Anti-Fas Induces Hepatic Chemokines and Promotes Inflammation by an NF-κB-independent, Caspase-3-dependent Pathway

Agonistic antibodies against the Fas receptor, when administered to mice in vivo, cause significant apoptosis in the liver. In this study we show that anti-Fas antibody not only causes apoptosis of liver cells but also provokes hepatic inflammation. Two hours after injection of anti-Fas, when mice displayed evidence of caspase-3 activation and apoptosis, we found significant hepatic induction of the CXC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein-2 and KC. Coincident with the chemokine induction was infiltration of the hepatic parenchyma by neutrophils. Neutralization experiments identified that chemokines were the cause of Fas-induced hepatic inflammation, with KC having the predominant effect. Chemokine induction in the livers of anti-Fas-treated mice was not associated with activation of NF-kappa B. Instead, it coincided with nuclear translocation of activator protein-1 (AP-1). AP-1 activation in liver was detected 1-2 h after anti-Fas treatment, suggesting a connection to the onset of apoptosis. When apoptosis was prevented by pretreating mice with a caspase-3 inhibitor, AP-1 activation and hepatic chemokine production were both significantly reduced. Hepatic inflammation was also reduced by 70%. Taken together, these findings indicate that Fas ligation can induce inflammation in the liver in vivo. Inflammation does not arise from Fas-mediated signaling through NF-kappa B; rather, it represents an indirect effect, requiring activation of caspase-3 and nuclear translocation of AP-1

Photography-based taxonomy is inadequate, unnecessary, and potentially harmful for biological sciences

The question whether taxonomic descriptions naming new animal species without type specimen(s) deposited in collections should be accepted for publication by scientific journals and allowed by the Code has already been discussed in Zootaxa (Dubois & Nemésio 2007; Donegan 2008, 2009; Nemésio 2009a–b; Dubois 2009; Gentile & Snell 2009; Minelli 2009; Cianferoni & Bartolozzi 2016; Amorim et al. 2016). This question was again raised in a letter supported by 35 signatories published in the journal Nature (Pape et al. 2016) on 15 September 2016. On 25 September 2016, the following rebuttal (strictly limited to 300 words as per the editorial rules of Nature) was submitted to Nature, which on 18 October 2016 refused to publish it. As we think this problem is a very important one for zoological taxonomy, this text is published here exactly as submitted to Nature, followed by the list of the 493 taxonomists and collection-based researchers who signed it in the short time span from 20 September to 6 October 2016