American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignant disease in the United States (U.S.). Almost two-thirds of CRC survivors are living 5 years following diagnosis. The prevalence of CRC survivors is likely to increase dramatically over the coming decades with further advances in early detection and treatment and the aging and growth of the U.S. population. Survivors are at risk for a CRC recurrence, a new primary CRC, other cancers, as well as both short and long-term adverse effects of the CRC and the modalities used to treat it. CRC survivors may also have psychological, reproductive, genetic, social, and employment concerns following treatment. Communication and coordination of care between the treating oncologist and the primary care clinician is critical to effectively and efficiently manage the long-term care of CRC survivors. The following guidelines are intended to assist primary care clinicians in delivering risk-based health care for CRC survivors who have completed active therapy

American Cancer Society prostate cancer survivorship care guidelines

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Prostate cancer survivors approach 2.8 million in number and represent 1 in 5 of all cancer survivors in the United States. While guidelines exist for timely treatment and surveillance for recurrent disease, there is limited availability of guidelines that facilitate the provision of posttreatment clinical follow‐up care to address the myriad of long‐term and late effects that survivors may face. Based on recommendations set forth by a National Cancer Survivorship Resource Center expert panel, the American Cancer Society developed clinical follow‐up care guidelines to facilitate the provision of posttreatment care by primary care clinicians. These guidelines were developed using a combined approach of evidence synthesis and expert consensus. Existing guidelines for health promotion, surveillance, and screening for second primary cancers were referenced when available. To promote comprehensive follow‐up care and optimal health and quality of life for the posttreatment survivor, the guidelines address health promotion, surveillance for prostate cancer recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, long‐term and late effects assessment and management, psychosocial issues, and care coordination among the oncology team, primary care clinicians, and nononcology specialists. A key challenge to the development of these guidelines was the limited availability of published evidence for management of prostate cancer survivors after treatment. Much of the evidence relies on studies with small sample sizes and retrospective analyses of facility‐specific and population databases. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:225–249. © 2014 American Cancer Society .Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/108098/1/caac21234.pd

Aspectos epidemiológicos dos pólipos e lesões plano-elevadas colorretais Epidemiological aspects of colorectal polyps and flat adenomas

INTRODUÇÃO: Os pólipos e as lesões plano-elevadas colorretais são importantes na prevenção do câncer colorretal pelo risco de malignização dos adenomas. OBJETIVO: traçar o perfil demográfico dos pacientes com diagnóstico endoscópico de pólipos e/ou lesões plano-elevadas colorretais no Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal de Sergipe e Torres Centro Médico. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados 6.919 prontuários de 2002 a 2007, enfatizando-se as variáveis: idade, gênero, procedência e indicação; número, tamanho, morfologia, histologia, grau de displasia, topografia, lesões sincrônicas e metacrônicas, e diagnósticos associados. RESULTADOS: Foram encontradas 1.031 (13,51%) lesões em 935 exames, correspondendo a 826 pacientes, 46% masculino e 54% feminino. A idade variou de 3 a 96 anos, com média de 53,64. A distribuição topográfica mais frequente das lesões polipoides foi em reto e sigmoide (58,40%). As lesões eram sésseis em 52,80%, pediculadas em 27,90% e plano-elevadas em 19,30% dos casos. Ocorreram lesões sincrônicas em 23,48% e metacrônicas em 30,10% dos pacientes. Histologicamente, 43,36% eram adenomas, sendo 85,70% tubulares, 9,60% tubulo-vilosos e 4,70% vilosos; 30,64% eram pólipos hiperplásicos, 15,80% inflamatórios e 10,20% possuíam outros tipos histológicos. Os adenomas apresentavam displasia de baixo grau em 83,40% dos casos e alto grau em 16,60%. Sete eram adenocarcinomas, um carcinoide e um tumor gastrointestinal estromal. CONCLUSÕES: A colonoscopia e a polipectomia são importantes no diagnóstico e prevenção do câncer colorretal.<br>INTRODUCTION: Colorectal polyps and flat injuries are important for the prevention of colorectal cancer due to the malignancy of adenomas. OBJECTIVE: To describe the demographic profile of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps and/or flat injuries at University Hospital of Universidade Federal de Sergipe and Torres Medical Center. METHODS: A total of 6,919 records were evaluated from January 2002 to December 2007 with respect to the following variables: age, gender, origin, indication; injury evaluation os number, size, morphology, histology, dysplasia degree, topography; synchronics and metachronics injuries and associated diagnoses. RESULTS: 1,031(13.51%) colorectal polyps and flat injuries were found in 935 tests, accounting for 826 patients, 46% males and 54% females. The age ranged from 3 to 96 years with average of 53.64. The most frequent topographic distribution of polypoid injuries were rectum and sigmoid (58.40%). The injuries were sessile in 52.80% of the cases, pedicle in 27.90%, and flat injuries in 19.30%. There were synchronical injuries in 23.48% of patients and metachronic in 22 patients. Histologically, 43.36% were adenomas, being 85.70% tubular, 9.60% tubulovillous and 4.70% villous; hyperplastic polyps were found in 30.64% of the cases, inflammatory in 15.80% and 10.20% presented other histological types. The adenomas showed low-grade dysplasia in 83.40% and high degree in 16.60% of the patients. Seven were adenoma-carcinomas, one was carcinoid and one was gastrointestinal stromal tumor. CONCLUSIONS: The colonoscopy and polypectomy are important in diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer