67 research outputs found

    Digital Processing of Remotely Sensed Imagery

    Get PDF
    Digital images can be acquired from various devices. Image scanners on personal computers can generate digital images of hard copy material. New digital cameras operate without film, recording a digital image of the scene in local solid state memory. Remote sensing instruments routinely return digital imagery to receiving stations for processing and display. Digital processing of remotely sensed imagery is a technology that is now over thirty years old. Earth orbitting and deep space exploration spacecraft have been returning digital imagery for many years. Earth-based systems, including biomedical imaging devices and other commercially available types of equipment, have also been producing digital imagery for many years. Each of these devices produce a digital version of an image as a two dimensional array of numbers. The values in the matrix represent the brightness of the scene at each individual sampled position in the image

    Southeastern Colorado survey of critical biological resources, 2007

    Get PDF
    Prepared for: Colorado Cattleman's Agricultural Land Trust, Great Outdoors Colorado, Colorado Dept. of Natural Resources.May 2008.Includes bibliographical references

    Variants in autophagy-related genes and clinical characteristics in melanoma: a population-based study

    Get PDF
    Autophagy has been linked with melanoma risk and survival, but no polymorphisms in autophagy-related (ATG) genes have been investigated in relation to melanoma progression. We examined five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in three ATG genes (ATG5; ATG10; and ATG16L) with known or suspected impact on autophagic flux in an international population-based case-control study of melanoma. DNA from 911 melanoma patients was genotyped. An association was identified between (GG) (rs2241880) and earlier stage at diagnosis (OR 0.47; 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) = 0.27-0.81, P = 0.02) and a decrease in Breslow thickness (P = 0.03). The ATG16L heterozygous genotype (AG) (rs2241880) was associated with younger age at diagnosis (P = 0.02). Two SNPs in ATG5 were found to be associated with increased stage (rs2245214 CG, OR 1.47; 95% CI = 1.11-1.94, P = 0.03; rs510432 CC, OR 1.84; 95% CI = 1.12-3.02, P = 0.05). Finally, we identified inverse associations between ATG5 (GG rs2245214) and melanomas on the scalp or neck (OR 0.20, 95% CI = 0.05-0.86, P = 0.03); ATG10 (CC) (rs1864182) and brisk tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (OR 0.42; 95% CI = 0.21-0.88, P = 0.02), and ATG5 (CC) (rs510432) with nonbrisk TILs (OR 0.55; 95% CI = 0.34-0.87, P = 0.01). Our data suggest that ATG SNPs might be differentially associated with specific host and tumor characteristics including age at diagnosis, TILs, and stage. These associations may be critical to understanding the role of autophagy in cancer, and further investigation will help characterize the contribution of these variants to melanoma progression

    Age- and Tumor Subtype-Specific Breast Cancer Risk Estimates for CHEK2*1100delC Carriers.

    Get PDF
    PURPOSE: CHEK2*1100delC is a well-established breast cancer risk variant that is most prevalent in European populations; however, there are limited data on risk of breast cancer by age and tumor subtype, which limits its usefulness in breast cancer risk prediction. We aimed to generate tumor subtype- and age-specific risk estimates by using data from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, including 44,777 patients with breast cancer and 42,997 controls from 33 studies genotyped for CHEK2*1100delC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CHEK2*1100delC genotyping was mostly done by a custom Taqman assay. Breast cancer odds ratios (ORs) for CHEK2*1100delC carriers versus noncarriers were estimated by using logistic regression and adjusted for study (categorical) and age. Main analyses included patients with invasive breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies. RESULTS: Proportions of heterozygous CHEK2*1100delC carriers in controls, in patients with breast cancer from population- and hospital-based studies, and in patients with breast cancer from familial- and clinical genetics center-based studies were 0.5%, 1.3%, and 3.0%, respectively. The estimated OR for invasive breast cancer was 2.26 (95%CI, 1.90 to 2.69; P = 2.3 × 10(-20)). The OR was higher for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease (2.55 [95%CI, 2.10 to 3.10; P = 4.9 × 10(-21)]) than it was for ER-negative disease (1.32 [95%CI, 0.93 to 1.88; P = .12]; P interaction = 9.9 × 10(-4)). The OR significantly declined with attained age for breast cancer overall (P = .001) and for ER-positive tumors (P = .001). Estimated cumulative risks for development of ER-positive and ER-negative tumors by age 80 in CHEK2*1100delC carriers were 20% and 3%, respectively, compared with 9% and 2%, respectively, in the general population of the United Kingdom. CONCLUSION: These CHEK2*1100delC breast cancer risk estimates provide a basis for incorporating CHEK2*1100delC into breast cancer risk prediction models and into guidelines for intensified screening and follow-up.NIH

    Comparison of 6q25 Breast Cancer Hits from Asian and European Genome Wide Association Studies in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC)

    Get PDF
    Peer reviewe

    Digital Processing of Remotely Sensed Imagery

    No full text
    Digital images can be acquired from various devices. Image scanners on personal computers can generate digital images of hard copy material. New digital cameras operate without film, recording a digital image of the scene in local solid state memory. Remote sensing instruments routinely return digital imagery to receiving stations for processing and display. Digital processing of remotely sensed imagery is a technology that is now over thirty years old. Earth orbitting and deep space exploration spacecraft have been returning digital imagery for many years. Earth-based systems, including biomedical imaging devices and other commercially available types of equipment, have also been producing digital imagery for many years. Each of these devices produce a digital version of an image as a two dimensional array of numbers. The values in the matrix represent the brightness of the scene at each individual sampled position in the image.</p
    corecore