62 research outputs found
Northern New England Palliative Care Teleconsult Research Laboratory
Introduction:
âą Palliative care (PC) is an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families.
âą Delivery of PC via telehealth technology (tele-PC) has been proposed as a solution to increase access to PC in rural areas. âą The feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of applying telehealth technology to PC remains unknown.
âą The overarching purpose of the proposed study is to 1) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a tele-PC intervention for seriously ill patients, and 2) generate pilot data to better understand provider-patient communication during tele-PC consultation
Historical Research Materials on Zhou Zuoren in the Possession of his Family
departmental bulletin pape
Peer effects and social preferences in voluntary cooperation: a theoretical and experimental analysis
Social preferences and social influence effects ("peer effects") are well documented, but little is known about how peers shape social preferences. Settings where social preferences matter are often situations where peer effects are likely too. In a gift-exchange experiment with independent payoffs between two agents we find causal evidence for peer effects. Efforts are positively correlated but with a kink: agents follow a low-performing but not a high-performing peer. This contradicts major theories of social preferences which predict that efforts are unrelated, or negatively related. Some theories allow for positively-related efforts but cannot explain most observations. Conformism, norm following and social esteem are candidate explanations
Risk preferences and predictions about others: no association with 2D:4D ratio
Abstract: Prenatal androgen exposure affects the brain development of the fetus which may facilitate certain behaviors and decision patterns in the later life. The ratio between the lengths of second and the fourth fingers (2D:4D) is a negative biomarker of the ratio between prenatal androgen and estrogen exposure and men typically have lower ratios than women. In line with the typical findings suggesting that women are more risk averse than men, several studies have also shown negative relationships between 2D:4D and risk taking although the evidence is not conclusive. Previous studies have also reported that both men and women believe women are more risk averse than men. In the current study, we re-test the relationship between 2D:4D and risk preferences in a German student sample and also investigate whether the 2D:4D ratio is associated with peopleâs perceptions about othersâ risk preferences. Following an incentivized risk elicitation task, we asked all participants their predictions about (i) othersâ responses (without sex specification), (ii) menâs responses, and (iii) womenâs responses; then measured their 2D:4D ratios. In line with the previous findings, female participants in our sample were more risk averse. While both men and women underestimated other participantsâ (non sex-specific) and womenâs risky decisions on average, their predictions about men were accurate. We also found evidence for the false consensus effect, as risky choices are positively correlated with predictions about other participantsâ risky choices. The 2D:4D ratio was not directly associated either with risk preferences or the predictions of other participantsâ choices. An unexpected finding was that women with mid-range levels of 2D:4D estimated significantly larger sex differences in participantsâ decisions. This finding needs further testing in future studies
Recommended from our members
Risk preference and choice stochasticity during decisions for other people
In several contexts, such as finance and politics, people make choices that are relevant for others but irrelevant for oneself. Focusing on decision-making under risk, we compared monetary choices made for oneâs own interest with choices made on behalf of an anonymous individual. Consistent with the previous literature, other-interest choices were characterized by an increased gambling propensity. We also investigated choice stochasticity, which captures how much decisions vary in similar conditions. An aspect related to choice stochasticity is how much decisions are tuned to the option values, and we found that this was higher during self-interest than during other-interest choices. This effect was observed only in individuals who reported a motivation to distribute rewards unequally, suggesting that it may (at least partially) depend on a motivation to make accurate decisions for others. Our results indicate that, during decision-making under risk, choices for other people are characterized by a decreased tuning to the values of the options, in addition to enhanced risk seeking
Does Good Advice Come Cheap? ââ On the Assessment of Risk Preferences in the Lab and the Field
- âŠ