Incidence of diabetes in patients treated with antipsychotics in primary care

Cartas al directorS

Moving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study

Background: The accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework defines 4 conditions for legitimate healthcare coverage decision processes: Relevance, Publicity, Appeals, and Enforcement. The aim of this study was to reflect on how the diverse features of decision-making processes can be aligned with A4R conditions to guide decision-making towards legitimacy. Rare disease and regenerative therapies (RDRTs) pose special decision-making challenges and offer therefore a useful case study. Methods: Features operationalizing each A4R condition as well as three different approaches to address these features (cost-per-QALY-focused and multicriteria-based) were defined and organized into a matrix. Seven experts explored these features during a panel run under the Chatham House Rule and provided general and RDRT-specific recommendations. Responses were analyzed to identify converging and diverging recommendations. Results: Regarding Relevance, recommendations included supporting deliberation, stakeholder participation and grounding coverage decision criteria in normative and societal objectives. Thirteen of 17 proposed decision criteria were recommended by a majority of panelists. The usefulness of universal cost-effectiveness thresholds to inform allocative efficiency was challenged, particularly in the RDRT context. RDRTs raise specific issues that need to be considered; however, rarity should be viewed in relation to other aspects, such as disease severity and budget impact. Regarding Publicity, panelists recommended transparency about the values underlying a decision and value judgements used in selecting evidence. For Appeals, recommendations included a life-cycle approach with clear provisions for re-evaluations. For Enforcement, external quality reviews of decisions were recommended. Conclusion: Moving coverage decision-making processes towards enhanced legitimacy in general and in the RDRT context involves designing and refining approaches to support participation and deliberation, enhancing transparency, and allowing explicit consideration of multiple decision criteria that reflect normative and societal objectives

Conurbation, Urban, and Rural Living as Determinants of Allergies and Infectious Diseases: Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre Annual Report 2016-2017.

BACKGROUND: Living in a conurbation, urban, or rural environment is an important determinant of health. For example, conurbation and rural living is associated with increased respiratory and allergic conditions, whereas a farm or rural upbringing has been shown to be a protective factor against this. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess differences in general practice presentations of allergic and infectious disease in those exposed to conurbation or urban living compared with rural environments. METHODS: The population was a nationally representative sample of 175 English general practices covering a population of over 1.6 million patients registered with sentinel network general practices. General practice presentation rates per 100,000 population were reported for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and infectious conditions grouped into upper and lower respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infection, and acute gastroenteritis by the UK Office for National Statistics urban-rural category. We used multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, deprivation, comorbidities, and smoking status, reporting odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. RESULTS: For allergic rhinitis, the OR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.04-1.23; P=.003) for urban and 1.29 (95% CI 1.19-1.41; P<.001) for conurbation compared with rural dwellers. Conurbation living was associated with a lower OR for both asthma (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73; P<.001) and lower respiratory tract infections (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P=.005). Compared with rural dwellers, the OR for upper respiratory tract infection was greater in urban (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08; P<.001) but no different in conurbation dwellers (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.97-1.03; P=.93). Acute gastroenteritis followed the same pattern: the OR was 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.25; P=.03) for urban dwellers and 1.04 (95% CI 0.93-1.17; P=.46) for conurbation dwellers. The OR for urinary tract infection was lower for urban dwellers (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99; P=.02) but higher in conurbation dwellers (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.00-1.13; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Those living in conurbations or urban areas were more likely to consult a general practice for allergic rhinitis and upper respiratory tract infection. Both conurbation and rural living were associated with an increased risk of urinary tract infection. Living in rural areas was associated with an increased risk of asthma and lower respiratory tract infections. The data suggest that living environment may affect rates of consultations for certain conditions. Longitudinal analyses of these data would be useful in providing insights into important determinants

Respiratory and mental health effects of wildfires: an ecological study in Galician municipalities (north-west Spain)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the summer of 2006, a wave of wildfires struck Galicia (north-west Spain), giving rise to a disaster situation in which a great deal of the territory was destroyed. Unlike other occasions, the wildfires in this case also threatened farms, houses and even human lives, with the result that the perception of disaster and helplessness was the most acute experienced in recent years. This study sought to analyse the respiratory and mental health effects of the August-2006 fires, using consumption of anxiolytics-hypnotics and drugs for obstructive airway diseases as indicators.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We conducted an analytical, ecological geographical- and temporal-cluster study, using municipality-month as the study unit. The independent variable was exposure to wildfires in August 2006, with municipalities thus being classified into the following three categories: no exposure; medium exposure; and high exposure. Dependent variables were: (1) anxiolytics-hypnotics; and (2) drugs for obstructive airway diseases consumption. These variables were calculated for the two 12-month periods before and after August 2006. Additive models for time series were used for statistical analysis purposes.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The results revealed a higher consumption of drugs for obstructive airway diseases among pensioners during the months following the wildfires, in municipalities affected versus those unaffected by fire. In terms of consumption of anxiolytics-hypnotics, the results showed a significant increase among men among men overall -pensioners and non-pensioners- in fire-affected municipalities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our study indicates that wildfires have a significant effect on population health. The coherence of these results suggests that drug utilisation research is a useful tool for studying morbidity associated with environmental incidents.</p

Can we improve management and control of chronic diseases?.

[ES] Objetivo: Investigar la efectividad de diferentes estrategias destinadas a mejorar la calidad y los resultados de las intervenciones en el tratamiento de las enfermedades crónicas. Metodología: Revisión sistemática de la bibliografía. Criterios de inclusión: Ensayos clínicos en lengua inglesa o española que evalúen la efectividad de distintas intervenciones para mejorar los resultados asistenciales del asma, la diabetes, la hipertensión y la insuficiencia cardíaca. Las intervenciones se clasifican de acuerdo con un modelo conceptual en 6 categorías: cambios organizativos, participación comunitaria, sistemas de información, diseño de la práctica clínica, apoyo a la toma de decisiones y de autocontrol. Los resultados evaluados fueron: utilización de servicios de salud, tratamiento clínico, resultados clínicos, calidad de vida, satisfacción e indicadores de capacidad de autocontrol. Resultados: Se incluyeron 37 estudios que incorporaban 38 intervenciones. Las intervenciones más frecuentes son las que investigan los cambios en el de diseño asistencial, seguidas de las que analizan el efecto de los sistemas de información y apoyo a la toma de decisiones. Las intervenciones más complejas en número de intervenciones, incluido el apoyo para el autocontrol, mostraron una mayor probabilidad de tener efectos positivos en el tratamiento y en los resultados clínicos. Pocas intervenciones consiguen mejoras en utilización de servicios, aunque sí se observaron sustanciales mejoras en los resultados percibidos. Conclusiones: Para mejorar la calidad asistencial y la efectividad en el control de las enfermedades crónicas es preciso adoptar una visión sistemática que incluya un sistema sanitario proactivo y pacientes protagonistas activos del tratamiento de su enfermedad. Los programas así diseñados deben combinar, al menos, estrategias organizativas, de diseño asistencial y de autocontrol. [EN] To evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving the quality and outcome of chronic disease management. Systematic review of the literature. Clinical trials in English and Spanish that assess the effectiveness of 1 or more strategies for improving quality and outcome in asthma, diabetes, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. Interventions were classified in line with a conceptual model in 6 categories: organizational changes, community participation, information systems, clinical practice design, decision-making support, and self-management. The outcomes considered were: health service utilization, chronic disease management, clinical outcomes, quality of life, satisfaction, and self-management indicators. Thirty seven studies with 38 interventions were included. The most common interventions were those that investigated changes in health care design, followed by those analysing information systems and decision-making support. The most complex interventions, in terms of the overall number of strategies, including support for self-management, showed more likelihood of positive effects in clinical management and clinical outcomes. Few interventions achieved improvements in use of health care services, though patients perceived substantial improvements. In order to improve quality and effectiveness of chronic disease management, it is necessary to take a systematic view including proactive health care systems and patients taking an active role in managing their disease. These programmes should combine, at the least, organizational strategies, design of clinical practice and patient self-management.S

Perspectiva de los pacientes sobre la diabetes tipo 2 y relación con los profesionales sanitarios de atención primaria: un estudio cualitativo

ObjetivoInvestigar la percepción que las personas con diabetes tipo 2 tienen sobre esta enfermedad y sobre la relación con los profesionales sanitarios de atención primaria.DiseñoInvestigación cualitativa realizada entre septiembre y diciembre de 2000.EmplazamientoCentro de salud Barrio del Pilar del Área 5 de Madrid.ParticipantesQuince personas con diabetes tipo 2. Las variables consideradas para el diseño de los perfiles a entrevistar fueron: edad, sexo, nivel educativo y tiempo de diagnóstico.MétodoMuestreo estructural. Se emplearon entrevistas abiertas.ResultadosLos pacientes entrevistados manifiestan tener escasa información sobre las consecuencias de la diabetes. El hecho de no tener síntomas dificulta que la diabetes se perciba como una enfermedad grave. Los aspectos más valorados en la relación con los profesionales sanitarios son que éstos proporcionen información clara y adaptada, construyan un contexto de confianza, presten apoyo para el cambio y consideren sus perspectivas y circunstancias existenciales.ConclusionesEs necesario comprender cómo los pacientes construyen e interpretan su enfermedad. La información que proporcionan los profesionales ha de adaptarse a las necesidades de los pacientes y producirse en un clima de confianza. Las decisiones relativas al manejo de la diabetes deben ser congruentes con la perspectiva de los pacientes. La comunicación efectiva se plantea como una herramienta útil para favorecer la adherencia y mejorar la calidad asistencial.AimThe objective of this study is to investigate the perception that people with type 2 diabetes have about the disease and about their relationship with the primary healthcare professionalsDesignQualitative research, carried out between September-November 2000.SettingPrimary healthcare center Barrio del Pilar from Madrid.Participants15 persons with type 2 diabetes. Variables considered to design the profiles of the interviewed were: age, gender, educational level, and time since diagnosis.MethodStructural sampling and open interviews.ResultsPatients express having scarce information regarding the consequences of diabetes. As diabetes is symptom free represents a difficulty for being perceived as a severe disease. The most valued aspects of the relationship with health professionals are that they provide with clear and tailored information, build a trust context, support changes and take account their perspectives and living circumstances.ConclusionsIt is essential to recognize how patients understand and shape the disease. Information provided by professionals have to be tailored to patients necessities, and take place in a trusting environment. Decisions related with diabetes management have to be aligned with patients perspectives. Effective communication could be considered as a useful tool to encourage adherence and improve healthcare quality