23 research outputs found
Assessing the Effectiveness of House-to-House Visits on Routine Oral Polio Immunization Completion and Tracking of Defaulters
Strengthening routine immunization is one of the four prongs of the
Global Polio Eradication Initiative. Using data collected through
30-cluster sample household surveys of caretakers of children aged
12-23 months, this paper assessed the effectiveness of house-to-house
visits on routine oral polio immunization completion, using simple
frequency tables, bivariate and multivariate logistic regression
analyses. Logistic regression results demonstrated that children in
households where the caregivers reported receiving a household visit by
health workers were more likely to be fully immunized for polio through
routine immunization than other children, although results were
significant only after correcting for confounders. In Ethiopia and
India, children of caregivers who remembered a house-to-house visit
were significantly and positively associated with routine polio
vaccination completion (OR=2.2 and OR=2.2 respectively). In Angola, the
association was positive, though not significant (OR=1.3). The evidence
suggests that targeting high-risk areas for house-to-house visits
played a role in increasing routine polio vaccination
Context-acceptability theories: example of family planning interventions in five African countries.
BACKGROUND: Family planning (FP) can lengthen birth intervals and potentially reduce the risk of foetal death, low birthweight, prematurity, and being small for gestational age. Effective FP is most easily achieved through access to and acceptability of modern contraceptive methods (MCMs). This study aimed to identify mechanisms of acceptability and the contexts in which they are triggered and to generate theories to improve the selection and implementation of effective interventions by studying an intervention integrating FP with childhood immunisation services. METHODS: Qualitative interpretative synthesis of findings from realist evaluations of FP interventions in five African countries was guided by an analytical framework. Empirical mechanisms of acceptability were identified from semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions with key stakeholders (N = 253). The context in which these mechanisms were triggered was also defined. Empirical mechanisms of acceptability were matched to constructs of a theoretical framework of acceptability. Context-acceptability theories (CATs) were developed, which summarised constructs of acceptability triggered for specific actors in specified contexts. Examples of interventions that may be used to trigger acceptability for these actors were described. RESULTS: Seven CATs were developed for contexts with strong beliefs in religious values and with powerful religious leaders, a traditional desire for large families, stigmatisation of MCM use, male partners who are non-accepting of FP, and rumours or experiences of MCM side effects. Acceptability mechanisms included alignment with values and beliefs without requiring compromise, actors' certainty about their ability to avoid harm and make the intervention work, and understanding the intervention and how it works. Additionally, acceptability by one group of actors was found to alter the context, triggering acceptability mechanisms amongst others. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the value of embedding realist approaches within implementation research. CATs are transferable theories that answer the question: given the context, what construct of acceptability does an intervention need to trigger, or more simply, what intervention do we need to apply here to achieve our outcomes? CATs facilitate transfer of interventions across geographies within defined contexts
"It was my own decision": the transformational shift that influences a woman's decision to use contraceptives covertly.
BACKGROUND: Family planning (FP) is an important element of sexual and reproductive health and rights, but socio-cultural barriers and unbalanced gender relations often limit women's decision-making about contraceptive use. Covert contraceptive use (CCU) exemplifies the limits on women's decision-making and represents a way in which some women overcome constraints to achieve their reproductive goals. This study explores the decision-making process through which women choose to use contraceptives covertly. METHODS: A qualitative synthesis was conducted using data from women, health providers, community members, health administrators, and intervention implementers (n = 400) to explore the decision-making process through which women choose to use contraceptives covertly. Interviews and focus group discussions were conducted at two time points as part of an evaluation of interventions integrating FP and childhood immunisation services at sites in Benin, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda. The sexual and reproductive health empowerment framework by Karp et al. (2020) was adapted and used to guide the analysis. RESULTS: Women recognised that although they suffered the negative consequences of frequent pregnancies and of raising large families, they lacked overt decision-making power over their fertility. Women were confident to engage in CCU because they believed their husbands did not understand these consequences nor acknowledged their suffering, which justified not informing them. CCU was a difficult choice however, women felt comfortable voicing their reproductive preferences in settings where health providers were supportive. CONCLUSIONS: Women chose to use contraceptives covertly when they questioned the unfairness of their situation and recognised their own power to act in accordance with their reproductive preferences. This represented an important shift in a woman's perception of who is entitled to make decisions about contraceptive use. Importantly, health providers can play a key role in supporting women's autonomous decision making about contraceptive use and should be careful not to undermine women's confidence
"As a woman who watches how my family is… I take the difficult decisions": a qualitative study on integrated family planning and childhood immunisation services in five African countries.
BACKGROUND: Family planning (FP) has the potential to improve maternal and child health outcomes and to reduce poverty in sub-Saharan Africa. However, substantial unmet need for modern contraceptive methods (MCMs) persists in this region. Current literature highlights multi-level barriers, including socio-cultural norms that discourage the use of MCMs. This paper explores women's choices and decision-making around MCM use and examines whether integrating FP services with childhood immunisations influenced women's perceptions of, and decision to use, an MCM. METHODS: 94 semi-structured interviews and 21 focus group discussions with women, health providers, and community members (N = 253) were conducted in health facilities and outreach clinics where an intervention was delivering integrated FP and childhood immunisation services in Benin, Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda. Data were coded using Nvivo software and an analytical framework was developed to support interpretative and thematic analyses on women's decision-making about MCM use. RESULTS: Most women shared the reproductive desire to space or limit births because of the perceived benefits of improved health and welfare for themselves and for their children, including the economic advantages. For some, choices about MCM use were restricted because of wider societal influences. Women's decision to use MCMs was driven by their reproductive desires, but for some that was stymied by fears of side effects, community stigma, and disapproving husbands, which led to clandestine MCM use. Health providers acknowledged that women understood the benefits of using MCMs, but highlighted that the wider socio-cultural norms of their community often contributed to a reluctance to use them. Integration of FP and childhood immunisation services provided repeat opportunities for health providers to counter misinformation and it improved access to MCMs, including for women who needed to use them covertly. CONCLUSIONS: Some women chose to use MCMs without the approval of their husbands, and/or despite cultural norms, because of the perceived health and economic benefits for themselves and for their families, and because they lived with the consequences of short birth intervals and large families. Integrated FP and childhood immunisation services expanded women's choices about MCM use and created opportunities for women to make decisions autonomously
Determining factors driving sustainable performance through the application of lean management practices in horticultural primary production
Erasmus Mundus Inspire Projec
eLife and early career researchers
There are many reasons for submitting your best work to eLife, especially if you are an early career researcher
Writing Across the Curriculum for Senior Biology Students: a Case Study
Applications of writing for critical thinking in STEM fields have expanded rapidly over the years. However the perennial challenge is how to simultaneously explore many forms of writing and also cover specific content, especially in college courses that are prerequisites for later courses or professional exams. In this non-laboratory capstone course, the theme, disease ecology, facilitated a more interdisciplinary approach. Multiple types of writing projects were incorporated on a daily basis. In addition to a focus on formative assessment and professional preparedness, self-directed project-based applications of content were implemented. This session will share methods and preliminary observations of this ongoing project. Participants will engage in self-reflections about writing as learning as did the students in the course. This model may be adapted to a variety of content areas without fundamental alteration of the student-centered learning structure