ECVAM retrospective validation of in vitro micronucleus test (MNT)

In the past decade several studies comparing the in vitro chromosome aberration test (CAT) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNT) were performed. A high correlation was observed in each of the studies (>85%); however, no formal validation for the micronucleus in vitro assay had been carried out. Therefore, a working group was established by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) to perform a retrospective validation of the existing data, in order to evaluate the validity of the in vitro MNT on the basis of the modular validation approach. The primary focus of this retrospective validation was on the evaluation of the potential of the in vitro MNT as alternative to the standard in vitro CAT. The working group evaluated, in a first step, the available published data and came to the conclusion that two studies [German ring trial, von der Hude, W., Kalweit, S., Engelhardt, G. et al. (2000) In-vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells: results of a collaborative study with 26 chemicals. Mutat. Res., 468, 137–163, and SFTG International Collaborative Study, Lorge, E., Thybaud, V., Aardema, M., Oliver, J., Wataka, A., Lorenzon, G. and Marzin, D. (2006) SFTG International Collaborative Study on in-vitro micronucleus test I. General conditions and overall conclusions of the study. Mutat. Res., 607, 13–36] met the criteria for a retrospective validation according to the criteria previously defined by the working group. These two studies were evaluated in depth (including the reanalysis of raw data) and provided the information required for assessing the reliability (reproducibility) of the test. For the assessment of the concordance between the in vitro MNT and the in vitro CAT, additional published data were considered. Based on this retrospective validation, the ECVAM Validation Management Team concluded that the in vitro MNT is reliable and relevant and can therefore be used as an alternative method to the in vitro CAT. Following peer review, these conclusions were formally endorsed by the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee

Classification and labeling of industrial products with extreme pH by making use of in vitro methods for the assessment of skin and eye irritation and corrosion in a weight of evidence approach

AbstractClassification and labeling of products with extreme pH values (⩽2 or ⩾11.5) is addressed in chemicals legislation. Following determination of pH and alkaline/acid reserve, additional in vitro tests are needed, especially to substantiate results less than corrosive. However, only limited experience with the practical application of in vitro methods to determine appropriate classifications for pH extreme products is available so far. Expert judgment and weight of evidence are given major roles under the globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (GHS) and should be performed on a sound data basis. We have used a tiered testing strategy to assess 20 industrial products (cleaning and metal pretreatment) regarding their corrosive and irritating properties towards human skin models in vitro in the EpiDerm™ skin corrosion and/or skin irritation test. Nine dilutions of individual compounds were additionally tested. Non-corrosive samples were tested in the Hen’s egg test chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM). We demonstrate how data is combined in a weight of evidence expert judgment, and give examples of classification decisions. To our knowledge this is the first comprehensive analysis of industrial products with extreme pH values to determine irritating and corrosive properties by making use of in vitro methods in a weight of evidence approach