2,513 research outputs found
Repository Interface for Overlaid Journal Archives: costs estimates and sustainability issues
The RIOJA project (http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja) investigated the feasibility of an overlay journal model in collaboration with the arXiv and in the scientific domain of astrophysics and cosmology. Scientists in this community are active users of e-prints repositories such as the arXiv. Furthermore, they have the support of Professional Associations and Learned Societies that have been pioneers in adapting to new publishing models and in particular electronic journals.
Long term access to information as well as maintaining provision to sustainable systems/services is important to various parties in the scholarly communication system: the creators of information, developers and managers of services, libraries, publishers, funders and also users. Although scientific journals have been in existence since the 18th century (Lawal, 2001), factors such as increased journal subscription prices in the last decades and the emergence of new technologies have triggered discussions on the potential of new business models for publishing research. Furthermore, the advent of the open access movement also contributed to exploration of the issues around free access to information and provision of sustainable services. Exploring aspects of sustainability is something that should be seen over a period of time and whether launching, converting or simply maintaining a new or existing system/service the needs of the community it serves should be taken into account.
Scientific journal publishing is a complex process. Besides disseminating scientific knowledge, registration of a claim for new discovery and a quality “stamp” it also facilitates social factors. Besides making research findings available and contributing to the advancement of knowledge, publishing is also a means for measuring quality of the work of scientists, allocating funding, and acknowledging contributions to knowledge.
In this report, we will try to provide an overview of a new publishing model, that of the overlay journal. We will discuss the use of the arXiv by scientists in astrophysics and cosmology as well as the role of professional associations and learned societies in the publishing process for this community.
We will briefly explain the methods employed to compile this report. We will also briefly present the RIOJA toolkit before we try and identify costs in the publishing process associated with the functions of registration, certification, and awareness and archiving.
This report does not aim to provide a comprehensive report of actual journal publishing costings. Despite the fact that there are studies in existence that tried to document costs associated with journal publishing, the information presented there rarely corresponds to the actual costs of individual journal functions. In addition, the interviews with publishers and editors did not reveal any substantial information about costings that have not already been reported in the literature or are available on some publishers' websites. Where appropriate, this report aims to acknowledge studies conducted previously as pointers to further reading and, where applicable, to compare reported findings to observations made during the development and implementation of the RIOJA toolkit (described below).
We will conclude this report with some of the issues reported in the literature around sustainability of services and some brief suggestions for further work
Usage Bibliometrics
Scholarly usage data provides unique opportunities to address the known
shortcomings of citation analysis. However, the collection, processing and
analysis of usage data remains an area of active research. This article
provides a review of the state-of-the-art in usage-based informetric, i.e. the
use of usage data to study the scholarly process.Comment: Publisher's PDF (by permission). Publisher web site:
books.infotoday.com/asist/arist44.shtm
Recommended from our members
Collaborative yet independent: Information practices in the physical sciences
In many ways, the physical sciences are at the forefront of using digital tools and methods to work with information and data. However, the fields and disciplines that make up the physical sciences are by no means uniform, and physical scientists find, use, and disseminate information in a variety of ways. This report examines information practices in the physical sciences across seven cases, and demonstrates the richly varied ways in which physical scientists work, collaborate, and share information and data.
This report details seven case studies in the physical sciences. For each case, qualitative interviews and focus groups were used to understand the domain. Quantitative data gathered from a survey of participants highlights different information strategies employed across the cases, and identifies important software used for research.
Finally, conclusions from across the cases are drawn, and recommendations are made. This report is the third in a series commissioned by the Research Information Network (RIN), each looking at information practices in a specific domain (life sciences, humanities, and physical sciences). The aim is to understand how researchers within a range of disciplines find and use information, and in particular how that has changed with the introduction of new technologies
The Language Question and the Paradoxes of Latin Journalism in 18th Century Hungary
A 18. századi magyarországi latin újságírás vizsgálata a nyelvkérdés európai kontextusába
Vaunting the independent amateur: Scientific American and the representation of lay scientists
This paper traces how media representations encouraged enthusiasts, youth and skilled volunteers to participate actively in science and technology during the twentieth century. It assesses how distinctive discourses about scientific amateurs positioned them with respect to professionals in shifting political and cultural environments. In
particular, the account assesses the seminal role of a periodical, Scientific American magazine, in shaping and championing an enduring vision of autonomous scientific enthusiasms. Between the 1920s and 1970s, editors Albert G. Ingalls and Clair L. Stong shepherded generations of adult ‘amateur scientists’. Their columns and books popularized a vision of independent nonprofessional research that celebrated the frugal ingenuity and skills of inveterate tinkerers. Some of these attributes have found more recent expression in present-day ‘maker culture’. The topic consequently is
relevant to the historiography of scientific practice, science popularization and science education. Its focus on independent nonprofessionals highlights political dimensions of agency and autonomy that have often been implicit for such historical (and contemporary) actors. The paper argues that the Scientific American template of adult scientific amateurism contrasted with other representations: those promoted by
earlier periodicals and by a science education organization, Science Service, and by the national demands for recruiting scientific labour during and after the Second World War. The evidence indicates that advocates of the alternative models had distinctive goals and adapted their narrative tactics to reach their intended audiences, which typically were conceived as young persons requiring instruction or mentoring. By contrast, the monthly Scientific American columns established a long-lived and stable image of the independent lay scientist
arXiv e-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships
Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of
research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and
the Web of Science (WoS), this paper investigates (a) the proportion of papers
across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers
that are in the WoS, (b) elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal
publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv
e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS
papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics,
and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed
time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains
longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in
astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay
faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers - both published and
unpublished - have lower citation rates than published papers, although there
is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of both published
and unpublished papers.Comment: 29 pages, 11 figure
Repository Interface for Overlaid Journal Archives: results from an online questionnaire survey
The Repository Interface for Overlaid Journal Archives (RIOJA) project
(http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/rioja) is an international partnership of members of academic staff,
librarians and technologists from UCL (University College London), the University of
Cambridge, the University of Glasgow, Imperial College London and Cornell University. It
aims to address some of the issues around the development and implementation of a
new publishing model, that of the overlay journal - defined, for the purposes of the project,
as a quality-assured journal whose content is deposited to and resides in one or more
open access repositories. The project is funded by the Joint Information Systems
Committee (JISC, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/) and runs from April 2007 to June 2008.
The RIOJA project will create an interoperability toolkit to enable the overlay of
certification onto papers housed in subject repositories. The intention is that the tool will
be generic, helping any repository to realise its potential to act as a more complete
scholarly resource. The project will also create a demonstrator overlay journal, using the
arXiv repository and OJS software, with interaction between the two facilitated by the
RIOJA toolkit.
To inform and shape the project, a survey of Astrophysics and Cosmology researchers
has been conducted. The findings from that survey form the basis of this report
Calculating Value: Using and Collecting the Tools of Early Modern Mathematics
Through detailed evaluation of the Science Museum Library’s Rare Books Collection, this thesis explores the use, ownership and subsequent collection of mathematical books produced between 1550 and 1750. Research has been undertaken as part of a Collaborative Doctoral Award between Swansea University and the Science Museum, London, funded by the UK Arts and Humanities Research Council from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018. Consisting of close to 1,700 titles published between 1486 and 1800 encompassing the pre-modern classification of mathematics, this subset of the Rare Books Collection represents a remarkable accumulation of the practical and the theoretical across a variety of disciplines and languages. My thesis begins by characterising these mathematical holdings in aggregate, analysing the contents and physical features of the texts therein. Findings are supplemented by examination of accompanying provenance, including bindings, bookplates, and signatures. Discrete case-studies then present key texts as part of their readers’ burgeoning mathematical practice, with chapters focussing on the spread of Ramist pedagogies of arithmetic, geometry, and trigonometry in sixteenth-century Germany; the interconnected use of text, instrument and theory in early modern English intellectual and navigational cultures; and the value attached to the related disciplines of mathematical astronomy and chronology at the University of Cambridge in the late 1690s. The thesis closes with a reconstruction of the library of the clergyman and mathematician, Nathaniel Torporley (1564-1632), tracing the journey of Torporley’s materials to the collection of the antiquarian Robert Brodhead Honeyman (1897-1987) and to the Science Museum thereafter. By placing the Museum’s Library and its holdings in their correct historical contexts, this thesis contributes to our understanding of mathematical culture in the early modern period, to the history of collecting in the modern era, and to the Science Museum’s understanding of its own holdings and of its role as an institutional collector
- …