Population Control in Japan: An Economic Theory and Its Application

Information technology (IT) have for several decades been used in university education. An increasing number of classrooms today are built around a concept which uses IT in collaboration with the room itself. However, little is known about the experience of university teachers when working in such classrooms. This study examines the views and opinions of teachers at a Swedish university regarding using and interacting with these classrooms. Furthermore, we identify possible underlying factors that influence these views. Using data from qualitative interviews we apply Technology acceptance model (TAM) and Activity theory (AT) used in both education and human computer interaction to identify how different factors interact to form these opinions. Our study finds that teachers experience a lack of proper training in the use of classrooms as a concept and tend to stay in established norms of how education is to be conducted. These results leads to questions whether education in the use of these classrooms is adequate for teachers or if education needs to focus more on outcomes of the concept and changing established norms rather than to focus on the use of technology. Our study also shows that teachers do not view the classrooms as a whole where artefacts enable and form each other. Rather they view the physical room, the technology and themselves as separate entities that operate separately from each other

Broad Repertoire of T Cell Autoreactivity Directly from Islets of Donors with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D)

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the infiltration of lymphocytes into the insulin-producing β-cells in the pancreas. We have isolated live T cells sorted or grown directly from the isolated, handpicked islets of human donors with T1D. We received ~500 islet equivalent EQ of variable purity (10-90%) from 12 donors with T1D (disease duration 0.42-20 years) and from seven control donors and two donors with type 2 diabetes (T2D). A total of 321 T cell lines and clones were derived from the islets of donors with T1D (3 lines from the 9 control donors). These are 131 CD4+ lines and clones, 47 CD8+ lines and 143 lines that contain both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. From 50 lines and clones examined to date, we have determined the autoreactivity of 19 and have seen a broad repertoire of T cell autoreactivity in the islets, including characterized targets and post-translationally modified targets. Autoreactivity of CD4+ T cell lines was to three different peptides from glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD; GAD115-127, GAD274-286, GAD555-567), proinsulin76-90, and to chromogranin A or proinsulin expressed by DR4+DQ8+ B cells transduced with lentivirus containing constructs with the open reading frames corresponding to whole autoantigens. Reactivity to modified peptides included the glucose-regulated protein 78 and islet amyloid polypeptide with arginine to citrulline modifications (GRP78292-305(Arg-Cit297) and IAPP65-84(Arg-Cit 73, 81)), deaminations (IA-2545-562(Gln-Glu 548, 551, 556), and to several insulin hybrid peptides. These autoreactive CD4+ T cell lines and clones secreted only pro-inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, TNFα) upon peptide stimulation. For CD8+ T cells from islets, from one donor with T1D, we saw binding of a pool of HLA-A2 pentamers loaded with insulin B10-18, IA-2797-805 and insulin specific glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit related protein, IGRP265-273. These results have implications for the development of successful prevention and reversal therapeutic strategies in T1D

Luxury brands consumption: The segment of “Chandlers”

The purpose of this paper is to introduce the segment of “chandlers” to the Russian academic society and to describe the specifics of their contemporary consumer behavior. The term “chandler” for this study was borrowed from American classical literature and applied to marketing. The study was conducted in April 2016 and comprised of two stages. The first stage was a series of in-depth interviews with seven representatives of the target audience from Moscow. It allowed to formulate the hypotheses which were proved/disproved by these hypotheses during the online survey. 117 relevant respondents were chosen for the study (72 — from Moscow, 45 — from regional city Ufa). The results allowed to formulate a preliminary conclusion there are no сhandlers in Ufa now. The most popular luxury brands for the Moscow сhandlers and specifics of their consumption were determined. This research is the first descriptive step to understanding the specifics of contemporary сhandlers — how they manage to consume luxury in the form of material artefacts and services, while being kept on a shoestring budget. The research entails a few limitations. The investigation comprised only a limited numbers of the respondents from Russian cities as Moscow and Ufa. In future, more consumers will be involved in the sample to cover more cities in Russia and respondents from other countries will be included. Upon the research completion a range of the recommendations has been provided to the luxury producers whose brands are already presented in Moscow and also for those who are planning to open their stores there. The results may serve as a guide for marketing tools development in the luxury industry. The originality of the paper lies in the term “chandlers’ segment” which is introduced in marketing theory for the first time

Many Labs 5:Testing pre-data collection peer review as an intervention to increase replicability

Replication studies in psychological science sometimes fail to reproduce prior findings. If these studies use methods that are unfaithful to the original study or ineffective in eliciting the phenomenon of interest, then a failure to replicate may be a failure of the protocol rather than a challenge to the original finding. Formal pre-data-collection peer review by experts may address shortcomings and increase replicability rates. We selected 10 replication studies from the Reproducibility Project: Psychology (RP:P; Open Science Collaboration, 2015) for which the original authors had expressed concerns about the replication designs before data collection; only one of these studies had yielded a statistically significant effect (p < .05). Commenters suggested that lack of adherence to expert review and low-powered tests were the reasons that most of these RP:P studies failed to replicate the original effects. We revised the replication protocols and received formal peer review prior to conducting new replication studies. We administered the RP:P and revised protocols in multiple laboratories (median number of laboratories per original study = 6.5, range = 3?9; median total sample = 1,279.5, range = 276?3,512) for high-powered tests of each original finding with both protocols. Overall, following the preregistered analysis plan, we found that the revised protocols produced effect sizes similar to those of the RP:P protocols (?r = .002 or .014, depending on analytic approach). The median effect size for the revised protocols (r = .05) was similar to that of the RP:P protocols (r = .04) and the original RP:P replications (r = .11), and smaller than that of the original studies (r = .37). Analysis of the cumulative evidence across the original studies and the corresponding three replication attempts provided very precise estimates of the 10 tested effects and indicated that their effect sizes (median r = .07, range = .00?.15) were 78% smaller, on average, than the original effect sizes (median r = .37, range = .19?.50)