Quelle régulation pour l’arrêt d’un protocole de recherche clinique de thérapie génique somatique ? État des lieux auprès des cliniciens-chercheurs européens

Depuis 2002, le débat sur les risques associés à la thérapie génique est initié suite à l’annonce que deux enfants inclus dans un essai thérapeutique impliquant une thérapie génique ont développé des effets indésirables important. En Janvier 2005, le débat sur les risques reprit suite à l’interruption du protocole sur les enfants bulle du Pr Fischer à l’hôpital Necker de Paris. Nous avons donc étudié le processus impliqué ainsi que la réflexion éthique associée aux décisions d’arrêt de protocole de recherche. Notre travail a été mené par une équipe pluridisciplinaire combinant chercheurs en santé, généticiens et éthiciens. Nous avons étudié la participation des chercheurs, des patients, des institutions officielles, des comités d’éthique ainsi que des associations de patients dans le processus de décision d’interruption d’un protocole de recherche.Nous avons également analysé les critères jugés les plus pertinents dans l’arrêt d’un protocole de recherche. Enfin nous avons analysé le point de vue des personnes directement impliquées dans la thérapie génique au moyen d’un questionnaire. Toutes les personnes contactées ont présenté un poster de recherche au congrès de la Société Européenne de Thérapie Génique. 62 personnes d’autant d’équipes de recherche différentes, de 17 pays, sur les 350 contactés ont répondu. Selon eux, la décision d’arrêt d’un protocole de recherche doit être prise suite à une consultation des chercheurs, des patients, du ministère de tutelle, d’une agence nationale de régulation ou d’un comité d’éthique ; la légitimité étant accordée à des décisions prises en commun par les chercheurs, les patients et les comités d’éthique. Les incidents sérieux et de façon plus surprenante, les incidents moins graves sont jugés comme étant des critères suffisants pour interrompre un essai. Nous avons fini par analyser les conséquences éthiques, telles que balance bénéfice/risque, processus de régulation ou responsabilité, de ces critères sur l’arrêt d’un protocole de recherche.In 2002, the debate on the risks of gene therapy was initiated following the annoucement that two children included in a clinical trial developed serious adverse effects. In January 2005, the debate was reignited following the interruption of the “bubble kids protocol” at the Hôpital Necker in Paris. We have thus investigated the ethical stakes involved in decisions to stop protocols. This work was carried out by a multidisciplinary team combining ethics researchers and geneticists. We studied the specific participation of researchers, patients, official institution, ethics committees and patient associations in the processes that can lead to an interruption of trial.We also analysed the criterion judged most relevant for halting a trial. Finally, we analyzed the perspective of the actors implicated directly in the provision of gene therapy, by means of a questionnaire. All the individuals contacted had presented a scientific poster at the European Society of Gene Therapy. 62 out of 350 persons, from 17 countries, responded to our questionnaire. According to these respondants, decisions to stop a trial should be taken after consultation with researchers, patients, the ministry, national agencies or ethics committees. Legitimacy was accorded to joint decision-making by researchers, patients and committees. Serious incidents, and surprisingly less serious incidents, clearly emerge as criterion for stopping a trial. We conclude by analyzing the ethical consequences, such as risk/benefit ratios, regulatory processes and responsibility, associated with these criterions and decisions to stop a trial

Patient/family views on data sharing in rare diseases: study in the European LeukoTreat project.: Survey assessing data sharing in leukodystrophies

International audienceThe purpose of this study was to explore patient and family views on the sharing of their medical data in the context of compiling a European leukodystrophies database. A survey questionnaire was delivered with help from referral centers and the European Leukodystrophies Association, and the questionnaires returned were both quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed. This study found that patients/families were strongly in favor of participating. Patients/families hold great hope and trust in the development of this type of research. They have a strong need for information and transparency on database governance, the conditions framing access to data, all research conducted, partnerships with the pharmaceutical industry, and they also need access to results. Our findings bring ethics-driven arguments for a process combining initial broad consent with ongoing information. On both, we propose key item-deliverables to database participants

Communicating the Results of Clinical Research to Participants: Attitudes, Practices, and Future Directions

The authors discuss the available data on the effects of communicating aggregate and individual research results on participants, investigators, and the research enterprise

Generation of recombinant single-chain antibodies neutralizing the cytolytic activity of vaginolysin, the main virulence factor of Gardnerella vaginalis

Generated scFvs is the first example of recombinant single-chain antibodies with VLY-neutralizing activity produced in prokaryote expression system. G. vaginalis caused infections continue to be a world-wide problem, therefore neutralizing recombinant antibodies may provide novel therapeutic agents useful in the treatment of bacterial vaginosis and other diseases caused by G. vaginalis

Exploiting nanobodies and Affimers for superresolution imaging in light microscopy

Antibodies have long been the main approach used for localizing proteins of interest by light microscopy. In the past 5 yr or so, and with the advent of superresolution microscopy, the diversity of tools for imaging has rapidly expanded. One main area of expansion has been in the area of nanobodies, small single-chain antibodies from camelids or sharks. The other has been the use of artificial scaffold proteins, including Affimers. The small size of nanobodies and Affimers compared with the traditional antibody provides several advantages for superresolution imaging

Communication of pharmacogenetic research results to HIV-infected treated patients: standpoints of professionals and patients.

International audienceThe aim of pharmacogenetic studies is to adapt therapeutic strategies to individual genetic profiles, thus maximising their efficacy and minimising the likelihood of adverse side effects. Since the advent of personalised medicine, the issue of communicating research results to participants has become increasingly important. We addressed this question in the context of HIV infection, as patients and associations are particularly concerned by research and therapeutic advances. We explored the standpoints of both research professionals and participants involved in a pharmacogenetic study conducted in a cohort of HIV-infected patients. The setting of the research protocol was followed over a 2-year period. Participants' standpoints were collected through a questionnaire and interviews were conducted with research professionals. Of 125 participants, 76% wished to receive individual results and 71% wished to receive collective results; 39% did not know when results might be expected. Communication of global research results is a principle that is generally accepted by professionals. Concerning individual feedback, the professionals felt that it was necessary if it could be of direct benefit to the participant, but they expressed doubts for situations with no recognised benefit. Our results highlight the necessity to consider this issue in greater detail. We suggest the need to anticipate the debates concerning individual feedback, to differentiate between situations and the importance of further investigations on the opportunities and modalities of communication. Finally, our work emphasised the opposite pressures between the pursuit of scientific knowledge and the therapeutic orientation of clinical trials

BMC Womens Health

BACKGROUND: The French national cancer institute (INCa) conducted a series of studies to assist decision-making in view of the implementation of organised cervical cancer screening that will be launched in 2018. The programme will concern all women aged 25-65 and targeted interventions will be developed for underscreened populations. This is an evolution from an equality-based approach to a step-by-step strategy of equity aiming to tackle health cancer inequalities that are avoidable and represents unfair differences. Here we present the work of the expert-group in ethics drafted by INCa to review the ethical issues prior to the programme implementation. DISCUSSION: We discuss the value of such a strategy and presents reflections with regard to issues of stigmatization, respect for individual freedom and autonomy. Indeed, the balance has to be found between the search for beneficence and the potential occurrence of perverse effects, which should be considered with particular attention. CONCLUSION: Moving toward an equity-oriented policy under a strategy of proportionate universalism faces a number of challenges, thus an overview of ethics and social sciences must be an integral part of the process