24 research outputs found

    Radiofrequency for chronic lumbosacral and cervical pain:Results of a consensus study using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method

    Get PDF
    Background: Despite the routine use of radiofrequency (RF) for the treatment of chronic pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region, there remains uncertainty on the most appropriate patient selection criteria. This study aimed to develop appropriateness criteria for RF in relation to relevant patient characteristics, considering RF ablation (RFA) for the treatment of chronic axial pain and pulsed RF (PRF) for the treatment of chronic radicular pain. Methods: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method (RUAM) was used to explore the opinions of a multidisciplinary European panel on the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a variety of clinical scenarios. Depending on the type of pain (axial or radicular), the expert panel rated the appropriateness of RFA and PRF for a total of 219 clinical scenarios. Results: For axial pain in the lumbosacral or cervical region, appropriateness of RFA was determined by the dominant pain trigger and location of tenderness on palpation with higher appropriateness scores if these variables were suggestive of the diagnosis of facet or sacroiliac joint pain. Although the opinions on the appropriateness of PRF for lumbosacral and cervical radicular pain were fairly dispersed, there was agreement that PRF is an appropriate option for well-selected patients with radicular pain due to herniated disc or foraminal stenosis, particularly in the absence of motor deficits. The panel outcomes were embedded in an educational e-health tool that also covers the psychosocial aspects of chronic pain, providing integrated recommendations on the appropriate use of (P)RF interventions for the treatment of chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary European expert panel established patient-specific recommendations that may support the (pre)selection of patients with chronic axial and radicular pain in the lumbosacral and cervical region for either RFA or PRF (accessible via https://rftool.org). Future studies should validate these recommendations by determining their predictive value for the outcomes of (P)RF interventions.</p

    Characterization of a nucleocapsid-like region and of two distinct primer tRNA(Lys,2) binding sites in the endogenous retrovirus Gypsy

    Get PDF
    Mobile LTR-retroelements comprising retroviruses and LTR-retrotransposons form a large part of eukaryotic genomes. Their mode of replication and abundance favour the notion that they are major actors in eukaryote evolution. The Gypsy retroelement can spread in the germ line of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster via both env-independent and env-dependent processes. Thus, Gypsy is both an active retrotransposon and an infectious retrovirus resembling the gammaretrovirus MuLV. However, unlike gammaretroviruses, the Gypsy Gag structural precursor is not processed into Matrix, Capsid and Nucleocapsid (NC) proteins. In contrast, it has features in common with Gag of the ancient yeast TY1 retroelement. These characteristics of Gypsy make it a very interesting model to study replication of a retroelement at the frontier between ancient retrotransposons and retroviruses. We investigated Gypsy replication using an in vitro model system and transfection of insect cells. Results show that an unstructured domain of Gypsy Gag has all the properties of a retroviral NC. This NC-like peptide forms ribonucleoparticle-like complexes upon binding Gypsy RNA and directs the annealing of primer tRNA(Lys,2) to two distinct primer binding sites (PBS) at the genome 5′ and 3′ ends. Only the 5′ PBS is indispensable for cDNA synthesis in vitro and in Drosophila cells

    Education des patients traités par anti-vitamines K pour maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse (le point de vue des patients)

    No full text
    A Grenoble, le programme Educ'AVK a pour objectif l'évaluation d'un dispositif simple (30 minutes de consultation et la remise d'un carnet de suivi) visant à éduquer des patients traités par AVK pour maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse, dans le cadre du réseau ville/hôpital. Son but est d'améliorer l'efficacité et la sécurité des AVK. L'évaluation de la satisfaction d'un échantillon de 50 patients (25 témoins, 25 éduqués) à propos de ce programme éducatif a montré leur satisfaction globale. Nous avons montré une différence significative à la faveur du groupe éduqué concernant la possibilité d'expression (80% versus 50%), la vérification de la compréhension des patients lors de l'entretien (72% versus 25%) et le détail du carnet de suivi. 75% des patients désirent un suivi de leur traitement AVK par leur médecin traitant au retour à domicile. Ce programme pourrait, grâce au réseau, constituer un intermédiaire entre les cliniques d'anticoagulants et le suivi classique assuré par les médecins généralistes des patients sous AVK.Educ'AVK programme is a simple education system (30 minutes of comment of a dedicated brochure) for patients undergoing anti-vitamin K (AVK) for venous thrombo-embolic disease. The evaluation of this programme was performed as a part of a medical care network project wich aims at improving the efficacity and the safeness of AVK. The evaluation of the satisfaction of a sub-sample of 50 patients (25 controls and 25 educated) in connection with this educating programme showed their global satisfaction. We found a significant difference favouring the educated group concerning the possibility of expression (80% versus 50%), the verification of patients understanding during the visit (72% versus 25%) and the degree of informativeness of the brochure. 75% of the patients would like to be followed by their general practitioner for their AVK treatment going back home. This programme, thanks to the angiological network, may be a third possibility in addition to anticoagulant clinics and classical follow-up by general practitioner of patients undergoing AVK treatment.GRENOBLE1-BU Médecine pharm. (385162101) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

    Long-term results of carmustine wafer implantation for newly diagnosed glioblastomas: a controlled propensity-matched analysis of a French multicenter cohort

    No full text
    CERVOXY COLLInternational audienceBACKGROUND: The standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is maximal safe surgical resection, followed by chemoradiation therapy. We assessed carmustine wafer implantation efficacy and safety when used in combination with standard care. METHODS: Included were adult patients with (n = 354, implantation group) and without (n = 433, standard group) carmustine wafer implantation during first surgical resection followed by chemoradiation standard protocol. Multivariate and case-matched analyses (controlled propensity-matched cohort, 262 pairs of patients) were conducted. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 12.0 months (95% CI: 10.7-12.6) in the implantation group and 10.0 months (9.0-10.0) in the standard group and the median overall survival was 20.4 months (19.0-22.7) and 18.0 months (17.0-19.0), respectively. Carmustine wafer implantation was independently associated with longer progression-free survival in patients with subtotal/total surgical resection in the whole series (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76 [95% CI: 0.63-0.92], P = .005) and after propensity matching (HR, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.60-0.92], P = .008), whereas no significant difference was found for overall survival (HR, 0.95 [0.80-1.13], P = .574; HR, 1.06 [0.87-1.29], P = .561, respectively). Surgical resection at progression whether alone or combined with carmustine wafer implantation was independently associated with longer overall survival in the whole series (HR, 0.58 [0.44-0.76], P \textless .0001; HR, 0.54 [0.41-0.70], P \textless .0001, respectively) and after propensity matching (HR, 0.56 [95% CI: 0.40-0.78], P \textless .0001; HR, 0.46 [95% CI: 0.33-0.64], P \textless .0001, respectively). The higher postoperative infection rate in the implantation group did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS: Carmustine wafer implantation during surgical resection followed by the standard chemoradiation protocol for newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults resulted in a significant progression-free survival benefi

    Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy after surgical resection does not impact survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients

    No full text
    International audienceBACKGROUND:To assess the influence of the time interval between surgical resection and standard combined chemoradiotherapy on survival in newly diagnosed and homogeneously treated (surgical resection plus standard combined chemoradiotherapy) glioblastoma patients; while controlling confounding factors (extent of resection, carmustine wafer implantation, functional status, neurological deficit, and postoperative complications).METHODS:From 2005 to 2011, 692 adult patients (434 men; mean of 57.5 ± 10.8 years) with a newly diagnosed glioblastoma were enrolled in this retrospective multicentric study. All patients were treated by surgical resection (65.5% total/subtotal resection, 34.5% partial resection; 36.7% carmustine wafer implantation) followed by standard combined chemoradiotherapy (radiotherapy at a median dose of 60 Gy, with daily concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide). Time interval to standard combined chemoradiotherapy was analyzed as a continuous variable and as a dichotomized variable using median and quartiles thresholds. Multivariate analyses using Cox modeling were conducted.RESULTS:The median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% CI, 10.0-11.0). The median overall survival was 19.7 months (95% CI, 18.5-21.0). The median time to initiation of combined chemoradiotherapy was 1.5 months (25% quartile, 1.0; 75% quartile, 2.2; range, 0.1-9.0). On univariate and multivariate analyses, OS and PFS were not significantly influenced by time intervals to adjuvant treatments. On multivariate analysis, female gender, total/subtotal resection and RTOG-RPA classes 3 and 4 were significant independent predictors of improved OS.CONCLUSIONS:Delaying standard combined chemoradiotherapy following surgical resection of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adult patients does not impact survival
    corecore