63 research outputs found

    Split graphs and Block Representations

    Full text link
    In this paper, we study split graphs and related classes of graphs from the perspective of their sequence of vertex degrees and an associated lattice under majorization. Following the work of Merris in 2003, we define blocks [α(π)∣β(π)][\alpha(\pi)|\beta(\pi)], where π\pi is the degree sequence of a graph, and α(π)\alpha(\pi) and β(π)\beta(\pi) are sequences arising from π\pi. We use the block representation [α(π)∣β(π)][\alpha(\pi)|\beta(\pi)] to characterize membership in each of the following classes: unbalanced split graphs, balanced split graphs, pseudo-split graphs, and three kinds of Nordhaus-Gaddum graphs (defined by Collins and Trenk in 2013). As in Merris' work, we form a poset under the relation majorization in which the elements are the blocks [α(π)∣β(π)][\alpha(\pi)|\beta(\pi)] representing split graphs with a fixed number of edges. We partition this poset in several interesting ways using what we call amphoras, and prove upward and downward closure results for blocks arising from different families of graphs. Finally, we show that the poset becomes a lattice when a maximum and minimum element are added, and we prove properties of the meet and join of two blocks.Comment: 23 pages, 7 Figures, 2 Table

    On the algorithmic complexity of twelve covering and independence parameters of graphs

    Get PDF
    The definitions of four previously studied parameters related to total coverings and total matchings of graphs can be restricted, thereby obtaining eight parameters related to covering and independence, each of which has been studied previously in some form. Here we survey briefly results concerning total coverings and total matchings of graphs, and consider the aforementioned 12 covering and independence parameters with regard to algorithmic complexity. We survey briefly known results for several graph classes, and obtain new NP-completeness results for the minimum total cover and maximum minimal total cover problems in planar graphs, the minimum maximal total matching problem in bipartite and chordal graphs, and the minimum independent dominating set problem in planar cubic graphs

    Bounds for the Number of Independent and Dominating Sets in Trees

    Get PDF
    In this work, we investigate bounds on the number of independent sets in a graph and its complement, along with the corresponding question for number of dominating sets. Nordhaus and Gaddum gave bounds on χ(G)+χ(G) and χ(G) χ(G), where G is any graph on n vertices and χ(G) is the chromatic number of G. Nordhaus-Gaddum- type inequalities have been studied for many other graph invariants. In this work, we concentrate on i(G), the number of independent sets in G, and ∂(G), the number of dominating sets in G. We focus our attention on Nordhaus-Gaddum-type inequalities over trees on a fixed number of vertices. In particular, we give sharp upper and lower bounds on i(T )+ i(T ) where T is a tree on n vertices, improving bounds and proofs of Hu and Wei. We also give upper and lower bounds on i(G) + i(G) where G is a unicyclic graph on n vertices, again improving a result of Hu and Wei. Lastly, we investigate ∂(T )+ ∂(T ) where T is a tree on n vertices. We use a result of Wagner to give a lower bound and make a conjecture about an upper bound

    Transitivity on subclasses of chordal graphs

    Full text link
    Let G=(V,E)G=(V, E) be a graph, where VV and EE are the vertex and edge sets, respectively. For two disjoint subsets AA and BB of VV, we say AA \textit{dominates} BB if every vertex of BB is adjacent to at least one vertex of AA in GG. A vertex partition π={V1,V2,…,Vk}\pi = \{V_1, V_2, \ldots, V_k\} of GG is called a \emph{transitive kk-partition} if ViV_i dominates VjV_j for all i,ji,j, where 1≤i<j≤k1\leq i<j\leq k. The maximum integer kk for which the above partition exists is called \emph{transitivity} of GG and it is denoted by Tr(G)Tr(G). The \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is to find a transitive partition of a given graph with the maximum number of partitions. It was known that the decision version of \textsc{Maximum Transitivity Problem} is NP-complete for chordal graphs [Iterated colorings of graphs, \emph{Discrete Mathematics}, 278, 2004]. In this paper, we first prove that this problem can be solved in linear time for \emph{split graphs} and for the \emph{complement of bipartite chain graphs}, two subclasses of chordal graphs. We also discuss Nordhaus-Gaddum type relations for transitivity and provide counterexamples for an open problem posed by J. T. Hedetniemi and S. T. Hedetniemi [The transitivity of a graph, \emph{J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput}, 104, 2018]. Finally, we characterize transitively critical graphs having fixed transitivity.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2204.1314

    Clique coverings and claw-free graphs

    Get PDF
    Let C be a clique covering for E(G) and let v be a vertex of G. The valency of vertex v (with respect to C), denoted by val(C) (v), is the number of cliques in C containing v. The local clique cover number of G, denoted by lcc(G), is defined as the smallest integer k, for which there exists a clique covering for E(G) such that val(C) (v) is at most k, for every vertex v is an element of V(G). In this paper, among other results, we prove that if G is a claw-free graph, then lcc(G) + chi(G) <= n + 1. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd

    Characterizations for split graphs and unbalanced split graphs

    Full text link
    We introduce a characterization for split graphs by using edge contraction. Then, we use it to prove that any (2K22K_{2}, claw)-free graph with α(G)≥3\alpha(G) \geq 3 is a split graph. Also, we apply it to characterize any pseudo-split graph. Finally, by using edge contraction again, we characterize unbalanced split graphs which we use to characterize the Nordhaus-Gaddum graphs
    • …
    corecore