CANABIC: CANnabis and Adolescents: effect of a Brief Intervention on their Consumption - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

International audienceBACKGROUND: Cannabis is the most consumed illegal substance in France. General practitioners (GPs) are the health professionals who are most consulted by adolescents. Brief intervention (BI) is a promising care initiative for the consumption of cannabis, and could be a tool for GPs in caring for adolescents who consume cannabis. The aim of the CANABIC study is to measure the impact of a BI carried out by a GP on the consumption of cannabis by adolescents of 15 to 25 years of age. METHODS: A randomized clustered controlled trial, stratified over three areas (Auvergne, Languedoc-Roussillon, and Rhone-Alps), comparing an intervention group, which carries out the BI in consultation, and a control group, which ensures routine medical care. The main assessment criterion is the consumption of cannabis by amount of joints per month, at 12 months. The amount necessary to highlight a significant difference between the two groups of 30 % of consumption at 12 months is 250 patients (50 GPs, 5 patients per GP; risk alpha = 5 %; power = 90 %; intra-cluster correlation coefficient rho = 0.2; Hawthorne effect = 15 %; lost to follow-up rates for GPs = 10 % and for patients = 20 %). This plan is replicated for the three areas, and therefore a total of 750 patients are expected.The secondary criteria for judgment are the associated consumption of tobacco and alcohol, the perception of the consequences of consumption, and the driving of a vehicle following consumption. DISCUSSION: Research about BI for young cannabis users is underway. The aim of the CANABIC study is to validate a BI suited to adolescents who consume cannabis, which may be performed in the general practice. This would provide a tool for their treatment by a GP, which could be widely distributed during initial or further medical training.Trial registration: CANABIC is a randomized clustered trial (NCT01433692, registered 2011 Sept 12), PHRC funded: Clinical Research Hospital Program (Governmental Fund, Health Ministry). Date first patient randomized: March 2012

Epidemiology of superficial-vein thrombosis of the legs in primary care

La sévérité potentielle de la thrombose veineuse superficielle (TVS) des membres inférieurs a récemment été documentée par des études réalisées en soins secondaires et tertiaires. Son épidémiologie reste cependant inconnue en soins primaires. Le premier objectif de ce travail était de mesurer la prévalence de la TVS en soins primaires, ainsi que le taux d'évènements thromboemboliques concomitants au moment du diagnostic. Pour y répondre, un réseau de recherche collaborative entre médecins généralistes et médecins vasculaires de la région stéphanoise a été mis en place. Une étude transversale descriptive a été réalisée au sein de ce réseau pendant un an. La prévalence annuelle de la TVS a été mesurée à 0,64 pour mille habitants. Au moment du diagnostic, 24,6% des TVS étaient associées à une thrombose veineuse profonde symptomatique et 4,7% à une embolie pulmonaire symptomatique. Une seconde étude a recherché une variation saisonnière de la fréquence de la TVS en analysant les données individuelles de trois études aux designs différents ; l'étude STENOX, l'étude POST et l'étude STEPH. Une variation significative n'a été retrouvée que dans l'étude POST, et les peak-to-low ratios étaient inférieurs à 1,2 dans les trois études. Ainsi, si une variation existe, celle-ci parait être de faible envergure, sans conséquence sur la pratique et la rechercheThe potential severity of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs has recently been shown by studies perfomed in secondary and tertiary care. The epidemiology of SVT remains unknown in primary care. The first objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of SVT in primary care, and the rate of concomitant thromboembolic events at diagnosis. A collaborative research network between general practitioners and vascular physicians from Saint-Etienne has been set up. A cross-sectional study has been conducted within this network during one year. The annual prevalence of SVT was measured to 0.64 per thousand inhabitants. At diagnosis, 24.6% of SVT were associated with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and 4.7% with symptomatic pulmonary embolism. A second study was looking for a seasonal variation of SVT frequency by analyzing individual data from three studies with different designs; the STENOX study, the POST study and the STEPH study. A significant variation was found only in the POST study, and peak-to-low ratios were below 1.2 in the three studies. Thus, if other more powerful and exhaustive studies could find a seasonal variation, that variation would probably be of low magnitude and without clinical significanc

Epidémiologie en soins primaires de la thrombose veineuse superficielle des membres inférieurs

The potential severity of superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) of the lower limbs has recently been shown by studies perfomed in secondary and tertiary care. The epidemiology of SVT remains unknown in primary care. The first objective of this study was to measure the prevalence of SVT in primary care, and the rate of concomitant thromboembolic events at diagnosis. A collaborative research network between general practitioners and vascular physicians from Saint-Etienne has been set up. A cross-sectional study has been conducted within this network during one year. The annual prevalence of SVT was measured to 0.64 per thousand inhabitants. At diagnosis, 24.6% of SVT were associated with symptomatic deep vein thrombosis and 4.7% with symptomatic pulmonary embolism. A second study was looking for a seasonal variation of SVT frequency by analyzing individual data from three studies with different designs; the STENOX study, the POST study and the STEPH study. A significant variation was found only in the POST study, and peak-to-low ratios were below 1.2 in the three studies. Thus, if other more powerful and exhaustive studies could find a seasonal variation, that variation would probably be of low magnitude and without clinical significanceLa sévérité potentielle de la thrombose veineuse superficielle (TVS) des membres inférieurs a récemment été documentée par des études réalisées en soins secondaires et tertiaires. Son épidémiologie reste cependant inconnue en soins primaires. Le premier objectif de ce travail était de mesurer la prévalence de la TVS en soins primaires, ainsi que le taux d'évènements thromboemboliques concomitants au moment du diagnostic. Pour y répondre, un réseau de recherche collaborative entre médecins généralistes et médecins vasculaires de la région stéphanoise a été mis en place. Une étude transversale descriptive a été réalisée au sein de ce réseau pendant un an. La prévalence annuelle de la TVS a été mesurée à 0,64 pour mille habitants. Au moment du diagnostic, 24,6% des TVS étaient associées à une thrombose veineuse profonde symptomatique et 4,7% à une embolie pulmonaire symptomatique. Une seconde étude a recherché une variation saisonnière de la fréquence de la TVS en analysant les données individuelles de trois études aux designs différents ; l'étude STENOX, l'étude POST et l'étude STEPH. Une variation significative n'a été retrouvée que dans l'étude POST, et les peak-to-low ratios étaient inférieurs à 1,2 dans les trois études. Ainsi, si une variation existe, celle-ci parait être de faible envergure, sans conséquence sur la pratique et la recherch

Baseline data from the CACAO study, a cohort in general practice.

The CACAO study is a french national cohort study, conducted by general practitioners on ambulatory patients under oral anticoagulant. In the first phase, investigators provided safety data available from medical records at inclusion. They also evaluated patients’ knowledge about anticoagulation and graded their perception of patients’ adherence. Between April and December 2014, 463 general practitioners included 7154 patients. In accordance with French legislation, all data that could identify participants (age, sex, date of birth, etc.) have been withdrawn

Ruling out deep vein thrombosis in patients with superficial vein thrombosis: external validation of the ICARO score

A clinical score was recently proposed to rule out concomitant DVT in patients with a clinical suspicion of SVT. This study aimed to assess the external validity of this score in patients from the STEPH study. We performed a post-hoc analysis of data from the STEPH study. The STEPH study was a prospective multicenter community-based study conducted during a 1-year period in the resident adult population of the Greater Saint-Etienne urban area (France). Every patient with a clinical suspicion of SVT underwent a venous compression ultrasonography, to confirm SVT and to assess the presence of a concomitant DVT or not. Odds ratios for concomitant DVT were calculated for each item of the ICARO score. We then computed the score for each patient, and performed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. In univariate analysis, none of the ICARO items were significantly different given the presence of a concomitant DVT. Given computed scores, 55 patients (45.1%) had a low risk, 17 (13.9%) had an intermediate risk and 50 (41.0%) had a high risk of a concomitant DVT. The area under the ROC curve was 0.386 [95% CI, 0.268-0.504]. When risk levels were dichotomized as low vs intermediate-high risk, the ICARO score had a sensitivity of 36.0%, a specificity of 40.2%, a positive predictive value of 13.4% and a negative predictive value of 70.9%. Our study does not confirm the utility of the ICARO clinical score to rule out concomitant DVT in case of SVT

Avoiding disease mongering: A checklist for vascular physicians and researchers

Disease mongering is an expression created in 1992 by a medical journalist, Lynn Payer, to qualify the "selling of sickness that widens the boundaries of treatable illness in order to expand markets for those who sell and deliver treatments". This interesting concept led us to question whether, as researchers with publication and career interests in superficial vein thrombosis, we were not shaping a benign condition into a disease. Since the publication of the CALISTO trial in 2010, anticoagulant management of superficial vein thrombosis remains debated. Issues raised, such as the cost-effectiveness of the treatment strategy, the use of a composite endpoint including death, the low event rate without mortality reduction and conflict of interest due to industrial funding. We searched Embase, Medline, Web of science, and Opengrey databases to review all aspects about disease mongering raised in the literature and created a checklist with seventeen items. We used this checklist as support for a narrative review, questioning known literature on superficial vein thrombosis. The main issues pointing towards disease mongering concerned definition and promotion; whereas management seemed rather spared. Many arguments could be counterbalanced, but researchers should pay particular attention to three major points: exaggeration of the severity of the disease and potential adverse outcomes without treatment, promotion by opinion leaders, and an openly declared, yet undoubtedly present, conflict of interest situation

Vaccination for Human Papillomavirus: an historic and bibliometric study

A systematic literature review was conducted to describe in a historical perspective the evolution of studies concerning HPV vaccination. The search identified 794 articles of which 568 were included. The first article was published in 2001, and the maximum annual number of publications was reached in 2014. The average number of authors per paper was 8.8. Papers originated from 49 different countries, with the USA accounted for the maximum number of publications (n = 217). Efficacy (46.5%) and safety (31.0%) were the most prevalent objectives. Clinical trials constituted the largest group of methods (37.9%). Chronological trends did not reveal any lasting curve-crossings, indicating that the priority topics have remained the same. The geographical origin of these studies raises questions about the transposability of the results to populations where HPV vaccination has been studied only a little. This study could help guide future research to less-studied research objectives, particularly for vaccines

How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey

International audienceObjectives To describe how general practitioners (GPs) adapted their practices to secure and maintain access to care in the epidemic phase. A secondary objective was to explore if GPs’ individual characteristics and type of practice determined their adaptation.Design Observational study using an online questionnaire. Organisational changes were measured by a main question and detailed in two specific outcomes. To identify which GPs’ characteristics impacted organisational changes, successive multivariate logistic modelling was performed. First, we identified the GPs’ characteristics related to organisational changes with a univariate analysis. Then, we tested the adjusted associations between this variable and the following GPs’ characteristics: age, gender and type of practice.Setting The questionnaire was administered online between 14 March and 21 March 2020. Practitioners were recruited by email using the contact lists of different French scientific GP societies.Participants The target population was GPs currently practising in France (n=46 056). We obtained a total of 7481 responses.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome: Proportion of GPs who adapted their practice. Secondary outcome: GPs’ characteristics related to organisational changes.Results Among the 7481 responses, 5425 were complete and were analysed. 3849 GPs (70.9%) changed their activity, 3605 GPs (66.5%) increased remote consultations and 2315 GPs (42.7%) created a specific pathway for probable patients with COVID-19. Among the 3849 GPs (70.9%) who changed their practice, 3306 (91.7%) gave more answers by phone, 996 (27.6%) by email and 1105 (30.7%) increased the use of video consultations. GPs working in multi-professional group practices were more likely to have changed their activity since the beginning of the epidemic wave than GPs working in mono-professional group or single medical practices (adjusted OR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.56, p=0.001).Conclusions French GPs adapted their practices regarding access to care for patients in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic. This adaptation was higher in multi-professional group practices

Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: cross-sectional analysis of the French CACAO cohort study in primary care

International audienceBackground Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for an increasing proportion of prescriptions in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in primary care. Inappropriate dosing of DOACs is a common problem, with under-dosing being a particular issue. However, conflicting results have been reported about the factors independently associated with inappropriate dosing. Aim To describe inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs among patients in the CACAO French nationwide general practice cohort, and to identify the factors independently associated with inappropriate DOAC doses. Design and setting Cross-sectional baseline analysis of the CACAO French national multicentre prospective cohort of adult patients in primary care receiving an oral anticoagulant who were recruited between April and October 2014. Method A total of 1111 patients from the CACAO cohort who received a DOAC for NVAF were included in this study. Inappropriate prescriptions of DOACs were described (inappropriate dosage, contraindications, non-indications, interactions, and non-compliance with the precautions for use). Multivariate logistic models were used to investigate factors associated with inappropriate DOAC dosing (under-dosing and over-dosing). Results Overall, 438 patients (39.4%) received at least one inappropriate DOAC prescription. The most common inappropriate prescription was inappropriate dosage ( n = 374, 33.7%), particularly under-dosing ( n = 348, 31.3%). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors independently associated with under-dosing were older age, prescription of apixaban or dabigatran, and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 vs. a score = 1. Factors with over-dosing were kidney failure, a HAS-BLED score ≥3, and older age. Conclusion The appropriateness of DOAC prescribing for NVAF can be improved, especially in older patients, and in patients with kidney failure, a higher risk of ischaemic stroke, and/or a higher risk of bleeding. GPs have a key role in increasing the proportion of appropriate DOAC prescriptions via informational, educational, and/or management strategies

How GPs adapted their practices and organisations at the beginning of COVID-19 outbreak: a French national observational survey

International audienceObjectives To describe how general practitioners (GPs) adapted their practices to secure and maintain access to care in the epidemic phase. A secondary objective was to explore if GPs’ individual characteristics and type of practice determined their adaptation.Design Observational study using an online questionnaire. Organisational changes were measured by a main question and detailed in two specific outcomes. To identify which GPs’ characteristics impacted organisational changes, successive multivariate logistic modelling was performed. First, we identified the GPs’ characteristics related to organisational changes with a univariate analysis. Then, we tested the adjusted associations between this variable and the following GPs’ characteristics: age, gender and type of practice.Setting The questionnaire was administered online between 14 March and 21 March 2020. Practitioners were recruited by email using the contact lists of different French scientific GP societies.Participants The target population was GPs currently practising in France (n=46 056). We obtained a total of 7481 responses.Primary and secondary outcome measures Primary outcome: Proportion of GPs who adapted their practice. Secondary outcome: GPs’ characteristics related to organisational changes.Results Among the 7481 responses, 5425 were complete and were analysed. 3849 GPs (70.9%) changed their activity, 3605 GPs (66.5%) increased remote consultations and 2315 GPs (42.7%) created a specific pathway for probable patients with COVID-19. Among the 3849 GPs (70.9%) who changed their practice, 3306 (91.7%) gave more answers by phone, 996 (27.6%) by email and 1105 (30.7%) increased the use of video consultations. GPs working in multi-professional group practices were more likely to have changed their activity since the beginning of the epidemic wave than GPs working in mono-professional group or single medical practices (adjusted OR: 1.32, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.56, p=0.001).Conclusions French GPs adapted their practices regarding access to care for patients in the context of the COVID-19 epidemic. This adaptation was higher in multi-professional group practices