25 research outputs found

    Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges

    Get PDF
    Background Although previous single-center studies report the rate of anaphylaxis for oral food challenges (OFCs) as 9% to 11%, little is known regarding the epidemiology of clinical OFCs across multiple centers in the United States. Objective To examine the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk OFCs in the nonresearch setting. Methods Data were obtained from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States. Allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics were determined using a linear mixed model. Meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 6,377 OFCs were performed, and the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%). The rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%) and was consistent during the study period (P = .40). Reaction rates ranged from 13% to 33%. Males reacted 16% more frequently than females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04). Foods challenged in 2013 varied geographically, with peanut as the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg as the most challenged in the South. Conclusion As the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States, this study found that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs results in few allergic reactions, with 86% of challenges resulting in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis

    A Screening Tool for Assessing Alcohol Use Risk among Medically Vulnerable Youth

    Get PDF
    Background: In an effort to reduce barriers to screening for alcohol use in pediatric primary care, the National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse (NIAAA) developed a two-question Youth Alcohol Screening Tool derived from population-based survey data. It is unknown whether this screening tool, designed for use with general populations, accurately identifies risk among youth with chronic medical conditions (YCMC). This growing population, which comprises nearly one in four youth in the US, faces a unique constellation of drinking-related risks. Method To validate the NIAAA Youth Alcohol Screening Tool in a population of YCMC, we performed a cross-sectional validation study with a sample of 388 youth ages 9–18 years presenting for routine subspecialty care at a large children’s hospital for type 1 diabetes, persistent asthma, cystic fibrosis, inflammatory bowel disease, or juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Participants self-administered the NIAAA Youth Alcohol Screening Tool and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children as a criterion standard measure of alcohol use disorders (AUD). Receiver operating curve analysis was used to determine cut points for identifying youth at moderate and highest risk for an AUD. Results: Nearly one third of participants (n = 118; 30.4%) reported alcohol use in the past year; 86.4% (106) of past year drinkers did not endorse any AUD criteria, 6.8% (n = 8) of drinkers endorsed a single criterion, and 6.8% of drinkers met criteria for an AUD. Using the NIAAA tool, optimal cut points found to identify youth at moderate and highest risk for an AUD were ≄ 6 and ≄12 drinking days in the past year, respectively. Conclusions: The NIAAA Youth Alcohol Screening Tool is highly efficient for detecting alcohol use and discriminating disordered use among YCMC. This brief screen appears feasible for use in specialty care to ascertain alcohol-related risk that may impact adversely on health status and disease management

    International consensus on the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema with C1-Inhibitor deficiency

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The consensus documents published to date on hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) have focused on adult patients. Many of the previous recommendations have not been adapted to pediatric patients. We intended to produce consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and management of pediatric patients with C1-INH-HAE. METHODS: During an expert panel meeting that took place during the 9th C1-Inhibitor Deficiency Workshop in Budapest, 2015 [w w w.haenet. hu], pediatric data were presented and discussed and a consensus developed by voting. RESULTS: The symptoms of C1-INH-HAE often present in childhood. Differential diagnosis can be difficult as abdominal pain is common in pediatric C1-INH-HAE but also commonly occurs in the general pediatric population. The early onset of symptoms may predict a more severe subsequent course of the disease. Before the age of 1 year, C1-INH levels may be lower than in adults; therefore, it is advisable to confirm the diagnosis after the age of one year. All neonates/infants with an affected C1-INH-HAE family member should be screened for C1-INH deficiency. Pediatric patients should always carry a C1-INH-HAE information card, and medicine for emergency use. The regulatory approval status of the drugs for prophylaxis and for acute treatment is different in each country. Plasma-derived C1-INH, recombinant C1-INH, and ecallantide are the only agents licensed for the acute treatment of pediatric patients. Clinical trials are underway with additional drugs. It is recommended to follow-up patients in an HAE comprehensive care centre. CONCLUSIONS: The Pediatric-focused International Consensus for the diagnosis and management of C1-INH-HAE patients was created. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

    The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema—The 2021 revision and update

    Get PDF
    Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1 inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1 inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: (1) How should HAE be diagnosed? (2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? (3) What are the goals of treatment? (4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast-feeding women? and (5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients

    The international WAO/EAACI guideline for the management of hereditary angioedema - The 2021 revision and update.

    Get PDF
    Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) is a rare and disabling disease for which early diagnosis and effective therapy are critical. This revision and update of the global WAO/EAACI guideline on the diagnosis and management of HAE provides up-to-date guidance for the management of HAE. For this update and revision of the guideline, an international panel of experts reviewed the existing evidence, developed 28 recommendations, and established consensus by an online DELPHI process. The goal of these recommendations and guideline is to help physicians and their patients in making rational decisions in the management of HAE with deficient C1-inhibitor (type 1) and HAE with dysfunctional C1-inhibitor (type 2), by providing guidance on common and important clinical issues, such as: 1) How should HAE be diagnosed? 2) When should HAE patients receive prophylactic on top of on-demand treatment and what treatments should be used? 3) What are the goals of treatment? 4) Should HAE management be different for special HAE patient groups such as children or pregnant/breast feeding women? 5) How should HAE patients monitor their disease activity, impact, and control? It is also the intention of this guideline to help establish global standards for the management of HAE and to encourage and facilitate the use of recommended diagnostics and therapies for all patients

    Definition, aims, and implementation of GA2LEN/HAEi Angioedema Centers of Reference and Excellence

    Get PDF

    A cytidine deaminase expressed in the post-infective L3 stage of the filarial nematode, Brugia pahangi, has a novel RNA-binding activity

    No full text
    A number of genes have been identified that are highly expressed in the post-infective L3 stage of the filarial parasite, Brugia pahangi. Amongst these was a cDNA with homology to the cytidine deaminase (CDD) gene family. Phylogenetic analysis of the various cytosine nucleoside deaminases suggest that Brugia pahangi CDD evolved with significant divergence from the RNA editing family. In order to characterize its function, we have expressed Brugia pahangi CDD in bacteria as a chimera with maltose-binding protein (MBP). Biochemical analysis demonstrates the MBP-CDD fusion protein functions as an authentic cytidine deaminase with an obligate requirement for zinc. In addition to cytidine deaminase activity, however, the fusion protein demonstrates RNA binding activity with specificity for AU-rich sequences and was found to bind an RNA template spanning the edited site of mammalian apolipoprotein B (apoB) mRNA. This RNA binding activity was not found in two different recombinant bacterial CDD proteins. In vitro RNA editing assays revealed that MBP-CDD failed to mediate cytidine deamination of a mammalian apoB RNA template. Furthermore, binding of MBP-CDD to the apoB RNA did not inhibit in vitro editing of this template by apobec-1. The data suggest that the cytosine nucleoside deaminases and RNA editing deaminases have acquired different mechanisms of binding to an AU-rich RNA template, presumably with different functional implications

    Sample Sociodemographic Characteristics by Past Year Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) Risk<sup>a</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>Sample Sociodemographic Characteristics by Past Year Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) Risk<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0156240#t002fn001" target="_blank"><sup>a</sup></a>.</p
    corecore