Globally consistent quantitative observations of planktonic ecosystems

In this paper we review the technologies available to make globally quantitative observations of particles in general—and plankton in particular—in the world oceans, and for sizes varying from sub-microns to centimeters. Some of these technologies have been available for years while others have only recently emerged. Use of these technologies is critical to improve understanding of the processes that control abundances, distributions and composition of plankton, provide data necessary to constrain and improve ecosystem and biogeochemical models, and forecast changes in marine ecosystems in light of climate change. In this paper we begin by providing the motivation for plankton observations, quantification and diversity qualification on a global scale. We then expand on the state-of-the-art, detailing a variety of relevant and (mostly) mature technologies and measurements, including bulk measurements of plankton, pigment composition, uses of genomic, optical and acoustical methods as well as analysis using particle counters, flow cytometers and quantitative imaging devices. We follow by highlighting the requirements necessary for a plankton observing system, the approach to achieve it and associated challenges. We conclude with ranked action-item recommendations for the next 10 years to move toward our vision of a holistic ocean-wide plankton observing system. Particularly, we suggest to begin with a demonstration project on a GO-SHIP line and/or a long-term observation site and expand from there, ensuring that issues associated with methods, observation tools, data analysis, quality assessment and curation are addressed early in the implementation. Global coordination is key for the success of this vision and will bring new insights on processes associated with nutrient regeneration, ocean production, fisheries and carbon sequestration

Recommendations on methods for the detection and control of biological pollution in marine coastal waters

Adverse effects of invasive alien species (IAS), or biological pollution, is an increasing problem in marine coastal waters, which remains high on the environmental management agenda. All maritime countries need to assess the size of this problem and consider effective mechanisms to prevent introductions, and if necessary and where possible to monitor, contain, control or eradicate the introduced impacting organisms. Despite this, and in contrast to more enclosed water bodies, the openness of marine systems indicates that once species are in an area then eradication is usually impossible. Most institutions in countries are aware of the problem and have sufficient governance in place for management. However, there is still a general lack of commitment and concerted action plans are needed to address this problem. This paper provides recommendations resulting from an international workshop based upon a large amount of experience relating to the assessment and control of biopollution

Comparing flow cytometry and microscopy in the quantification of vital aquatic organisms in ballast water, Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology

The ability to quantify vital aquatic organisms in the 2–50 µm size range was compared between five different flow cytometers and several different microscopes. Counts of calibration beads, algal monocultures of different sizes as well as organisms in a Wadden Sea sample were compared. Flow cytometers and microscopes delivered different bead concentrations. These differences between the instruments became larger for algal monocultures and were even higher for the Wadden Sea sample. It was observed that the concentration differences were significant between flow cytometer and microscope counts, and that this difference increased with the size of the objects counted. Microscope counts were more accurate for larger (50 µm) objects because cytometers struggled with bigger particles that clogged the instruments. Contrary to microscopy, the flow cytometers were capable of accurately enumerating cultured cells in the 2–10 µm size range and cells in the lower size range of the 10–50 µm size class. Flow cytometers were also well-suited to assess low abundance samples due to their ability to process larger volumes than microscopes. The results were used to indicate which tools are suitable for ballast water monitoring: flow cytometry is a suitable technology for an indicative and real time analysis of ballast water samples whilst only microscopy would be robust enough for detailed taxonomical analyses.publishedVersio

Water quality monitoring based on chemometric analysis of high-resolution phytoplankton data measured with flow cytometry

River water is an important source of Dutch drinking water. For this reason, continuous monitoring of river water quality is needed. However, comprehensive chemical analyses with high-resolution gas chromatography [GC]-mass spectrometry [MS]/liquid chromatography [LC]-MS are quite tedious and time consuming; this makes them poorly fit for routine water quality monitoring and, therefore, many pollution events are missed. Phytoplankton are highly sensitive and responsive to toxicity, which makes them highly usable for effect-based water quality monitoring. Flow cytometry can measure the optical properties of phytoplankton every hour, generating a large amount of information-rich data in one year. However, this requires chemometrics, as the resulting fingerprints need to be processed into information about abnormal phytoplankton behaviour. We developed Discriminant Analysis of Multi-Aspect CYtometry (DAMACY) to model the “normal condition” of the phytoplankton community imposed by diurnal, meteorological, and other exogenous influences. DAMACY first describes the cellular variability and distribution of phytoplankton in each measurement using principal component analysis, and then aims to find subtle differences in these phytoplankton distributions that predict normal environmental conditions. Deviations from these normal environmental conditions indicated abnormal phytoplankton behaviour that happened alongside pollution events measured with the GC/MS and LC/MS systems. Thus, our results demonstrate that flow cytometry in combination with chemometrics may be used for an automated hourly assessment of river water quality and as a near real-time early warning for detecting harmful known or unknown contaminants. Finally, both the flow cytometer and the DAMACY algorithm run completely autonomous and only requires maintenance once or twice per year. The warning system results may be uploaded automatically, so that drinking water companies may temporary stop pumping water whenever abnormal phytoplankton behaviour is detected. In the case of prolonged abnormal phytoplankton behaviour, comprehensive analysis may still be used to identify the chemical compound, its origin, and toxicity

Comparing flow cytometry and microscopy in the quantification of vital aquatic organisms in ballast water

International audienceThe ability to quantify vital aquatic organisms in the 2–50 µm size range was compared between five different flow cytometers and several different microscopes. Counts of calibration beads, algal monocultures of different sizes as well as organisms in a Wadden Sea sample were compared. Flow cytometers and microscopes delivered different bead concentrations. These differences between the instruments became larger for algal monocultures and were even higher for the Wadden Sea sample. It was observed that the concentration differences were significant between flow cytometer and microscope counts, and that this difference increased with the size of the objects counted. Microscope counts were more accurate for larger (50 µm) objects because cytometers struggled with bigger particles that clogged the instruments. Contrary to microscopy, the flow cytometers were capable of accurately enumerating cultured cells in the 2–10 µm size range and cells in the lower size range of the 10–50 µm size class. Flow cytometers were also well-suited to assess low abundance samples due to their ability to process larger volumes than microscopes. The results were used to indicate which tools are suitable for ballast water monitoring: flow cytometry is a suitable technology for an indicative and real time analysis of ballast water samples whilst only microscopy would be robust enough for detailed taxonomical analyses

Comparing flow cytometry and microscopy in the quantification of vital aquatic organisms in ballast water

The ability to quantify vital aquatic organisms in the 2–50 µm size range was compared between five different flow cytometers and several different microscopes. Counts of calibration beads, algal monocultures of different sizes as well as organisms in a Wadden Sea sample were compared. Flow cytometers and microscopes delivered different bead concentrations. These differences between the instruments became larger for algal monocultures and were even higher for the Wadden Sea sample. It was observed that the concentration differences were significant between flow cytometer and microscope counts, and that this difference increased with the size of the objects counted. Microscope counts were more accurate for larger (50 µm) objects because cytometers struggled with bigger particles that clogged the instruments. Contrary to microscopy, the flow cytometers were capable of accurately enumerating cultured cells in the 2–10 µm size range and cells in the lower size range of the 10–50 µm size class. Flow cytometers were also well-suited to assess low abundance samples due to their ability to process larger volumes than microscopes. The results were used to indicate which tools are suitable for ballast water monitoring: flow cytometry is a suitable technology for an indicative and real time analysis of ballast water samples whilst only microscopy would be robust enough for detailed taxonomical analyses

Comparing flow cytometry and microscopy in the quantification of vital aquatic organisms in ballast water

The ability to quantify vital aquatic organisms in the 2–50 µm size range was compared between five different flow cytometers and several different microscopes. Counts of calibration beads, algal monocultures of different sizes as well as organisms in a Wadden Sea sample were compared. Flow cytometers and microscopes delivered different bead concentrations. These differences between the instruments became larger for algal monocultures and were even higher for the Wadden Sea sample. It was observed that the concentration differences were significant between flow cytometer and microscope counts, and that this difference increased with the size of the objects counted. Microscope counts were more accurate for larger (50 µm) objects because cytometers struggled with bigger particles that clogged the instruments. Contrary to microscopy, the flow cytometers were capable of accurately enumerating cultured cells in the 2–10 µm size range and cells in the lower size range of the 10–50 µm size class. Flow cytometers were also well-suited to assess low abundance samples due to their ability to process larger volumes than microscopes. The results were used to indicate which tools are suitable for ballast water monitoring: flow cytometry is a suitable technology for an indicative and real time analysis of ballast water samples whilst only microscopy would be robust enough for detailed taxonomical analyses

Comparing flow cytometry and microscopy in the quantification of vital aquatic organisms in ballast water, Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology

The ability to quantify vital aquatic organisms in the 2–50 µm size range was compared between five different flow cytometers and several different microscopes. Counts of calibration beads, algal monocultures of different sizes as well as organisms in a Wadden Sea sample were compared. Flow cytometers and microscopes delivered different bead concentrations. These differences between the instruments became larger for algal monocultures and were even higher for the Wadden Sea sample. It was observed that the concentration differences were significant between flow cytometer and microscope counts, and that this difference increased with the size of the objects counted. Microscope counts were more accurate for larger (50 µm) objects because cytometers struggled with bigger particles that clogged the instruments. Contrary to microscopy, the flow cytometers were capable of accurately enumerating cultured cells in the 2–10 µm size range and cells in the lower size range of the 10–50 µm size class. Flow cytometers were also well-suited to assess low abundance samples due to their ability to process larger volumes than microscopes. The results were used to indicate which tools are suitable for ballast water monitoring: flow cytometry is a suitable technology for an indicative and real time analysis of ballast water samples whilst only microscopy would be robust enough for detailed taxonomical analyses

Indices of Metabolic Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress

Abstract Metabolic alterations are a key player involved in the onset of Alzheimer disease pathophysiology and, in this review, we focus on diet, metabolic rate, and neuronal size differences that have all been shown to play etiological and pathological roles in Alzheimer disease. Specifically, one of the earliest manifestations of brain metabolic depression in these patients is a sustained high caloric intake meaning that general diet is an important factor to take in account. Moreover, atrophy in the vasculature and a reduced glucose transporter activity for the vessels is also a common feature in Alzheimer disease. Finally, the overall size of neurons is larger in cases of Alzheimer disease than that of age-matched controls and, in individuals with Alzheimer disease, neuronal size inversely correlates with disease duration and positively associates with oxidative stress. Overall, clarifying cellular and molecular manifestations involved in metabolic alterations may contribute to a better understanding of early Alzheimer disease pathophysiology