444 research outputs found

    Geomorphometric Characteristics of Landslides in the Tinalah Watershed, Menoreh Mountains, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

    Get PDF
    AbstractA landslide is one of natural hazards that affect humans and their livelihood especially in the mountainous area. The increasing landslide risk due to global climate change and demographic pressure demands integration between disaster risk reduction and sustainability management, for instance, the recently increasing people's awareness of the landslide and its impacts. Landslides occur in particular location regarding both physical and non-physical features of an area, comprising geomorphology, geology, geomorphometry, human activities, earthquake probability, rainfall occurrence, and etc. This research aims to understand the characteristics of the specific land surface that bears susceptibility to landslides using a geomorphometric approach and to analyze the relationship between geomorphometric characteristics and landslide events. The Tinalah watershed is located in Menoreh Mountains, one of mountainous areas in Java where highly frequent landslides occur. Geomorphometric characteristics, derived from DEMs with 2x2-m2 grid resolution, consist of elevation, slope gradient, aspect, profile curvature, plan curvature, and general curvature. The inventory of landslide events, consisting of the location, time, area, perimeter, typology, and activity, is derived from the field maps, local government's report analysis, and interviews with local people. In this research, landslide distribution is mapped using the multi-temporal records of landslide events during 2006-2010. A raster-based spatial analysis reveals the relationship between landslide events and geomorphometric characteristics. Each variable shows the quantitative information of landslide distribution in the Tinalah watershed. As a result, geomorphometric characteristics have the most significant relationship with the landslide distribution in this study area

    Physical geomorphometry for elementary land surface segmentation and digital geomorphological mapping

    Get PDF
    By interpretations related to energy, elementary land surface segmentation can be treated as a physical problem. Many pieces of such a view found in the literature can be combined into a synthetic comprehensive physical approach. The segmentation has to be preceded by defining the character and size of searched units to result from the segmentation. A high-resolution digital elevation model (DEM) is the key input for this task; it should be generalized to the resolution best expressing information about the searched units. Elementary land surface units can be characterized by various parts of potential gravitational energy associated with a set of basic geomorphometric variables. Elevation above sea level (z) represents Global Geomorphic Energy (GGE). Regional and Local Geomorphic Energy (RGE and LGE) are parts of GGE, represented respectively by relative elevation above the local base level (zrel) and local relief (elevation differential in a moving window Δz). Derivation (change) of elevation defines the slope inclination (S), determining the local Potential Energy of Surface (PES) applicable to mass flow. Normal slope line (profile) curvature (kn)s and normal contour (tangential) curvature (kn)c express change in the PES value (ΔPES(kn )s, ΔPES(kn )c), responsible for acceleration/deceleration and convergence/ divergence of flow. Mean curvature (kmean) determines the Potential Energy of Surface applicable to Diffusion (PESD). Energetic interpretation of basic geomorphometric variables enables their direct comparison and systematic evaluation. Consequently, the homogeneity of basic geomorphometric variables defines a hierarchy of states of local geomorphic equilibria: static equilibrium, steady state, and non-steady state dynamic equilibrium. They are local attractors of landform development reflected in the geomorphometric tendency to symmetry (horizontality, various types of linearity, and curvature isotropy, together expressed by gravity concordance). Nonequilibrium and transitional states can be characterized by the PES excess (PESe) determined by difference curvature (kd), by gravity discordant change of the PES characterized by twisting curvature (τg)c, and by Integral Potential Energy of Surface Curvature (IPESC) expressed by Casorati curvature (kC) (general curvedness). Excluding zrel and Δz, all these energy-related geomorphometric variables are local point-based. Local area-based and regional variables such as Glock’s Available Relief, Melton Ruggedness Number, Stream Power Index, Openness, Topographic Position Index, Topographic Wetness Index, and Index of Connectivity also have energetic interpretations although their definition is more complex. Therefore we suggest exclusive use of the local point-based variables in designs of elementary land surface segmentation. The segmentation should take notice of natural interconnections, the hierarchy of geomorphometric variables, elements of Local Geomorphic Energy, and (dis)equilibria states, so that elementary segments are clearly interpretable geomorphologically. This is exemplified by Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) segmentation of Sandberg, a territory on the boundary of the Carpathians and Vienna Basin with a complex geomorphic history and marked morphodynamics. Compared with expert-driven field geomorphological mapping, the automatic physically-based segmentation resulted in a more specific delineation and composition of landforms. Physical-geomorphometric characteristics of the elementary forms enabled the formulation of their system and subsequent improvement of the expert-based qualitative genetic analysis, with interpretation leading to a deeper understanding of the development and recent dynamics of the landscape

    Digital Elevation Models in Geomorphology

    Get PDF
    This chapter presents place of geomorphometry in contemporary geomorphology. The focus is on discussing digital elevation models (DEMs) that are the primary data source for the analysis. One has described the genesis and definition, main types, data sources and available free global DEMs. Then we focus on landform parameters, starting with primary morphometric parameters, then morphometric indices and at last examples of morphometric tools available in geographic information system (GIS) packages. The last section briefly discusses the landform classification systems which have arisen in recent years

    Characterising the ocean frontier : a review of marine geomorphometry

    Get PDF
    Geomorphometry, the science that quantitatively describes terrains, has traditionally focused on the investigation of terrestrial landscapes. However, the dramatic increase in the availability of digital bathymetric data and the increasing ease by which geomorphometry can be investigated using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has prompted interest in employing geomorphometric techniques to investigate the marine environment. Over the last decade, a suite of geomorphometric techniques have been applied (e.g. terrain attributes, feature extraction, automated classification) to investigate the characterisation of seabed terrain from the coastal zone to the deep sea. Geomorphometric techniques are, however, not as varied, nor as extensively applied, in marine as they are in terrestrial environments. This is at least partly due to difficulties associated with capturing, classifying, and validating terrain characteristics underwater. There is nevertheless much common ground between terrestrial and marine geomorphology applications and it is important that, in developing the science and application of marine geomorphometry, we build on the lessons learned from terrestrial studies. We note, however, that not all terrestrial solutions can be adopted by marine geomorphometric studies since the dynamic, four- dimensional nature of the marine environment causes its own issues, boosting the need for a dedicated scientific effort in marine geomorphometry. This contribution offers the first comprehensive review of marine geomorphometry to date. It addresses all the five main steps of geomorphometry, from data collection to the application of terrain attributes and features. We focus on how these steps are relevant to marine geomorphometry and also highlight differences from terrestrial geomorphometry. We conclude with recommendations and reflections on the future of marine geomorphometry.peer-reviewe

    Automated unsupervised geomorphometric classification of earth surface for landslide susceptibility assessment

    Get PDF
    The aim of this work is to define an automated method of terrain classification in order to evaluate the correlation degree between topographic forms of the analyzed territory and registered landslide phenomena with a Landslide Inventory and DEMs as unique input data. A reliable procedure that identifies areas subject to different levels of susceptibility by a geomorphometric approach is presented. The main objective is reached by means of intermediate steps. The first step is the individuation of a set of measures, a geometric signature, that describes topographic form to distinguish among geomorphically different landscapes; the identified parameters are slope gradient, aspect, plan and section curvatures, local convexity and surface texture, computed from a 30x30m square-grid digital elevation model (DEM). The second step is the classification of the analyzed territory in eleven classes using the geometric signature tool. Finally, the eleven classes are statistically correlated with the Landslide Inventory of the analyzed territory. This work represents a useful tool in large-scale landslide susceptibility analysis. In fact, the application of this repeatable and reliable procedure may return the best results in a short time and with low economic resources, providing specific useful information in planning Civil Protection investigations and operations

    Tools for Semi-automated Landform Classification: A Comparison in the Basilicata Region (Southern Italy)

    Get PDF
    Recent advances in spatial methods of digital elevation model (DEMs) analysis have addressed many research topics on the assessment of morphometric parameters of the landscape. Development of computer algorithms for calculating the geomorphometric properties of the Earth’s surface has allowed for expanding of some methods in the semi-automatic recognition and classification of landscape features. In such a way, several papers have been produced, documenting the applicability of the landform classification based on map algebra. The Topographic Position Index (TPI) is one of the most widely used parameters for semi-automated landform classification using GIS software. The aim was to apply the TPI classes for landform classification in the Basilicata Region (Southern Italy). The Basilicata Region is characterized by an extremely heterogeneous landscape and geological features. The automated landform extraction, starting from two different resolution DEMs at 20 and 5 m-grids, has been carried out by using three different GIS software: Arcview, Arcmap, and SAGA. Comparison of the landform maps resulting from each software at a different scale has been realized, furnishing at the end the best landform map and consequently a discussion over which is the best software implementation of the TPI method

    Quality assessment of DEM derived from topographic maps for geomorphometric purposes

    Get PDF
    Digital elevation models (DEMs) play a significant role in geomorphological research. For geomorphologists reconstructing landform and drainage structure is frequently as important as elevation accuracy. Consequently, large-scale topographic maps (with contours, height points and watercourses) constitute excellent material for creating models (here called Topo-DEM) in fine resolution. The purpose of the conducted analyses was to assess the quality of Topo-DEM against freely-available globalDEMs and then to compare it with a reference model derived from laser scanning (LiDAR-DEM). The analysis also involved derivative maps of geomorphometric parameters (local relief, slope, curvature, aspect) generated on the basis of Topo-DEM and LiDAR-DEM. Moreover, comparative classification of landforms was carried out. It was indicated that Topo-DEM is characterised by good elevation accuracy (RMSE <2 m) and reflects the topography of the analyzed area surprisingly well. Additionally, statistical and percentage metrics confirm that it is possible to generate a DEM with very good quality parameters on the basis of a large-scale topographic map (1:10,000): elevation differences between Topo-DEM and: 1) topographic map amounted from−1.68 to +2.06 m,MAEis 0.10 m, RMSE 0.16 m; 2) LiDAR-DEM (MAE 1.13 m, RMSE 1.69 m, SD 1.83 m); 3) GPS RTK measurements amounted from−3.6 to +3.01 m, MAE is 0.72 m, RMSE 0.97 m, SD 0.97 m. For an area of several dozen km2 Topo-DEM with 10×10 m resolution proved more efficient than detailed (1×1 m) LiDAR-DEM

    Scripting methods in topographic data processing on the example of Ethiopia

    Get PDF
    This study evaluates the geomorphometric parameters of the topography in Ethiopia using scripting cartographic methods by applying R languages (packages 'tmap' and 'raster') and Generic Mapping Tools (gmt) for 2D and 3D topographic modelling. Data were collected from the open source repositories on geospatial data with high resolution: gebco with 15 arc-second and etopo1 with 1 arc-minute resolution and embedded dataset of srtm 90 m in 'raster' library of R. The study demonstrated application of the programming approaches in cartographic data visualization and mapping for geomorphometric analysis. This included modelling of slope steepness, aspect and hillshade visualized using dem srtm90 to derive geomorphometric parameters of slope, aspect and hillshade of Ethiopia and demonstrate contrasting topography and variability climate setting of Ethiopia. The topography of the country is mapped, including Great Rift Valley, Afar Depression, Ogaden Desert and the most distinctive features of the Ethiopian Highlands. A variety of topographical zones is demonstrated on the presented maps. The results include 6 new maps made using programming console-based approach which is a novel method of cartographic visualization compared to traditional gis software. The most important fragments of the codes are presented and technical explanations are provided. The presented series of 6 new maps contributes to the cartographic data on Ethiopia and presents the methodology of scripting mapping techniques

    Spatial analysis of topography for glacier mapping in the Western Himalaya

    Get PDF
    Understanding climate change requires accurate assessment of the Earths cryosphere, as glacier fluctuations directly and indirectly reflect changes in radiative forcing and temperature and precipitation patterns. Direct assessment of alpine glaciers in high-mountains is notoriously difficult, and assessment from space represents the only practical alternative for assessing regional and global ice-fluctuation patterns. The mapping of debris-covered glaciers is especially problematic, as glacier surfaces exhibit spectral reflectance patterns similar to surrounding rock and sediment. Therefore, multispectral analysis of satellite imagery does not permit accurate delineation. Consequently, the use of satellite-derived topographic information and spatial analysis were evaluated for mapping the Raikot and Sachen Glaciers at Nanga Parbat mountain in the Pakistan Himalaya. Geomorphometric analyses were used to generate first- and secondorder topographic parameters. These were utilized to generate homogeneous elemental-form objects, which were evaluated for glacier mapping. Topo-sequence information was also examined and represents the slope-angle altitude function within slope facet objects. The results indicate that it is difficult to characterize the hierarchical topographic organization of glaciers using topographic parameters and elemental form objects. Even though only one level of the topographic hierarchy was attempted, elemental form objects appear to be more useful than topographic parameters, as they represent a combination of topographic information. In addition, elemental-form objects can be used to identify and map selected glacial features without further aggregation to another level in the hierarchy. Toposequence information was found to be of value in differentiating glacier versus non-glacier surfaces. Collectively these results indicate that spatial analysis of the topography can be used for glacier mapping, although accurate digital elevation models are required, along with more sophisticated approaches for quantitatively characterizing the topography. It is suggested that specific topographic primitives and glacier landforms be individually characterized and integrated into a landscape topographic hierarchy in order to accurately characterize and map debris-covered glaciers. Finally, special attention to the concept of scale must be formally accounted for in analysis procedures

    A review of marine geomorphometry, the quantitative study of the seafloor

    Get PDF
    Geomorphometry, the science of quantitative terrain characterization, has traditionally focused on the investigation of terrestrial landscapes. However, the dramatic increase in the availability of digital bathymetric data and the increasing ease by which geomorphometry can be investigated using geographic information systems (GISs) and spatial analysis software has prompted interest in employing geomorphometric techniques to investigate the marine environment. Over the last decade or so, a multitude of geomorphometric techniques (e.g. terrain attributes, feature extraction, automated classification) have been applied to characterize seabed terrain from the coastal zone to the deep sea. Geomorphometric techniques are, however, not as varied, nor as extensively applied, in marine as they are in terrestrial environments. This is at least partly due to difficulties associated with capturing, classifying, and validating terrain characteristics underwater. There is, nevertheless, much common ground between terrestrial and marine geomorphometry applications and it is important that, in developing marine geomorphometry, we learn from experiences in terrestrial studies. However, not all terrestrial solutions can be adopted by marine geomorphometric studies since the dynamic, four-dimensional (4-D) nature of the marine environment causes its own issues throughout the geomorphometry workflow. For instance, issues with underwater positioning, variations in sound velocity in the water column affecting acousticbased mapping, and our inability to directly observe and measure depth and morphological features on the seafloor are all issues specific to the application of geomorphometry in the marine environment. Such issues fuel the need for a dedicated scientific effort in marine geomorphometry. This review aims to highlight the relatively recent growth of marine geomorphometry as a distinct discipline, and offers the first comprehensive overview of marine geomorphometry to date. We address all the five main steps of geomorphometry, from data collection to the application of terrain attributes and features. We focus on how these steps are relevant to marine geomorphometry and also highlight differences and similarities from terrestrial geomorphometry. We conclude with recommendations and reflections on the future of marine geomorphometry. To ensure that geomorphometry is used and developed to its full potential, there is a need to increase awareness of (1) marine geomorphometry amongst scientists already engaged in terrestrial geomorphometry, and of (2) geomorphometry as a science amongst marine scientists with a wide range of backgrounds and experiences.peer-reviewe
    corecore