182 research outputs found

    ‘The Science of CAIM: What's Next for Complementary, Alternative and Integrative Medical Research?’

    Get PDF
    symposium on the future of complementary, alternative and integrative medical research featuring nationally recognized speakers. The symposium took place on the UCLA campus in late January and was targeted to the Geffen School of Medicine’s Institutional Review Board (IRB). Its purpose was to address the finding by th

    The development of a decision aid for tinnitus

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To develop a decision aid for tinnitus care that would meet international consensus for decision aid quality. DESIGN: A mixed methods design that included qualitative in-depth interviews, literature review, focus groups, user testing and readability checking. STUDY SAMPLE: Patients and clinicians who have clinical experience of tinnitus. RESULTS: A decision aid for tinnitus care was developed. This incorporates key evidence of efficacy for the most frequently used tinnitus care options, together with information derived from patient priorities when deciding which choice to make. CONCLUSION: The decision aid has potential to enable shared decision making between clinicians and patients in audiology. The decision aid meets consensus standards

    Understanding the relationship between the perceived characteristics of clinical practice guidelines and their uptake: protocol for a realist review

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Clinical practice guidelines have the potential to facilitate the implementation of evidence into practice, support clinical decision making, specify beneficial therapeutic approaches, and influence public policy. However, these potential benefits have not been consistently achieved. The limited impact of guidelines can be attributed to organisational constraints, the complexity of the guidelines, and the lack of usability testing or end-user involvement in their development. Implementability has been referred to as the perceived characteristics of guidelines that predict the relative ease of their implementation at the clinical level, but this concept is as yet poorly defined. The objective of our study is to identify guideline attributes that affect uptake in practice by considering evidence from four disciplines (medicine, psychology, management, human factors engineering) to determine the relationship between the perceived characteristics of recommendations and their uptake and to develop a framework of implementability.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A realist-review approach to knowledge synthesis will be used to understand attributes of guidelines (<it>e.g</it>., its text and content) and how changing these elements might impact clinical practice and clinical decision making. It also allows for the exploration of 'what works for whom, in what circumstances, and in what respects'. The realist review will be structured according to Pawson's five practical steps in realist reviews: (1) clarifying the scope of the review, (2) determining the search strategy, (3) ensuring proper article selection and study quality assessment, (4) extracting and organising data, and (5) synthesising the evidence and drawing conclusions. Data will be synthesised according to a two-stage analysis: (1) we will extract and define all relevant guideline attributes from the different disciplines, then create a shortlist of unique attributes and investigate their relationships with uptake, and (2) we will compare and contrast the attributes and guideline uptake within each and between the four disciplines to create a robust framework of implementability.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Creating guidelines that are designed to maximise uptake may be a potentially effective and inexpensive way of increasing their impact. However, this is best achieved by a comprehensive framework to inform the design of guidelines drawing on a range of disciplines that study behaviour change. This study will use a customised realist-review approach to synthesising the literature to better understand and operationalise a complex and under-theorised concept.</p

    Creativity in a COVID-19 Virtual Learning Space

    Get PDF
    The COVID-19 pandemic has changed the world, and education too has been affected in many ways. In particular, much learning in higher education has moved to synchronous virtual spaces. Regardless of context, the principles of learning and teaching remain at the foreground, and the importance of developing active and creative learning spaces has never been greater. We are a group of one faculty member, six graduate students, and one teaching assistant who came together to write this paper so that we could share our online experiences in a clinical education course during the summer of 2020. We used a variety of active-learning and creative-teaching approaches. In this paper, we share our virtual use of video-based learning, gaming/crosswords, speed dating, blowing bubbles as a way to learn how to teach a psychomotor skill, image-based art, forum theatre, and found poetry. We share a crossword designed specifically for readers with which to grapple and our summary is presented as a found poem. Student author quotes are interspersed throughout the paper. RĂ©sumĂ© La pandĂ©mie de COVID-19 a changĂ© le monde et du mĂȘme coup, a fait basculer le domaine de l’éducation. Principalement en enseignement supĂ©rieur une grande partie de l’apprentissage a maintenant lieu dans des espaces virtuels synchrones. Mais peu importe le contexte, les principes d’apprentissage et d’enseignement restent Ă  l’avant-plan et le besoin de dĂ©velopper des espaces d’apprentissage actifs et crĂ©atifs est plus important que jamais. Notre groupe, composĂ© d’un membre du corps professoral, de six Ă©tudiantes des cycles supĂ©rieurs et d’une auxiliaire d’enseignement, fut crĂ©Ă© pour rĂ©diger cet article et ainsi partager nos expĂ©riences d’un cours en ligne de formation clinique Ă  l’étĂ© 2020, dans lequel une variĂ©tĂ© d’approches d’apprentissage actif et d’enseignement crĂ©atif ont Ă©tĂ© utilisĂ©es. Dans cet article, nous partageons notre utilisation virtuelle d’outils d’apprentissage tels les vidĂ©os, jeux/mots croisĂ©s, rencontres express (speed dating), faire des bulles pour apprendre Ă  enseigner une habiletĂ© psychomotrice, l’art visuel par l’image, le thĂ©Ăątre-forum et la poĂ©sie retrouvĂ©e. Nous partageons Ă©galement un mot croisĂ© conçu spĂ©cifiquement Ă  l’intention de nos lecteurs et lectrices et notre rĂ©sumĂ© est prĂ©sentĂ© comme un poĂšme retrouvĂ©. Quelques citations d’étudiantes ayant participĂ© Ă  la rĂ©daction, ont Ă©tĂ© insĂ©rĂ©es çà et lĂ  Ă  travers l’articl

    A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals

    Get PDF
    Background Biomedical journals are the main route for disseminating the results of health-related research. Despite this, their editors operate largely without formal training or certification. To our knowledge, no body of literature systematically identifying core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals exists. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a scoping review to determine what is known on the competency requirements for scientific editors of biomedical journals. Methods We searched the MEDLINE¼, Cochrane Library, Embase¼, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ERIC databases (from inception to November 2014) and conducted a grey literature search for research and non-research articles with competency-related statements (i.e. competencies, knowledge, skills, behaviors, and tasks) pertaining to the role of scientific editors of peer-reviewed health-related journals. We also conducted an environmental scan, searched the results of a previous environmental scan, and searched the websites of existing networks, major biomedical journal publishers, and organizations that offer resources for editors. Results A total of 225 full-text publications were included, 25 of which were research articles. We extracted a total of 1,566 statements possibly related to core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals from these publications. We then collated overlapping or duplicate statements which produced a list of 203 unique statements. Finally, we grouped these statements into seven emergent themes: (1) dealing with authors, (2) dealing with peer reviewers, (3) journal publishing, (4) journal promotion, (5) editing, (6) ethics and integrity, and (7) qualities and characteristics of editors. Discussion To our knowledge, this scoping review is the first attempt to systematically identify possible competencies of editors. Limitations are that (1) we may not have captured all aspects of a biomedical editor’s work in our searches, (2) removing redundant and overlapping items may have led to the elimination of some nuances between items, (3) restricting to certain databases, and only French and English publications, may have excluded relevant publications, and (4) some statements may not necessarily be competencies. Conclusion This scoping review is the first step of a program to develop a minimum set of core competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals which will be followed by a training needs assessment, a Delphi exercise, and a consensus meeting

    Shared decision-making in tinnitus care: an exploration of clinical encounters

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVES: This study examined clinical encounters between clinicians and patients to determine current practice for the diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus. The objective was to develop an understanding of the ideal clinical encounter that would facilitate genuine shared decision-making. DESIGN: Video ethnography was used to examine clinical encounters for the diagnosis and treatment of tinnitus. METHODS: Clinical encounters were video-recorded. Patients were interviewed individually following their clinic appointment. Data were analysed using constant comparison techniques from Grounded Theory. Initial inductive analyses were then considered against theoretical conceptualizations of the clinician-patient relationship and of the clinical encounter. RESULTS: Alignment between clinician and patient was found to be essential to a collaborative consultation and to shared decision-making. Clinician groups demonstrated variation in behaviour in the encounter; some asked closed questions and directed the majority of the consultation; others asked open questions and allowed patients to lead the consultation. CONCLUSIONS: A shift away from aetiology and physiological tests is needed so that tinnitus is managed as a persistent unexplained set of symptoms. This uncertainty is challenging for the medical professionals; lessons could be learned from the use of therapeutic skills. Further research is required to test techniques, such as the use of decision aids, to determine how we might create the ideal clinical encounter. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Tinnitus is a condition in which sound is heard in the absence of an external source. Current approaches to managing tinnitus vary depending on clinical site (Hoare & Hall, ). In most instances, tinnitus does not have a straightforward medical cause. Tinnitus care is challenging to traditional biomedical encounters because the process of diagnosis may not lead to a defined treatment. Clinicians are required to consider not only what the tinnitus sounds like but more importantly, what it means for the affected individual. This requires a careful and skilled approach to eliciting a patient's current behaviour, coping, and preferences for both outcomes and treatment approaches. What does this study add? We provide the first in-depth description of decision-making in clinical services for tinnitus. Findings suggest a shift in focus is required to move away from the current prioritization of the biomedical treatment of tinnitus. There is variation to the extent different clinicians were able to deal with the uncertainty presented by the symptoms of tinnitus

    Corporal punishment by parents and associated child behaviors and experiences: A meta-analytic and theoretical review.

    Full text link

    Protocol: developing a conceptual framework of patient mediated knowledge translation, systematic review using a realist approach

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patient involvement in healthcare represents the means by which to achieve a healthcare system that is responsive to patient needs and values. Characterization and evaluation of strategies for involving patients in their healthcare may benefit from a knowledge translation (KT) approach. The purpose of this knowledge synthesis is to develop a conceptual framework for patient-mediated KT interventions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A preliminary conceptual framework for patient-mediated KT interventions was compiled to describe intended purpose, recipients, delivery context, intervention, and outcomes. A realist review will be conducted in consultation with stakeholders from the arthritis and cancer fields to explore how these interventions work, for whom, and in what contexts. To identify patient-mediated KT interventions in these fields, we will search MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE from 1995 to 2010; scan references of all eligible studies; and examine five years of tables of contents for journals likely to publish quantitative or qualitative studies that focus on developing, implementing, or evaluating patient-mediated KT interventions. Screening and data collection will be performed independently by two individuals.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The conceptual framework of patient-mediated KT options and outcomes could be used by healthcare providers, managers, educationalists, patient advocates, and policy makers to guide program planning, service delivery, and quality improvement and by us and other researchers to evaluate existing interventions or develop new interventions. By raising awareness of options for involving patients in improving their own care, outcomes based on using a KT approach may lead to greater patient-centred care delivery and improved healthcare outcomes.</p
    • 

    corecore