Discovery and systematic characterization of risk variants and genes for coronary artery disease in over a million participants

Funding Information: T. Kessler is supported by the Corona-Foundation (Junior Research Group Translational Cardiovascular Genomics) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 1123 (B02). T.J. was supported by a Medical Research Council DTP studentship (MR/S502443/1). J.D. is a British Heart Foundation Professor, European Research Council Senior Investigator, and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator. J.C.H. acknowledges personal funding from the British Heart Foundation (FS/14/55/30806) and is a member of the Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence (RE/13/1/30181). R.C. has received funding from the British Heart Foundation and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence. O.G. has received funding from the British Heart Foundation (BHF) (FS/14/66/3129). P.S.d.V. was supported by American Heart Association grant number 18CDA34110116 and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant R01HL146860. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services (contract HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700004I and HHSN268201700005I), R01HL087641, R01HL059367 and R01HL086694; National Human Genome Research Institute contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health contract HHSN268200625226C. We thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. Infrastructure was partly supported by grant UL1RR025005, a component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology is financed by Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; and Central Norway Regional Health Authority. Whole genome sequencing for the HUNT study was funded by HL109946. The GerMIFs gratefully acknowledge the support of the Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care, furthermore founded this work within its framework of DigiMed Bayern (grant DMB-1805-0001), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of ERA-NET on Cardiovascular Disease (Druggable-MI-genes, 01KL1802), within the scheme of target validation (BlockCAD, 16GW0198K), within the framework of the e:Med research and funding concept (AbCD-Net, 01ZX1706C), the British Heart Foundation (BHF)/German Centre of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)-collaboration (VIAgenomics) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 1123 (B02), the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB TRR 267 (B05), and EXC2167 (PMI). This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) under grant RG/14/5/30893 (P.D.) and forms part of the research themes contributing to the translational research portfolios of the Barts Biomedical Research Centre funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). I.S. is supported by a Precision Health Scholars Award from the University of Michigan Medical School. This work was supported by the European Commission (HEALTH-F2–2013-601456) and the TriPartite Immunometabolism Consortium (TrIC)-NovoNordisk Foundation (NNF15CC0018486), VIAgenomics (SP/19/2/344612), the British Heart Foundation, a Wellcome Trust core award (203141/Z/16/Z to M.F. and H.W.) and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. M.F. and H.W. are members of the Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence (RE/13/1/30181). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. C.P.N. and T.R.W. received funding from the British Heart Foundation (SP/16/4/32697). C.J.W. is funded by NIH grant R35-HL135824. B.N.W. is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Program (DGE, 1256260). This research was supported by BHF (SP/13/2/30111) and conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (application 9922). O.M. was funded by the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the European Research Council ERC-AdG-2019-885003 and Lund University Infrastructure grant ‘Malmö population-based cohorts’ (STYR 2019/2046). T.R.W. is funded by the British Heart Foundation. I.K., S. Koyama, and K. Ito are funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED, under grants JP16ek0109070h0003, JP18kk0205008h0003, JP18kk0205001s0703, JP20km0405209 and JP20ek0109487. The Biobank Japan is supported by AMED under grant JP20km0605001. J.L.M.B. acknowledges research support from NIH R01HL125863, American Heart Association (A14SFRN20840000), the Swedish Research Council (2018-02529) and Heart Lung Foundation (20170265) and the Foundation Leducq (PlaqueOmics: New Roles of Smooth Muscle and Other Matrix Producing Cells in Atherosclerotic Plaque Stability and Rupture, 18CVD02. A.V.K. has been funded by grant 1K08HG010155 from the National Human Genome Research Institute. K.G.A. has received support from the American Heart Association Institute for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine (17IFUNP3384001), a KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training (CMeRIT) award from the Harvard Catalyst (KL2 TR002542) and the NIH (1K08HL153937). A.S.B. has been supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (APP2002375). D.S.A. has received support from a training grant from the NIH (T32HL007604). N.P.B., M.C.C., J.F. and D.-K.J. have been funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2UM1DK105554). EPIC-CVD was funded by the European Research Council (268834) and the European Commission Framework Programme 7 (HEALTH-F2-2012-279233). The coordinating center was supported by core funding from the UK Medical Research Council (G0800270; MR/L003120/1), British Heart Foundation (SP/09/002, RG/13/13/30194, RG/18/13/33946) and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This work was supported by Health Data Research UK, which is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome. Support for title page creation and format was provided by AuthorArranger, a tool developed at the National Cancer Institute. Funding Information: T. Kessler is supported by the Corona-Foundation (Junior Research Group Translational Cardiovascular Genomics) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 1123 (B02). T.J. was supported by a Medical Research Council DTP studentship (MR/S502443/1). J.D. is a British Heart Foundation Professor, European Research Council Senior Investigator, and National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator. J.C.H. acknowledges personal funding from the British Heart Foundation (FS/14/55/30806) and is a member of the Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence (RE/13/1/30181). R.C. has received funding from the British Heart Foundation and British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence. O.G. has received funding from the British Heart Foundation (BHF) (FS/14/66/3129). P.S.d.V. was supported by American Heart Association grant number 18CDA34110116 and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute grant R01HL146860. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services (contract HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700004I and HHSN268201700005I), R01HL087641, R01HL059367 and R01HL086694; National Human Genome Research Institute contract U01HG004402; and National Institutes of Health contract HHSN268200625226C. We thank the staff and participants of the ARIC study for their important contributions. Infrastructure was partly supported by grant UL1RR025005, a component of the National Institutes of Health and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research. The Trøndelag Health Study (The HUNT Study) is a collaboration between HUNT Research Centre (Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Trøndelag County Council, Central Norway Regional Health Authority and the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The K.G. Jebsen Center for Genetic Epidemiology is financed by Stiftelsen Kristian Gerhard Jebsen; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology; and Central Norway Regional Health Authority. Whole genome sequencing for the HUNT study was funded by HL109946. The GerMIFs gratefully acknowledge the support of the Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care, furthermore founded this work within its framework of DigiMed Bayern (grant DMB-1805-0001), the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the framework of ERA-NET on Cardiovascular Disease (Druggable-MI-genes, 01KL1802), within the scheme of target validation (BlockCAD, 16GW0198K), within the framework of the e:Med research and funding concept (AbCD-Net, 01ZX1706C), the British Heart Foundation (BHF)/German Centre of Cardiovascular Research (DZHK)-collaboration (VIAgenomics) and the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB 1123 (B02), the Sonderforschungsbereich SFB TRR 267 (B05), and EXC2167 (PMI). This work was supported by the British Heart Foundation (BHF) under grant RG/14/5/30893 (P.D.) and forms part of the research themes contributing to the translational research portfolios of the Barts Biomedical Research Centre funded by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). I.S. is supported by a Precision Health Scholars Award from the University of Michigan Medical School. This work was supported by the European Commission (HEALTH-F2–2013-601456) and the TriPartite Immunometabolism Consortium (TrIC)-NovoNordisk Foundation (NNF15CC0018486), VIAgenomics (SP/19/2/344612), the British Heart Foundation, a Wellcome Trust core award (203141/Z/16/Z to M.F. and H.W.) and the NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre. M.F. and H.W. are members of the Oxford BHF Centre of Research Excellence (RE/13/1/30181). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health. C.P.N. and T.R.W. received funding from the British Heart Foundation (SP/16/4/32697). C.J.W. is funded by NIH grant R35-HL135824. B.N.W. is supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Program (DGE, 1256260). This research was supported by BHF (SP/13/2/30111) and conducted using the UK Biobank Resource (application 9922). O.M. was funded by the Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the European Research Council ERC-AdG-2019-885003 and Lund University Infrastructure grant ‘Malmö population-based cohorts’ (STYR 2019/2046). T.R.W. is funded by the British Heart Foundation. I.K., S. Koyama, and K. Ito are funded by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED, under grants JP16ek0109070h0003, JP18kk0205008h0003, JP18kk0205001s0703, JP20km0405209 and JP20ek0109487. The Biobank Japan is supported by AMED under grant JP20km0605001. J.L.M.B. acknowledges research support from NIH R01HL125863, American Heart Association (A14SFRN20840000), the Swedish Research Council (2018-02529) and Heart Lung Foundation (20170265) and the Foundation Leducq (PlaqueOmics: New Roles of Smooth Muscle and Other Matrix Producing Cells in Atherosclerotic Plaque Stability and Rupture, 18CVD02. A.V.K. has been funded by grant 1K08HG010155 from the National Human Genome Research Institute. K.G.A. has received support from the American Heart Association Institute for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine (17IFUNP3384001), a KL2/Catalyst Medical Research Investigator Training (CMeRIT) award from the Harvard Catalyst (KL2 TR002542) and the NIH (1K08HL153937). A.S.B. has been supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (APP2002375). D.S.A. has received support from a training grant from the NIH (T32HL007604). N.P.B., M.C.C., J.F. and D.-K.J. have been funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2UM1DK105554). EPIC-CVD was funded by the European Research Council (268834) and the European Commission Framework Programme 7 (HEALTH-F2-2012-279233). The coordinating center was supported by core funding from the UK Medical Research Council (G0800270; MR/L003120/1), British Heart Foundation (SP/09/002, RG/13/13/30194, RG/18/13/33946) and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC-1215-20014). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. This work was supported by Health Data Research UK, which is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation and Wellcome. Support for title page creation and format was provided by AuthorArranger, a tool developed at the National Cancer Institute. Publisher Copyright: © 2022, The Author(s).The discovery of genetic loci associated with complex diseases has outpaced the elucidation of mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. Here we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) comprising 181,522 cases among 1,165,690 participants of predominantly European ancestry. We detected 241 associations, including 30 new loci. Cross-ancestry meta-analysis with a Japanese GWAS yielded 38 additional new loci. We prioritized likely causal variants using functionally informed fine-mapping, yielding 42 associations with less than five variants in the 95% credible set. Similarity-based clustering suggested roles for early developmental processes, cell cycle signaling and vascular cell migration and proliferation in the pathogenesis of CAD. We prioritized 220 candidate causal genes, combining eight complementary approaches, including 123 supported by three or more approaches. Using CRISPR–Cas9, we experimentally validated the effect of an enhancer in MYO9B, which appears to mediate CAD risk by regulating vascular cell motility. Our analysis identifies and systematically characterizes >250 risk loci for CAD to inform experimental interrogation of putative causal mechanisms for CAD.Peer reviewe

Investigating the Causal Relationship of C-Reactive Protein with 32 Complex Somatic and Psychiatric Outcomes: A Large-Scale Cross-Consortium Mendelian Randomization Study

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with immune, cardiometabolic, and psychiatric traits and diseases. Yet it is inconclusive whether these associations are causal. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using two genetic risk scores (GRSs) as instrumental variables (IVs). The first GRS consisted of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CRP gene (GRSCRP), and the second consisted of 18 SNPs that were significantly associated with CRP levels in the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) to date (GRSGWAS). To optimize power, we used summary statistics from GWAS consortia and tested the association of these two GRSs with 32 complex somatic and psychiatric outcomes, with up to 123,865 participants per outcome from populations of European ancestry. We performed heterogeneity tests to disentangle the pleiotropic effect of IVs. A Bonferroni-corrected significance level of less than 0.0016 was considered statistically significant. An observed p-value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered nominally significant evidence for a potential causal association, yet to be confirmed. The strengths (F-statistics) of the IVs were 31.92-3,761.29 and 82.32-9,403.21 for GRSCRP and GRSGWAS, respectively. CRP GRSGWAS showed a statistically significant protective relationship of a 10% genetically elevated CRP level with the risk of schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR] 0.86 [95% CI 0.79-0.94]; p < 0.001). We validated this finding with individual-level genotype data from the schizophrenia GWAS (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.98]; p < 1.72 × 10-6). Further, we found that a standardized CRP polygenic risk score (CRPPRS) at p-value thresholds of 1 × 10-4, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 using individual-level data also showed a protective effect (OR < 1.00) against schizophrenia; the first CRPPRS (built of SNPs with p < 1 × 10-4) showed a statistically significant (p < 2.45 × 10-4) protective effect with an OR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99). The CRP GRSGWAS showed that a 10% increase in genetically determined CRP level was significantly associated with coronary artery disease (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.94]; p < 2.4 × 10-5) and was nominally associated with the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.74-0.98]; p < 0.03), Crohn disease (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.70-0.94]; p < 0.005), psoriatic arthritis (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.00-1.84]; p < 0.049), knee osteoarthritis (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01-1.36]; p < 0.04), and bipolar disorder (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.05-1.40]; p < 0.007) and with an increase of 0.72 (95% CI 0.11-1.34; p < 0.02) mm Hg in systolic blood pressure, 0.45 (95% CI 0.06-0.84; p < 0.02) mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure, 0.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI 0.003-0.02; p < 0.005) in estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine, 0.01 g/dl (95% CI 0.0004-0.02; p < 0.04) in serum albumin level, and 0.03 g/dl (95% CI 0.008-0.05; p < 0.009) in serum protein level. However, after adjustment for heterogeneity, neither GRS showed a significant effect of CRP level (at p < 0.0016) on any of these outcomes, including coronary artery disease, nor on the other 20 complex outcomes studied. Our study has two potential limitations: the limited variance explained by our genetic instruments modeling CRP levels in blood and the unobserved bias introduced by the use of summary statistics in our MR analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically elevated CRP levels showed a significant potentially protective causal relationship with risk of schizophrenia. We observed nominal evidence at an observed p < 0.05 using either GRSCRP or GRSGWAS-with persistence after correction for heterogeneity-for a causal relationship of elevated CRP levels with psoriatic osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, knee osteoarthritis, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum albumin, and bipolar disorder. These associations remain yet to be confirmed. We cannot verify any causal effect of CRP level on any of the other common somatic and neuropsychiatric outcomes investigated in the present study. This implies that interventions that lower CRP level are unlikely to result in decreased risk for the majority of common complex outcomes

Marginal role for 53 common genetic variants in cardiovascular disease prediction.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated discrimination and calibration of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk scores when genotypic was added to phenotypic information. The potential of genetic information for those at intermediate risk by a phenotype-based risk score was assessed. METHODS: Data were from seven prospective studies including 11 851 individuals initially free of CVD or diabetes, with 1444 incident CVD events over 10 years' follow-up. We calculated a score from 53 CVD-related single nucleotide polymorphisms and an established CVD risk equation 'QRISK-2' comprising phenotypic measures. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), detection rate for given false-positive rate (FPR) and net reclassification improvement (NRI) index were estimated for gene scores alone and in addition to the QRISK-2 CVD risk score. We also evaluated use of genetic information only for those at intermediate risk according to QRISK-2. RESULTS: The AUROC was 0.635 for QRISK-2 alone and 0.623 with addition of the gene score. The detection rate for 5% FPR improved from 11.9% to 12.0% when the gene score was added. For a 10-year CVD risk cut-off point of 10%, the NRI was 0.25% when the gene score was added to QRISK-2. Applying the genetic risk score only to those with QRISK-2 risk of 10%-<20% and prescribing statins where risk exceeded 20% suggested that genetic information could prevent one additional event for every 462 people screened. CONCLUSION: The gene score produced minimal incremental population-wide utility over phenotypic risk prediction of CVD. Tailored prediction using genetic information for those at intermediate risk may have clinical utility

Investigating the Causal Relationship of C-Reactive Protein with 32 Complex Somatic and Psychiatric Outcomes: A Large-Scale Cross-Consortium Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: C-reactive protein (CRP) is associated with immune, cardiometabolic, and psychiatric traits and diseases. Yet it is inconclusive whether these associations are causal. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using two genetic risk scores (GRSs) as instrumental variables (IVs). The first GRS consisted of four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the CRP gene (GRSCRP), and the second consisted of 18 SNPs that were significantly associated with CRP levels in the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) to date (GRSGWAS). To optimize power, we used summary statistics from GWAS consortia and tested the association of these two GRSs with 32 complex somatic and psychiatric outcomes, with up to 123,865 participants per outcome from populations of European ancestry. We performed heterogeneity tests to disentangle the pleiotropic effect of IVs. A Bonferroni-corrected significance level of less than 0.0016 was considered statistically significant. An observed p-value equal to or less than 0.05 was considered nominally significant evidence for a potential causal association, yet to be confirmed. The strengths (F-statistics) of the IVs were 31.92-3,761.29 and 82.32-9,403.21 for GRSCRP and GRSGWAS, respectively. CRP GRSGWAS showed a statistically significant protective relationship of a 10% genetically elevated CRP level with the risk of schizophrenia (odds ratio [OR] 0.86 [95% CI 0.79-0.94]; p < 0.001). We validated this finding with individual-level genotype data from the schizophrenia GWAS (OR 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.98]; p < 1.72 × 10-6). Further, we found that a standardized CRP polygenic risk score (CRPPRS) at p-value thresholds of 1 × 10-4, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, and 0.1 using individual-level data also showed a protective effect (OR < 1.00) against schizophrenia; the first CRPPRS (built of SNPs with p < 1 × 10-4) showed a statistically significant (p < 2.45 × 10-4) protective effect with an OR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99). The CRP GRSGWAS showed that a 10% increase in genetically determined CRP level was significantly associated with coronary artery disease (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.94]; p < 2.4 × 10-5) and was nominally associated with the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.74-0.98]; p < 0.03), Crohn disease (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.70-0.94]; p < 0.005), psoriatic arthritis (OR 1.36 [95% CI 1.00-1.84]; p < 0.049), knee osteoarthritis (OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01-1.36]; p < 0.04), and bipolar disorder (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.05-1.40]; p < 0.007) and with an increase of 0.72 (95% CI 0.11-1.34; p < 0.02) mm Hg in systolic blood pressure, 0.45 (95% CI 0.06-0.84; p < 0.02) mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure, 0.01 ml/min/1.73 m2 (95% CI 0.003-0.02; p < 0.005) in estimated glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine, 0.01 g/dl (95% CI 0.0004-0.02; p < 0.04) in serum albumin level, and 0.03 g/dl (95% CI 0.008-0.05; p < 0.009) in serum protein level. However, after adjustment for heterogeneity, neither GRS showed a significant effect of CRP level (at p < 0.0016) on any of these outcomes, including coronary artery disease, nor on the other 20 complex outcomes studied. Our study has two potential limitations: the limited variance explained by our genetic instruments modeling CRP levels in blood and the unobserved bias introduced by the use of summary statistics in our MR analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Genetically elevated CRP levels showed a significant potentially protective causal relationship with risk of schizophrenia. We observed nominal evidence at an observed p < 0.05 using either GRSCRP or GRSGWAS-with persistence after correction for heterogeneity-for a causal relationship of elevated CRP levels with psoriatic osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, knee osteoarthritis, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, serum albumin, and bipolar disorder. These associations remain yet to be confirmed. We cannot verify any causal effect of CRP level on any of the other common somatic and neuropsychiatric outcomes investigated in the present study. This implies that interventions that lower CRP level are unlikely to result in decreased risk for the majority of common complex outcomes

Expression quantitative trait loci in the developing human brain and their enrichment in neuropsychiatric disorders

BACKGROUND: Genetic influences on gene expression in the human fetal brain plausibly impact upon a variety of postnatal brain-related traits, including susceptibility to neuropsychiatric disorders. However, to date, there have been no studies that have mapped genome-wide expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) specifically in the human prenatal brain. RESULTS: We performed deep RNA sequencing and genome-wide genotyping on a unique collection of 120 human brains from the second trimester of gestation to provide the first eQTL dataset derived exclusively from the human fetal brain. We identify high confidence cis-acting eQTL at the individual transcript as well as whole gene level, including many mapping to a common inversion polymorphism on chromosome 17q21. Fetal brain eQTL are enriched among risk variants for postnatal conditions including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder. We further identify changes in gene expression within the prenatal brain that potentially mediate risk for neuropsychiatric traits, including increased expression of C4A in association with genetic risk for schizophrenia, increased expression of LRRC57 in association with genetic risk for bipolar disorder, and altered expression of multiple genes within the chromosome 17q21 inversion in association with variants influencing the personality trait of neuroticism. CONCLUSIONS: We have mapped eQTL operating in the human fetal brain, providing evidence that these confer risk to certain neuropsychiatric disorders, and identifying gene expression changes that potentially mediate susceptibility to these conditions

Identifying small-effect genetic associations overlooked by the conventional fixed-effect model in a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary artery disease

Motivation: Common small-effect genetic variants that contribute to human complex traits and disease are typically identified using traditional fixed-effect meta-analysis methods. However, the power to detect genetic associations under fixed-effect models deteriorates with increasing hetero-geneity, so that some small-effect heterogeneous loci might go undetected. Han and Eskin devel-oped a modified random-effects meta-analysis approach (RE2) that is more powerful than tradi-tional fixed and random-effects methods at detecting small-effect heterogeneous genetic associa-tions, updating the method (RE2C) to identify small-effect heterogeneous variants overlooked by traditional fixed-effect meta-analysis. Here we re-appraise a large-scale meta-analysis of coronary disease with RE2C to search for small-effect genetic signals potentially masked by heterogeneity in a fixed-effect meta-analysis. Results: Our application of RE2C suggests a high sensitivity but low specificity of this approach for discovering small-effect heterogeneous genetic associations. We recommend that reports of small-effect heterogeneous loci discovered with RE2C are accompanied by forest plots and SPRE (standardized predicted random-effects) statistics to reveal the distribution of genetic effect esti-mates across component studies of meta-analyses, highlighting overly influential outlier studies with the potential to inflate genetic signals.</p

Identifying systematic heterogeneity patterns in genetic association meta-analysis studies.

Progress in mapping loci associated with common complex diseases or quantitative inherited traits has been expedited by large-scale meta-analyses combining information across multiple studies, assembled through collaborative networks of researchers. Participating studies will usually have been independently designed and implemented in unique settings that are potential sources of phenotype, ancestry or other variability that could introduce between-study heterogeneity into a meta-analysis. Heterogeneity tests based on individual genetic variants (e.g. Q, I-2) are not suited to identifying locus-specific from more systematic multi-locus or genome-wide patterns of heterogeneity. We have developed and evaluated an aggregate heterogeneity M statistic that combines between-study heterogeneity information across multiple genetic variants, to reveal systematic patterns of heterogeneity that elude conventional single variant analysis. Application to a GWAS meta-analysis of coronary disease with 48 contributing studies uncovered substantial systematic between-study heterogeneity, which could be partly explained by age-of-disease onset, family-history of disease and ancestry. Future meta-analyses of diseases and traits with multiple known genetic associations can use this approach to identify outlier studies and thereby optimize power to detect novel genetic associations

New genetic loci link adipose and insulin biology to body fat distribution

Body fat distribution is a heritable trait and a well-established predictor of adverse metabolic outcomes, independent of overall adiposity. To increase our understanding of the genetic basis of body fat distribution and its molecular links to cardiometabolic traits, here we conduct genome-wide association meta-analyses of traits related to waist and hip circumferences in up to 224,459 individuals. We identify 49 loci (33 new) associated with waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index (BMI), and an additional 19 loci newly associated with related waist and hip circumference measures (P < 5 7 10(-8)). In total, 20 of the 49 waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for BMI loci show significant sexual dimorphism, 19 of which display a stronger effect in women. The identified loci were enriched for genes expressed in adipose tissue and for putative regulatory elements in adipocytes. Pathway analyses implicated adipogenesis, angiogenesis, transcriptional regulation and insulin resistance as processes affecting fat distribution, providing insight into potential pathophysiological mechanisms