86 research outputs found
Us and them: how populist parties get their message across
Current discussions about politics – be it European, British, or American – almost inevitably end up being discussions about populism. Yet we know little about how populist parties communicate their messages. Focusing on this area, and drawing on extensive research from across Europe, Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Stromback, and Claes de Vreese share some key findings on populist political communication
Auntie knows best? public broadcasters and current affairs knowledge
Public service broadcasters (PSBs) are a central part of national news media landscapes. In many countries, PSBs are the first choice of citizens when it comes to news providers. And in perhaps more countries still, PSBs are thought of as specialists in provision of hard news. We test this proposition here using survey data from a large crossnational survey involving indicators of current affairs knowledge and media consumption. Specifically, we examine whether exposure to public versus commercial news influences the knowledge citizens possess about current affairs, both domestically and internationally. We
also test, using propensity score analysis, whether there is variation across PSBs in this regard. Results indicate that compared to commercial news, watching PSB has a net
positive influence on knowledge of hard news, though not all PSBs are equally effective in contributing to knowledge acquisition. This knowledge gap between PSB and commercial
news media consumption appears to be mitigated by factors such as de jure independence,proportion of public financing, and audience share
Populism as an Expression of Political Communication Content and Style: A New Perspective
In this article, the introduction to a special International Journal of Press/Politics (IJPP) issue on populism, we articulate and define populism as a communication phenomenon. We provide an overview of populist political communication research and its current foci. We offer a framework for ongoing research and set the boundary conditions for a new generation of research on populist political communication, with an aim to push the research agendas and design toward a more interactive, systematic, and in particular, comparative approach to the study of populist political communication
Media Systems and the Political Information Environment: A Cross-National Comparison
To express attitudes and act according to their self-interest, citizens need relevant, up-to-date information about current affairs. But has the increased commercialization in the media market increased or decreased the flow of political information? Hallin and Mancini stress that the existing empirical evidence is fragmented and that this question therefore has been difficult to answer. In this article the authors present new data that allow them to systematically examine how the flow of political information on TV occurs across six Western countries during a thirty-year period. The authors find that the flow of political information through TV varies according to the degree of commercialization. The flow of news and current affairs is lowest in the most commercially oriented television system and among the commercial TV channels. There is however important cross-national variation even within similar media systems. The authors’ data do not suggest a convergence toward the liberal system when it comes to the political information environment on TV. Rather, what strikes them is how strongly resistant some European countries have been to subordinating the needs of democracy to profit making
Navigating high-choice European political information environments : a comparative analysis of news user profiles and political knowledge
The transition from low- to high-choice media environments has had far-reaching
implications for citizens’ media use and its relationship with political knowledge.
However, there is still a lack of comparative research on how citizens combine the
usage of different media and how that is related to political knowledge. To fill this
void, we use a unique cross-national survey about the online and offline media use
habits of more than 28,000 individuals in 17 European countries. Our aim is to (i) profile
different types of news consumers and (ii) understand how each user profile is
linked to political knowledge acquisition. Our results show that five user profiles –
news minimalists, social media news users, traditionalists, online news seekers, and hyper
news consumers – can be identified, although the prevalence of these profiles varies
across countries. Findings further show that both traditional and online-based news
diets are correlated with higher political knowledge. However, online-based news
use is more widespread in Southern Europe, where it is associated with lower levels
of political knowledge than in Northern Europe. By focusing on news audiences, this
study provides a comprehensive and fine-grained analysis of how contemporary
European political information environments perform and contribute to an informed
citizenry
Why are “others” so polarized? Perceived political polarization and media use in 10 countries.
This study tests the associations between news media use and perceived political polarization, conceptualized as citizens’ beliefs about partisan divides among major political parties. Relying on representative surveys in Canada, Colombia, Greece, India, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Norway, United Kingdom and United States, we test whether perceived polarization is related to the use of television news, newspaper, radio news, and online news media. Data show that online news consumption is systematically and consistently related to perceived polarization, but not to attitude polarization, understood as individual attitude extremity. In contrast, the relationships between traditional media use and perceived and attitude polarization is mostly country dependent. An explanation of these findings based on exemplification is proposed and tested in an experimental design
Media Use and Misperceptions Does TV Viewing Improve our Knowledge about Immigration?
There is considerable evidence that many people generally misperceive the size of the immigrant population in their country, and that this may have essential political implications.
In studies of political knowledge, the news media are typically said to be one important
source of information that can help make people more knowledgeable. In the present article,
we investigate whether there is a relationship between TV viewing, media system variations
and knowledge about immigration. We base our analysis on highly comparable data from
the 2002-2003 wave of the European Social Survey (ESS) and an American replication of
the ESS. The results indicate that TV viewing in general is associated with lower levels of
knowledge, while there is a positive but non-significant relationship between watching TV
news and knowledge about immigration. Differences in the levels of knowledge between the countries are fairly large, with residents of Nordic countries being most knowledgeable and
residents of the UK, US and France tending to be least knowledgeable. Aggregate explana
-tions for variations in media influence (share of public service TV and “media systems”)
do not prove to be of much value in explaining differences in knowledge about the sizes
of immigrant populations
Stimulert eller demobilisert? – En kvantitativ undersøkelse av mediebruk og politisk engasjement
Kritiske kvinner og medievridde menn – En empirisk studie av stortingsmedlemmers forhold til norske medier
Media Systems, News Content and Public Perception of Political Reality - A Cross-National Content Analysis, 2009
Public opinion constitutes one of the cornerstones of democracy. Citizens are assumed to hold preferences for particular polices, know where parties and candidates for office are located on the relevant policy dimensions, and cast their votes accordingly. In other words: Democracy functions best when its citizens are politically informed. In order to express attitudes and act according to their self-interest, citizens need relevant and up to date information about current affairs. In many respects, political relevant information is more widely available now than at any time in history. However, several scholars have questioned the quality and the form of information provided by the news media. A central hypothesis in this project is that media systems matter for the information available to the public. How commercial and public broadcasting is organised within a country, or the relative importance of newspapers to television, are all factors that can influence the information provided by the news media, and thus the potential effect on the public. The overall purpose of this project is to study the information given by the news media to the public, and how this information influences public's knowledge and perception of political reality. This data set consist of a content analysis of news output in six countries: Norway, Sweden, Belgium, The Netherlands, UK and the US. The content analysis studies between and within country variations in news content, including important factors such as hard versus soft news, thematic versus episodic news frames, domestic versus international focus, use of actors and sources as well as main arguments presented on a few selected topics
- …