Risk factors and outcome of COVID-19 in patients with hematological malignancies

Background: Prognostic factors of poor outcome in patients with hematological malignancies and COVID-19 are poorly defned. Patients and methods: This was a Spanish transplant group and cell therapy (GETH) multicenter retrospective observational study, which included a large cohort of blood cancer patients with laboratory-confrmed SARS-CoV-2 infection through PCR assays from March 1st 2020 to May 15th 2020. Results: We included 367 pediatric and adult patients with hematological malignancies, including recipients of autologous (ASCT) (n=58) or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) (n=65) from 41 hospitals in Spain. Median age of patients was 64 years (range 1-93.8). Recipients of ASCT and allo-SCT showed lower mortality rates (17% and 18%, respectively) compared to non-SCT patients (31%) (p=0.02). Prognostic factors identifed for day 45 overall mortality (OM) by logistic regression multivariate analysis included age>70 years [odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95% con‑ fdence interval (CI) 1.2-3.8, p=0.011]; uncontrolled hematological malignancy (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.6-5.2, p20 mg/dL (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.7-6.4, p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis of 216 patients with very severe COVID-19, treatment with azithromycin or low dose corticosteroids was associated with lower OM (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.2-0.89 and OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.87, respectively, p=0.02) whereas the use of hidroxycloroquine did not show signifcant improvement in OM (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.37-1.1, P=0.1). Conclusions: In most patients with hematological malignancies COVID-19 mortality was directly driven by older age, disease status, performance status, as well as by immune (neutropenia) parameters and level of infammation (high CRP). Use of azithromycin and low dose corticosteroids may be of value in very severe COVID-19

Cost-effectiveness analysis of defibrotide in the treatment of patients with severe veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome with multiorgan dysfunction following hematopoietic cell transplantation in Spain.

This study evaluated cost-effectiveness of defibrotide vs best supportive care (BSC) for the treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (VOD/SOS) with multiorgan dysfunction (MOD) post-hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in Spain. A two-phase Markov model, comprising a 1-year acute phase with daily cycles and a lifetime long-term phase with annual cycles, was adapted to the Spanish setting. The model included a cohort of patients with severe VOD/SOS (defined as VOD/SOS with MOD) post-HCT. For the acute phase, efficacy and VOD/SOS-related length of stay were obtained from a phase 3 defibrotide study (NCT00358501). VOD/SOS-related hospital stays were 7.5 and 23.2 days in defibrotide-treated and BSC patients, respectively. Defibrotide-treated patients spent 30% of their stay in the intensive care unit vs 60% in BSC patients. Assumptions for the long-term phase and utility values were obtained from the literature. Costs were from the Spanish Health System perspective (€2019). Defibrotide cost was based on 25 mg/kg/day over 17.5 days, using local expert opinion. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and costs were estimated over a lifetime horizon, applying a 3% discount rate for costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses assessed the robustness of the results. Defibrotide produced an additional 1.214 QALYs and 1.348 LYs vs BSC, with a total cost of €33,708 more than BSC alone. However, defibrotide resulted in savings up to €16,644/patient for cost of hospital stay. Difference between costs and effective measures led to ratios of €27,757/QALY and €25,007/LY gained. Additional hospital stays had the greatest influence on base-case results. Probabilistic analysis confirmed the robustness of the deterministic results. Limitations include use of historical controls and assumptions extrapolated from the literature. This cost-effectiveness model, adapted to the Spanish setting, showed that defibrotide is a cost-effective alternative to BSC alone in patients with severe VOD/SOS post-HCT

High Rate of Inappropriate Antibiotics in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia following International Guideline Recommendations

ABSTRACT Optimal coverage of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is challenging in febrile neutropenic patients due to a progressive increase in antibiotic resistance worldwide. We aimed to detail current rates of resistance to antibiotics recommended by international guidelines for P. aeruginosa isolated from bloodstream infections (BSI) in patients with hematologic malignancies. Secondarily, we aimed to describe how many patients received inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) and its impact on mortality. We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of the last 20 BSI episodes caused by P. aeruginosa in patients with hematologic malignancies from across 14 university hospitals in Spain. Of the 280 patients with hematologic malignancies and BSI caused by P. aeruginosa, 101 (36%) had strains resistant to at least one of the β-lactam antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, namely, cefepime, piperacillin-tazobactam, and meropenem. Additionally, 21.1% and 11.4% of the strains met criteria for MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa, respectively. Even if international guidelines were followed in most cases, 47 (16.8%) patients received IEAT and 66 (23.6%) received inappropriate β-lactam empirical antibiotic treatment. Thirty-day mortality was 27.1%. In the multivariate analysis, pulmonary source (OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.34) and IEAT (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.37 to 5.23) were factors independently associated with increased mortality. We concluded that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines, which is associated with frequent IEAT and higher mortality. New therapeutic strategies are needed. IMPORTANCE Bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by P. aeruginosa is related with an elevated morbidity and mortality in neutropenic patients. For this reason, optimal antipseudomonal coverage has been the basis of all historical recommendations in the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenia. However, in recent years the emergence of multiple types of antibiotic resistances has posed a challenge in treating infections caused by this microorganism. In our study we postulated that P. aeruginosa-causing BSI in patients with hematologic malignancies is commonly resistant to antibiotics recommended in international guidelines. This observation is associated with frequent IEAT and increased mortality. Consequently, there is a need for a new therapeutic strategy

Correction: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with FGFR1-rearrangement: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm (MLN) with FGFR1 rearrangement, but data on overall results are limited. We report on the largest series of patients (n = 22) with FGFR1-rearranged MLN undergoing allo-HCT. Distribution according to cytogenetic subtype was: t(8;13) in 11 cases, t(8;22) in 7 cases, t(6;8) in 2 cases, and other (n = 2). Over a third of patients displayed a chronic myeloproliferative (MPN) phenotype, another third showed MPN features with concomitant lymphoma or acute leukemia, and the remaining ones presented as acute leukemia. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years from transplant, the estimated 5-year survival rate, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence was 74%, 63%, 14% and 23%, respectively. Causes of death were relapse/progression (n = 4), graft-versus-host disease (n = 2) and organ toxicity (n = 1). Six patients experienced disease relapse at a median of 6.1 months (range: 2.3-119.6). Two of them achieved complete remission with ponatinib or pemigatinib and were alive at 34.5 and 37 months from relapse, respectively. These data highlight the significant curative potential of allo-HCT in this aggressive disease. Maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be a promising approach, at least in cases with detectable residual disease after transplant

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with FGFR1-rearrangement: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm (MLN) with FGFR1 rearrangement, but data on overall results are limited. We report on the largest series of patients (n = 22) with FGFR1-rearranged MLN undergoing allo-HCT. Distribution according to cytogenetic subtype was: t(8;13) in 11 cases, t(8;22) in 7 cases, t(6;8) in 2 cases, and other (n = 2). Over a third of patients displayed a chronic myeloproliferative (MPN) phenotype, another third showed MPN features with concomitant lymphoma or acute leukemia, and the remaining ones presented as acute leukemia. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years from transplant, the estimated 5-year survival rate, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence was 74%, 63%, 14% and 23%, respectively. Causes of death were relapse/progression (n = 4), graft-versus-host disease (n = 2) and organ toxicity (n = 1). Six patients experienced disease relapse at a median of 6.1 months (range: 2.3-119.6). Two of them achieved complete remission with ponatinib or pemigatinib and were alive at 34.5 and 37 months from relapse, respectively. These data highlight the significant curative potential of allo-HCT in this aggressive disease. Maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be a promising approach, at least in cases with detectable residual disease after transplant

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with FGFR1-rearrangement: a study of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of EBMT

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only curative treatment for patients with myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm (MLN) with FGFR1 rearrangement, but data on overall results are limited. We report on the largest series of patients (n = 22) with FGFR1-rearranged MLN undergoing allo-HCT. Distribution according to cytogenetic subtype was: t(8;13) in 11 cases, t(8;22) in 7 cases, t(6;8) in 2 cases, and other (n = 2). Over a third of patients displayed a chronic myeloproliferative (MPN) phenotype, another third showed MPN features with concomitant lymphoma or acute leukemia, and the remaining ones presented as acute leukemia. After a median follow-up of 4.1 years from transplant, the estimated 5-year survival rate, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence was 74%, 63%, 14% and 23%, respectively. Causes of death were relapse/progression (n = 4), graft-versus-host disease (n = 2) and organ toxicity (n = 1). Six patients experienced disease relapse at a median of 6.1 months (range: 2.3-119.6). Two of them achieved complete remission with ponatinib or pemigatinib and were alive at 34.5 and 37 months from relapse, respectively. These data highlight the significant curative potential of allo-HCT in this aggressive disease. Maintenance with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may be a promising approach, at least in cases with detectable residual disease after transplant