The Cancer Spliceome: Reprograming of Alternative Splicing in Cancer

Alternative splicing allows for the expression of multiple RNA and protein isoforms from one gene, making it a major contributor to transcriptome and proteome diversification in eukaryotes. Advances in next generation sequencing technologies and genome-wide analyses have recently underscored the fact that the vast majority of multi-exon genes under normal physiology engage in alternative splicing in tissue-specific and developmental-specific manner. On the other hand, cancer cells exhibit remarkable transcriptome alterations partly by adopting cancer-specific splicing isoforms. These isoforms and their encoded proteins are not insignificant byproducts of the abnormal physiology of cancer cells, but either drivers of cancer progression or small but significant contributors to specific cancer hallmarks. Thus, it is paramount that the pathways that regulate alternative splicing in cancer, including the splicing factors that bind to pre-mRNAs and modulate spliceosome recruitment. In this review, we present a few distinct cases of alternative splicing in cancer, with an emphasis on their regulation as well as their contribution to cancer cell phenotype. Several categories of splicing aberrations are highlighted, including alterations in cancer-related genes that directly affect their pre-mRNA splicing, mutations in genes encoding splicing factors or core spliceosomal subunits, and the seemingly mutation-free disruptions in the balance of the expression of RNA-binding proteins, including components of both the major (U2-dependent) and minor (U12-dependent) spliceosomes. Given that the latter two classes cause global alterations in splicing that affect a wide range of genes, it remains a challenge to identify the ones that contribute to cancer progression. These challenges necessitate a systematic approach to decipher these aberrations and their impact on cancer. Ultimately, a sufficient understanding of splicing deregulation in cancer is predicted to pave the way for novel and innovative RNA-based therapies

L’actionnariat salarié et performance des entreprises : Revue de littérature

This article reviews the main streams of research on employee ownership over the past fifty years. It proposes several theoretical contributions to provide a more complex picture of the relationship between employee ownership and firm performance that goes beyond most existing work, which has tended to focus only on employee attitudes and behaviors. It shows that employee ownership can affect different performance indicators through different mechanisms, whereas past empirical research has often failed to make such a distinction.  The article does not provide a comprehensive review of the literature on these topics: rather, it highlights the main findings that have emerged from the literature to date, and suggests some avenues for future research. It is suggested that majority employee ownership is different in nature and effect from "classic" minority employee ownership plans for large companies, but the literature has tended to confuse the two. Future research will need to distinguish between the different forms of employee ownership if the impact of ownership is to be more accurately calibrated. The article is organized as follows. First, it reviews the research findings on types of ownership and the impact of stock plans. Second, it contributes to the literature on the "determinants" of the use of stock ownership plans by companies and the influences on employee participation in stock ownership plans. Next, it highlights the effect of share ownership on employees' attitudes and behavior and on company performance. Finally, the relationship between stock ownership plans and other forms of employee participation is demonstrated and reported with conclusions about managerial implications.   Keywords: employee ownership, employee attitudes and behavior, company performance, performance indicators, the impact of employee ownership, forms of employee participation JEL Classification: L25, G32 Paper type: Theoretical ResearchCet article passe en revue les principaux courants de recherche sur l'actionnariat salarié au cours des cinquante dernières années. Il propose plusieurs contributions théoriques pour fournir une image plus complexe des relations entre l'actionnariat salarié et la performance de l'entreprise qui va au-delà de la plupart des travaux existants, qui ont eu tendance à se concentrer uniquement sur les attitudes et les comportements des employés. Il montre que l'actionnariat salarié peut affecter différents indicateurs de performance par différents mécanismes, alors que les recherches empiriques passées ont souvent omis de faire une telle distinction. L’article ne fournit pas une revue complète de la littérature sur ces sujets : il met plutôt en évidence les principales conclusions qui ont émergé de la littérature à ce jour, et suggère quelques pistes de recherche pour l'avenir. Il est suggéré que l'actionnariat salarié majoritaire est différent, dans sa nature et ses effets, des plans d'actionnariat salarié minoritaire "classiques" dans les grandes entreprises, mais la littérature a eu tendance à confondre les deux. Les recherches futures devront distinguer les différentes formes d'actionnariat salarié si l'on veut calibrer plus précisément l'impact de l'actionnariat. L’article s’organise comme suit. Tout d’abord, il examine les résultats de la recherche sur les types d'actionnariat et l'incidence des plans d'actionnariat. Ensuite, il contribue à la littérature sur les "déterminants" de l'utilisation des plans d'actionnariat par les entreprises et les influences sur la participation des salariés aux plans d'actionnariat. Après, il met en évidence l'effet de l'actionnariat sur les attitudes et le comportement des salariés et sur les performances de l'entreprise. Enfin, la relation entre les plans d'actionnariat et les autres formes de participation des salariés est démontrée et rapportée en tirant des conclusions des implications managériales.   Classification JEL : L25, G32 Type de l’article : Article théoriqu

Minor Intron Splicing from Basic Science to Disease

Pre-mRNA splicing is an essential step in gene expression and is catalyzed by two machineries in eukaryotes: the major (U2 type) and minor (U12 type) spliceosomes. While the majority of introns in humans are U2 type, less than 0.4% are U12 type, also known as minor introns (mi-INTs), and require a specialized spliceosome composed of U11, U12, U4atac, U5, and U6atac snRNPs. The high evolutionary conservation and apparent splicing inefficiency of U12 introns have set them apart from their major counterparts and led to speculations on the purpose for their existence. However, recent studies challenged the simple concept of mi-INTs splicing inefficiency due to low abundance of their spliceosome and confirmed their regulatory role in alternative splicing, significantly impacting the expression of their host genes. Additionally, a growing list of minor spliceosome-associated diseases with tissue-specific pathologies affirmed the importance of minor splicing as a key regulatory pathway, which when deregulated could lead to tissue-specific pathologies due to specific alterations in the expression of some minor-intron-containing genes. Consequently, uncovering how mi-INTs splicing is regulated in a tissue-specific manner would allow for better understanding of disease pathogenesis and pave the way for novel therapies, which we highlight in this review

ZRSR2 Mutation Induced Minor Intron Retention Drives MDS and Diverse Cancer Predisposition Via Aberrant Splicing of LZTR1

Mutations in RNA splicing factors are amongst the most common genetic alterations in myeloid malignancies. Mutations in the splicing factors SF3B1, SRSF2, and U2AF1 occur as heterozygous, missense mutations and have been shown to confer a change-of-function. In contrast, the X chromosome encoded ZRSR2 is enriched in nonsense/frameshift mutations in males, consistent with loss of function. To date however, we do not understand the basis for enrichment of ZRSR2 mutations in leukemia. Moreover, ZRSR2 is the only one of these factors that primarily functions in the minor spliceosome. While most introns are spliced by the major spliceosome, a small subset (<1%) of introns are recognized by a separate complex, the minor spliceosome. Although minor (or "U12") introns are present in only ~800 genes in humans, their sequences and positions are highly evolutionarily conserved - more so than their U2 counterparts. The high conservation of minor introns suggests key regulatory roles yet few functional roles for the minor spliceosome in regulating biological phenotypes are known. The rarity and conservation of minor introns offered a unique opportunity to investigate splicing factor mutations and identify potential tissue-specific roles of the minor spliceosome. Modeling loss-of-function mutations in ZRSR2 via a mouse model for induced deletion of Zrsr2 revealed strikingly enhanced self-renewal of Zrsr2-deficient male and female hematopoietic cells (Fig. A-C). This was in stark contrast to the effects of hotspot mutations in Sf3b1and Srsf2 and similar to those of Tet2 loss on increasing self-renewal and numbers of HSCs. Zrsr2 loss was also associated increased myeloid cells in the blood and long-term hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the marrow (Fig. C). To understand the mechanistic basis by which ZRSR2 loss causes aberrant HSC self-renewal, we quantified transcriptome-wide splicing patterns in MDS patients. ZRSR2-mutant samples had widespread, dysfunctional recognition of minor introns- 48% of minor introns exhibiting significantly increased retention (Fig. D). We next systematically mimicked the effects of nonsense-mediated decay caused by minor intron retention in ZRSR2-mutants. Every gene containing a ZRSR2-regulated minor intron was targeted by 4 sgRNAs via a positive-enrichment CRISPR screen using pools of lentiviral sgRNAs in cytokine-dependent human and mouse hematopoietic cell lines. This identified several minor intron-containing genes whose downregulation conferred cytokine independence. Strikingly, just one gene was enriched in all lines (Fig. E): LZTR1, a cullin-3 adaptor for ubiquitin-mediated suppression of RAS-related GTPases which is subject to loss-of-function mutations in several cancers and the RASopathy Noonan Syndrome. Minor intron retention in LZTR1 correlated with reduced LZTR1 protein in MDS patients (Fig. F-G). Inducing mutations in either the protein-coding region of LZTR1 or its minor intron resulted in cytokine independence (Fig. H), reduced LZTR1, and dramatic accumulation of RIT1, a RAS GTPase substrate of LZTR1. In a Noonan Syndrome family wherein one child died of AML, the mother and all children carried an intronic mutation within LZTR1's minor intron (Fig. I-J). Fibroblasts from each family member revealed clear LZTR1 minor intron retention with impaired LZTR1 protein expression and RIT1 accumulation in subjects bearing the LZTR1 minor intron mutation (Fig. J). We next interrogated LZTR1 minor intron splicing across all cancers in the TCGA. While LZTR1's minor intron was efficiently excised in normal samples, a notable subset of tumors in almost all cancer types exhibited significantly increased retention within LZTR1's minor intron. These data indicate LZTR1 is frequently dysregulated via perturbed minor intron splicing - much more so than by protein-coding mutations alone. Here we uncover a heretofore unrecognized role of minor intron excision in regulating HSC self-renewal, a molecular link between ZRSR2 mutations and aberrant LZTR1 splicing and expression, and frequent LZTR1 minor intron retention in diverse cancers and cancer predisposition syndromes. Given frequent post-transcriptional disruption of LZTR1 in the absence of protein-coding mutations, our data additionally motivate study of other cancer-associated minor intron-containing genes which may be dysregulated via similar, and as-yet-undetected, aberrant splicing. Figure Disclosures Abdel-Wahab: Merck: Consultancy; Envisagenics Inc.: Current equity holder in private company; H3 Biomedicine Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy

Minor intron retention drives clonal hematopoietic disorders and diverse cancer predisposition.

Most eukaryotes harbor two distinct pre-mRNA splicing machineries: the major spliceosome, which removes &gt;99% of introns, and the minor spliceosome, which removes rare, evolutionarily conserved introns. Although hypothesized to serve important regulatory functions, physiologic roles of the minor spliceosome are not well understood. For example, the minor spliceosome component ZRSR2 is subject to recurrent, leukemia-associated mutations, yet functional connections among minor introns, hematopoiesis and cancers are unclear. Here, we identify that impaired minor intron excision via ZRSR2 loss enhances hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. CRISPR screens mimicking nonsense-mediated decay of minor intron-containing mRNA species converged on LZTR1, a regulator of RAS-related GTPases. LZTR1 minor intron retention was also discovered in the RASopathy Noonan syndrome, due to intronic mutations disrupting splicing and diverse solid tumors. These data uncover minor intron recognition as a regulator of hematopoiesis, noncoding mutations within minor introns as potential cancer drivers and links among ZRSR2 mutations, LZTR1 regulation and leukemias

Alcohol use disorder causes global changes in splicing in the human brain

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a widespread disease leading to the deterioration of cognitive and other functions. Mechanisms by which alcohol affects the brain are not fully elucidated. Splicing constitutes a nuclear process of RNA maturation, which results in the formation of the transcriptome. We tested the hypothesis as to whether AUD impairs splicing in the superior frontal cortex (SFC), nucleus accumbens (NA), basolateral amygdala (BLA), and central nucleus of the amygdala (CNA). To evaluate splicing, bam files from STAR alignments were indexed with samtools for use by rMATS software. Computational analysis of affected pathways was performed using Gene Ontology Consortium, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, and LncRNA Ontology databases. Surprisingly, AUD was associated with limited changes in the transcriptome: expression of 23 genes was altered in SFC, 14 in NA, 102 in BLA, and 57 in CNA. However, strikingly, mis-splicing in AUD was profound: 1421 mis-splicing events were detected in SFC, 394 in NA, 1317 in BLA, and 469 in CNA. To determine the mechanism of mis-splicing, we analyzed the elements of the spliceosome: small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and splicing factors. While snRNAs were not affected by alcohol, expression of splicing factor heat shock protein family A (Hsp70) member 6 (HSPA6) was drastically increased in SFC, BLA, and CNA. Also, AUD was accompanied by aberrant expression of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) related to splicing. In summary, alcohol is associated with genome-wide changes in splicing in multiple human brain regions, likely due to dysregulation of splicing factor(s) and/or altered expression of splicing-related lncRNAs.Funding Agencies|National Institute of HealthUnited States Department of Health &amp; Human ServicesNational Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA [R01-AA023781, R01-AA023781-04S1, U01-AA020926, R01-AA012404]; American Psychiatric Association; University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center</p