6 research outputs found
Pressure Ulcers Risk Assessment According to Nursing Criteria
Pressure ulcers (PU) represent a health problem with a significant impact on the morbidity
and mortality of immobilized patients, and on the quality of life of affected people and their families.
Risk assessment of pressure ulcers incidence must be carried out in a structured and comprehensive
manner. The Braden Scale is the result of an analysis of risk factors that includes subscales that define
exactly what should be interpreted in each one. The healthcare work with evidence-based practice
with an objective criterion by the nursing professional is an essential addition for the application of
preventive measures. Explanatory models based on the different subscales of Braden Scale purvey
an estimation to level changes in the risk of suffering PU. A binary-response logistic regression
model, supported by a study with an analytical, observational, longitudinal, and prospective design
in the Granada-Metropolitan Primary Healthcare District (DSGM) in Andalusia (Southern Spain),
with a sample of 16,215 immobilized status patients, using a Braden Scale log, is performed. A
model that includes the mobility and activity scales achieves a correct classification rate of 86%
(sensitivity (S) = 87.57%, specificity (SP) = 81.69%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 91.78%, and
negative preventive value (NPV) = 73.78%), while if we add the skin moisture subscale to this model,
the correct classification rate is 96% (S = 90.74%, SP = 88.83%, PPV = 95.00%, and NPV = 80.42%).
The six subscales provide a model with a 99.5% correct classification rate (S = 99.93%, SP = 98.50%,
PPV = 99.36%, and NPV = 99.83%). This analysis provides useful information to help predict this risk
in this group of patients through objective nursing criteria.Consejeria de Salud, Junta de Andalucia (Fundacion Publica Andaluza Progreso y Salud) AP-0086-201
Monitoring Immobilized Elderly Patients Using a Public Provider Online System for Pressure Ulcer Information and Registration (SIRUPP): Protocol for a Health Care Impact Study
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13701However, this body played no part in drafting or revising the paper or in approving the final manuscript. The views expressed in
the paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía or of FIBAO.PMID: 31407669Background: Pressure ulcers represent a major challenge to patient safety in the health care context, presenting high incidence
(from 7% to 14% in Spain) and increased financial costs (€400-600 million/year) in medical treatment. Moreover, they are a
significant predictor of mortality. The prevention of pressure ulcers in long-term care centers and patients’ own homes is proposed
as a priority indicator of health care quality. Early stage risk assessment and database recording are both crucial aspects of
prevention, classification, diagnosis, and treatment.
Objective: This project proposes a 3-year study of immobilized patients residing in the Granada-Metropolitan Primary Healthcare
District (DSGM) and monitored via the Pressure Ulcer Information and Registration System (SIRUPP, Spanish initials). The
project aims to estimate the incidence of PUs among immobilized elderly patients, analyze the health-related quality of life of
these patients by using the Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life (PU-QoL) instrument in a sample of 250 patients, determine the average
time to complete wound healing, estimate the rate of pressure ulcers–associated mortality, and assess the predictive value of the
Braden and Mini Nutritional Assessment risk measurement scales in a sample of 1700 patients.
Methods: The DSGM runs SIRUPP, which is linked to patients’ electronic health records. Currently, 17,104 immobilized
patients are monitored under this system. Health-related quality of life will be measured by patient self-reports using the Spanish
Pressure Ulcer Quality of Life questionnaire, following cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation with respect to the
English-language version.
Results: The project commenced in June 2017 and is expected to conclude in April 2020.
Conclusions: This study addresses two main health outcomes—the time needed for wound healing and the mortality associated
with pressure ulcers—both of which might be accounted for by variations in clinical practice and the health-related quality of
life of patients with pressure ulcers.The SIRUPP study is funded by Fundación Progreso y Salud-FIBAO (Consejería de Salud y Familias, Junta de Andalucía)
Effectiveness of an intervention for improving drug prescription in primary care patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy:Study protocol of a cluster randomized clinical trial (Multi-PAP project)
This study was funded by the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias ISCIII (Grant Numbers PI15/00276, PI15/00572, PI15/00996), REDISSEC (Project Numbers RD12/0001/0012, RD16/0001/0005), and the European Regional Development Fund ("A way to build Europe").Background: Multimorbidity is associated with negative effects both on people's health and on healthcare systems. A key problem linked to multimorbidity is polypharmacy, which in turn is associated with increased risk of partly preventable adverse effects, including mortality. The Ariadne principles describe a model of care based on a thorough assessment of diseases, treatments (and potential interactions), clinical status, context and preferences of patients with multimorbidity, with the aim of prioritizing and sharing realistic treatment goals that guide an individualized management. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention that implements the Ariadne principles in a population of young-old patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. The intervention seeks to improve the appropriateness of prescribing in primary care (PC), as measured by the medication appropriateness index (MAI) score at 6 and 12months, as compared with usual care. Methods/Design: Design:pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial. Unit of randomization: family physician (FP). Unit of analysis: patient. Scope: PC health centres in three autonomous communities: Aragon, Madrid, and Andalusia (Spain). Population: patients aged 65-74years with multimorbidity (≥3 chronic diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 drugs prescribed in ≥3months). Sample size: n=400 (200 per study arm). Intervention: complex intervention based on the implementation of the Ariadne principles with two components: (1) FP training and (2) FP-patient interview. Outcomes: MAI score, health services use, quality of life (Euroqol 5D-5L), pharmacotherapy and adherence to treatment (Morisky-Green, Haynes-Sackett), and clinical and socio-demographic variables. Statistical analysis: primary outcome is the difference in MAI score between T0 and T1 and corresponding 95% confidence interval. Adjustment for confounding factors will be performed by multilevel analysis. All analyses will be carried out in accordance with the intention-to-treat principle. Discussion: It is essential to provide evidence concerning interventions on PC patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity, conducted in the context of routine clinical practice, and involving young-old patients with significant potential for preventing negative health outcomes. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02866799Publisher PDFPeer reviewe
Small-area analyses of bone cancer diagnosed in Great Britain provide clues to aetiology
Background: The aetiology of bone cancers is poorly understood. This study examined geographical patterning in incidence of primary bone cancers diagnosed in 0-49 year olds in Great Britain during 1980-2005 to provide information on factors linked with disease development. We investigated putative associations with deprivation and population density.Methods: Data on osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma were obtained from national population-based registries. Negative binomial regression was used to examine the relationship between incidence rates and the Townsend deprivation score (and its component variables) and small-area population density.Results: The study analyzed 2566 osteosarcoma and 1650 Ewing sarcoma cases. For females with osteosarcoma, statistically significant decreased risk was associated with higher levels of deprivation (relative risk [RR] per unit increase in deprivation score = 0.969; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.946-0.993). For all Ewing sarcoma combined, statistically significant decreased risk was associated with greater area-level population density and higher levels of non-car ownership (RR per person per hectare increase = 0.984; 95% CI 0.976-0.993, RR per 1% increase in non-car ownership = 0.994; 95% CI 0.991-0.998).Conclusions: Higher incidence of osteosarcoma was observed for females in areas with lower deprivation levels indicating increased risk is linked to some aspect of affluent living. Higher incidence of Ewing sarcoma occurred in areas of low population density and where more people owned cars, both characteristic of rural environments. The study adds substantially to evidence associating Ewing sarcoma risk with rural environmental exposures. Putative risk factors include agricultural exposures, such as pesticides and zoonotic agents
Dolor crónico no oncológico (origen musculoesquelético) : proceso asistencial integrado. 3ª ed
YesEl Proceso Asistencial Integrado (PAI) se ha reafirmado como una herramienta de mejora continua y ordenado los diferentes flujos de trabajo, integrando el conocimiento actualizado y mejorando los resultados en salud, gracias todo ello a la implicación de los profesionales y a su capacidad para introducir la idea de mejora continua en la calidad de sus procesos