Starting or Changing Therapy - A Prospective Study Exploring Antiretroviral Decision-Making

Background:: When to start or change antiretroviral treatment against HIV infection is of major importance. Patients' readiness is considered a major factor influencing such treatment decisions, in particular because no objective, absolute time point when to start antiretroviral therapy exists. We aimed at evaluating patients' readiness to start or change antiretroviral therapy (ART). Patients and Methods:: HIV-infected patients starting or changing ART between July 2002 and February 2003, treating physicians and nurses participated in this prospective, observational multicenter study. We assessed shared decision-making including qualitative aspects, expected treatment decisions and treatment status after 3 months. Results:: 75 patients were included. Of 34 patients for whom starting ART was considered, 27 (79%) indicated that they were willing to start treatment. After 3 months, 21 of 27 (78%) actually started therapy, six did not. Patients with depression were less likely to be ready for ART (p < 0.05). Of 41 patients for whom changing ART was considered, 35 (85%) indicated that they were willing to change treatment. Of the latter 35 patients, 33 (94%) finally changed ART within 3 months. Physicians and nurses were too optimistic in predicting the start or change of ART. The main reason to start or change ART was the sole recommendation of the physician (52% in those starting, 61% in those changing ART). Patients mainly judged the decision as shared and were very satisfied (71%) with the process. Qualitative findings revealed the importance of a dialectic decisionmaking, described with two categories: "dealing with oneself and others”‚ and "understanding and being understood.” Conclusion:: Patients mainly shared the decision made during consultation. Although physicians have an essential role concerning ART, patients, physicians, and nurses all contribute to the decision. Qualitative findings indicate the importance for health-care providers to include patients' expertise and contribution

We know DAAs work, so now what?:Simplifying models of care to enhance the hepatitis C cascade

Globally, some 71 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Marginalised populations, particularly people who inject drugs (PWID), have low testing, linkage-to-care and treatment rates for HCV. Several models of care (MoCs) and service delivery interventions have the potential to improve outcomes across the HCV cascade of care, but much of the relevant research was carried out when interferon-based treatment was the standard of care. Often it was not practical to scale up these earlier models and interventions because the clinical care needs of patients taking interferon-based regimens imposed too much of a financial and human resource burden on health systems. Despite the adoption of highly effective, all-oral direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies in recent years, approaches to HCV testing and treatment have evolved slowly and often remain rooted in earlier paradigms. The effectiveness of DAAs allows for simpler approaches and has encouraged countries where the drugs are widely available to set their sights on the ambitious World Health Organization (WHO) HCV elimination targets. Since a large proportion of chronically HCV-infected people are not currently accessing treatment, there is an urgent need to identify and implement existing simplified MoCs that speak to specific populations' needs. This article aims to: 1) review the evidence on MoCs for HCV; and 2) distil the findings into recommendations for how stakeholders can simplify the path taken by chronically HCV-infected individuals from testing to cure and subsequent care and monitoring

Disease knowledge after an educational program in patients with GERD – a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Patient education has proved beneficial in several but not all chronic disease. Inconsistent findings may rely on varying educational effects of various programs and differential effects on subgroups of patients. Patients' increase in disease knowledge may serve as a feedback to the educator on how well the education program works – but may not be associated to relevant clinical outcomes like quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to investigate the effects of a group based education program for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on disease knowledge and the association between knowledge and QoL.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients with GERD were randomly allocated to education (102 patients) or control (109 patients). The education program was designed as a structured dialogue conveying information about pathophysiology, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of GERD, patients' rights and use of healthcare. Outcomes were a 24 item knowledge test on GERD (score 0 – 24) 2 and 12 months after the educational program and disease specific and general QoL (Digestive symptoms and disease impact, DSIQ, and General Health Questionnaire, GHQ).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Patients allocated to education achieved higher knowledge test scores than controls at 2 months (17.0 vs. 13.1, p < 0.001) and at 12 months (17.1 vs. 14.0, p < 0.001) follow-up. Knowledge test score was positively associated with having completed advanced school and inversely related to psychiatric illness and poor QoL as perceived by the patients at the time of inclusion. Overall, changes in knowledge test score were not associated with change in QoL.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A group based education program for patients with GERD designed as a structured dialogue increased patients' disease knowledge, which was retained after 1 year. Changes in GERD-knowledge were not associated with change in QoL.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0061850</p

The complete genome sequence of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis FRC41 isolated from a 12-year-old girl with necrotizing lymphadenitis reveals insights into gene-regulatory networks contributing to virulence

Trost E, Ott L, Schneider J, et al. The complete genome sequence of Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis FRC41 isolated from a 12-year-old girl with necrotizing lymphadenitis reveals insights into gene-regulatory networks contributing to virulence. BMC Genomics. 2010;11(1): 728

Sustainable intensification in tropical agriculture: Example of Africa

A focus on locally adapted methods and stakeholder participation should be regarded as key to the adaptation of the sustainable intensification concept in the context of smallholder farmers

HCV RNA quantification in capillary dried blood spots with the Xpert® HCV Viral Load test for diagnosing chronic HCV infection, monitoring treatment and detecting reinfection

BACKGROUND: For patients with difficult venous access after long-term intravenous drug use, rapid point-of-care hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification in capillary whole blood with the Xpert® HCV Viral Load Fingerstick (VL FS) test (60 minutes) is a convenient and reliable method for diagnosing chronic HCV infection, monitoring treatment and detecting reinfection. However, an expensive GeneXpert® system must be available on site. In decentralised settings with a low case-load, dried blood spot (DBS) testing might be an alternative. METHODS: Between December 2019 and January 2021, patients with an indication for HCV RNA quantification and informed consent provided 100 µl capillary whole blood each for on-site Xpert® HCV VL FS testing (reference) and DBS testing in the laboratory. For the latter, 100 µl blood, collected with an EDTA Minivette®, were transferred to a Whatman® 903 filter card. After drying for at least 1 hour, the DBS sample was packed into a sealable plastic bag with desiccant and sent to the central laboratory of our hospital, where it was stored at –20°C. For HCV RNA extraction, the whole DBS was cut out with an 18-mm puncher and transferred into 1.3 ml guanidinium thiocyanate-containing buffer (provided by Cepheid®). After mixing and incubating at room temperature for 2–3 hours, 1 ml supernatant was analysed with the Xpert® HCV VL test (105 minutes) (filter paper absorbs 0.3 ml). RESULTS: Of 109 paired samples from 67 patients, 38 (34.9%) were positive with the Xpert® HCV VL FS test. Sensitivity and specificity of DBS testing were 89.5% (34/38; 95% confidence interval [CI] 75.9–95.8%) and 97.2% (69/71; 95% CI 90.3–99.2%), respectively. The six (5.5%) discordant results (four false negative, two false positive) all were observed in samples with HCV RNA detectable below the limit of quantification after 2–8 weeks of pan-genotypic direct-acting antiviral treatment or 5 weeks after acute hepatitis C in a patient clearing HCV spontaneously. Quantifiable results (n = 30; 16 genotype 1, 7 genotype 3, 4 genotype 4, 1 genotype 1a and 3a, 2 unknown; HCV RNA range: 2.74–6.66 log IU/ml) correlated well (R2 = 0.981). On average, uncorrected DBS test results were 1.30 ± 0.14 log IU/ml lower than Xpert® HCV VL FS test results (~42 μl instead of the expected 1000 μl plasma used). Storage of DBS samples at room temperature for 7 days before freezing reduced HCV RNA by 0.29 ± 0.12 log IU/ml. CONCLUSION: HCV RNA can reliably be quantified with the Xpert® HCV VL test in capillary dried blood spot samples. Thus, access to capillary HCV RNA quantification for diagnosing chronic HCV infection, monitoring treatment and detecting reinfection can be extended to decentralised settings with a low case load

Direct-acting antiviral interactions with opioids, alcohol or illicit drugs of abuse in HCV-infected patients

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) prevalence is extremely high in patients who consume and inject illicit drugs. Concerns about poor adherence and fear of interaction with drugs of abuse could constitute further disincentive for treatment initiation in these patients. We discussed the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of currently prescribed direct antiviral agents (NSA5 inhibitors: daclatasvir, elbasvir, ledipasvir, pibrentasvir, velpatasvir; NS5B inhibitor: sofosbuvir; NS3/4A protease inhibitors: glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) and most common substances of abuse (opioids: buprenorphine, fentanyl, heroin, methadone, morphine, oxycodone; stimulants: amphetamines, cathinones, cocaine; cannabinoids; ethanol). Overall, most direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are substrates and inhibitors of the transmembrane transporter P-glycoprotein (P-gp), and several of them are metabolized by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Clinically relevant interactions are associated with P-gp and CYP3A modulators. Most substances of abuse are eliminated by Phase I and Phase II metabolizing enzymes, but none of them are either major inhibitors or inducers. PK studies did not show any relevant interactions between DAA and methadone or buprenorphine. Based on pharmacological considerations, neither efficacy loss nor adverse drug event associated with detrimental interaction are expected with opioids, stimulants, cannabinoids and ethanol. In summary, our literature review shows that the interaction potential of DAA with most opioids and illicit drugs is limited and should not be a hurdle to the initiate DAA