Consenso da Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia sobre o tratamento da migrânea crônica

Chronic migraine poses a significant personal, social and economic burden and is characterized by headache present on 15 or more days per month for at least three months, with at least eight days of migrainous headache per month. It is frequently associated with analgesic or acute migraine medication overuse and this should not be overlooked. The present consensus was elaborated upon by a group of members of the Brazilian Headache Society in order to describe current evidence and to provide recommendations related to chronic migraine pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment. Withdrawal strategies in medication overuse headache are also described, as well as treatment risks during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Oral topiramate and onabotulinum toxin A injections are the only treatments granted Class A recommendation, while valproate, gabapentin, and tizanidine received Class B recommendation, along with acupuncture. biofeedback, and mindfulness. The anti-CGRP or anti-CGRPr monoclonal antibodies, still unavailable in Brazil, are promising new drugs already approved elsewhere for migraine prophylactic treatment, the efficacy of which in chronic migraine is still to be definitively proven777509520A migrânea (enxaqueca) crônica determina uma carga pessoal, social e econômica significativa e é caracterizada por dor de cabeça presente em quinze ou mais dias por mês por ao menos três meses, com no mínimo oito dias de cefaleia migranosa a cada mês. É frequentemente associada ao uso excessivo de medicação analgésica ou antimigranosa aguda e isso não deve ser negligenciado. Este consenso foi elaborado por um grupo de membros da Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia, para descrever as evidências atualmente disponíveis e fornecer recomendações relacionadas ao tratamento farmacológico e não farmacológico da migrânea crônica. Estratégias de retirada na cefaleia por uso excessivo de medicamentos também são descritas, assim como os riscos dos tratamentos durante a gravidez e a amamentação. O topiramato oral e as injeções de toxina onabotulínica A são os únicos tratamentos que receberam a recomendação classe A, enquanto que o valproato, a gabapentina e a tizanidina receberam recomendação classe B, juntamente com acupuntura, biofeedback e mindfulness. Os anticorpos monoclonais anti-CGRP ou anti-CGRPr, ainda não disponíveis no Brasil, são novos fármacos promissores, já aprovados em outros países para o tratamento profilático da migrânea, cuja eficácia na migrânea crônica ainda está por ser definitivamente comprovad

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear un derstanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5–7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8–11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world’s most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepre sented in biodiversity databases.13–15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may elim inate pieces of the Amazon’s biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological com munities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple or ganism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region’s vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most ne glected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lostinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Pervasive gaps in Amazonian ecological research

Biodiversity loss is one of the main challenges of our time,1,2 and attempts to address it require a clear understanding of how ecological communities respond to environmental change across time and space.3,4 While the increasing availability of global databases on ecological communities has advanced our knowledge of biodiversity sensitivity to environmental changes,5,6,7 vast areas of the tropics remain understudied.8,9,10,11 In the American tropics, Amazonia stands out as the world's most diverse rainforest and the primary source of Neotropical biodiversity,12 but it remains among the least known forests in America and is often underrepresented in biodiversity databases.13,14,15 To worsen this situation, human-induced modifications16,17 may eliminate pieces of the Amazon's biodiversity puzzle before we can use them to understand how ecological communities are responding. To increase generalization and applicability of biodiversity knowledge,18,19 it is thus crucial to reduce biases in ecological research, particularly in regions projected to face the most pronounced environmental changes. We integrate ecological community metadata of 7,694 sampling sites for multiple organism groups in a machine learning model framework to map the research probability across the Brazilian Amazonia, while identifying the region's vulnerability to environmental change. 15%–18% of the most neglected areas in ecological research are expected to experience severe climate or land use changes by 2050. This means that unless we take immediate action, we will not be able to establish their current status, much less monitor how it is changing and what is being lost

Uso prático da AbobotulinumtoxinA no tratamento de espasticidade em crianças com paralisia cerebral

AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) has been used for the treatment of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy (CP). Its use requires careful administration, regarding dosing, selection of local of application, interval between applications and efficacy and safety monitoring. This was the first panel of experts on the treatment of spasticity, which developed a guide to provide an overview on important issues related to therapeutic strategies adopted by physicians using ABO, including its dosage to be applied per muscle.Treatment should be initiated as soon as possible, ideally between two and six years old. A clinical evaluation should identify muscles presenting spastic activity, and determine desired outcome: improvement of function, esthetics/aspect, pain treatment, easing care and positioning, preventing hips dislocation, improvement of walking and posture, and to provide conditions for education and social participation. Pre-requisites to achieve good results are adequate muscle selection, adequate ABO dosage and exact injection technique. Many common pathological patterns can be adequately treated if several muscles are simultaneously injected in a single treatment session; planning ABO dosage per muscle should take into consideration the maximum dosage in units per muscle and the total maximum ABO dosage per session (30 U/kg patient´s body weight, not exceeding 1000 U).After application children should be submitted to physical therapy and occupational therapy, focused on home therapy, and family involvement, increasing chances of therapeutic gain. Treatment with ABO is multidisciplinary and requires integrated approaches.AbobotulinumtoxinA (ABO) tem sido utilizada para o tratamento da espasticidade em crianças com paralisia cerebral (PC). Seu uso requer uma administração cuidadosa, quanto à dosagem, seleção de locais de aplicação, intervalo entre aplicações, eficácia e segurança. Este foi o primeiro painel de especialistas no tratamento da espasticidade que desenvolveu um guia sobre questões gerais relacionadas a terapêutica de médicos que utilizam ABO, incluindo a indicação da dosagem a ser aplicada por músculo. O tratamento deve ser iniciado o mais rápido, idealmente entre dois e seis anos de idade. Uma avaliação clínica deve identificar os músculos espásticos e determinar o objetivo: melhora funcional, analgesia, facilidade de cuidados e posicionamento, prevenção da luxação dos quadris, melhora da marcha e postura, facilitação do processo de educação, maior participação social e/ou melhora estética. Os pré-requisitos para alcançar bons resultados são a seleção muscular adequada, a dosagem de ABO e a técnica de injeção. Muitos padrões patológicos comuns podem ser tratados se vários músculos forem simultaneamente injetados em uma única sessão de tratamento; O planejamento da dose de ABO por músculo deve levar em consideração a dosagem máxima em unidades por músculo e a dose de ABO máxima total por sessão (30 U / kg de peso corporal do paciente, não superior a 1000 U). Após a aplicação, as crianças devem ser submetidas a programas de fisioterapia e terapia ocupacional, focadas em orientações domiciliares e em orientações para a família, aumentando as chances de ganho terapêutico. O tratamento com ABO é multidisciplinar e requer abordagens integradas

Latin American consensus on guidelines for chronic migraine treatment

Chronic migraine is a condition with significant prevalence all around the world and high socioeconomic impact, and its handling has been challenging neurologists. Developments for understanding its mechanisms and associated conditions, as well as that of new therapies, have been quick and important, a fact which has motivated the Latin American and Brazilian Headache Societies to prepare the present consensus. The treatment of chronic migraine should always be preceded by a careful diagnosis review; the detection of possible worsening factors and associated conditions; the stratification of seriousness/impossibility to treat; and monitoring establishment, with a pain diary. The present consensus deals with pharmacological and nonpharmacological forms of treatment to be used in chronic migraine

Consenso latino-americano para as diretrizes de tratamento da migranea cronica

Chronic migraine is a condition with significant prevalence all around the world and high socioeconomic impact, and its handling has been challenging neurologists. Developments for understanding its mechanisms and associated conditions, as well as that of new therapies, have been quick and important, a fact which has motivated the Latin American and Brazilian Headache Societies to prepare the present consensus. The treatment of chronic migraine should always be preceded by a careful diagnosis review; the detection of possible worsening factors and associated conditions; the stratification of seriousness/impossibility to treat; and monitoring establishment, with a pain diary. The present consensus deals with pharmacological and nonpharmacological forms of treatment to be used in chronic migraine.A migrânea crônica é uma condição com prevalência significativa ao redor do mundo e alto impacto socioeconômico, sendo que seu manuseio tem desafiado os neurologistas. Os avanços na compreensão de seus mecanismos e das condições a ela associadas, bem como nas novas terapêuticas, têm sido rápidos e importantes, fato que motivou as Sociedades Latino-americana e Brasileira de Cefaleia a elaborarem o presente consenso. O tratamento da migrânea crônica deve ser sempre precedido por uma revisão cuidadosa do diagnóstico, pela detecção de possíveis fatores de piora e das condições associadas, pela estratificação de gravidade/impossibilidade de se tratar e pelo monitoramento com um diário da dor. Este consenso apresenta abordagens farmacológicas e não-farmacológicas para tratar a migrânea crônica.Universidad de Santiago de Chile and Sociedad de Neurologia Psiquiatria y NeurocirugiaUniversidad de Costa Rica Hospital San Juan de DiosUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais Hospital das ClinicasUniversidade Jose do Rosario VellanoUniversidade de São Paulo Faculdade de Medicina Barao de Maua Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao PretoUniversidad Nacional de CordobaBrazilian and International Headache Societies Academia Brasileira de NeurologiaCentro Universitario de Volta Redonda Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF)Universidad de la Republica Hospital Maciel Facultad de MedicinaUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de Medicina Sector of Investigation and Treatment of Headaches at Clinical Neurology in the Neurology DisciplineUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NorteUniversidade Federal do ParanaUFF Associacao Latino-Americana de CefaleiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas Faculdade de Medicina de CatanduvaUSP Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao PretoUniversidade Federal de Ciencias da Saude de Porto Alegre Academia Brasileira de NeurologiaUniversidade de La SabanaUSP Faculdade de MedicinaHospital Perez CarrenoUFFUniversidad Mayor de San AndresUniversidad Central de Venezuela Hospital Vargas de CaracasUniversidade de Santo Amaro Escola Paulista de Medicina da UNIFESPUniversidad de GuadalajaraUNIFESP Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaUSP Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirao Preto Centro Educacional Barao de MauaUniversidade Federal de PernambucoUniversidad Mayor de San Andres Hospital das ClinicasAcademia Mexicana de Neurologia Hospital Especialidades Centro Medico La RazaSociedad NeurologicaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein UNIFESPUniversidad de ConcepcionUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho Faculdade de MedicinaUniversity of TrondheimASS Colombiana de Neurologia AHSUniversidad de Buenos AiresUniversidad Central de Venezuela Hospital VargasUniversidad Diego PortalesUniversidad de SantiagoInstituto de NeurologiaUFF Medicine SchoolUNIFESP, EPM, Sector of Investigation and Treatment of Headaches at Clinical Neurology in the Neurology DisciplineUniversidade de Santo Amaro Escola Paulista de Medicina da UNIFESP, Universidade Federal de Santa CatarinaHospital Israelita Albert Einstein UNIFESPSciEL

Consenso latino-americano para as diretrizes de tratamento da migranea cronica

Chronic migraine is a condition with significant prevalence all around the world and high socioeconomic impact, and its handling has been challenging neurologists. Developments for understanding its mechanisms and associated conditions, as well as that of new therapies, have been quick and important, a fact which has motivated the Latin American and Brazilian Headache Societies to prepare the present consensus. The treatment of chronic migraine should always be preceded by a careful diagnosis review; the detection of possible worsening factors and associated conditions; the stratification of seriousness/impossibility to treat; and monitoring establishment, with a pain diary. The present consensus deals with pharmacological and nonpharmacological forms of treatment to be used in chronic migraine.A migrânea crônica é uma condição com prevalência significativa ao redor do mundo e alto impacto socioeconômico, sendo que seu manuseio tem desafiado os neurologistas. Os avanços na compreensão de seus mecanismos e das condições a ela associadas, bem como nas novas terapêuticas, têm sido rápidos e importantes, fato que motivou as Sociedades Latino-americana e Brasileira de Cefaleia a elaborarem o presente consenso. O tratamento da migrânea crônica deve ser sempre precedido por uma revisão cuidadosa do diagnóstico, pela detecção de possíveis fatores de piora e das condições associadas, pela estratificação de gravidade/impossibilidade de se tratar e pelo monitoramento com um diário da dor. Este consenso apresenta abordagens farmacológicas e não-farmacológicas para tratar a migrânea crônica.47848