14 research outputs found

    Measuring the effect of enhanced cleaning in a UK hospital : a prospective cross-over study

    Get PDF
    Increasing hospital-acquired infections have generated much attention over the last decade. There is evidence that hygienic cleaning has a role in the control of hospital-acquired infections. This study aimed to evaluate the potential impact of one additional cleaner by using microbiological standards based on aerobic colony counts and the presence of Staphylococcus aureus including meticillin-resistant S. aureus. We introduced an additional cleaner into two matched wards from Monday to Friday, with each ward receiving enhanced cleaning for six months in a cross-over design. Ten hand-touch sites on both wards were screened weekly using standardised methods and patients were monitored for meticillin-resistant S. aureus infection throughout the year-long study. Patient and environmental meticillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were characterised using molecular methods in order to investigate temporal and clonal relationships. Enhanced cleaning was associated with a 32.5% reduction in levels of microbial contamination at handtouch sites when wards received enhanced cleaning (P < 0.0001: 95% CI 20.2%, 42.9%). Near-patient sites (lockers, overbed tables and beds) were more frequently contaminated with meticillin-resistant S. aureus/S. aureus than sites further from the patient (P = 0.065). Genotyping identified indistinguishable strains from both handtouch sites and patients. There was a 26.6% reduction in new meticillin-resistant S. aureus infections on the wards receiving extra cleaning, despite higher meticillin-resistant S. aureus patient-days and bed occupancy rates during enhanced cleaning periods (P = 0.032: 95% CI 7.7%, 92.3%). Adjusting for meticillin-resistant S. aureus patient-days and based upon nine new meticillin-resistant S. aureus infections seen during routine cleaning, we expected 13 new infections during enhanced cleaning periods rather than the four that actually occurred. Clusters of new meticillin-resistant S. aureus infections were identified 2 to 4 weeks after the cleaner left both wards. Enhanced cleaning saved the hospital £30,000 to £70,000.Introducing one extra cleaner produced a measurable effect on the clinical environment, with apparent benefit to patients regarding meticillin-resistant S. aureus infection. Molecular epidemiological methods supported the possibility that patients acquired meticillin-resistant S. aureus from environmental sources. These findings suggest that additional research is warranted to further clarify the environmental, clinical and economic impact of enhanced hygienic cleaning as a component in the control of hospital-acquired infection

    Discussion

    No full text
    SCOPUS: cp.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    A practical critique of antifungal treatment guidelines for haemato-oncologists

    No full text
    The management of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in the haemato-oncology setting remains a challenge. This article reviews recent guidelines relating to IFD for their similarities and differences, as well as applying the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation (AGREE) criteria. The guidelines’ recommendations on antifungal prophylaxis, empirical and definitive treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis are summarized; also, minimum standards for diagnosis and follow-up are discussed. This critique of the reviewed guidelines is a practical guide to physicians and commissioners in making local policies for IFD management

    Pharmacokinetic studies of linezolid and teicoplanin in the critically ill

    No full text
    Objectives: To determine the pharmacokinetic characteristics of linezolid and teicoplanin in critically ill patients. Patients and methods: Serum was collected frequently during day 0 and then pre- and 1 h post-dose on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and every third day thereafter during treatment. Serum linezolid concentrations were analysed using HPLC. Serum teicoplanin levels were analysed by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Results: A two-compartment model was required to characterize linezolid pharmacokinetics (n = 28) and account for the accumulation seen after multiple dosing. The estimated clearance was 0.049 ± 0.016 L/h/kg (±S.E.M. of estimate). At steady state (dosing interval 12 h), linezolid serum concentrations exceeded the breakpoint of 4mg/L for 10.88h (95% Cl 10.09-11.66) after a 600 mg dose with an AUC/MIC of 92.4 (95% Cl 57.2-127.7). Teicoplanin was best described by a two-compartment model (n = 26). The clearance was 4.97 ± 1.58 L/h. Serum levels exceeded the breakpoint of 4 mg/L for the entire dosing interval in all subjects (400 mg dose every 12 h) with an AUC/MIC of 399.3 (95% Cl 329.6-469.0). However, only four of 14 exceeded trough serum concentrations of 10 mg/L. For both agents, trough levels were similar in those who survived and those who died. Conclusions: Linezolid dosage at 600 mg every 12 h was adequate in the critically ill without need for adjustment for renal function. For teicoplanin, further study is needed to confirm if a trough of 10 mg/L is associated with a higher rate of cure than 5 mg/L. If so, serum drug assays would be needed to ensure a therapeutic level. © The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2005; all rights reserved

    Erratum: Epidemiology and Outcome of Fungemia in a Cancer Cohort of the Infectious Diseases Group (IDG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 65031) (Clin Infect Dis. (2015) 61:3 (324-331) DOI: 10.1093/cid/civ293)

    No full text
    In the original publication of this manuscript [Cornely OA, Gachot B, Akan H et al. Epidemiology and Outcome of Fungemia in a Cancer Cohort of the Infectious Diseases Group (IDG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 65031). Clin Infect Dis. Volume 61 Issue 3; August 1 2015, 324-331, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/civ293], the author Safaa Ramadan's affiliation was incorrect and should be as follows: Department of Medical Oncology, NCI-Cairo University, 11796 Cairo, Egypt. This has been updated in this correction only to preserve the version of record online, and the authors regret this error.SCOPUS: er.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Epidemiology and Outcome of Fungemia in a Cancer Cohort of the Infectious Diseases Group (IDG) of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC 65031)

    No full text
    Background. Anti-cancer treatment and the cancer population have evolved since the last European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) fungemia survey, and there are few recent large epidemiological studies. Methods. This was a prospective cohort study including 145 030 admissions of patients with cancer from 13 EORTC centers. Incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcome of fungemia were analyzed. Results. Fungemia occurred in 333 (0.23%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21-.26) patients, ranging from 0.15% in patients with solid tumors to 1.55% in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients. In 297 evaluable patients age ranged from 17 to 88 years (median 56 years), 144 (48%) patients were female, 165 (56%) had solid tumors, and 140 (47%) had hematological malignancies. Fungemia including polymicrobial infection was due to: Candida spp. in 267 (90%), C. albicans in 128 (48%), and other Candida spp. in 145 (54%) patients. Favorable overall response was achieved in 113 (46.5%) patients by week 2. After 4 weeks, the survival rate was 64% (95% CI, 59%-70%) and was not significantly different between Candida spp. Multivariable logistic regression identified baseline septic shock (odds ratio [OR] 3.04, 95% CI, 1.22-7.58) and tachypnoea as poor prognostic factors (OR 2.95, 95% CI, 1.66-5.24), while antifungal prophylaxis prior to fungemia (OR 0.20, 95% CI, 06-.62) and remission of underlying cancer (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 06-.50) were protective. Conclusions. Fungemia, mostly due to Candida spp. was rare in cancer patients from EORTC centers but was associated with substantial mortality. Antifungal prophylaxis and remission of cancer predicted better survival.SCOPUS: re.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore