state benefit claims in a cohort with early RA.
Methods. The Early RA Network (ERAN) inception cohort recruited from 22 centres. At baseline, and during each annual visit, participants (n = 1235) reported employment status and benefits claims and how both were influenced by RA. Survival analysis derived adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% CIs to predict associations between baseline factors and time until loss of employment due to RA or a state benefits claim due to RA.
Results. At baseline, 47% of participants were employed and 17% reported claiming benefits due to RA. During follow-up, loss of employment due to RA was reported by 10% (49/475) of the participants and 20% (179/905) began to claim benefits. Independent predictors of earlier work disability were bodily pain (aHR 2.45, 95% CI 1.47, 4.08, P = 0.001) and low vitality (aHR 1.84, 95% CI 1.18, 2.85, P = 0.007). Disability (aHR 1.28, 95% CI 1.02, 1.61, P = 0.033), DAS28 (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.05, 2.09, P = 0.026) and extra-articular disease (aHR 1.77, 95% CI 1.17, 2.70, P = 0.007) predicted earlier benefits claims.
Conclusion. Work disability and benefits claims due to RA were predicted by different baseline factors. Pain and low vitality predicted work disability. Baseline disability, extra-articular disease manifestations and disease activity predicted new benefits claims due to RA. Future research on interventions targeting these factors could investigate job retention and financial independence
- âŠ