25 research outputs found

    Influence of Fe2+-catalysed iron oxide recrystallization on metal cycling

    Get PDF
    Abstract Recent work has indicated that iron (oxyhydr-)oxides are capable of structurally incorporating and releasing metals and nutrients as a result of Fe 2 + -induced iron oxide recrystallization. In the present paper, we briefly review the current literature examining the mechanisms by which iron oxides recrystallize and summarize how recrystallization affects metal incorporation and release. We also provide new experimental evidence for the Fe 2 + -induced release of structural manganese from manganese-doped goethite. Currently, the exact mechanism(s) for Fe 2 + -induced recrystallization remain elusive, although they are likely to be both oxideand metal-dependent. We conclude by discussing some future research directions for Fe 2 + -catalysed iron oxide recrystallization. Metal incorporation in iron oxides Natural iron (oxyhydr-)oxides are rarely pure. Instead, they often contain structural trace metal impurities (e.g. Key words: goethite, haematite, iron oxide, magnetite, metal cycling, recrystallization. Abbreviations used: XAS, X-ray absorption spectroscopy. 1 To whom correspondence should be addressed (email [email protected]). In the present paper, we provide a brief overview of the evidence and possible mechanisms of Fe 2 + -catalysed iron oxide recrystallization in the absence of secondary transformations and summarize recent findings on metal incorporation and/or release during recrystallization. We also present some new results demonstrating Mn 2 + release from goethite in the presence of aqueous Fe 2 + and provide some closing remarks on future research directions for Fe 2 + -catalysed iron oxide recrystallization. Fe 2 + -catalysed iron oxide recrystallization of goethite, haematite and magnetite There were some clear early indications in the literature that the reaction of aqueous Fe 2 + with the more stable iron oxides, such as goethite, haematite and magnetite, was more dynamic than a simple adsorption reaction. For example, Tronc et al. [25

    Stable U(IV) Complexes Form at High-Affinity Mineral Surface Sites

    Get PDF
    Uranium (U) poses a significant contamination hazard to soils, sediments, and groundwater due to its extensive use for energy production. Despite advances in modeling the risks of this toxic and radioactive element, lack of information about the mechanisms controlling U transport hinders further improvements, particularly in reducing environments where UIV predominates. Here we establish that mineral surfaces can stabilize the majority of U as adsorbed UIV species following reduction of UVI. Using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and electron imaging analysis, we find that at low surface loading, UIV forms inner-sphere complexes with two metal oxides, TiO2 (rutile) and Fe3O4 (magnetite) (at <1.3 U nm–2 and <0.037 U nm–2, respectively). The uraninite (UO2) form of UIV predominates only at higher surface loading. UIV–TiO2 complexes remain stable for at least 12 months, and UIV–Fe3O4 complexes remain stable for at least 4 months, under anoxic conditions. Adsorbed UIV results from UVI reduction by FeII or by the reduced electron shuttle AH2QDS, suggesting that both abiotic and biotic reduction pathways can produce stable UIV–mineral complexes in the subsurface. The observed control of high-affinity mineral surface sites on UIV speciation helps explain the presence of nonuraninite UIV in sediments and has important implications for U transport modeling

    Fe Electron Transfer and Atom Exchange in Goethite: Influence of Al-Substitution and Anion Sorption

    No full text
    The reaction of Fe­(II) with Fe­(III) oxides and hydroxides is complex and includes sorption of Fe­(II) to the oxide, electron transfer between sorbed Fe­(II) and structural Fe­(III), reductive dissolution coupled to Fe atom exchange, and, in some cases mineral phase transformation. Much of the work investigating electron transfer and atom exchange between aqueous Fe­(II) and Fe­(III) oxides has been done under relatively simple aqueous conditions in organic buffers to control pH and background electrolytes to control ionic strength. Here, we investigate whether electron transfer is influenced by cation substitution of Al­(III) in goethite and the presence of anions such as phosphate, carbonate, silicate, and natural organic matter. Results from <sup>57</sup>Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy indicate that both Al-substitution (up to 9%) and the presence of common anions (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3‑</sup>, CO<sub>3</sub><sup>2‑</sup>, SiO<sub>4</sub><sup>4‑</sup>, and humic acid) does not inhibit electron transfer between aqueous Fe­(II) and Fe­(III) in goethite under the conditions we studied. In contrast, sorption of a long-chain phospholipid completely shuts down electron transfer. Using an enriched isotope tracer method, we found that Al-substitution in goethite (10%), does, however, significantly decrease the extent of atom exchange between Fe­(II) and goethite (from 43 to 12%) over a month’s time. Phosphate, somewhat surprisingly, appears to have little effect on the rate and extent of atom exchange between aqueous Fe­(II) and goethite. Our results show that electron transfer between aqueous Fe­(II) and solid Fe­(III) in goethite can occur under wide range of geochemical conditions, but that the extent of redox-driven Fe atom exchange may be dependent on the presence of substituting cations such as Al

    Stable U(IV) Complexes Form at High-Affinity Mineral Surface Sites

    No full text
    Uranium (U) poses a significant contamination hazard to soils, sediments, and groundwater due to its extensive use for energy production. Despite advances in modeling the risks of this toxic and radioactive element, lack of information about the mechanisms controlling U transport hinders further improvements, particularly in reducing environments where U<sup>IV</sup> predominates. Here we establish that mineral surfaces can stabilize the majority of U as adsorbed U<sup>IV</sup> species following reduction of U<sup>VI</sup>. Using X-ray absorption spectroscopy and electron imaging analysis, we find that at low surface loading, U<sup>IV</sup> forms inner-sphere complexes with two metal oxides, TiO<sub>2</sub> (rutile) and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> (magnetite) (at <1.3 U nm<sup>–2</sup> and <0.037 U nm<sup>–2</sup>, respectively). The uraninite (UO<sub>2</sub>) form of U<sup>IV</sup> predominates only at higher surface loading. U<sup>IV</sup>–TiO<sub>2</sub> complexes remain stable for at least 12 months, and U<sup>IV</sup>–Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> complexes remain stable for at least 4 months, under anoxic conditions. Adsorbed U<sup>IV</sup> results from U<sup>VI</sup> reduction by Fe<sup>II</sup> or by the reduced electron shuttle AH<sub>2</sub>QDS, suggesting that both abiotic and biotic reduction pathways can produce stable U<sup>IV</sup>–mineral complexes in the subsurface. The observed control of high-affinity mineral surface sites on U<sup>IV</sup> speciation helps explain the presence of nonuraninite U<sup>IV</sup> in sediments and has important implications for U transport modeling
    corecore